Citations

OBJECTIVES: Explore short-term effects of “The Caregiver Pathway,” an intervention for family caregiver follow-up, on Post-Intensive Care Syndrome symptoms among families (PICS-F). DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A medical ICU at a Norwegian University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-six family caregivers of critically ill patients randomized to an intervention (n = 101) or control group (n = 95). INTERVENTIONS: “The Caregiver Pathway” four-step model offers individual and structured follow-up, including: 1) mapping family caregivers’ needs and concerns with an assessment tool followed by a conversation with an ICU nurse within the first days at the ICU, 2) a supportive card when leaving the ICU, 3) offer for the family caregivers to receive a phone call after ICU patient discharge, and 4) a follow-up conversation within 3 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected at baseline and after 3 months and analyzed using linear regression. No significant effects were detected when comparing all participants completing 3-month outcome measurements (n = 144). A subgroups analysis stratified on patient survival, however, showed statistically significant effect for family caregivers of patients surviving the ICU stay receiving the intervention compared with controls. Caregivers of surviving patients reported improved symptoms related to post-traumatic stress disorder, measured by Impact of Event Scale-Revised (B = –8.2 [95% CI, –14.2 to –2.2]; p = 0.008), anxiety (B = –2.2 [95% CI, –4.0 to –0.5]; p = 0.014), and depression (B = –1.5 [95% CI, –2.9 to –0.1]; p = 0.035); measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, subscore physical functioning in health-related quality of life (B = 9.7 [95% CI, 0.3–19.0]; p = 0.043); measured by Short Form 12-Item Health Survey; and hope (B = 2.4 [95% CI, 0.4–4.3]; p = 0.017) and measured by the Herth Hope Index. At 3-month, the model did not appear to improve the outcomes for family caregivers of nonsurviving patients. CONCLUSIONS: “The Caregiver Pathway” intervention was associated with reduced symptoms of PICS-F in family caregivers of surviving ICU patients compared with controls.

Abstract Introduction: Chronic pain affects a wide range of physical and psychological aspects of life for those impacted. Psychosocial treatment approaches may be of support, but outreach is still limited. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of EPIO, an evidence-informed, user-centered digital self-management intervention for people with chronic pain, in a 12-month randomized controlled trial. Methods: People living with chronic pain (N = 266) were randomized to the EPIO intervention (n = 132) or a usual-care control group (n = 134). The intervention was delivered in a simple blended care model, and outcome measures collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Generalized linear models for repeated measures were fitted to compare groups over time. Results: Participants were primarily female (81%), median age 49 years (range 22–78), with heterogeneous pain conditions, and had lived with pain >5 years (77.6%). A mixed linear model with all timepoints included revealed no statistically significant group differences for the primary outcome of pain interference. Significant psychological benefits in favor of the intervention group were however detected for depression (P = 0.022), self-regulatory fatigue (P = 0.024), vitality (P = 0.016), and mental health (P = 0.047). Baseline to 12-month changes showed additional favorable effects for anxiety (between-group mean differences [MDs] = 0.79, P = 0.047), depression (MD = 1.08, P = 0.004), self-regulatory fatigue (MD = 2.42, P = 0.021), pain catastrophizing (MD = 2.62, P = 0.009), and health-related quality of life. Conclusions: The EPIO program aims to improve outreach of evidence-based pain self-management interventions. Findings demonstrate how using EPIO can lead to sustainable psychological change, enhancing mental health and health-related quality of life for people suffering from pain, providing a chance to live well with the pain.

Abstract Alpha-tubulin 4A encoding gene (TUBA4A) has been associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, based on identification of likely pathogenic variants in patients from distinct amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia cohorts. By screening a multicentric French cohort of 448 unrelated probands presenting with cerebellar ataxia, we identified ultra-rare TUBA4A missense variants, all being absent from public databases and predicted pathogenic by multiple in silico tools. In addition, gene burden analyses in the 100 000 Genomes project (100KGP) showed enrichment of TUBA4A rare variants in the inherited ataxia group compared to controls [odds ratio: 57.0847 (10.2−576.7); P = 4.02 ×10−7]. Taken together, we report 12 patients presenting with spasticity and/or cerebellar ataxia and harbouring a predicted pathogenic TUBA4A missense mutation, including five confirmed de novo cases and a mutation previously reported in a large family presenting with spastic ataxia. Cultured fibroblasts from three patients harbouring distinct TUBA4A missense showed significant alterations in microtubule organization and dynamics, providing insight of TUBA4A variants pathogenicity. Our data confirm the identification of a hereditary spastic ataxia disease gene with variable age of onset, expanding the clinical spectrum of TUBA4A associated phenotypes.

