Pansomatostatin Agonist Pasireotide Long-Acting Release for Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney or Liver Disease with Severe Liver Involvement
Background and objectives We assessed safety and efficacy of another somatostatin receptor analog, pasireotide long-acting release, in severe polycystic liver disease and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Pasireotide long-acting release, with its broader binding profile and higher affinity to known somatostatin receptors, has potential for greater efficacy. Design, setting, participants, & measurements Individuals with severe polycystic liver disease were assigned in a 2:1 ratio in a 1-year, double-blind, randomized trial to receive pasireotide long-acting release or placebo. Primary outcome was change in total liver volume; secondary outcomes were change in total kidney volume, eGFR, and quality of life. Results Of 48 subjects randomized, 41 completed total liver volume measurements ( n =29 pasireotide long-acting release and n =12 placebo). From baseline, there were −99±189 ml/m absolute and −3%±7% change in annualized change in height-adjusted total liver volume (from 2582±1381 to 2479±1317 ml/m) in the pasireotide long-acting release group compared with 136±117 ml/m absolute and 6%±7% increase (from 2387±759 to 2533±770 ml/m) in placebo ( P <0.001 for both). Total kidney volumes decreased by −12±34 ml/m and −1%±4% in pasireotide long-acting release compared with 21±21 ml/m and 4%±5% increase in the placebo group ( P =0.05 for both). Changes in eGFR were similar between groups. Among the n =48 randomized, adverse events included hyperglycemia (26 of 33 [79%] in pasireotide long-acting release versus four of 15 [27%] in the placebo group; P <0.001), and among the 47 without diabetes at baseline, 19 of 32 (59%) in the pasireotide long-acting release group versus one of 15 (7%) in the placebo group developed diabetes ( P =0.001). Conclusions Another somatostatin analog, pasireotide long-acting release, slowed progressive increase in both total liver volume/total kidney volume growth rates without affecting GFR decline. Participants experienced higher frequency of adverse events (hyperglycemia and diabetes). Clinical Trial registry name and registration number Pasireotide LAR in Severe Polycystic Liver Disease, NCT01670110 Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_08_28_CJN13661119.mp3
Quality of life and caregiver burden in familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration: Analyses of symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals within the LEFFTDS cohort
AbstractObjectiveThe Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects evaluates familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) kindreds with MAPT, GRN, or C9orf72 mutations. Objectives were to examine whether health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) correlates with clinical symptoms and caregiver burden, and whether self‐rated and informant‐rated HRQoL would correlate with each other.MethodsIndividuals were classified using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR®) Scale plus National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) FTLD. HRQoL was measured with DEMQOL and DEMQOL‐proxy; caregiver burden with the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). For analysis, Pearson correlations and weighted kappa statistics were calculated.ResultsThe cohort of 312 individuals included symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. CDR® plus NACC FTLD was negatively correlated with DEMQOL (r = −0.20, P = .001), as were ZBI and DEMQOL (r = −0.22, P = .0009). There was fair agreement between subject and informant DEMQOL (κ = 0.36, P <.0001).ConclusionLower HRQoL was associated with higher cognitive/behavior impairment and higher caregiver burden. These findings demonstrate the negative impact of FTLD on individuals and caregivers.
Late-life Physical Exercise, Neuropsychiatric Symptoms And The Risk Of Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment
Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of the Cogstate Brief Battery and Auditory Verbal Learning Test in Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease and Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment: Implications for Defining Subtle Objective Cognitive Impairment
AbstractIntroductionWe examined differences in cortical thickness in empirically derived mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subtypes in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.MethodsWe compared cortical thickness of four incident MCI subtypes (n = 192) to 1257 cognitive unimpaired individuals.ResultsThe subtle cognitive impairment cluster had atrophy in the entorhinal and parahippocampal cortex. The amnestic, dysnomic, and dysexecutive clusters also demonstrated entorhinal cortex atrophy as well as thinning in temporal, parietal, and frontal isocortex in somewhat different patterns.DiscussionWe found patterns of atrophy in each of the incident MCI clusters that corresponded to their patterns of cognitive impairment. The identification of MCI subtypes based on cognitive and structural features may allow for more efficient trial and study designs. Given individuals in the subtle cognitive impairment cluster have less structural changes and cognitive decline and may represent the earliest group, this could be a unique group to target with early interventions.
