Citations

ABSTRACT Introduction Studies of erectile dysfunction (ED) therapies typically assess erectile function end- points, although other treatment outcomes may also be of value to men and their partners. Aim To examine the treatment sensitivity of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS) associated with the use of two phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors with different duration of action. Methods Men with ED were recruited from three clinical trials of tadalafil and sildenafil citrate to complete post-treatment questionnaires that included the PAIRS. In Study 1, the PAIRS was assessed after 6 months of open-label tadalafil (20 mg) treatment and after 2 months of real-world sildenafil use (25–100 mg). In studies 2 and 3, the PAIRS was assessed at the end of the trial assessment phase. In Study 2, men with a 6–24 week history of sildenafil use (25–100 mg) received 3 weeks of open-label sildenafil treatment (dosage at study entry), and then switched to 9 weeks of tadalafil treatment. In Study 3, a double-blind, crossover study, men were randomized to 12 weeks of either tadalafil (20 mg) or sildenafil (50 mg) treatment, followed by 12 weeks of the alternate treatment; PAIRS scores for the second treatment period were evaluated. Main Outcome Measure Treatment outcomes were assessed with the PAIRS, a new reliable and valid self-report measure of sexual self-confidence, spontaneity, and time concerns before sex. Results Significant mean differences were observed on all PAIRS domain scores associated with tadalafil and sildenafil treatment. Across studies, men had significantly higher sexual self-confidence and spontaneity scores, and lower time concerns scores in reference to tadalafil compared with their scores in reference to sildenafil. Conclusions Mean differences observed on PAIRS domains across studies support the sensitivity of the measure to differentiate between these two ED treatments.

ABSTRACT Introduction The optimal approach for identification and evaluation of the sexual problems in men and women in primary care or general medicine practice has not been consensed. Aim To provide recommendations/guidelines concerning state-of-the-art knowledge for clinical evaluation and management strategies in the evaluation and treatment of sexual dysfunction in men and women, emphasizing evidence-based medicine and a patient-centered framework. Methods An International Consultation in collaboration with the major urology and sexual medicine associations assembled over 200 multidisciplinary experts from 60 countries into 17 committees. Committee members established specific objectives and scopes for various male and female sexual medicine topics. The recommendations concerning state-of-the-art knowledge in the respective sexual medicine topic represent the opinion of experts from five continents developed in a process over a 2-year period. Concerning the Clinical Evaluation and Management Strategies Committee, there were 12 experts from five countries. Main Outcome Measure Expert opinion was based on grading of evidence-based medical literature, widespread internal committee discussion, public presentation and debate. Results Three concepts underlie sexual medicine management: (i) adoption of a patient-centered framework for evaluation and treatment; (ii) application of the principles of evidence-based medicine in diagnostic and treatment planning; and (iii) use of a unified management approach in men and women. When taken together, these three principles provide a balanced and integrated approach to sexual dysfunction management. Common algorithms for diagnosis and management of men and women with sexual dysfunction, brief sexual symptom checklists, basics in history and physical examination, indications for specialized referral and development of a follow-up strategy are presented. Conclusions More research is needed in understanding the role of evidence-based and patient-centered medicine in the clinical evaluation and management strategies of men and women with sexual dysfunction.

Background and Purpose— The natural history of perihematomal edema in human hyperacute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has not been well described. Methods— This study was a secondary analysis of a previously reported prospective, population-based study of hematoma growth in 142 patients with spontaneous ICH. Patients were first imaged within 3 hours of onset, then 1 and 20 hours later. We excluded patients with anticoagulant use (n=7), underlying aneurysm/vascular malformation (n=9), trauma (n=1), incomplete data (n=20), infratentorial ICH (n=17), and no consent (n=2), leaving an overall study population of 86 patients. From this overall group we further excluded patients with intraventricular extension (n=38), subsequent surgery (n=5), or death (n=2) before 20-hour postbaseline CT. This second, “restricted” analysis group of 41 patients was relatively devoid of clinical or radiological variables likely to confound edema measurement. Absolute and relative edema volumes (edema volume divided by hematoma volume) were descriptively summarized. Correlations between baseline edema volumes and relevant clinical and radiological variables were then performed. Results— Overall, median absolute edema volume increased from 6.93 to 14.4 cm 3 during the first 24 hours after ICH, and median relative edema volume increased from 0.47 to 0.81. In the restricted group, median absolute edema volume was 7.4 cm 3 at baseline and 11.0 cm 3 at 24 hours after ICH, and median relative edema volume increased from 0.55 to 0.81. Baseline relative edema volume was significantly negatively correlated with subsequent change in relative edema volume from baseline to 20-hour CT ( r =0.57, P =0.0002) but was not significantly correlated with other clinical and radiological variables, including hematoma volume or change in hematoma volume. Conclusions— Perihematomal edema volume increases by approximately 75% during the first 24 hours after hyperacute spontaneous ICH. Patients with the least amounts of baseline relative edema volume were most likely to develop significant additional amounts of edema during the first 24 hours after spontaneous ICH.

Background and Purpose— Little is known about the relationship between perihematomal edema in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine whether absolute or relative edema volume (edema volume divided by hematoma volume) predicts mortality or functional outcome in patients with hyperacute spontaneous ICH. We hypothesized that increasing baseline relative edema volume is associated with greater probability of poor functional outcome. Methods— This was a secondary analysis of a prospective, population-based study of hematoma growth in 142 patients with spontaneous ICH. Patients were imaged within 3 hours of onset, then 1 and 20 hours later. Our primary analysis excluded patients with anticoagulant use (n=7), underlying aneurysm/vascular malformation (n=9), trauma (n=1), incomplete data (n=20), infratentorial ICH (n=17), intraventricular extension (n=38), and no consent (n=2). We analyzed whether associations existed between baseline edema volumes or other clinical/radiological variables and either 12-week modified Rankin Scale score >2 or 30-day mortality. Secondary analyses used 20-hour CT scan data, all patients with supratentorial ICH, and 12-week Barthel Index score <85. Results— By multivariable logistic regression analysis, baseline relative edema was the strongest independent predictor of functional outcome and was associated with lesser odds of poor 3-month functional outcome (odds ratio, 0.09 per 1.0-unit [100%] increase; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.64; P =0.016) and 12-week Barthel Index score <85 (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.91; P =0.039) but did not predict mortality. Secondary analyses confirmed this result. Absolute edema volume predicted neither mortality nor functional outcome. Conclusions— Relative edema is strongly predictive of functional outcome in patients with hyperacute supratentorial spontaneous ICH without intraventricular extension.