Citations

Background: There are limited data on the epidemiology and timing of in-hospital death (IHD) in patients with acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). Methods: Adult admissions with AMI-CS with IHDs were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (2000–2016) and were classified as early (≤2 days), mid-term (3–7 days), and late (>7 days). Inter-hospital transfers and those with do-not-resuscitate statuses were excluded. The outcomes of interest included the epidemiology, temporal trends and predictors for IHD timing. Results: IHD was noted in 113,349 AMI-CS admissions (median time to IHD 3 (interquartile range 1–7) days), with early, mid-term and late IHD in 44%, 32% and 24%, respectively. Compared to the mid-term and late groups, the early IHD group had higher rates of ST-segment-elevation AMI-CS (74%, 63%, 60%) and cardiac arrest (37%, 33%, 29%), but lower rates of acute organ failure (68%, 79%, 89%), use of coronary angiography (45%, 56%, 67%), percutaneous coronary intervention (33%, 36%, 42%), and mechanical circulatory support (31%, 39%, 50%) (all p < 0.001). There was a temporal increase in the early (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for 2016 vs. 2000 2.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.22–2.78)) and a decrease in mid-term (aOR 0.75 (95% CI 0.71–0.79)) and late (aOR 0.34 (95% CI 0.31–0.37)) IHD. ST-segment-elevation AMI-CS and cardiac arrest were associated with the increased risk of early IHD, whereas advanced comorbidity and acute organ failure were associated with late IHD. Conclusions: Early IHD after AMI-CS has increased between 2000 and 2016. The populations with early vs. late IHD were systematically different.

Objectives: To characterize the association between the use of physiologic assessment (central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, passive leg raise test, and critical care ultrasound) with fluid and vasopressor administration 24 hours after shock onset and with in-hospital mortality. Design: Multicenter prospective cohort study between September 2017 and February 2018. Settings: Thirty-four hospitals in the United States and Jordan. Patients: Consecutive adult patients requiring admission to the ICU with systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg, mean arterial blood pressure less than or equal to 65 mm Hg, or need for vasopressor. Interventions: None. Measurement and Main Results: Of 1,639 patients enrolled, 39% had physiologic assessments. Use of physiologic assessment was not associated with cumulative fluid administered within 24 hours of shock onset, after accounting for baseline characteristics, etiology and location of shock, ICU types, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and hospital (beta coefficient, 0.04; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.15). In multivariate analysis, the use of physiologic assessment was associated with a higher likelihood of vasopressor use (adjusted odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.45−2.71) and higher 24-hour cumulative vasopressor dosing as norepinephrine equivalent (beta coefficient, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19−0.55). The use of vasopressor was associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.27−2.78). In-hospital mortality was not associated with the use of physiologic assessment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63−1.18). Conclusions: The use of physiologic assessment in the 24 hours after shock onset is associated with increased use of vasopressor but not with fluid administration.

Background: We aimed to describe the incidence of hospital-acquired dyschloremia and its association with in-hospital mortality in general hospitalized patients. Methods: All hospitalized patients from 2009 to 2013 who had normal admission serum chloride and at least two serum chloride measurements in the hospital were studied. The normal range of serum chloride was defined as 100–108 mmol/L. Hospital serum chloride levels were grouped based on the occurrence of hospital-acquired hypochloremia and hyperchloremia. The association of hospital-acquired hypochloremia and hyperchloremia with in-hospital mortality was analyzed using logistic regression. Results: Among the total of 39,298 hospitalized patients, 59% had persistently normal hospital serum chloride levels, 21% had hospital-acquired hypochloremia only, 15% had hospital-acquired hyperchloremia only, and 5% had both hypochloremia and hyperchloremia. Compared with patients with persistently normal hospital serum chloride levels, hospital-acquired hyperchloremia only (odds ratio or OR 2.84; p < 0.001) and both hospital-acquired hypochloremia and hyperchloremia (OR 1.72; p = 0.004) were associated with increased in-hospital mortality, whereas hospital-acquired hypochloremia only was not (OR 0.91; p = 0.54). Conclusions: Approximately 40% of hospitalized patients developed serum chloride derangements. Hospital-acquired hyperchloremia, but not hypochloremia, was associated with increased in-hospital mortality.

