Citations

Abstract Aims Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is an important determinant of functional status and survival in various diseases states. Data are sparse on the epidemiology and outcome of patients with severe RVD. This study examined the characteristics, aetiology, and survival of patients with severe RVD. Methods and results Retrospective study of consecutive patients with severe RVD diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) between 2011 and 2015 in a single tertiary referral institution. Patients with prior cardiac surgery, mechanical assist devices, and congenital heart disease were excluded. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. In 64 728 patients undergoing TTE, the prevalence of ≥mild RVD was 21%. This study focused on the cohort of 1299 (4%) patients with severe RVD; age 64 ± 16 years; 61% male. The most common causes of severe RVD were left-sided heart diseases (46%), pulmonary thromboembolic disease (18%), chronic lung disease/hypoxia (CLD; 17%), and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH; 11%). After 2 ± 2 years of follow-up, 701 deaths occurred, 66% within the first year of diagnosis. The overall probability of survival at 1- and 5 years for the entire cohort were 61% [95% confidence interval (CI) 58–64%] and 35% (95% CI 31–38%), respectively. In left-sided heart diseases, 1- and 5-year survival rates were 61% (95% CI 57–65%) and 33% (95% CI 28–37%), respectively; vs. 76% (95% CI 68–82%) and 50% (95% CI 40–59%) in PAH, vs. 71% (95% CI 64–76%) and 49% (95% CI 41–58%) in thromboembolic diseases, vs. 42% (95% CI 35–49%) and 8% (95% CI 4–15%) in CLD (log-rank P < 0.0001). Presence of ≥moderate tricuspid regurgitation portended worse survival in severe RVD. Conclusion One-year mortality of patients with severe RVD was high (∼40%) and dependent on the aetiology of RVD. Left-sided heart diseases is the most common cause of severe RVD but prognosis was worst in CLD.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Mayo Clinic Background Variability in Doppler signals is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF is common in low-gradient AS (LGAS). Presence of high single beat Doppler signals (peak velocity ≥4m/s or mean gradient ≥40mmHg) is not factored into decision-making in low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS). Objective Determine prevalence of at least one high Doppler signal in AF LGAS and its relationship to computed tomography aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) versus sinus rhythm (SR) high-gradient aortic stenosis (HGAS). Methods Consecutive patients with aortic valve area ≤1cm2 and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% during echo were identified (January 1, 2012-December 31, 2016). At least three consecutive Doppler signals were averaged in sinus rhythm (SR) and five in atrial fibrillation (AF). Results Of 1,854 patients, age 76± 11 years, male 52%, 301/1,854 (16%) were in AF and LGAS was present in 122/301 (41%). At least one high Doppler signal in AF LGAS was present in 43/122 (35%). AVCS within 1 year of echo was available for 36% of patient with SR HGAS and 34% of AS LGAS. Median AVCS was not different in SR HGAS 2424 (IQR 1623, 3445) vs AF LGAS with at least one high Doppler signal 2509 [IQR1547, 3119], p =0.10 AVCS threshold for severe AS (men >2000 women >1200) was met in 80% SR HGAS vs 86% AF LGAS with high signals. Conclusions High Doppler signals in AF LGAS are associated with high AVCS more frequently exceeding thresholds for severe AS. Single-beat high Doppler signals instead of the average correlate better with AVCS and classic HGAS.

Abstract Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) causes left ventricular (LV) pressure overload, leading to adverse LV remodeling and dysfunction. Identifying early subclinical markers of LV dysfunction in patients with significant AS is critical as this could provide support for earlier intervention, which may result in improved long-term outcomes. We therefore examined the impact of severe AS and its consequent increase in LV afterload on myocardial deformation and rotational mechanics by 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography. Methods: We prospectively measured various strain parameters in 168 patients (42% female, mean age 72±12 years) with severe AS and LV ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%, and compared them to normal values found in literature. 2D and 3D images were analyzed for global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain (GRS), basal rotation, apical rotation, and peak systolic twist. We further assessed the degree of concordance between 2D and 3D strain, and examined their association with measures of LV preload and afterload. Results: Patients with severe AS exhibited significantly lower GLS and GRS but higher GCS, apical rotation, and twist by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared with published normal values (P=0.003 for 3D twist,P<0.001 for all others). Agreement between 2D- and 3D-GLS by concordance correlation coefficient was 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.57). GLS was correlated with valvulo-arterial impedance, a measure of LV afterload (r=0.34, p<0.001 and r=0.23, p=0.003, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with severe AS demonstrated lower-than-normal GLS and GRS but appear to compensate with higher-than-normal GCS, apical rotation, and twist in order to maintain a preserved LVEF. GLS showed a modest correlation with valvulo-arterial impedance.

