Citations

Clear

214 citation(s) found for "Welch, R".

Identification of a new murine eosinophil major basic protein (mMBP) gene: cloning and characterization of mMBP-2
Macias, MiMi P. , Denzler, Karen L., Larson, Kirsten A., Lee, Nancy A., Welch, Kenneth C. , Lee, James J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Leukocyte Biology | January 12, 2018 | Volume: 67 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 567-576

10.1002/jlb.67.4.567 | PMID 10770291 Get It

Abstract We have identified a new eosinophil major basic protein gene family member in the mouse and have given it the designation murine major basic protein-2 (mMBP-2). The gene was initially characterized as a unique expressed sequence tag (EST) clone having significant identity to the previously recognized member of this gene family, mMBP-1. The EST was used to screen and isolate mMBP-2 from a bone marrow cDNA library. In addition, a genomic clone of mMBP-2 was isolated and this gene was shown to be physically linked to within 100 kb of mMBP-1 on the central region of mouse chromosome 2. Progressive similarity alignment of the deduced mMBP-2 open reading frame demonstrates the apparent conservation of the “pre-pro-mature” protein structure found in the other known mammalian MBPs. Mature mMBP-2 maintains the cationic nature associated with these proteins with a predicted pI of 9.95. However, unlike the human MBPs, which display a three orders of magnitude charge difference [hMBP-1 (pI11.4) vs. hMBP-2 (pI8.7)], mMBP-2 is only slightly less cationic than mMBP-1 (pI 10.5). Expression studies demonstrate that transcription of the mMBP-2 gene parallels mMBP-1 and is confined to hematopoietic compartments engaged in eosinophilopoiesis. Moreover, using mMBP-1 knockout mice and immunohistochemistry with an antisera that recognizes both mMBP-1 and -2, we demonstrate that mMBP-2 protein expression is restricted to eosinophil lineage-committed cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 67: 567–576; 2000.
Evaluation of previously embolized intracranial aneurysms: inter-and intra-rater reliability among neurosurgeons and interventional neuroradiologists
Lakomkin, Nikita , Magarik, Jordan A., Stephens, Marcus L., Akinpelu, Babatunde , Spiotta, Alejandro M , Ahmed, Azam , Hirsch, Joshua A , James, Robert F. , Kallmes, David F. , Meyers, Philip M. , Niemann, David , Rasmussen, Peter A. , Turner, Raymond D , Welch, Babu G. , Zuckerman, Scott L. , Vargas, Jan , Arthur, Adam Stephen , Fiorella, David , Hanel, Ricardó A. , Hui, Ferdinand , Mocco, J

Mayo Clinic

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | September 16, 2017 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 462-466

10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013231 | PMID 28918386 Get It

Background The angiographic evaluation of previously coiled aneurysms can be difficult yet remains critical for determining re-treatment. Objective The main objective of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability for both the Raymond Scale and per cent embolization among a group of neurointerventionalists evaluating previously embolized aneurysms. Methods A panel of 15 neurointerventionalists examined 92 distinct cases of immediate post-coil embolization and 1 year post-embolization angiographs. Each case was presented four times throughout the study, along with alterations in demographics in order to evaluate intra-rater reliability. All respondents were asked to provide the per cent embolization (0–100%) and Raymond Scale grade (1-3) for each aneurysm. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated by computing weighted kappa values (for the Raymond Scale) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for per cent embolization. Results 10 neurosurgeons and 5 interventional neuroradiologists evaluated 368 simulated cases. The agreement among all readers employing the Raymond Scale was fair (κ=0.35) while concordance in per cent embolization was good (ICC=0.64). Clinicians with fewer than 10 years of experience demonstrated a significantly greater level of agreement than the group with greater than 10 years (κ=0.39 and ICC=0.70 vs κ=0.28 and ICC=0.58). When the same aneurysm was presented multiple times, clinicians demonstrated excellent consistency when assessing per cent embolization (ICC=0.82), but moderate agreement when employing the Raymond classification (κ=0.58). Conclusions Identifying the per cent embolization in previously coiled aneurysms resulted in good inter- and intra-rater agreement, regardless of years of experience. The strong agreement among providers employing per cent embolization may make it a valuable tool for embolization assessment in this patient population.
Diabetes, Prediabetes, and Brain Volumes and Subclinical Cerebrovascular Disease on MRI: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS)
Schneider, Andrea L.C. , Selvin, Elizabeth , Sharrett, A. Richey, Griswold, Michael , Jack, Clifford R. , Selvin, Elizabeth , Jack, Clifford R , Selvin, Elizabeth , Coresh, Josef , Knopman, David S. , Mosley, Thomas H. , Gottesman, Rebecca F. , Schneider, Andrea L C