Abstract Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) carries a poor prognosis. Its incidence is increasing in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our purpose in this study is to develop and externally validate a model for predicting AKI in the ICU using patient data present prior to ICU admission. Methods We used data of 98 472 adult ICU admissions at Mayo Clinic between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2017 and 51 801 encounters from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) cohort. A gradient-boosting model was trained on 80% of the Mayo Clinic cohort using a set of features to predict AKI acquired in the ICU. Results AKI was identified in 39 307 (39.9%) encounters in the Mayo Clinic cohort. Patients who developed AKI in the ICU were older and had higher ICU and in-hospital mortality compared to patients without AKI. A 30-feature model yielded an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.690 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.682–0.697] in the Mayo Clinic cohort set and 0.656 (95% CI 0.648–0.664) in the MIMIC-III cohort. Conclusions Using machine learning, AKI among ICU patients can be predicted using information available prior to admission. This model is independent of ICU information, making it valuable for stratifying patients at admission.

ABSTRACT Background: Lactate is a prognostic marker in critically ill patients, although currently available illness severity scores do not include lactate as a predictive parameter. We sought to describe the association between lactate and hospital mortality in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) with cardiac arrest (CA) and shock. Methods: Retrospective observational analysis of Mayo Clinic CICU patients admitted from 2007 to 2018 with measured lactate on admission, including patients with and without CA or shock. We examined hospital mortality as a function of admission lactate in patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of hospital mortality. Results: We included 3,042 patients with a median age of 70 years (IQR 60–80), including 41% females, 26% with CA, and 39% with shock. The median APACHE-IV predicted mortality was 24% (IQR 11–51%), and the median admission lactate was 1.8 mmol/L (IQR 1.1–3.0). Hospital mortality occurred in 23% of patients and rose progressively with higher admission lactate, including in patients with and without CA or shock. After multivariable adjustment for clinical characteristics, therapies, and illness severity, a higher lactate remained associated with increased hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.13 per mmol/L, 95% CI 1.06–1.20, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Admission lactate levels are strongly associated with increased hospital mortality among CICU patients, including those with and without CA or shock. The prognostic value of lactate levels is independent of established ICU prognostic scores and dependent on admission diagnosis, which may help inform clinicians caring for CICU patients.

This study aimed to assess the one-year mortality risk based on discharge serum chloride among the hospital survivors. We analyzed a cohort of adult hospital survivors at a tertiary referral hospital from 2011 through 2013. We categorized discharge serum chloride; ≤96, 97–99, 100–102, 103–105, 106–108, and ≥109 mmoL/L. We performed Cox proportional hazard analysis to assess the association of discharge serum chloride with one-year mortality after hospital discharge, using discharge serum chloride of 103–105 mmoL/L as the reference group. Of 56,907 eligible patients, 9%, 14%, 26%, 28%, 16%, and 7% of patients had discharge serum chloride of ≤96, 97–99, 100–102, 103–105, 106–108, and ≥109 mmoL/L, respectively. We observed a U-shaped association of discharge serum chloride with one-year mortality, with nadir mortality associated with discharge serum chloride of 103–105 mmoL/L. When adjusting for potential confounders, including discharge serum sodium, discharge serum bicarbonate, and admission serum chloride, one-year mortality was significantly higher in both discharge serum chloride ≤99 hazard ratio (HR): 1.45 and 1.94 for discharge serum chloride of 97–99 and ≤96 mmoL/L, respectively; p < 0.001) and ≥109 mmoL/L (HR: 1.41; p < 0.001), compared with discharge serum chloride of 103–105 mmoL/L. The mortality risk did not differ when discharge serum chloride ranged from 100 to 108 mmoL/L. Of note, there was a significant interaction between admission and discharge serum chloride on one-year mortality. Serum chloride at hospital discharge in the optimal range of 100–108 mmoL/L predicted the favorable survival outcome. Both hypochloremia and hyperchloremia at discharge were associated with increased risk of one-year mortality, independent of admission serum chloride, discharge serum sodium, and serum bicarbonate.

AIMS To report the major characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with ACE inhibitors and ARBs and compare the different effects of the two drugs for outcomes of COVID-19 patients. METHODS This is a retrospective, two-center case series of 198 consecutive COVID-19 patients with a history of hypertension. RESULTS Among 198 patients, 58 (29.3%) and 16 (8.1%) were on were on ARB and ACEI, respectively. Patients who were on ARB or ACEI/ARB had a significantly lower rate of severe illness and ARDS when compared with patients treated with ACEI alone or not receiving RAAS blocker (P＜0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that patients with ARB in their antihypertensive regimen had a trend towards a higher survival rate when compared with individuals without ARB (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.07-1.02; P=0.054). The occurrence rates of severe illness, ARDS, and death were similar in the two groups regardless of receiving ACEI. The Cox-regression analysis to compared ACEI vs. ARB groups showed a significantly lower mortality rate in the ARB group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.00-0.58; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Our data may provide some evidence of using ARB, but not ACEI, was associated with a reduced rate of severe illness and ARDS, indicating their potential protective impact in COVID-19. Further large sample sizes and multiethnic populations are warranted to confirm our findings.