Citations

Clear

2414 citation(s) found for "Yu, Jason W".

Scoring system predicting overall survival (OS) in patients (Pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Tan, Angelina D., Molina, Julian R. , Ross, Helen J. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Schild, Steven E. , Wampfler, Jason A. , Yang, Ping

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 7545-7545

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.7545 Get It

7545 Background: Interpretation of lung cancer clinical trials is complicated by the heterogeneity of the patient population due to disease burden and comorbidities making pre-trial assessment of OS probability challenging. Methods: To create and validate a scoring system to estimate OS and improve the quality of future trials, this study evaluated the pretreatment prognostic factors of 2,442 pts with NSCLC. Univariate (UV) and multivariate (MV) Cox models were used to evaluate the prognostic importance of each baseline factor on OS. Those prognostic factors significant on both UV and MV analyses that were used to develop the scoring system included overall quality of life, age, sex, stage, ECOG performance status, the presence of other cancers, and smoking cessation. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 5-year OS rate (in %) by 10 and summing these scores to form a total score. Multivariate models and the score for each factor were validated using bootstrapping with 1000 iterations from the original samples. Results: The score for each factor ranged from 1 to 7 points and the total scores ranged between 23 and 39 points. Higher scores reflected better OS. Categorization of the score was delineated first by clinician expert opinion (see Table) and then by multiple statistically defined empirical cut points. All categorization schemes demonstrated successful prognostic power. The bootstrap method confirmed the reliability of multivariate Cox model and score (Spearman correlation coefficient= 0.45). Conclusions: Prognostic factors significantly associated with OS on both UV and MV analysis were used to construct a valid scoring system which can be used to predict survival of NSCLC pts. This scoring system can be used by clinicians in counseling pts and for stratification in future trial design. [Table: see text]
Association of the 3'-untranslated region KRAS-variant with cisplatin resistance in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Lee, Ju‐Whei , Slebos, Robbert J.C. , Howard, Jason D. , Pérez, Jimena, Gilbert, Jill, Nallur, Sunitha, Paranjape, Trupti, García, Joaquín J., Forastiere, Arlene A. , Chung, Christine H. , Weidhaas, Joanne B. , Burtness, Barbara

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 6016-6016

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.6016 Get It

6016 Background: A germline mutation in let-7 complementary site 6 (LCS6) within the KRAS 3'-untranslated region (rs61764370, the KRAS-variant: TG/GG) is known to associate with poor outcome and drug resistance in various cancers compared to the wild type allele (TT). We examine the prognostic significance of the KRAS-variant in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods: The KRAS-variant was determined in 116 tumor DNA samples from HNSCC patients enrolled in 3 clinical trials and a tissue collection study using a previously validated PCR-based assay. Results: KRAS-variant status could be determined in 108/116 (93%) samples and an allele frequency of TG/GG was 28.7%. These results were correlated with patient demographics, p16/human papillomavirus (HPV) status and clinical outcome. There was no association between p16/HPV status and the KRAS-variant status (Fisher’s exact test, p=1.0). The KRAS-variant was associated with poor progression-free survival in patients treated with cisplatin+/-cetuximab (log-rank p=0.002) but this association was not observed in docetaxel/bortezomib treated patients (log-rank p=0.89). Conclusions: KRAS-variant is a potentially promising biomarker of poor prognosis and a predictive biomarker of cisplatin resistance in R/M HNSCC. Prospective validation is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT00003809.
Adverse events (AEs) and the return of myelofibrosis (MF)-related symptoms after interruption or discontinuation of ruxolitinib (RUX) therapy.
Catalano, John, Deininger, Michael W. , Miller, Carole B., Silver, Richard T. , Winton, Elliott F., Harvey, Jimmie H., Arcasoy, Murat O. , Lyons, Roger M. , Paquette, Ronald , Raza, Azra , Investigators, for the COMFORT-I, Verstovšek, Srđan , Mesa, Ruben A. , Gotlib, Jason , Gupta, Vikas , DiPersio, John F. , Talpaz, Moshe , Hexner, Elizabeth O. , Sun, William , Kantarjian, Hagop M. , Investigators, for the COMFORT-I