Mayo Clinic

Diabetes Care | September 15, 2017 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1514-1521

10.2337/dc17-1185 | PMID 28916531 Get It

OBJECTIVE To examine the associations of prediabetes, diabetes, and diabetes severity (as assessed by HbA1c and diabetes duration) with brain volumes and vascular pathology on brain MRI and to assess whether the associations of diabetes with brain volumes are mediated by brain vascular pathology. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Cross-sectional study of 1,713 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) (mean age 75 years, 60% female, 27% black, 30% prediabetes, and 35% diabetes) who underwent 3T brain MRI scans in 2011–2013. Participants were categorized by diabetes-HbA1c status as without diabetes (<5.7% [reference]), with prediabetes (5.7 to <6.5%), and with diabetes ([defined as prior diagnosis or HbA1c ≥6.5%] <7.0% vs. ≥7.0%), with further stratification by diabetes duration (<10 vs. ≥10 years). RESULTS In adjusted analyses, compared with participants without diabetes and HbA1c <5.7%, participants with prediabetes and those with diabetes and HbA1c <7.0% did not have significantly different brain volumes or vascular pathology (all P > 0.05), but those with diabetes and HbA1c ≥7.0% had smaller total brain volume (β −0.20 SDs, 95% CI −0.31, −0.09), smaller regional brain volumes (including frontal, temporal, occipital, and parietal lobes; deep gray matter; Alzheimer disease signature region; and hippocampus [all P < 0.05]), and increased burden of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) (P = 0.016). Among participants with diabetes, those with HbA1c ≥7.0% had smaller total and regional brain volumes and an increased burden of WMH (all P < 0.05) compared with those with HbA1c <7.0%. Similarly, participants with longer duration of diabetes (≥10 years) had smaller brain volumes and higher burden of lacunes (all P < 0.05) than those with a diabetes duration <10 years. We found no evidence for mediation by WMH in associations of diabetes with smaller brain volumes by structural equation models (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS More-severe diabetes (defined by higher HbA1c and longer disease duration) but not prediabetes or less-severe diabetes was associated with smaller brain volumes and an increased burden of brain vascular pathology. No evidence was found that associations of diabetes with smaller brain volumes are mediated by brain vascular pathology, suggesting that other mechanisms may be responsible for these associations.
Anesthesia-Related Outcomes for Endovascular Stroke Revascularization
Brinjikji, Waleed , Pasternak, Jeffrey J., Murad, M. Hassan , Cloft, Harry J. , Welch, Tasha L. , Kallmes, David F. , Pasternak, Jeffrey, Murad, Mohammad H, Murad, M Hassan , Welch, Tasha L , Rabinstein, Alejandro A.

Mayo Clinic

Stroke | September 14, 2017 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2784-2791

10.1161/strokeaha.117.017786 | PMID 28904228 Get It

Background and Purpose— There is currently controversy on the ideal anesthesia strategy during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients undergoing general anesthesia (GA group) and those receiving either local anesthesia or conscious sedation (non-GA group). Methods— A literature search on anesthesia and endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke was performed. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we evaluated the following outcomes: recanalization rate, good functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Score≤2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, death, vascular complications, respiratory complications, procedure time, and time to groin puncture. Results— Twenty-two studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 19 observational studies), including 4716 patients (1819 GA and 2897 non-GA) were included. In the nonadjusted analysis, patients in the GA group had higher odds of death (odds ratio [OR], 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66–2.45) and respiratory complications (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.22–2.37) and lower odds of good functional outcome (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.48–0.64) compared with the non-GA group. There was no difference in procedure time between the 2 primary comparison groups. When adjusting for baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, GA was still associated with lower odds of good functional outcome (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.29–0.94). When considering studies performed in the stent-retriever/aspiration era, there was no significant difference in good neurological outcome rates (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67–1.06). Conclusions— Acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing intra-arterial therapy may have worse outcomes when treated with GA as compared with conscious sedation/local anesthesia. However, major limitations of current evidence (ie, retrospective studies and selection bias) indicate a need for adequately powered, multicenter randomized controlled trials to answer this question.
Considering health equity when moving from evidence-based guideline recommendations to implementation: a case study from an upper-middle income country on the GRADE approach
Eslava‐Schmalbach, Javier , Mosquera, Paola A. , Álzate, Juan Pablo , Jull, Janet , Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal , Morton, Rachel L, Thabane, Lehana , Shea, Bev , Singh, Jasvinder A. , Flórez, Iván D. , Schünemann, Holger J. , Singh, Jasvinder, Singh, Jasvinder A , Schünemann, Holger J , Thabane, Lehana , Pottie, Kevin , Welch, Vivian Andrea , Akl, Elie A. , Lang, Eddy , Stein, Aírton Tetelbom , Guyatt, Gordon , Tugwell, Peter

