Citations

Clear

40 citation(s) found for "Aldoss, Ibrahim".

NGS MRD Negativity on Day 28 after Brexu Cel in Adults with R/R ALL Is Associated with Favorable Progression Free Survival
Valtis, Yannis K. , Devlin, Sean, Jeyakumar, Nikeshan , Miller, Katharine, Zhang, Amy , Sutherland, Katherine C. , Kopmar, Noam E. , Dekker, Simone E. , Yaghmour, George , Tsai, Stephanie B., Moore, Jozal , O'Dwyer, Kristen M., Connor, Matthew P. , Frey, Noelle, Vasu, Sumithira , Ulrickson, Matthew L. , Boccucci, Jacob , Merchant, Akil, Pullarkat, Vinod , Langston, Amelia , Solh, Melhem , O’Connor, Timothy E. , Malik, Shabaz, Mountjoy, Luke , Hoeg, Rasmus T. , Oliai, Caspian , Gupta, Vishal , Koura, Divya, Kumaran, Muthu V., Schwartz, Marc S. , Tracy, Sean , Bobillo, Maria Odstrcil, Ladha, Abdullah , Gatell, Vivian Irrizary, Shaughnessy, Paul , Muffly, Lori , Park, Jae H. , Muffly, Lori , Nemirovsky, David , Roloff, Gregory W. , Aldoss, Ibrahim , Advani, Anjali S. , Luskin, Marlise R , Chen, Evan , Jamy, Omer , Grunwald, Michael R. , Muhsen, Ibrahim N. , Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai , Leonard, Jessica T , Tsai, Stephanie B., Stock, Wendy , O'Dwyer, Kristin , Logan, Aaron C , Frey, Noelle, Bezerra, Evandro D. , Dykes, Kaitlyn C. , Battiwalla, Minoo , Lin, Chenyu , Reshef, Ran , Cassaday, Ryan D. , Hill, LaQuisa C. , Lee, Catherine J , Kota, Vamsi , Sasine, Joshua , Hilal, Talal , Faramand, Rawan , Othman, Tamer , Majhail, Navneet S. , Oliai, Caspian H , Schwartz, Marc, Bachanová, Veronika , Jackson, Clayton, Gatell, Vivian Irizarry , Oluwole, Olalekan O. , Daunov, Michael , Mathews, John, Shah, Bijal

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 6, 2024 | Volume: 144 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 4200-4200

10.1182/blood-2024-201610 Get It

Introduction: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu cel) is a CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy approved for the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Some patients (pts) proceed with a consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) after breux cel. We do not know which pts can safely avoid a consolidative HCT and its associated morbidity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Real-World Outcomes Collaborative of CAR-T in Adult ALL (ROCCA) dataset. ROCCA is a registry of brexu cel pts in 32 centers in North America. We defined complete remission (CR) as < 5% blasts in the bone marrow and no central nervous system (CNS) or extramedullary (EM) disease on or around D28 after brexu cel. We defined measurable residual disease negative (MRD-) CR as CR and no abnormal blasts in the bone marrow by multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, ClonoSeq next generation sequencing (NGS), or other sequencing modalities with lower sensitivity. ClonoSeq NGS has a sensitivity of 10-6, while the other modalities have a sensitivity of at least 10-4. We defined progression free survival (PFS) as the time from CAR-T infusion to relapse or death, censored at the date of last follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed in R. Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine the association of pre-specified variables with PFS. Variables known to be associated with CAR T outcomes in ALL were entered into a multivariable model. HCT was incorporated as a time-varying covariate. Results: During the study period, 281 pts were infused with brexu cel. We focused our analysis on 172 (61%) pts with confirmed MRD- CR on D28, as that is the group with clinical equipoise regarding maintenance strategy. 38 (22%) of those pts received a consolidative HCT, 30 (17%) received another form of maintenance therapy (primarily tyrosine kinase inhibitors for Philadelphia (Ph)-chromosome positive ALL), and 104 (60%) pts received no maintenance therapy. Pts who underwent consolidative HCT were younger (median age 35 years) than those who received no maintenance (42y) (p = 0.023) and were less likely to have a history of prior HCT (13% vs. 47%, p < 0.001). No differences were observed with respect to sex, TP53 mutation status, prior inotuzumab (ino) or blinatumomab (blina) exposure, disease burden prior to CAR, or development of any cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or any neurotoxicity with brexu cel. We performed univariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses among pts in MRD- CR on D28, excluding those who received other maintenance therapy besides HCT; the median follow up was 8.1 months. In univariable analyses, D28 MRD negativity by ClonoSeq NGS (versus MRD negativity by other, less sensitive methods), development of CRS, and pre-CAR BM blasts < 5% were associated with improved PFS; prior ino exposure was negatively associated with PFS (p < 0.05). Age, sex, Ph status, TP53 status, and neurotoxicity development were not associated with PFS. In a multivariable model incorporating ALL type, prior HCT, prior ino/blina, and pre-CAR blast burden, as well as consolidative HCT as a time-varying covariate, only MRD negativity by ClonoSeq NGS with at least 10-6 sensitivity retained statistical significance (PFS hazard ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.77, p = 0.005). Pts who were MRD- by ClonoSeq NGS on D28 and received no maintenance had favorable 6m PFS of 76% (95% CI: 59-98%) and OS of 100% with a median follow up of 6.3 months in this subgroup. Among those in MRD- CR by NGS, HCT as a time-varying covariate was not associated with improved PFS (HR 0.6, p = 0.6). Conclusions: In a large real-world cohort of adults with R/R B-ALL infused with brexu cel, we identified practice variation regarding the use of consolidative HCT. Among brexu cel recipients who entered an MRD- CR, we identified ClonoSeq NGS MRD negativity as a novel predictive factor of favorable oncologic outcomes, even without a consolidative HCT. Similar results have been obtained in pediatric ALL patietns ftreated with 41BB-based tisagenleucleucel (Pulsipher et al., Blood Cancer Discovery 2022). Longer follow-up is needed to validate the safety of omitting consolidative HCT in such pts, but these results encourage the potential for definitive therapy with brexu cel when D28 ClonoSeq NGS MRD is negative.
Efficacy and Safety of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel for Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Patients Aged 60 and Above
Jeyakumar, Nikeshan , Miller, Katharine, Zhang, Amy , Sutherland, Katherine C. , Boccucci, Jacob , Ulrickson, Matthew L. , Vasu, Sumithira, Langston, Amelia , Kopmar, Noam E. , Tsai, Stephanie B., O’Connor, Timothy E. , Park, Jae H. , Valtis, Yannis K. , Solh, Melhem , Dekker, Simone E. , Malik, Shahbaz A. , Shaughnessy, Paul , Mountjoy, Luke , Hoeg, Rasmus T. , Oliai, Caspian , Gupta, Vishal , Koura, Divya, Kumaran, Muthu V., Schwartz, Marc S. , Tracy, Sean , O'Dwyer, Kristen M., Moore, Jozal , Bobillo, María Silvina Odstrcil , Frey, Noelle, Connor, Matthew P. , Ladha, Abdullah , Yaghmour, George , Gatell, Vivian Irrizary, Pullarkat, Vinod , Merchant, Akil, Muffly, Lori , Muffly, Lori , Muhsen, Ibrahim N. , Advani, Anjali S. , Roloff, Gregory W. , Grunwald, Michael R. , Kota, Vamsi , Sasine, Joshua , Aldoss, Ibrahim , Othman, Tamer , Vasu, Sumithira , Reshef, Ran , Luskin, Marlise R , Chen, Evan , Lin, Chenyu , Cassaday, Ryan D. , Tsai, Stephanie B., Hilal, Talal , Faramand, Rawan , Bezerra, Evandro D. , Leonard, Jessica T , Majhail, Navneet S. , Battiwalla, Minoo , Mathews, John, Oliai, Caspian H , Dykes, Kaitlyn C. , Logan, Aaron C , Stock, Wendy , Schwartz, Marc, Bachanová, Veronika , O'Dwyer, Kristin , Lee, Catherine J , Frey, Noelle, Jamy, Omer , Daunov, Michael , Jackson, Clayton, Gatell, Vivian Irizarry , Oluwole, Olalekan O. , Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai , Shah, Bijal , Hill, LaQuisa C.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 6, 2024 | Volume: 144 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 523-523