ABSTRACT Aims Mild to moderate functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) where it is usually considered as an innocent bystander. We hypothesized that MR in HFpEF reflects greater left atrial (LA) myopathy, leading to more adverse haemodynamics and poorer exercise reserve. Methods and results Patients with HFpEF (n = 280) with and without MR underwent echocardiography, invasive haemodynamic exercise testing, and expired gas analysis. As compared to non-MR-HFpEF (n = 163), patients with MR-HFpEF (n = 117; 78 mild and 39 moderate, central jet in 90%) were older, more likely female, with lower body mass and higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). HFpEF patients with MR displayed greater LA volume, reduced LA strain and compliance, and greater mitral annular dilatation, which was strongly correlated with LA dilatation (r = 0.63, P &lt; 0.0001) but was only weakly related to left ventricular remodelling (r = 0.37). Patients with MR-HFpEF displayed worse biventricular function, more adverse pulmonary haemodynamics, impaired pulmonary vasodilatation, blunted right ventricular reserve, and reduced cardiac output with exercise as compared to non-MR-HFpEF. Importantly, these findings were maintained after excluding patients with HFpEF and AF, suggesting a role for LA myopathy in contributing to MR in HFpEF, independent of rhythm. Conclusions Functional MR in patients with HFpEF reflects LA myopathy, even in the absence of AF, and is associated with greater haemodynamic severity of disease and poorer functional capacity. Further study is required to better define causal mechanisms and potential treatments for MR and LA dysfunction in patients with HFpEF.

Abstract Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) causes left ventricular (LV) pressure overload, leading to adverse LV remodeling and dysfunction. We examined the impact of severe AS and its consequent increase in LV afterload on myocardial deformation and rotational mechanics by 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography. Methods: We prospectively measured various strain parameters in 168 patients (42% female, mean age 72±12 years) with severe AS and LV ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%, and compared them to normal values found in literature. 2D and 3D images were analyzed for global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain (GRS), basal rotation, apical rotation, and peak systolic twist. We further assessed the degree of concordance between 2D and 3D strain, and examined their association with measures of LV preload and afterload. Results: Patients with severe AS exhibited significantly lower GLS and GRS but higher GCS, apical rotation, and twist by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared with published normal values (P=0.003 for 3D twist,P<0.001 for all others). There was modest agreement between 2D and 3D GLS measurements (concordance correlation coefficient 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.57). GLS was modestly correlated with valvulo-arterial impedance, a measure of LV afterload (r=0.34, p<0.001 for 2D and r=0.23, p=0.003 for 3D). Conclusion: Patients with severe AS demonstrate lower-than-normal GLS and GRS as a result of increased afterload but appear to compensate with higher-than-normal GCS, apical rotation, and twist in order to maintain a preserved LVEF. Our study provides, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive analysis to date of myocardial deformation and rotational mechanics by 2D and 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography in patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF.

Abstract Aims Despite improvements in cardiac haemodynamics and symptoms, long-term mortality remains increased in some patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Limited data exist on the prognostic role of left ventricular (LV) chamber stiffening in these patients. Methods and results We performed a retrospective analysis in 1893 patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for AVR. LV end-diastolic pressure–volume relations (EDPVR, P = αV^β) were reconstructed from echocardiographic measurements of end-diastolic volumes and estimates of end-diastolic pressure (EDP). The impact of EDPVR-derived LV chamber stiffness (CS30, at 30 mmHg EDP) on all-cause mortality after AVR was evaluated. Mean age was 76 ± 10 years, 39% were females, and ejection fraction (EF) was 61 ± 12%. The mean LV chamber stiffness (CS30) was 2.2 ± 1.3 mmHg/mL. A total of 877 (46%) patients had high LV stiffness (CS30 &gt;2 mmHg/mL). In these patients, the EDPVR curves were steeper and shifted leftwards, indicating higher stiffness at all pressure levels. These patients were slightly older, more often female, and had more prevalent comorbidities compared to patients with low stiffness. At follow-up [median 4.2 (interquartile range 2.8–6.3) years; 675 deaths], a higher CS30 was associated with lower survival (hazard ratio: 2.7 for severe vs. mild LV stiffening; P &lt; 0.0001), both in patients with normal or reduced EF. At multivariate analysis, CS30 remained an independent predictor, even after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, EF, LV remodelling, and diastolic dysfunction. Conclusion Higher preoperative LV chamber stiffening in patients with severe AS is associated with poorer outcome despite successful AVR.