Abstract: Being able to increase and know how to strengthen resilience may be relevant for patients living with long-term symptoms such as chronic fatigue syndromes. The current study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of a Norwegian-translated version of the REMAP resilience measure in a sample of patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy controls. Factor analyses indicated poor fit for both the one- and five-factor solutions of the translated REMAP measure with best fit for a correlated five-factor model. Validity proved to be good, while reliability was poor for two of the subscales. Differences were revealed between gender, age groups, and between patients and healthy controls. The construct validity indicates that REMAP assesses adequate aspects of resilience. REMAP might be valuable to use to show that resilience resources could be developed in various life domains and aid in coping with chronic illness. However, REMAP should be further tested in other samples and cultures.

Background: Randomized clinical trials are often criticized for not reflecting real-world practice. To understand the effect of site and patient selection on trial generalizability, we examined US patient and hospital participation within the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Study, a broadly inclusive trial of PCI patients, using a linked analysis with the CathPCI Registry®. Methods: Within the CathPCI Registry, we identified patients undergoing PCI between September 1, 2009 and July 1, 2011 - the period of DAPT Study enrollment. We compared US patients enrolled in DAPT to CathPCI Registry patients meeting DAPT inclusion criteria. Characteristics of US DAPT sites were also compared to those of hospitals not participating in DAPT. Standardized differences (%) for all variables were estimated, with those greater than 10% considered significant. Results: Among 1,139,932 NCDR patients undergoing PCI, 748374 (65.7%) met the enrollment criteria for DAPT, and 23495 (2.1%) were enrolled. Enrolled patients were younger and had lower rates of prior stroke, CHF and peripheral vascular disease, but were similar with respect to race and gender compared with eligible patients (Table). Of the 1276 hospitals within the NCDR, 309 (24.2%) participated in DAPT. Hospital characteristics differed markedly, with DAPT-participating hospitals being larger (mean beds 468 vs. 311), more often located in urban settings (61.2% vs. 42.6%), more often affiliated with training programs (53.7% vs. 34.1%), and with higher annual PCI volumes (mean annual hospital volume 858 vs. 378 PCIs) compared with non-DAPT hospitals. Conclusions: While liberal inclusion criteria may allow randomized trials to better simulate “real-world” clinical practice, the process of site selection may encourage participation of higher volume, urban hospital settings. These findings are relevant to clinical trial interpretation and implementation of evidence-based practice throughout the healthcare system.

Little is known about how health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in breast cancer cases differed from that of controls during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study used data from an ongoing, nationwide HRQoL survey of 4279 newly diagnosed breast cancer cases and 2911 controls to investigate how breast cancer patients fared during different phases of the pandemic compared to controls. Responders during 2020–2022 were categorized into three COVID-19-related phases: the social restrictions phase, the high infection rate phase, and the post-pandemic phase. Across phases, breast cancer cases had significantly worse scores in most HRQoL domains compared to controls. Apart from slightly more insomnia in the high infection rate phase for both cases and controls, and better social functioning for young cases in the post-COVID-19 phase, the case-control differences in HRQoL remained consistent across phases. When the phases were assessed as one period, young women and those living with children <18 years of age fared the worst among breast cancer cases, while single women fared the worst among controls. In contrast, controls living with children <18 years of age exhibited better HRQoL than controls without children. In summary, women with breast cancer did not appear to fare differently than controls in terms of HRQoL across COVID-19 phases. However, breast cancer cases with young children fared worse in their HRQoL than other breast cancer cases.