10.1182/blood-2024-210682 Get It

Introduction: Brexucabtagene Autoleucel (brexu-cel) is the first CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CD19.CAR) T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in adult (≥18 yo) patients (pts) based on results from the ZUMA-3 trial. However, data on the safety and efficacy of CAR-T cells in older pts (≥60 yo) remains limited, with only 8 pts >65 yo enrolled in the ZUMA-3 trial. We evaluated the treatment characteristics and outcomes with use of brexu-cel amongst patients ≥60 yo in the Real-World Outcomes Collaborative for CAR-T in ALL (ROCCA) consortium database. Methodology: ROCCA is a consortium of over 30 U.S.-based institutions with a database of adult pts with B-ALL who received brexu-cel as standard of care therapy. We identified pts ≥60 yo and further stratified them into two cohorts: 60-69 yo and ≥70 yo. Outcomes of interest included OS, PFS, ORR, and toxicities (CRS and ICANS). Both OS and PFS were calculated from the day of brexu-cel infusion. Response assessment occurred on day +28, and MRD evaluation was per institutional practices. CRS and ICANS were graded according to the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy criteria. Results: Of 280 brexu-cel recipients in the ROCCA database, 73 (26%) were ≥60 yo, of which 58 (79%) were between 60-69 yo and 15 (21%) were ≥70 yo. Among pts ≥60 yo, the median age at infusion was 65 (range 60-81). Pts were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range 2-9). Prior therapies included: allogeneic HSCT (38%), inotuzumab ozogamicin (41%), and blinatumomab (62%). Forty pts (55%) had Ph-negative B-ALL, 24 (33%) had Ph+ B-ALL and 9 (12%) had Ph-like B-ALL. When grouped by HCT-CI equal to 0, 1-2 or ≥3, a higher proportion of pts ≥60 yo had HCT-CI ≥3 (19% vs. 7% in <60 yo; p=0.004). Pre-apheresis, 33 pts (45%) had active disease (>5% marrow blasts or extramedullary disease), 34 (47%) were in CR (of whom 14 were MRD-negative) and 6 had unknown disease status. Following brexu-cel, 43 (59%) achieved MRD-negative CR, 20 (27%) had MRD + or CR with unknown MRD status, 6 (8%) had refractory disease and 5 had no disease evaluation available. The ORR was similar between pts 60-69 and ≥70 yo (MRD-negative CR rate: 58% vs 61%, r/r to brexu-cel: 9% vs 6%) and was comparable to pts <60 yo (MRD-negative CR 66%; r/r disease of 9%). The rate of all grade ICANS was higher in pts ≥70 (77%) than in pts 60-69 (47%) or pts <60 (49%), with grade 1-2 ICANS occurring at a significantly higher rate in pts ≥70 (44% vs. 20% in 60-69 and 20% in <60, p=0.049). Grade 3-4 ICANS were similar between the groups: 33%, 27% and 29% in the ≥70, 60-69, and <60 groups, respectively. Conversely, rates of CRS were similar across age groups (80-84%). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of grade 3-4 CRS which was 17% in pts ≥70, 4% in pts 60-69, and 11% in pts <60 yo. With a median follow-up of 332 days (range 8-936 days) from infusion, pts ≥60 yo had a median PFS of 395 days compared to 547 days in pts <60 yo. Median PFS was lower in the ³70 yo (231 days) compared to 677 in the 60-69 yo cohort. No statistically significant difference was found between the <60 and ≥60groups in 6- and 12-month PFS rates (6 months PFS: 66% vs 64%, p=0.77 and 12 months PFS: 57% vs 57%, p=1.00). When pts ≥60 yo were stratified by age, pts ≥70 yo had similar 6-month PFS compared to other age groups but significantly lower 12-month PFS (38%; vs. 64% in pts 60-69and 57% in pts <60, p=0.001). Median OS was not reached in any of the age groups, and there was no statistically significant difference in 6-month OS (72% in ≥ 70 vs. 82% in the 60-69 vs. 82% in <60, p=0.14) or 12-months OS (61% in ≥ 70 vs. 69% in 60-69 vs. 73% in <60, p=0.18). Conclusion: This is the largest study to date of older B-ALL pts receiving CAR-T cells. We observed that older pts, particularly those aged 60-69, have similar outcomes to younger pts. However, pts ≥70 yo had lower median and 12-month PFS when compared to younger patients. Additionally, pts ≥70 yo had higher rates of grades 1-2 ICANS. An important limitation of this analysis is the potential selection bias among clinicians when selecting older patients for this treatment. Longer follow-up, including inclusion of additional pts ≥70 yo is needed to confirm these results, and further studies are needed to identify the optimal approach for use of CAR T-cell therapy in patients in this age group.
Clinical and Molecular Characterization of TP53-Mutant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Vanegas, Yenny Alejandra Moreno, Coltoff, Alexander , Wang, Peng , Tjota, Melissa Y. , Cheng, Jason X. , Drazer, Michael W. , Odenike, Olatoyosi , Drazer, Michael , Harris, Ethan James , Sukhanova, Madina , Abaza, Yasmin , Vanegas, Yenny Moreno , Badar, Talha , Lin, Chenyu , Patel, Anand , Gurbuxani, Sandeep K. , Venkataraman, Girish , Arber, Daniel A. , DuVall, Adam , Larson, Richard A. , Shah, Bijal , Stock, Wendy , Aldoss, Ibrahim , Saygin, Caner