Abstract Background Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) impacts outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but whether it is a specific therapeutic target in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose The aims of this study were to investigate whether surgical or trans-catheter intervention reduces SMR and improves outcomes compared to optimal medical therapy in HFpEF patients. Methods We retrospectively identified 120 HFpEF patients with moderate-to-severe or greater SMR from January 1, 2007, until December 31, 2017. Moderate-to-severe SMR was defined as an effective regurgitant orifice area of >0.3cm2, and/or a regurgitation volume of >45ml per beat. Those with primary mitral regurgitation, endocarditis, HFrEF, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, and history of valve intervention were excluded. All-cause mortality was analyzed and correlated to clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. Amongst the 120 patients, 36 received surgical or trans-catheter procedure in addition to medical therapy (procedure group) and 84 patients received optimal medical therapy only (conservative treatment group). The median follow-up period was 864 (15–3553) days. Results Patients in the procedure group were younger (75±8 vs 81±10, P=0.0002) and with fewer comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index 7.0±2.4 vs 8.0±2.0, P=0.022) compared to the conservative treatment group. In addition, the procedure group had larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameters and higher SMR volume at baseline. During follow-up, SMR decreased by ≥2 grades in 75% of patients (27/36) in the procedure group compared to 20% of patients (12/60) in the conservative treatment group. After adjusting for age and comorbidities, the procedure group showed better overall survival compared to the conservative treatment group (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17–0.80; P=0.011). On multivariate analysis for the different groups (procedure group vs. conservative treatment group) (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.17–0.91; P=0.019), increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.02–1.32; P=0.028) and average mitral E/e' ratio (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01–1.11; P=0.031) were independent predictors of increased all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve Conclusion Among heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction and moderate-to-severe or severe SMR, surgical or trans-catheter mitral-valve repair or replacement resulted in lower all-cause mortality compared to conservative treatment after 9 years of follow-up.

Abstract Background Currently data on the risk stratification of patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) are very limited. Method Patients diagnosed with moderate AS in 2012 (aortic valve area [AVA]: >1 and ≤1.5cm2) were identified. Patients were stratifying by LV diastolic function (normal vs high filling pressure), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50 vs <50%) and stroke volume index (SVI ≥35 vs <35 ml/m2). High filling pressure was defined as average E/e' ≥14 or septal E/e' ≥11 when atrial fibrillation was present. The prognosis was compared to age- and sex-matched general population. Results 898 patients were included (age 74 years, 58% male, AVA 1.25 cm2). During a median follow-up of 2.9 years, there were 346 deaths. In patients with moderate AS, mortality was higher than expected (P<0.001, Fig 1A). LV high filling pressure, LVEF<50% and SVI<35ml/m2 were present in 416 (55%), 140 (17%) and 81 (9%) patients, respectively. Those with normal filling pressure had similar prognosis when compared to controls (Fig 1C, P=0.35); whereas mortality rates remained higher than reference even when LVEF≥50% or SVI≥35ml/m2 (Fig 1E, 1G, P<0.001). Amongst all groups, mortality rates were the highest in patients with LVEF <50% or SVI <35 ml/m2 (Fig 1D, 1F, P<0.001); mortality ratios were 3.78 (95% CI 3.01–4.67) and 6.91 (95% CI 5.13–9.11), respectively. Noteworthy, high filling pressure allowed further risk stratification when LVEF or SVI was preserved (Fig 2, P<0.001). Figures 1 & 2 Conclusions Patients with moderate AS showed poor survival. A clinical trial examining role of aortic valve replacement would be beneficial not only in patients with reduced LVEF or SVI but also in those with high LV filling pressures.

Abstract Background Cardiac power output-to-mass (CPOM) ratio is a measure of myocardial performance that incorporates both pressure and flow output, normalized to left ventricular (LV) mass generating that cardiac work. Prior small studies have shown that CPOM predicts outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and reduced LV ejection fraction (EF). We sought to evaluate the prognostic significance of peak exercise CPOM and power reserve (increase from rest to peak exercise) in patients with normal EF. Methods and results Retrospective study in 24,783 patients (age 59±13 years, 45% females) with EF≥50% and no significant valve disease or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, undergoing exercise stress echocardiography between 2004–2018. CPOM was calculated as previously described (0.222 x cardiac output x mean blood pressure / LV mass) and expressed in Watts/100g myocardium. Power reserve was calculated as difference in CPOM between peak stress and rest. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Patients were divided into quartiles of power reserve. Patients with higher power reserve were younger, had higher blood pressure and heart rate, lower LV mass, and lower prevalence of prior myocardial infarction. (Table). During follow-up (median (IQR) 3.9 (0.6–8.3) years), 931 (3.8%) patients died. Progressively lower power reserve was associated with increasing mortality (Figure A). Compared to patients with abnormal stress test, patients with the lowest power reserve but otherwise normal stress test had the same survival as those with infarction/cardiomyopathy or ischemia on stress test (Figure B). Resting CPOM had lower predictive value. After adjusting for age, sex, METs achieved, ischemia/infarction on stress test results, and diastolic function grade, both peak exercise CPOM and power reserve were independent predictors of mortality (p<0.0001), incremental to conventional measures. Conclusion Cardiac power output and reserve measured during exercise stress echo provides independent prognostic information in patients with normal resting EF and no significant valve disease or RV dysfunction. The survival of patients with low power reserve but normal stress test was similar to patients with prior infarction/ cardiomyopathy or ischemia on stress test.