Mayo Clinic

Health Policy and Planning | August 26, 2017 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1484-1490

10.1093/heapol/czx126 | PMID 29029068 Get It

Subarachnoid and intraperitoneal hemorrhage secondary to segmental arterial mediolysis: A case report and review of the literature
Welch, Brian T. , Brinjikji, Waleed , Stockland, Andrew H., Lanzino, Giuseppe

Mayo Clinic

Interventional Neuroradiology | April 26, 2017 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 378-381

10.1177/1591019917703074 | PMID 28443482 Get It

Background Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is an uncommon or underdiagnosed arteriopathy that presents with life-threatening hemorrhage. SAM can affect the intracranial, spinal, and visceral arteries, with reported cases of concomitant intracranial and visceral hemorrhage. Case description We present the case of a 61-year-old male with concurrent subarachnoid and intraperitoneal hemorrhage caused by simultaneously bleeding posterior spinal artery and splenic artery pseudoaneurysms. The posterior spinal artery pseudoaneurysms were treated with selective injection of polyvinyl alcohol particles into the posterior spinal artery, while the splenic artery pseudoaneurysm was treated with Gelfoam embolization. The constellation of imaging, clinical, and laboratory features led to a presumptive diagnosis of SAM, which remains the only reported cause of concurrent neurovascular and visceral artery aneurysm rupture. Conclusion SAM is a key diagnostic consideration in cases of concomitant intracranial, spinal, and visceral artery aneurysm rupture.
Incidence of brain metastasis from esophageal cancer.
Ashman, Jonathan B. , Welch, Gabrielle, Jaroszewski, Dawn E. , Fleischer, David E., Rule, William G., Paripati, Harshita, Ramirez, Francisco C. , Ross, Helen J. , Patel, Naresh P.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 21, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 165-165

10.1200/jco.2017.35.4_suppl.165 Get It

165 Background: Distant metastases are common in primary esophageal cancer, but data conflict regarding the rates of brain metastases (BM) ranging from 0% to 13%. We sought to investigate whether the incidence of BM from esophageal malignancies is increasing in the modern era. Methods: After IRB approval, a single institution retrospective review identified 583 patients (pts) treated between 1/1997 and 1/2016 for stage I-IV cancer of the esophagus/esophagogastric junction with at least 3 months follow-up. Data collected included demographic information, primary diagnosis date and staging, histologic subtype, treatment regimens for primary and BM, date of BM diagnosis, status of neurologic symptoms and extracranial disease at BM diagnosis, and date of death. Data were analyzed by Fischer’s exact test and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: The overall cohort was comprised of 495 pts (85%) with adenocarcinoma and 82 pts (14%) with squamous cell carcinoma. 492 pts (84%) were male; the median age was 68 years (range 26-90). BM were identified in 22 pts (3.8%) with a median latency of 11 months from the primary diagnosis. Of the pts with BM, the primary histology was adenocarcinoma in 21 pts and squamous cell carcinoma in 1 pt ( P = 0.3). BM developed in 12 pts who were initially treated for locally advanced disease and in 10 pts who presented with distant metastases. Diagnosis of BM was at the time of initial presentation in 4 of these 10 stage IV pts. A solitary BM was identified in 9 pts. Initial treatments of BM were surgical resection followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS; n = 5); surgical resection followed by whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT; n = 1); WBRT alone (n = 13); SRS alone (n = 3). Overall survival (OS) following diagnosis of BM was 18% at 1 year with a median of 4 months. OS was superior for pts who had surgical resection as initial treatment of BM compared to pts treated with WBRT or SRS alone (1-year OS 67 vs. 0%; median OS 13.5 vs. 3 months; P = 0.003). Conclusions: The incidence of BM is low in esophageal cancer with no statistically significant increased rate of BM developing in patients with adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma. Outcomes were poor overall for pts who developed BM, but pts who were appropriate for neurosurgical resection had improved survival.
Educational intervention for improving the appropriateness of transthoracic echocardiograms ordered by pediatric cardiologists
Sachdeva, Ritu , Douglas, Pamela S. , McCracken, Courtney , Lopez, Leo , Stern, Kenan W.D. , Eidem, Benjamin W., Benavidez, Oscar J., Weiner, Rory B., Welch, Elizabeth , Campbell, Robert M. , Kelleman, Michael Scott , Lai, Wyman W. , Douglas, Pamela S