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 6, 2024 | Volume: 144 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 1425-1425

10.1182/blood-2024-212213 Get It

Introduction: TP53 mutations are found in 18% of adult patients (pts) with acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALL), and portends poor prognosis (Saygin, Blood Cancer Discov 2024). TP53 mutations are often associated with low hypodiploidy and Li Fraumeni syndrome (germline) in children. However, we and others have shown that TP53-mutant (TP53-m) ALL arises from pre-existing TP53-m clonal hematopoiesis in adults as opposed to germline origin. The impact of co-occurring mutations, TP53 allelic frequency (AF) and different types of treatment on outcomes of TP53-m ALL are not fully characterized. We set out to investigate the clinical and molecular predictors of outcomes in adults with TP53-mutant ALL. Methods: We retrospectively studied 107 patients with TP53-m ALL treated at seven different academic centers in North America. Genetic profiling of pre-treatment bone marrow samples was performed with a comprehensive panel covering 147 myeloid and lymphoid genes. We also performed RNA-sequencing to identify fusions that define ALL subtypes. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array was used to define low hypodiploidy. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range, 10-80), 42% were female, 70% White. 89% of pts had B-ALL while 11% had T-lineage ALL. 24% of pts were classified to have therapy-related ALL based on their history of exposure to genotoxic therapy for another cancer. 45% of pts had hypodiploid karyotype, 79% of whom were low-hypodiploid. 7% had hyperdiploid karyotype and 5% had BCR::ABL1. 11 pts had two different TP53 variants. 90% of TP53 variants involved the DNA binding domain. Most frequently observed co-occurring mutations involved CDKN2A (20%), NOTCH1 (12%) and RB1 (10%) genes. 71% of pts were treated with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy, while the remaining pts received newer antibody-based therapies (i.e., inotuzumab, blinatumomab) or venetoclax in first-line setting. 11% of pts received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in first complete remission (CR1) while 3% received HCT after relapse (CR2 or CR3). When patients with vs without low hypodiploidy were compared, we did not observe a significant difference in overall survival (OS) as outcomes were poor in both groups (median, 17 vs 19 months, p= 0.89). However, pts who had TP53 AF >0.5 had significantly worse OS when compared to pts with TP53 VAF <0.5 (13 vs 25 months, p= 0.03). Conclusions: TP53-m ALL is a very high-risk disease subtype and its dismal outcome is independent from presence of co-existing low hypodiploidy. Loss of heterozygosity, characterized by TP53 AF >0.5 is associated with even worse survival. New therapies are urgently needed to improve outcomes in this subset.
Outcomes After Brexucabtagene Autoleucel Administered as a Standard Therapy for Adults With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell ALL
Aldoss, Ibrahim , Kopmar, Noam E. , Lin, Chenyu , Dekker, Simone E. , Gupta, Vishal, O’Connor, Timothy E. , Jeyakumar, Nikeshan , Muhsen, Ibrahim N. , Valtis, Yannis K. , Zhang, Amy , Miller, Kate , Ahmed, Mohamed , Schwartz, Marc S. , Tracy, Sean , Mukherjee, Akash , Ladha, Abdullah , Guzowski, Caitlin, Hoeg, Rasmus T. , Moore, Jozal , Connor, Matthew P. , Hill, LaQuisa C. , Tsai, Stephanie B., Sasine, Joshua , Solh, Melhem , Koura, Divya, Veeraputhiran, Muthu, Park, Jae H. , Bachanová, Veronika , Galal, Ahmed , Pullarkat, Vinod , Muffly, Lori , Oliai, Caspian , Yaghmour, George , Sutherland, Katherine, Zambrano, Héctor, Bradshaw, Danielle , Kubiak, Michal , Mountjoy, Luke , Malik, Shahbaz A. , Shaughnessy, Paul , Stefan, Maryann, O'Dwyer, Kristen M., Blunk, Betsy, Bishop, Michael R. , Aldoss, Ibrahim , Kopmar, Noam E , Lin, Chenyu , Gupta, Vishal K , Muhsen, Ibrahim N , Valtis, Yannis , Miller, Katharine , Chen, Evan , Mercadal, Santiago , Tracy, Sean I , Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai R , Battiwalla, Minoo , Logan, Aaron C , Ladha, Abdullah , Hilal, Talal , Connor, Matthew , Hill, LaQuisa C , Sasine, Joshua , Solh, Melham M , Kota, Vamsi , Frey, Noelle V , Park, Jae H , Luskin, Marlise R , Stock, Wendy , Cassaday, Ryan D , Muffly, Lori , Bachanova, Veronika , Roloff, Gregory W. , Ahmed, Naveed, Dykes, Kaitlyn C. , Schwartz, Marc, Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai , Battiwalla, Minoo , Hilal, Talal , Tsai, Stephanie B., Kota, Vamsi , Leonard, Jessica T , Frey, Noelle V. , Stock, Wendy , Cassaday, Ryan D. , Shah, Bijal , Faramand, Rawan , Oliai, Caspian H , Majhail, Navneet S. , Mathews, John Abraham , Advani, Anjali S. , O'Dwyer, Kristin , Lee, Catherine J , Bishop, Michael Russell