SAT-641 Self-Reported Psychological Stress and Glucose Variability in Type 1 Diabetes on Sensor Augmented Pump over 5 Weeks
Abstract Introduction: Patients and their families and medical providers have assumed that psychologic stress impacts glucose control in T1D (Type 1 Diabetes) though studies providing confirmatory evidence in real world settings are, to our knowledge, lacking. We hypothesized that self-reported psychologic stress worsens glucose control in T1D. Method: We studied 20 adults with T1D on continuous glucose monitor (CGM), sensor augmented insulin pump (SAP) prospectively at 2 clinical research centers. Patients reported psychological stress through stress diaries for 5 weeks on a severity scale of 1-7 using hard copy logs including time of onset and offset of stress and severity. For analytic purpose, grades 1-4 are classified as mild and grades 5-7 as severe. Results: Baseline characteristics were age 44.9±15.0 years, F/M 12/8, HbA1c 6.8 ± 0.7%, and diabetes duration of 22.9±15.9 years. We analyzed glucose variability during days of stress versus days without stress. During a 24 hour period, patients experienced less hypoglycemia during days with stress versus days without stress (p value 0.03). During the 5 week period, patients reported 23 ± 19.5 events. We analyzed the impact of self-reported stress on CGM data streams after excluding stress events associated with missing CGM data, nocturnal events (from 12 MN to 6 AM, too few events) and events for which subjects did not provide duration of stress. Thus, we analyzed 19.5 ± 17 events per patient from 6AM to 12MN. From 6 AM to 12 MN, the episodes lasted 179 ± 255 minutes with 83 % episodes being mild/moderate and 17% moderate/ severe. Number of CGM readings during daytime stress episodes were 717± 1120 compared to 8768± 1238 during non-stress periods. Impact of stress from 6 AM to 12 MN (Mid-Night) on CGM glucose was analyzed using matched paired t test. Mean glucose (160.6±41.9 vs 148.3± 28.6) and SD (53.2 ±17.7 vs 56.1±14.6) did not show a difference; however % of time spent below 70 mg/dl was less (4 ± 5) in patients during stressful periods compared to times without stress (6.3± 5.5, P value 0.02). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study attempting to analyze the impact of self-reported stress using daily stress diaries on CGM data streams in T1D patients on SAP. The study revealed significant challenges experienced by patients in reporting adequate data. Self-reported stress was not associated with hyperglycemia. However, days of self-reported stress and periods during patients reported stress were characterized by less hypoglycemia on CGM data streams.
SUN-624 Low Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Pancreas Transplantation Alone
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) patients have an increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Pancreas Transplantation Alone (PTA) in patients with T1D achieves near normal glucose control for a prolonged period but limited data are available to date regarding MACE during a 10 year follow up period after the procedure. OBJECTIVE: We studied incidence of MACE after PTA in T1D patients over a 10 year follow-up period. METHODS: Retrospectively, we studied 113 T1D recipients of PTA at Mayo Clinic, Rochester with the procedure performed between January 1998 and August 2018 and follow up of at least 1 year. Data were collected before transplantation and up to 10 year follow up after the first PTA. MACE data were gathered until primary non function, re-transplantation, or complete loss of c-peptide (<0.01ng/ml). We report vascular risk factors including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking and BMI along with MACE (defined as cardiac events as unstable angina, Myocardial Infarction (MI), need for re-vascularization, cardiac death, cerebral events as Transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, need for re-vascularization and peripheral arterial disease as need for re-vascularization, gangrene and amputation). RESULTS: Eighteen subjects had pre-transplant MACE. A total of 14 subjects had graft failure within 24 to 36 hours due to thrombosis, with 3 in pre-transplant MACE cohort and 11 in no MACE cohort. Thus, we followed 99 subjects for the development of post-transplant MACE for a period of 6.3 ± 3.6 years. T1D subjects with MACE (n=15) had baseline characteristics: Age 48± 7.8 years, gender F/M 9/6,, duration of diabetes 33 ± 12 years, BMI 26± 3.1(Kg/m2), HbA1c 9.3 ± 1.5% and C-peptide 0.09 ng/ml. 84 T1D patients without MACE were age 42 ± 10.6 years, gender F/M 55/29, duration of diabetes 26.5 ± 10.7 years, BMI 26 ± 5.2(Kg/m2), HbA1c 6.7 ± 2.5 and C-peptide 0.09 ng/ml. There are a total of 584 person-years of follow up to first MACE event and 632 person-years of graft failure, death or last follow-up. Nine patients developed 11 MACE events post-PTA. Therefore, the event rate is 1.5 MACE events per 100 person-years for first MACE event and the total event rate is 1.7 MACE events per 100 person-years of follow-up. Age, smoking (yes), gender, duration of diabetes, HTN and Hyperlipidemia presence did not show any significant impact on post-transplant MACE outcome based on univariate Cox regression but the pre-transplant BMI (HR = 1.14; CI = (1.04, 1.26); p = 0.008) and pre-transplant HbA1c (HR = 1.26; CI = (1.06, 1.51); p = 0.01) showed statistically significant impact. CONCLUSIONS: At our center, MACE is low in PTA recipients. There is no impact of presence of pre-transplant MACE on development of post-transplant MACE but pre-transplant BMI and HbA1c account for risk of MACE.
