Citations

Abstract Context Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely prescribed for type 2 diabetes and obesity and can lead to substantial weight loss. In patients taking levothyroxine, weight loss can reduce thyroid hormone requirements and potentially associated adverse effects. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) monitoring is essential but unclear whether thyroid function is routinely reassessed after GLP-1 RAs initiation. Objective Examine the changes in the timing of TSH testing after GLP-1 RAs. Design Retrospective cohort study emulating a target trial using Medicare from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020. The primary analysis followed an intention-to-treat approach. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scores. Logistic regression models and informed by least absolute shrinkage operator variable selection were used. Setting The 15% sample of U.S. Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Patients or Other Participants Adults aged ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes on a stable levothyroxine dose at baseline. Intervention(s) Initiation of GLP-1 RAs vs initiation/ongoing use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is). Main Outcome Measure(s) TSH testing during follow-up. Results Among 5370 matched patients, the mean age was 73.2 years. 71.6% were women, and 87.1% were White. Approximately 83.0% of patients in both treatment groups receive a TSH testing within a 1-year follow-up. The mean time to TSH testing was approximately 130.5 days for both groups. Conclusion TSH testing patterns did not differ between GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2is, despite the greater likelihood of requiring levothyroxine dose adjustment associated with weight loss seen with GLP-1 RA therapy. Given levothyroxine's widespread use, this gap suggests missed opportunities for timely and weight-responsive thyroid monitoring.

PURPOSE The primary objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase II study (Alliance A221805) was to screen two doses of duloxetine for preventing sensory oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). METHODS Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive once daily 30 mg duloxetine, 60 mg duloxetine, or placebo. Eligible participants had stage II to III colorectal cancer and no baseline neuropathy, had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, were age 25 years and older, and received oxaliplatin via one of the following doses and schedules: 85 mg/m 2 every 2 weeks (6 or 12 doses) or 130 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks (4 doses). Duloxetine/placebo was taken once daily beginning day 1 of cycle 1 and continued for 17 weeks. The primary end point, a composite response reflecting sensory OIPN symptom severity and onset, was measured in weeks 19-21 using a validated participant-reported outcome survey assessing extremity numbness, tingling, and pain. Response was defined as a participant-reported highest score of ≤2 (ie, 1 = not at all; 2 = a little) on survey items. To be evaluable for the response end point, eligible participants must have initiated oxaliplatin and submitted ≥1 postbaseline OIPN survey. RESULTS Of the 199 participants (n = 66, 30 mg duloxetine; n = 66, 60 mg duloxetine; n = 67, placebo), 46, 47, and 50 (N = 143, 71.8%), respectively, were evaluable for primary end point analysis based on modified intention-to-treat criteria. Participant mean age was 55.1 years (standard deviation = 10.4). Most were White (n = 113, 80.7%) and male (n = 82, 58.6%). The proportion of responders among those receiving placebo (68.0%) was similar to those receiving duloxetine 30 mg (65.2%) or 60 mg (66.0%). Duloxetine adherence rates, measured via pill counts—30 mg (54%), 60 mg (57%), and placebo (59%) groups—were low (<75%). CONCLUSION Duloxetine is not more promising than placebo for preventing sensory OIPN.

ABSTRACT Cataract is a leading cause of visual impairment worldwide, and its prevalence is increasing with population aging. The majority are age‐related cataracts (ARC), clinically classified into nuclear, cortical, and posterior subcapsular cataracts (PSC) by opacity location. Mechanisms of cataractogenesis remain incompletely understood. While cortical and nuclear cataracts are largely attributed to crystallin aggregation, such protein‐centric mechanisms fail to explain the early onset and axial location of PSC. Morphologically, PSC resembles posterior capsule opacification (PCO), a secondary cataract driven by epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) of lens epithelial cells (LECs), suggesting LEC‐EMT may also contribute to PSC. Using clinically stratified human lens samples, we confirmed EMT marker expression across PSC subtypes. Transcriptomic profiling revealed that LECs, the lens's sole metabolically active cells, in age‐related PSC (ARC‐PSC), compared with age‐related nuclear cataract (ANC) and clear lenses, exhibit elevated EMT signatures tightly linked to senescence‐associated inflammatory signaling. Aqueous humor (AqH) profiling demonstrated a pro‐inflammatory milieu across PSC subtypes, with IL‐17A uniquely elevated in ARC‐PSC, consistent with transcriptomic findings. Integrated analyses support a model in which senescence functions as an upstream driver, whereby senescent LECs release SASP factors, including IL‐17A, that activate NF‐κB signaling to amplify inflammation, reinforce senescence, and drive EMT. In vitro, senolysis and IL‐17A blockade disrupted this loop, attenuating senescence‐ and EMT‐associated phenotypes. Collectively, our study demonstrates that senescent LECs sustain an IL‐17A–NF‐κB circuit that drives EMT and accelerates ARC‐PSC progression, positioning ARC‐PSC as a unique human context to study senescence‐induced epithelial remodeling in aging tissues.