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 17, 2024 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 558-566

10.1200/jco.24.00321 | PMID 39418622 Get It

PURPOSE On the basis of the results of the ZUMA-3 trial, brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, gained US Food and Drug Administration approval in October 2021 for adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell ALL (B-ALL). We report outcomes of patients treated with brexu-cel as a standard therapy. METHODS We developed a collaboration across 31 US centers to study adults with B-ALL who received brexu-cel outside the context of a clinical trial. Data were collected retrospectively from October 2021 to October 2023. Toxicities were graded per American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy guidelines for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). RESULTS At the time of data lock, 204 patients had undergone apheresis and 189 were infused. Median follow-up time was 11.4 months. Forty-two percent of patients received brexu-cel in morphologic remission and would have been ineligible for participation in ZUMA-3. After brexu-cel, 151 achieved complete remission (CR), of which 79% were measurable residual disease (MRD) negative remissions. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.5 months and median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3-4 CRS or ICANS occurred in 11% and 31%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients receiving consolidative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT; hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.85]) after brexu-cel had superior PFS compared with those who did not receive any consolidation or maintenance therapy. CONCLUSION Similar to ZUMA-3, high rates of MRD-negative CR were observed after brexu-cel treatment for R/R B-ALL. The use of HCT as consolidation after brexu-cel resulted in improved PFS.
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Version 2.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Mattison, Ryan J. , Abdelmessieh, Peter, Burke, Patrick W. , DeAngelo, Daniel J., Dinner, Shira, Fathi, Amir T. , Haddadin, Michael , Kirby, Suzanne, Liedtke, Michaela , Litzow, Mark R. , Long, Meixiao, Luger, Selina M. , Mangan, James K. , Massaro, Stephanie, May, William , Park, Jae H. , Schwartz, Marc S. , Shami, Paul J. , Tomlinson, Benjamin , Webster, Jonathan , Stehman, Katie, Shah, Bijal , Abboud, Ramzi , Aldoss, Ibrahim , DeAngelo, Daniel J. , Gauthier, Jordan , Jain, Nitin , Jonas, Brian A. , Logan, Aaron C , Oluwole, Olalekan O. , Przespolewski, Amanda , Rangaraju, Sravanti , Saygin, Caner , Schwartz, Marc, Awotiwon, Ajibola

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | October 16, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 563-576

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0051 | PMID 39413812 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) provide recommendations for management of ALL, with a focus on the classification of ALL subtypes based on immunophenotype and cytogenetic/molecular markers; risk assessment and stratification for risk-adapted therapy; treatment strategies for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative ALL for both adolescent and young adult and adult patients; and supportive care considerations. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for ALL focuses on treatment recommendations for adults with newly diagnosed Ph-negative ALL based on current evidence.
Impact of prior inotuzumab ozogamicin treatment on brexucabtagene autoleucel outcomes in adults with B-cell ALL
Aldoss, Ibrahim , Roloff, Gregory W. , Kopmar, Noam E. , Lin, Chenyu , Advani, Anjali S. , Dekker, Simone E. , O’Connor, Timothy E. , Jeyakumar, Nikeshan , Muhsen, Ibrahim N. , Valtis, Yannis K. , Zhang, Amy , Miller, Katharine, Sutherland, Katherine C. , Ahmed, Mohamed , Zambrano, Héctor, Bradshaw, Danielle , Schwartz, Marc S. , Tracy, Sean , Kubiak, Michal Jakub , Mukherjee, Akash , Mountjoy, Luke , Malik, Shahbaz A. , Shaughnessy, Paul , Ladha, Abdullah , Stefan, Maryann, Guzowski, Caitlin, Hoeg, Rasmus T. , Moore, Jozal , Connor, Matthew P. , O’Dwyer, Kristen M. , Hill, LaQuisa C. , Tsai, Stephanie B., Sasine, Joshua , Solh, Melhem , Koura, Divya, Veeraputhiran, Muthu, Blunk, Betsy, Oliai, Caspian , Park, Jae H. , Bachanová, Veronika , Galal, Ahmed , Bishop, Michael R. , Pullarkat, Vinod , Muffly, Lori , Lin, Chenyu , Advani, Anjali S , Jeyakumar, Nikeshan , Dykes, Kaitlyn C , Chen, Evan , Bradshaw, Danielle , Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai R , Majhail, Navneet S , Logan, Aaron C , Ladha, Abdullah , Hilal, Talal , Moore, Jozal , Connor, Matthew , Hill, LaQuisa C , Sasine, Joshua , Lee, Catherine J , Leonard, Jessica T , Frey, Noelle V , Luskin, Marlise R , Muffly, Lori , Bachanova, Veronika , Aldoss, Ibrahim , Muhsen, Ibrahim N , Sutherland, Katherine , Roloff, Gregory W , Faramand, Rawan , Gupta, Vishal , Dykes, Kaitlyn C. , Mercadal, Santiago , Schwartz, Marc, Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai , Majhail, Navneet S. , Battiwalla, Minoo , Mathews, John, Hilal, Talal , O'Dwyer, Kristin , Tsai, Stephanie B., Kota, Vamsi , Oliai, Caspian H , Frey, Noelle V. , Bishop, Michael Russell , Stock, Wendy , Cassaday, Ryan D. , Shah, Bijal