Mayo Clinic

Congenital Heart Disease | February 22, 2017 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 373-381

10.1111/chd.12455 | PMID 28225219 Get It

Application of pediatric appropriate use criteria for initial outpatient evaluation of syncope
Phelps, Heather M. , McCracken, Courtney , Benavidez, Oscar J., Campbell, Robert M. , Douglas, Pamela S. , Eidem, Benjamin W., Lopez, Leo , Stern, Kenan W.D. , Welch, Elizabeth , Sachdeva, Ritu , Kelleman, Michael Scott , Lai, Wyman W. , Douglas, Pamela S

Mayo Clinic

Echocardiography | February 8, 2017 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 441-445

10.1111/echo.13475 | PMID 28177138 Get It

BackgroundSyncope is a common reason for outpatient transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We studied the applicability of pediatric appropriate use criteria (AUC) on initial outpatient evaluation of children (≤18 years) with syncope.MethodsData were obtained before (Phase I, April–September 2014) and after (Phase II, January‐April 2015) the release of the AUC document from six participating pediatric cardiology centers. Site investigators determined the indication for TTE and assigned appropriateness rating based on the AUC document: Appropriate (A), May Be Appropriate (M), Rarely Appropriate (R), or “unclassifiable” (U) if it did not fit any scenario in the AUC document.ResultsOf the total 4562 TTEs, 310 (6.8%) were performed for syncope: 174/2655 (6.6%) Phase I and 136/1907 (7.1%) Phase II, P=.44. Overall, 168 (50.5%) were for indications rated A, 63 (18.9%) for M, 79 (23.7%) for R, and 23 (6.9%) for U. Release of AUC did not change the appropriateness of TTEs [A=51.6% vs 49.0%, P=.63, R=20.2% vs 28.3%, P=.09]. Overall syncope‐related R indications formed 15.7% of R indications for all the echocardiograms performed in the entire Pediatric Appropriate Use (PAUSE) study (11.9% Phase I and 22.4% Phase II, P=.002). TTEs were normal in majority of the patients except 7 that had incidental findings.ConclusionsIn conclusion, syncope is a common reason for indications rated R and release of the AUC document did not improve appropriate utilization of TTE in syncope. Targeted educational interventions are needed to reduce unnecessary TTEs in children with syncope.
Aneurysms with persistent patency after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device
Kan, Peter , Srinivasan, Visish M. , Mbabuike, Nnenna, Ban, Vin Shen , Welch, Babu G. , Mokin, Maxim, Mitchell, Bartley D., Puri, Ajit S , Binning, Mandy J., Duckworth, Edward , Tawk, Rabih G. , Mokin, Maxim

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Neurosurgery | September 16, 2016 | Volume: 126 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1894-1898

10.3171/2016.6.jns16402 | PMID 27636182 Get It

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) was approved for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms from the petrous to the superior hypophyseal segment of the internal carotid artery. However, since its approval, its use for treatment of intracranial aneurysms in other locations and non-sidewall aneurysms has grown tremendously. The authors report on a cohort of 15 patients with 16 cerebral aneurysms that incorporated an end vessel with no significant distal collaterals, which were treated with the PED. The cohort includes 7 posterior communicating artery aneurysms, 5 ophthalmic artery aneurysms, 1 superior cerebellar artery aneurysm, 1 anterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm, and 2 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. None of the aneurysms achieved significant occlusion at the last follow-up evaluation (mean 24 months). Based on these observations, the authors do not recommend the use of flow diverters for the treatment of this subset of cerebral aneurysms.