Abstract In many cancers, a major barrier to effective immunotherapy is the dominance of tumor-associated myeloid cells (TAMs), which establish a profoundly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). This challenge is particularly pronounced in glioblastoma (GBM), where myeloid cells represent the predominant immune population and actively suppress antitumor immunity. Identifying targets that can reprogram TAMs from an immunosuppressive state toward a pro-inflammatory, antigen-presenting phenotype remains a critical unmet need. Here, we identify the voltage-gated proton channel Hv1 as an immune-restricted regulator of glioma-associated macrophage function. Hv1 is notable not only for its immune-specific expression but also for its established roles in central nervous system (CNS) pathologies, where Hv1 depletion alters microglial and macrophage polarization, reduces myeloid accumulation, dampens inflammatory cytokine production, and limits secondary tissue damage. However, Hv1’s role in shaping the GBM immune landscape—particularly in vivo—has remained poorly understood due to low Hvcn1 transcript abundance and the lack of reliable antibodies and genetic tools. Given the dominance of myeloid cells in GBM and their central role in tumor immune regulation, we sought to define Hv1 function within this highly immunosuppressive brain TME. Analysis of patient datasets revealed that elevated Hv1 expression correlates with poor clinical prognosis. Consistently, Hv1 loss significantly prolonged survival in multiple murine glioma models. Using in vivo two-photon imaging and spectral flow cytometry, we show that Hv1 depletion reprograms TAMs toward an anti-tumor phenotype characterized by enhanced tumor cell phagocytosis, improved antigen presentation, and increased T cell infiltration. By generating new Hv1 reporter and conditional mouse lines, we further demonstrate that tumor-associated microglia and infiltrating macrophages are the principal sources of Hv1 and markedly upregulate its expression in response to glioma. Notably, selective deletion of Hv1 in infiltrating macrophages phenocopied the survival benefit observed with global Hv1 loss. Mechanistically, using mass spectrometry and genetic models, we identify the Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) as a previously unrecognized binding partner of Hv1, placing Hv1 within the STING signaling pathway, a central regulator of innate and adaptive immune responses. Together, these findings fill a critical gap in understanding myeloid Hv1 function in GBM and identify Hv1 as a promising target for reprogramming the tumor immune microenvironment. Citation Format: Jiaying Zheng, Lingxiao Wang, Shunyi Zhao, Katayoun Ayasoufi, Meijie Wang, Praveen N. Pallegar, Peter R. Strege, Langni Liu, Yushan Wan, Wenjing Zhang, Emma N. Goddery, Manling Xie, Arthur Beyder, Aaron J. Johnson, Long-Jun Wu. Myeloid Hv1-STING axis tunes glioma immunity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Brain Cancer; 2026 Mar 23-25; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(6_Suppl):Abstract nr A016.

Abstract Purpose: The Pancreatic Cancer Detection Consortium (PCDC) performed a blinded Early Detection Research Network–defined phase II biomarker bakeoff study of blood-based biomarker panels. The aims were to evaluate panel performance, to compare the panels’ performance with that of cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) alone, and to evaluate the performance of new combinations of the individual biomarkers. Experimental Design: Ten biomarkers representing eight biomarker panels and CA19-9 were evaluated using plasma, serum, and germline DNA from 140 stage I to IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases and 140 controls from three tertiary care institutions, with controls frequency matched to cases on age and sex. LASSO regression was employed to explore new biomarker combinations. The primary metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The study population was 51% female, with median age 67.3 (minimum: 45, maximum: 90) years. Biomarker panel AUCs ranged from 89.9 to 96.3; the AUC for serum CA19-9 alone was 91.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 87.8–95.6]. Two panels had significantly higher AUCs than serum CA19-9 alone, the CA19-9/FUT2/3 panel (AUC = 96.3, P = 0.002), and the tissue factor pathway inhibitor/tenascin C (TFPI/TNC-FNIII-C) panel (AUC = 95, P = 0.01). Exploratory models to recombine biomarkers retained all but two biomarkers [optimism-corrected AUC = 96.4 (94–98.9)]. Conclusions: The CA19-9/FUT2/3 panel was the best performing panel in this biomarker bakeoff. Its evaluation in larger studies is warranted. Biomarker bakeoffs are an effective strategy for comparing the performance of promising biomarkers for pancreatic cancer early detection, and the PCDC is well poised to conduct such studies. Recommendations for performing such studies are provided.