Mayo Clinic

Blood Advances | August 2, 2024 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 6139-6147

10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013747 | PMID 39093952 Get It

Abstract The effect of prior inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) treatment on brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) outcomes remains unclear in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 189 patients with relapsed/refractory ALL treated with brexu-cel. Over half of the patients received InO before brexu-cel (InO exposed). InO-exposed patients were more heavily pretreated (P = .02) and frequently had active marrow disease before apheresis (P = .03). Response rate and toxicity profile after brexu-cel were comparable for InO-exposed and InO-naïve patients; however, consolidation therapy after brexu-cel response was used at a higher rate in InO-naïve patients (P = .005). With a median follow-up of 11.4 months, InO-exposed patients had inferior progression-free survival (PFS; P = .013) and overall survival (OS; P = .006) in univariate analyses; however, prior InO exposure did not influence PFS (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-2.03) in multivariate models. Within InO-exposed patients, InO responders had superior PFS (P = .002) and OS (P < .0001) relative to InO-refractory patients. The timing of administering InO did not affect brexu-cel outcomes, with comparable PFS (P = .51) and OS (P = .86) for patients receiving InO as bridging therapy or before apheresis. In conclusion, although InO exposure was associated with inferior survival outcomes after brexu-cel in unadjusted analyses, these associations were no longer significant in multivariate analyses, suggesting it is unlikely that InO negatively affects brexu-cel efficacy. Our data instead imply that InO-exposed recipients of brexu-cel tend to be higher-risk patients with intrinsic adverse leukemia biology.
Project Evolve, Evaluation of Lineage Switch (LS), an International Initiative: Preliminary Results Reveal Dismal Outcomes in Patients with LS
Harrison, Cynthia , Biery, D. N. , Zerkalenkova, Elena , Alonso‐Saladrigues, Anna , Utley, Kaylyn, Fernandes, Sneha, Carapia, Naomi Torres, Vatsayan, Anant , Pacenta, Holly , Escherich, Gabriele , Lee, Benjamin J. , Fitzjohn, Mandi R., Larson, Daniel P. , Cuevo, Raymund S., He, Rui , Reed, Kelly, Wölfl, Matthias , Raikar, Sunil S. , Savaşan, Süreyya , Puri, Latika, Gahvari, Zhubin, Talleur, Aimee C. , Abdel‐Azim, Hisham , Chamdin, Aghiad, Provost, Marlie R. M., Mezger, Kerstin, Stevens, Alexandra M. , Hsieh, Emily M. , Duffner, Ulrich, Hoang, Chloe, Davis, Kara L. , Jacoby, Elad , Попов, А. М. , Lamble, Adam J. , Raikar, Sunil S , Zerkalenkova, Elena , Harrison, Cynthia , Lee, Benjamin J , Davis, Kara L , Silbert, Sara K. , Semchenkova, Alexandra , Aldoss, Ibrahim , Zhao, Liping , Rubinstein, Jeremy , Chang, Bill H , De Moerloose, Barbara , Kuo, Dennis J , Redell, Michele S. , Duployez, Nicolas , Dickens, David S. , Chaer, Firas El , Fabrizio, Vanessa A , Wang, Hao‐Wei , Yuan, Constance M. , Pan, Jing , Ghorashian, Sara , Rives, Susana , Shah, Nirali N

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 1, 2023 | Volume: 142 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 4202-4202