Abstract Artificial intelligence has been introduced to clinical practice, especially radiology and radiation oncology, from image segmentation, diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. It is not only crucial to have an accurate artificial intelligence model, but also to understand the internal logic and gain the trust of the experts. This review is intended to provide some insights into core concepts of the interpretability, the state-of-the-art methods for understanding the machine learning models, the evaluation of these methods, identifying some challenges and limits of them, and gives some examples of medical applications.

BACKGROUND: Although the safety of laparoscopic redo ileocolonic resection for Crohn’s disease has been described before, the safety of robotic redo ileocolonic resection is still unelucidated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to share our preliminary experience regarding the safety of robotic redo ileocolonic resection for Crohn’s disease. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: All consecutive adult patients who underwent robotic ileocolonic resection for Crohn’s disease at our institution between 2014 and 2021 were included. Patients were divided into redo ileocolonic resection and primary ileocolonic resection groups. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline demographics, preoperative risk factors, and intraoperative details were compared between both groups. The primary outcome was conversion to an open approach, and secondary outcomes were 30-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were included. Of them, 18 (18.4%) had a redo ileocolonic resection. Patients who had a redo ileocolonic resection were more likely to have a longer duration of disease, associated anoperineal disease, a higher number of previous lines of medical treatments, received total parental nutrition before the operation for correction of malnutrition, and longer time for adhesiolysis. Patients who had redo ileocolonic resection had a higher risk for conversion to open ileocolonic resection [3 (16.7%) versus 2 (2.5%); p value = 0.04]. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the overall length of stay and the 30-day morbidity between both groups. No 30-day mortality or anastomotic leaks occurred in either group. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature of the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic redo ileocolonic resection showed similar short-term postoperative outcomes to robotic primary ileocolonic resection for Crohn’s disease. However, conversion rates are higher in robotic redo ileocolonic resection yet seem lower than previously published results in laparoscopic surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C77. RESECCIÓN ILEOCÓLICA ROBÓTICA REDO PARA LA ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN: INFORME PRELIMINAR DE UN CENTRO DE ATENCIÓN TERCIARIA ANTECEDENTES: Si bien la seguridad de la resección ileocolónica laparoscópica para la enfermedad de Crohn se ha descrito antes, la seguridad de la resección ileocolónica robótica aún no se ha dilucidado. OBJETIVO: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo compartir nuestra experiencia preliminar con respecto a la seguridad de la resección ileocolónica robótica para la enfermedad de Crohn. DISEÑO: Análisis retrospectivo. AJUSTE: Centro de atención terciaria. PACIENTES: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes adultos consecutivos que se sometieron a resección ileocolónica robótica por enfermedad de Crohn en nuestra institución entre 2014 y 2021. Los pacientes se dividieron en grupos de resección ileocolónica reconfeccionada y resección ileocolónica primaria. MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Se compararon los datos demográficos iniciales, los factores de riesgo preoperatorios y los detalles intraoperatorios entre ambos grupos. El resultado primario fue la conversión a abierto y los resultados secundarios fueron las complicaciones posoperatorias a los treinta días. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 98 pacientes. De ellos, 18 (18,4%) tuvieron resección ileocolónica. Los pacientes que se sometieron a una nueva resección ileocolónica tenían más probabilidades de tener una mayor duración de la enfermedad, enfermedad anoperineal asociada, un mayor número de líneas previas de tratamientos médicos, más probabilidades de haber recibido nutrición parental total antes de la operación para la corrección de la desnutrición y más tiempo tiempo de adhesiolisis. Los pacientes que se sometieron a una nueva resección ileocolónica tuvieron un mayor riesgo de conversión a cirugía abierta [3 (16,7 %) frente a 2 (2,5 %); valor p 0,04]. No hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa con respecto a la duración total de la estancia y la morbilidad a los treinta días entre ambos grupos. No hubo mortalidad a los treinta días ni fugas anastomóticas en ninguno de los grupos. LIMITACIONES: Naturaleza retrospectiva del análisis. CONCLUSIÓN: La resección ileocolónica robótica mostró resultados postoperatorios a corto plazo similares a la resección ileocolónica primaria robótica para la enfermedad de Crohn. Sin embargo, las tasas de conversión son más altas en la resección ileocolónica robótica, pero parecen más bajas que los resultados publicados previamente en la cirugía laparoscópica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C77. (Traducción—Dr Yolanda Colorado)