ABSTRACT Background Antiplatelet management in patients hospitalised for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires balancing risks of rebleeding and clinical vascular events. Aims Evaluate the impact of antiplatelet resumption timing post‐endoscopy on rebleeding and clinical vascular events. Methods We performed a retrospective nationwide cohort study of patients hospitalised with post‐PCI GIB on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using the Vizient Clinical Database. Co‐primary outcomes were 30‐day rebleeding and 90‐day clinical vascular events after endoscopy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed. Results Among 2979 patients with both antiplatelet agents held before endoscopy for GIB (46.0% upper; 34.8% lower), antiplatelet resumption > 7 days post‐endoscopy was associated with decreased 30‐day rebleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.49–0.87]) and increased 90‐day clinical vascular events (HR 1.18 [1.02–1.36]) compared to restarting ≤ 1 day post‐endoscopy. Among 869 patients with one antiplatelet agent held before endoscopy for GIB (47.3% upper; 36.3% lower), resumption at > 7 days vs. ≤ 1 day had HR 0.69 (0.41–1.14) for rebleeding and HR 1.41 (0.97–2.04) for clinical vascular events. HRs for antiplatelet resumption > 3 days vs. ≤ 1 day post‐endoscopy were similar. Conclusions Antiplatelet resumption > 7 days after endoscopy in patients hospitalised with post‐PCI GIB is associated with decreased 30‐day rebleeding but increased 90‐day clinical vascular events compared with resumption ≤ 1 day post‐endoscopy. Similar tradeoffs were noted with antiplatelet resumption > 3 days post‐endoscopy. To optimise competing risks of rebleeding versus clinical vascular events, antiplatelet therapy should be resumed no later than 7 days post‐endoscopy, and preferably within 3–4 days.

Abstract Lentigo maligna (LM) is a subtype of cutaneous melanoma in situ that develops on chronically sun‐damaged skin in elderly individuals. Its diagnosis and management remain challenging due to its slow progression, frequent occurrence on cosmetically sensitive areas in frail individuals, and tendency for subclinical peripheral extension. Despite its potential for invasive transformation, the natural history of LM remains incompletely understood and evidence‐based management strategies for this specific entity remain limited. This work aims to bridge the gap between scarce high‐quality evidence and the clinicians' need for practical guidance on LM management by formulating evidence‐based and expert consensus‐driven recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Under the coordination of the International Dermoscopy Society, a global, multidisciplinary consortium of 53 experts—including dermatologists, dermato‐oncologists, dermatologic surgeons, radiologists, radiotherapists, pathologists and epidemiologists—formulated recommendations through structured consensus, informed by a comprehensive review of current scientific evidence and clinical practice standards. Optimal management of LM requires accurate diagnosis and individualized treatment planning. Non‐invasive skin imaging techniques, especially dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy, aid in diagnosis, biopsy orientation, lesion delineation and post‐treatment monitoring. Multiple partial biopsies help confirm diagnosis and rule out invasion. Complete surgical excision remains the first treatment option. No definitive safety margins can be recommended for standard surgery; margin‐controlled techniques are preferable for large or ill‐defined lesions. Topical imiquimod and radiotherapy are effective alternatives where surgery is unsuitable. Topical imiquimod is useful as primary, adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Blind destructive methods should be avoided. Close clinical and imaging follow‐up is needed. Patient‐centred care, shared decision‐making, and a multidisciplinary approach are critical for optimal outcomes. These international consensus recommendations summarize current best practices for LM management, offering practical, evidence‐informed guidance to clinicians while acknowledging the potential of future research in refining these conclusions.

Cellular and molecular heterogeneity in the liver has been increasingly recognized to drive liver fibrosis progression, but the particular events that occur initially in response to liver injury and trigger immune cell recruitment remain unclear. Here, we identify epigenetically aberrant liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) as key players in this process. Mechanistically, the epigenetic readers like bromodomain-containing protein 4–dependent (BRD4-dependent) super enhancers (SEs) activate proinflammatory genes, including promyelocytic leukemia (PML). The PML protein, in turn, binds BRD4 and amplifies proinflammatory angiocrine signaling through phase separation–dependent SE activation via PML/BRD4 condensate formation. In mouse models, LSEC-specific depletion of the PML/BRD4 complex mitigates liver inflammation and fibrosis. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals that epigenetically aberrant LSECs exhibit a reprogrammed proinflammatory angiocrine landscape in mouse fibrotic livers. TIMP1 + LSECs promote the recruitment of CD63 + monocyte–derived macrophages (MoMFs) during liver fibrosis progression. Thereby, PML/BRD4 in LSECs governs inflammatory immune cell recruitment in liver fibrosis. Pharmacological BRD4 inhibition or epigenetic PML-SE repression alleviates liver inflammation and fibrosis. In conclusion, PML/BRD4-mediated SE activation via phase separation drives proinflammatory angiocrine signaling in LSECs, initiating the inflammatory cascade and subsequent immune cell recruitment during liver fibrosis.