10.1182/blood-2023-182293 Get It

Introduction: Lineage switch (LS) refers to the transformation of acute leukemia from one cell lineage to another (e.g., lymphoid (ALL) to myeloid (AML)). This rare phenomenon, distinct from treatment induced malignancy (i.e., t-AML) and mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL), is increasingly being observed following cell surface antigen targeting. Given challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of LS, Project EVOLVE was developed to globally identify cases of LS following immunotherapy. Methods: A protocol and data collection form for this IRB exempt study was widely disseminated to capture deidentified LS case information across multiple centers and cancer consortia. This included collection of data from published reports of LS, with authors contacted to obtain additional information. For this analysis, LS was defined by the emergence of cell-surface markers warranting reclassification of the original leukemia as a different lineage derivation based on the immunophenotype, including cases of AML emerging alongside the original ALL. “Confirmed” LS cases included those where retention of original cytogenetic or molecular aberrations and/or the clonal immunoglobulin rearrangement patterns were verified to confirm the clonal relationship. “Suspected” LS cases included those where samples to confirm clonality marker retention could not be obtained, but the clinical presentation was consistent with LS. The term “transition” was applied when immunophenotypic shifts were transient. Cases with new cytogenetic abnormalities unrelated to the original diagnosis and compatible with t-AML were excluded. Statistical analysis was primarily descriptive. Data cut-off was July 26, 2023. Results: A total of 58 cases were identified, including 19 cases referenced in prior publications. Of the 58, 11 cases were excluded from this initial analysis, including: 4 cases of t-AML, 2 cases of T-ALL to AML, and 5 “transition” cases. Collectively, 47 cases of LS (43 “confirmed”; 4 “suspected”), spanning across 3 continents and 8 countries, were analyzed. (Fig. 1A) Cases included transition from B-ALL to AML in 36 (76.6%) and to MPAL/biphenotypic/ambiguous lineage in 11 (23.4%). Two likely had MPAL at diagnosis and a third with chronic myeloid leukemia. The median age at initial diagnosis was 8.4 years (range, 1 day-76.5 years); median age at LS presentation was 11.0 years (range 0.4-77.3 years). Twenty-three (48.9%) were male and 19 (40.4%) had prior stem cell transplant (SCT). Baseline cytogenetics showed KMT2A rearrangement in 27 (57.4%). Baseline myeloid antigen co-expression was seen in 22 of 23 patients with submitted data, but variation in degree of expression across patients and antigens was substantial. The most proximal immunotherapy prior to development of LS was CAR T-cells in 23 (48.9%) and blinatumomab in 24 (51.1%). The median time from the most proximal immunotherapy to development of LS was 1.6 months (range, 7 days-36.5 months). In 7 (29.2%) patients receiving blinatumomab, LS developed during the infusion. LS presented as isolated marrow relapse in 27 (57.4%), isolated CNS in 2 (4.3%), isolated non-CNS extramedullary disease in 3 (6.4%), combined relapse in 14 (29.8%) and unreported in 1. First line treatment for LS was chemotherapy induction in 31 (66.0%), palliative care/no therapy in 8 (17.0%), and alternative therapies in the remaining 8 (17.0%). In 35 (74.5%) patients, remission induction was the goal of first line therapy. Fifteen (31.9%) achieved a complete remission (CR) of whom 2 were treated with palliative intent. Across all patients, 8 (17.0%) are alive in remission, the longest being 4.7 years from LS diagnosis; 2 (4.3%) are alive with active LS and 37 (78.7%) died from LS, their original disease, or complications of treatment of LS (Fig 1B). For those alive in CR (n=8), 7 (87.5%) proceeded to a consolidative SCT for treatment of LS and 1 patient, an octogenarian remains in remission after AML directed therapy. Conclusions: LS is emerging as an important mechanism of immune escape following immunotherapy. Project EVOLVE provides the largest dataset of patients with LS to date. This systematic, international effort reveals substantial complexity and variability in diagnosing and managing LS. Unfortunately, outcomes following LS are grim, underscoring the critical need to identify risk factors of and optimal therapies for this leukemia transformation.
Minimal Residual Disease-Negative Complete Remission at the End of Induction Is a Prognostic Indicator of Long-Term Survival in Adult Patients with Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Receiving First-Line Therapy
Ashaye, Ajibade , Dombret, Hervé , Fazioli, Katherine , Wang, Bingxia , Szabo, Nora, McCloskey, Conor , Nair, Sunita, Dalal, Mehul , Hennessy, Meliessa, Yeh, Tammie C., Chalandon, Yves , Aldoss, Ibrahim , Huang, Fei, Leonard, Jessica T , Badar, Talha , Kantarjian, Hagop M. , Ribera, Josep‐María , Jabbour, Elias

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 1, 2023 | Volume: 142 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 6075-6075

10.1182/blood-2023-179645 Get It

Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an established, prognostic indicator for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), including Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between MRD and long-term outcomes (event-free survival [EFS] and overall survival [OS]) in adult patients with Ph+ ALL receiving first-line therapy. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify eligible studies, including interventional and observational studies reporting survival outcomes by MRD status in adults ≥18 years of age with Ph+ ALL receiving first-line therapy. Key outcomes and data elements of interest were EFS, OS, and MRD or MRD-negative complete remission (CR) at end of induction (EOI). Aggregate study-level and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses were conducted. The IPD approach included a log-level MRD analysis to evaluate the concordance of deepening levels of molecular response with long-term EFS or OS in patients with CR and an analysis evaluating the utility of MRD-negative CR over CR alone. The analyses were conducted using frequentist and Bayesian approaches with fixed-effects and random-effects models. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests was used for survival analysis. Where applicable, Cox regression method with and without adjustment for prognostic factors were applied. Results: The SLR identified 19 publications (18 unique studies), 10 (9 unique studies) of which had sufficient MRD and EFS/OS data. Nine studies (n=704) were included in the aggregate study-level analysis; 3 of the 9 studies (Phase II AP24534-11-001 [Jabbour et al. 2015], Phase II GIMEMAINCB 84344-201 [Martinelli et al. 2017], and Phase III GRAAPH-2005 RCT [Chalandon et al. 2015]) had IPD available. MRD was assessed by polymerase chain reaction in all 9 studies. Findings from the aggregate study-level meta-analysis demonstrated a significant long-term survival benefit (EFS and OS) in favor of patients with MRD-negative CR. This significant benefit was generally consistent across analysis types (base-case or sensitivity analyses), analytic models (fixed- or random-effects), and approaches (frequentist or Bayesian). Evidence from the IPD analysis, based on patients with CR, was mostly consistent with the aggregate study-level meta-analysis, supporting MRD-negative CR at the EOI as being predictive of EFS or OS. Log-level MRD analysis showed that patients who are in CR with deeper molecular response ( BCR::ABL1/ABL1 ≤0.01%) at EOI have significantly better long-term EFS and OS compared with patients with other levels of MRD (ie, BCR::ABL1/ABL1 >0.01%). This significant long-term survival benefit was also demonstrated in patients with MRD-negative CR ( BCR::ABL1/ABL1 ≤0.01%) at EOI compared with patients who were MRD-positive ( BCR::ABL1/ABL1 >0.01%) ( Table 1) or based on achievement of CR alone (regardless of BCR::ABL1/ABL1 values). Results from the IPD analysis standardized for outcome definition, with and without adjustment for prognostic factors (age, gender, white blood cell count at baseline, and stem cell transplant), were consistent with the findings from the log-level MRD analysis. The analysis showed a significant association between MRD-negative/MRD-negative CR status (ie, BCR::ABL1/ABL1 ≤0.01% threshold) at EOI with improved long-term EFS and OS. The results were significant for EFS in both the adjusted and unadjusted models. The OS results were significant only in the unadjusted model. Conclusions: These analyses indicate that a deeper molecular response at EOI results in better long-term EFS and OS; MRD-negative CR has a greater prognostic value than CR and is strongly associated with long-term EFS and OS in patients with Ph+ ALL. Acknowledgement: The authors acknowledge APHP, who provided the individualized patients data for the GRAAPH study.
The Impact of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (InO) Treatment on Brexucabtagene Autoleucel (Brexu-cel) Outcomes in Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)
Kopmar, Noam E. , Dekker, Simone E. , Gupta, Vishal, Jeyakumar, Nikeshan , O’Connor, Timothy E. , Zhang, Amy , Miller, Katharine, Ahmed, Mohamed , Zambrano, Héctor, Bradshaw, Danielle , Schwartz, Marc S. , Tracy, Sean , Kubiak, Michal , Mukherjee, Akash , Mountjoy, Luke , Malik, Shahbaz A. , Shaughnessy, Paul , Ladha, Abdullah , Yaghmour, George , Stefan, Maryann, Guzowski, Caitlin, Hoeg, Rasmus T. , Moore, Jozal , O’Dwyer, Kristen M. , Tsai, Stephanie B., Solh, Melhem , Koura, Divya, Veeraputhiran, Muthu, Blunk, Betsy, Oliai, Caspian , Galal, Ahmed , Pullarkat, Vinod , Muffly, Lori , Muffly, Lori , Aldoss, Ibrahim , Roloff, Gregory W. , Advani, Anjali S. , Lin, Chenyu , Dykes, Kaitlyn C. , Mercadal, Santiago , Schwartz, Marc, Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai , Majhail, Navneet S. , Battiwalla, Minoo , Mathews, John Abraham , Logan, Aaron C , Hilal, Talal , O'Dwyer, Kristin , Tsai, Stephanie B., Sasine, Joshua , Lee, Catherine J , Kota, Vamsi , Leonard, Jessica T , Oliai, Caspian H , Bachanová, Veronika , Stock, Wendy , Cassaday, Ryan D. , Shah, Bijal , Faramand, Rawan