Competing Risk Analysis in Renal Allograft Survival: A New Perspective to an Old Problem
Background. Graft survival after kidney transplant (KTX) is often estimated by the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method censoring for competing endpoints, primarily death. This method overestimates the incidence of graft loss. Methods. In 3157 adult KTX recipients followed for a mean of 79.2 months, we compared kidney and patient survival probabilities by KM versus competing risk analysis (CRA). These methods are extended to comparing different regression methods. Results. Compared with CRA, the probabilities of death and graft loss (censored for the other outcome) were substantially higher by KM. These differences increased with increasing follow-up time. Importantly, differences in graft losses were magnified in subgroups with greater probabilities of death. Among recipients with diabetes, the probabilities of graft loss at 20 years were 57% by KM and 32% by CRA, while for non-diabetes mellitus corresponding values were 44% and 35%. Similar results are noted when comparing older versus younger recipients. Finally, we find that the Fine-Gray method assumptions are violated when using age and gender as covariates and that the alternative method of Aalen-Johansen may be more appropriate. Conclusions. CRA provides more accurate estimates of long-term graft survival and death, particularly in subgroups of recipients with higher rates of the competing event. Overestimation of risk by KM leads to both quantitative and qualitative misinterpretations of long-term KTX outcomes. When using regression analyses, care should be taken to check assumptions to guide the choice of appropriate method.
Brain amyloid, cortical thickness, and changes in activities of daily living
AbstractObjectiveTo examine the association of baseline elevated brain amyloid and neurodegeneration with changes in activities of daily living in participants without dementia (ND; i.e., cognitively unimpaired and participants with mild cognitive impairment) at baseline in the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.MethodsWe included 1747 ND participants with 11C‐PiB PET and MR imaging in the study, with data on activities of daily living (as assessed by the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and the Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes for functional domains (CDR‐SOB (functional)), with a median (range) of 4.3 (0.0–12.7) years of follow‐up. Abnormal (elevated; A+) 11C‐PiB‐PET retention ratio was defined as standardized uptake value ratio ≥ 1.48, and abnormal (reduced) AD signature cortical thickness as ≤ 2.68 mm (neurodegeneration; N+). Associations were examined with mixed effects models, adjusting for age, sex, education, apolipoprotein E ε4 allele carrier status, and global cognitive z‐score.ResultsMean age (SD) was 71.4 years (10.1), 46.7% were females, 195 (11.2%) had A+N‐, 442 (25.3%) had A‐N+, and 339 (19.4%) had A+N+ biomarkers. The A+N+ group had the largest annualized change in the FAQ score from baseline (difference in annual change A+N+ vs. A‐N‐; ß (SE): 0.80 (0.07)); associations were substantially attenuated when a time‐varying global cognitive composite was included in the model (A+N+ vs. A‐N‐; ß (SE): 0.31 (0.05)). CDR‐SOB (functional) findings partly agreed with FAQ score findings.InterpretationThe longitudinal increase in functional limitations is greater for individuals with abnormal neuroimaging biomarkers, especially for those with both elevated brain amyloid and neurodegeneration.