BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Identifying and characterizing sources of targeting error in stereotactic procedures is essential to maximizing accuracy, potentially improving surgical outcomes. We aim to describe a generic framework which characterizes sources of stereotactic inaccuracy. METHODS: We assembled a list of stereotactic systems: ROSA, Neuromate, Mazor Renaissance, ExcelsiusGPS, Cirq, STarFix (FHC), Nexframe, ClearPoint, CRW, and Leksell. We searched the literature for qualitative and quantitative work identifying and quantifying potential sources of inaccuracy and describing each system's implementation using Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Our literature search spanned 1969 to 2024, and various studies were included, with formats ranging from phantom studies to systematic reviews. Keyword searches were conducted, and the details about each system were used to create a framework for identifying and describing the unique targeting error profile of each system. RESULTS: We describe and illustrate the details of various sources of stereotactic inaccuracies and generate a framework to unify these sources into a single framework. This framework entails 5 domains: imaging, registration, mechanical accuracy, target planning and adjustment, and trajectory planning and adjustment. This framework was applied to 10 stereotactic systems. CONCLUSION: This framework provides a rubric to analyze the sources of error for any stereotactic system. Illustrations allow the reader to understand sources of error conceptually so that they may apply them to their practice.
What does a neurosurgeon look like? The social intersection of appearance and gender within neurosurgery
OBJECTIVE Since FDA approval of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor over 2 decades ago, indications and utilization of this modality have rapidly expanded worldwide. However, certain patient populations are known to be underrepresented among those undergoing DBS for various indications. METHODS A systematic search was conducted using PubMed and Embase for disparities related to DBS care. Any retrospective or prospective study addressing inequalities related to DBS were included for qualitative analysis. Additionally, all clinical trials and DBS studies with at least 100 patients were also included to evaluate for demographic disparities in the DBS literature. RESULTS Of the 5192 screened articles, 43 were included. The authors found that female gender, minority race, geographic barriers, low socioeconomic status, and the presence of multiple comorbidities are all linked to the underutilization of DBS. Analysis of demographic data from large-scale DBS studies and clinical trials revealed that females and Black patients continue to be underrepresented in the DBS literature and among those receiving DBS therapy. CONCLUSIONS As the indications and utilization continue to grow, addressing healthcare disparities related to DBS has become increasingly important. The authors suggest that increasing patient and provider education, expanding the role of telemedicine within DBS care, and improving support services for DBS patients may improve access and utilization.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a surgical treatment for chronic neuropathic pain refractory to medical management. An SCS system comprised one or more leads implanted in the epidural space, typically connected to an implantable pulse generator. This review discusses the history, indications, surgical technique, technological advances, and future directions of SCS.