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 1, 2023 | Volume: 142 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 4877-4877

10.1182/blood-2023-182404 Get It

Cellular Immunotherapies: Late Phase and Commercially Available Therapies The Impact of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (InO) Treatment on Brexucabtagene Autoleucel (Brexu-cel) Outcomes in Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) Introduction: Brexu-cel is the first approved CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-ALL. InO, an anti-CD22 antibody drug conjugate, is also approved for the same indication. With the accessibility to several targeted therapies in r/r B-ALL, the optimal sequence remains uncertain. The effect of prior treatment with InO on brexu-cel outcomes remains underreported, especially as a bridging therapy, as well as the effect of previous response to InO on post brexu-cel outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter analysis from 25 U.S. institutions of adults (≥18 years) with r/r B-ALL treated with commercial brexu-cel from 2021 to 2023 post FDA approval. Methodologies for assessing minimal residual disease (MRD) (minimal threshold of 10 -4) included flow cytometry, NGS, or qPCR depending on institutional practice. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from day of brexu-cel infusion and were not censored for hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) or maintenance. All living patients were censored at the time of last follow-up prior to data lock, which occurred on June 30, 2023. Results: Among 152 infused, 83 (54.6%) had pre-CAR InO therapy (InO-exposed), with a median of 3 administered doses (range: 1-22). Within the InO-exposed cohort, 23 (28%) pts received InO as a CAR T-cell bridging therapy (ie, between apheresis and lymphodepletion) with or without pre-apheresis and 60 (72%) pts received InO only during pre-apheresis. Baseline characteristics for InO exposed and InO-naïve pts are shown in Table 1. InO-exposed pts had higher median prior lines of therapies (4 vs. 3; p= 0.05), more frequently had active disease (≥5% marrow blasts) at the time of apheresis (67% vs. 44%, p= 0.02), and had lower incidence of Ph+ disease (19% vs. 45%, p=0.003), compared to InO-naïve pts, respectively. The incidences of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (85% vs. 85%, p= 0.26) and ICANS (58% vs. 57%, p= 0.36) post infusion were similar, and post-infusion death in remission occurred in 17% and 12% among InO-exposed and InO-naïve pts, respectively. Morphological complete remission (CR) and MRD- rates following brexu-cel infusion were 89% and 77% for InO-exposed pts, and 92% and 70% for InO-naive pts, respectively. Post CAR therapy, more InO-naïve pts underwent consolidation/maintenance therapy (transplant, chemotherapy, or TKIs) compared to InO-exposed pts (41% vs. 19%, p= 0.004). The median follow-up after brexu-cel was 8.4 (range) months. Median OS (not reached (NR) vs. 12 months; p= 0.033) and median PFS (NR vs. 7 months; p= 0.029) were superior in InO-naïve pts compared to InO-exposed pts, respectively. However, after adjusting for pre-apheresis disease burden and post-CAR maintenance therapy, there were no longer significant differences in OS (HR= 1.25;95%CI: 0.62-2.53; p= 0.53) or PFS (HR= 1.24;95%CI:0.71-2.16, p=0.45) based on pre-CAR InO exposure. When InO-exposed pts were stratified based on prior InO-response (CR vs. no response), InO-responsive pts had superior estimated 12-month OS (64%) and PFS (38%) relative to InO-refractory pts (OS: 33%; PFS: 34%), but inferior to InO-naïve pts (OS: 75%; PFS 56%), with p-values of 0.0001 and 0.021 for OS and PFS, respectively (Figure 1). The timing of pre-CAR InO therapy did not impact brexu-cel survival outcomes, with comparable estimated 12-month OS (43% vs. 58%, p= 0.35) and PFS (46% vs. 38%, p= 0.57) for InO-exposed pts during bridging therapy and patients who received InO as a therapy prior to apheresis. Conclusion: After adjusting for pre-CAR disease burden and post-CAR consolidation/maintenance, we found that prior InO exposure does not significantly associate with PFS or OS following brexu-cel. However, relative to InO-responsive patients, patients who were InO-refractory appear to have worse post-CAR survival outcomes. Finally, timing of InO administration (ie as a prior line of therapy or as CAR bridging) did not influence outcomes brexu-cel outcomes.
Toxicity Profile of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel (brexu-cel; CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy) in Adult Patients (pts) with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL): Results from a Multicenter Real-World Outcomes Study
Kopmar, Noam E. , Gooley, Ted , Dekker, Simone E. , Jeyakumar, Nikeshan , O’Connor, Timothy E. , Ahmed, Mohamed , Zambrano, Héctor, Bradshaw, Danielle , Schwartz, Marc S. , Tracy, Sean , Kubiak, Michal , Mukherjee, Akash , Mountjoy, Luke , Malik, Shabaz, Shaughnessy, Paul , Ladha, Abdullah , Yaghmour, George , Stefan, Maryann, Guzowski, Caitlin, Hoeg, Rasmus T. , Moore, Jozal , O’Dwyer, Kristen M. , Tsai, Stephanie B., Solh, Melhem , Koura, Divya, Veeraputhiran, Muthu, Blunk, Betsy, Oliai, Caspian , Galal, Ahmed , Pullarkat, Vinod , Muffly, Lori , Muffly, Lori , Roloff, Gregory W. , Aldoss, Ibrahim , Lin, Chenyu , Gupta, Vishal , Dykes, Kaitlyn C. , Mercadal, Santiago , Schwartz, Marc, Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai , Majhail, Navneet S. , Battiwalla, Minoo , Mathews, John Abraham , Logan, Aaron C , Advani, Anjali S. , Hilal, Talal , O'Dwyer, Kristin , Tsai, Stephanie B., Sasine, Joshua , Lee, Catherine J , Kota, Vamsi , Leonard, Jessica T , Oliai, Caspian H , Bachanová, Veronika , Stock, Wendy , Shah, Bijal , Faramand, Rawan , Cassaday, Ryan D.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 1, 2023 | Volume: 142 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 522-522

10.1182/blood-2023-185107 Get It

Introduction: In October 2021, the FDA approved brexu-cel for the treatment of adults ≥ 18 years old with R/R B-ALL. Following this approval, a consortium of cancer centers was formed across the US to investigate outcomes following commercial brexu-cel use for adults with R/R B-ALL. One area of interest is the toxicity profile of brexu-cel when given in the real-world context, including the respective incidences and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS). Methods: Eligible pts included adults ≥ 18 years old who received commercial brexu-cel starting in October 2021 onward at a participating center in the US (N = 25). Retrospective patient data were collected across participating institutions, with the most recent data lock occurring on June 30, 2023. Criteria from the ASTCT were used to grade CRS and ICANS severity. Statistical methods included the use of medians and simple ratios for descriptive outcomes; univariate logistic regression models were used to assess the association of various factors with the probability of CRS and ICANS, and Cox regression was used to examine the association of each with the hazards of mortality and failure for event-free survival (EFS; earliest of progression, relapse, or death). Results: Key demographics and toxicities are described in Tables 1 and 2 (respectively). Of the 152 pts infused with brexu-cel, 82% (N = 125) developed CRS and 56% (N = 85) developed ICANS. CRS and ICANS did NOT develop in 12% (N = 19). Twenty percent of all pts (N = 31) required ICU-level care for management of CAR-related toxicities, with a median LOS in ICU of 4 days (range 1-79). In univariate models, grade 3+ ICANS was most likely to occur in pts with active disease (≥ 5% marrow blasts and/or EMD) at the time of apheresis (OR 2.63, 1.28-5.38, p = 0.008); a numerical increase for grade 3+ CRS (OR 2.35, 0.69-8, p = 0.17) was seen in pts with active disease at apheresis. Therapies received for these CAR-related toxicities included steroids, tocilizumab (toci), and anakinra (Table 2). Among pts who received steroids (N = 94), 37% (N = 34) achieved a sufficient response to the first steroid trial and did not require subsequent therapies; otherwise, toxicities improved with the first steroid course but later worsened in 16% (N = 15); the first trial of steroids was not effective but improved when further steroids were given in 31% (N = 29); there were no responses to any doses of steroids in 10% (N = 9). In pts receiving toci (N = 103), 31% (N = 32) achieved a sufficient response to the first dose and did not require any further therapy; toxicities improved with the first dose but later worsened in 31% (N = 32); the first dose was ineffective but improvement was seen with subsequent doses in 21% (N = 22); 9% (N = 9) did not respond at all to toci. The rate of death within day +28 was 6% (N = 9), and the respective causes were typically multifactorial: CRS was implicated in 3 cases, ICANS in 3, infection in 5, disease relapse/progression in 2, and HLH in 1 case. In total, uncontrolled ICANS was implicated in the death of 6 pts (between day +9 to day +106). HLH was reported in 6 pts: in most cases, this was a biochemical diagnosis, and it either overlapped with concurrent CRS or infection or occurred following CRS/ICANS. The most common infections between day 0 and day +28 included bacteremia in 8% of pts (N = 12), fungal infections in 4% (N = 6), pneumonia in 3% (N = 5), and CMV infections in 3% (N = 4). The fungal infections included 4 instances of invasive sinopulmonary infections (2 due to aspergillus; 2 due to mucormycosis) and 2 cases of candidemia. With both CRS and ICANS treated as a time-varying covariate, the development of grade 3+ CRS was associated with a higher hazard of death (HR 2.38, 1.00-5.66, p = 0.05); grade 3+ ICANS was not associated with a demonstrably higher risk of death (HR 1.11, 0.60-2.05, p = 0.74). The HR of EFS failure for Grade 3+ CRS was 1.81 (0.87-3.79, p = 0.12) and for grade 3+ ICANS HR = 0.93 (0.56-1.53, p = 0.77). Conclusions: In this real-world study of toxicities from brexu-cel use for adults with R/R B-ALL, we observed CRS and ICANS in the majority of pts, and no new safety signals were observed. Rates of severe CRS and ICANS were more common with active disease. Interestingly, though CRS-related mortality was rare, grade 3+ CRS was associated with a higher risk of death. Efforts to identify mechanisms and mitigable risk factors for these toxicities are warranted.