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 6624-6624

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.6624 Get It

6624 Background: RUX is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that demonstrated significant clinical benefit in patients (pts) with MF in COMFORT-I (NCT00952289), a phase 3, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study (N=309). Methods: Pts assessed MF-related symptoms daily using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v2.0; Total Symptom Score (TSS) was calculated from individual scores for abdominal discomfort, pain under left ribs, early satiety, night sweats, itching, and bone/muscle pain. Therapy was interrupted if platelet or absolute neutrophil count fell below 50,000/µL or 500/µL, respectively. AEs were evaluated during treatment interruption or discontinuation. The protocol suggested an optional tapering strategy and possible addition of steroids if RUX therapy was discontinued for reasons other than thrombocytopenia. Results: In RUX-treated patients with treatment interruption, TSS gradually returned to baseline levels over approximately 1 week. The most common AE leading to treatment interruption or discontinuation in each group was thrombocytopenia (n=11, RUX) and abdominal pain (n=4, PBO). Of these, only 1 RUX pt discontinued for thrombocytopenia. A summary of new onset/worsening AE data after treatment interruption or discontinuation is presented (Table). Of 58 pts who discontinued study treatment, 23 (n=10, RUX; n=13, PBO) experienced a total of 43 SAEs (19, RUX; 24, PBO) that showed no specific pattern or difference between treatment groups. Four of 21 RUX-treated pts had dose tapering following study drug discontinuation. Conclusions: Apart from the expected return of MF-related symptoms, there was no pattern of AEs to suggest that RUX interruption or discontinuation is associated with a specific withdrawal syndrome. [Table: see text]
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for anal cancer: Results from a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.
Call, Jason A., Prendergast, Brendan M., Jensen, Lindsay G., Ord, Celine Bicquart, Jacob, Rojymon , Thomas, Charles R., Goodman, Karyn A. , Mell, Loren K. , Jabbour, Salma K , Miller, Robert C.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e14555-e14555

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e14555 Get It

e14555 Background: This study was done to assess the toxicity and efficacy of IMRT for anal cancer in a multi-institutional setting. Methods: Records of 152 total patients (pts) were reviewed retrospectively. Data on disease control and toxicity were collected as well as pt and treatment characteristics. Acute (<6 months) and late (>6 months) severe toxicity (grade >3) were recorded at each institution. Four were excluded for either presence of metastatic disease (2) or stage TX (2). There was data for late toxicity on 120 pts. Results: T stage was T1 in 28, T2 in 79, T3 in 29 and T4 in 12 pts. N stage was N0 in 77, N1 in 40, N2 in 19 and N3 in 12 pts. The median age was 56 yrs and median follow-up was 26.8 months. Cumulative IMRT dose was 51.25 Gy (median) (range: 4.32-61.2 Gy) in a median of 28 fractions (2-34). Chemotherapy was given in all but 2 pts and the most common regimen was 5- fluorouracil plus mitomycin-C. The median total elapsed treatment time was 40 days. Local control at 3 yrs was 87% and was significantly worse for patients with T3-4 disease (79% vs 90% at 3 years; p=0.04). There was no correlation between dose and local control. Regional control, distant control and overall survival were 97%, 91%, and 87% at 3 yrs, respectively. Nodal status was associated with regional and distal control as well as overall survival (p<0.01 for each). The most common acute severe toxicity was hematologic (41%). Severe acute GI, skin or other toxicity was 11%, 20% and 1% respectively. There were two grade 5 toxicities (hematologic and GI). Severe late toxicity was limited to skin (1%) and GI (3%). Conclusions: IMRT resulted in excellent local control in this multi-institutional cohort of pts. Although T stage did predict for worse local control, most pts with T3-4 disease were controlled with IMRT. Nodal status predicts for regional and distal control as well as overall survival. Severe toxicity was acceptable with this technique.
Health and quality of life (QOL) issues in four groups of lung cancer patients: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screened, chest x-ray detected, incidentally found, and routinely diagnosed.
Yost, Kathleen J. , Clark, Matthew M. , Piderman, Katherine M. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Midthun, David E. , Yang, Ping , Andrade, Mariza de , Wampfler, Jason A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 1610-1610

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1610 Get It

1610 Background: Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans have reduced lung cancer deaths by 20.3% in high risk populations, although there is an unknown balance between the benefits and harms of LDCT scans as a screening tool. Our purpose was to compare health-related QOL issues among lung cancer patients who were initially detected by LDCT scans; 4 comparison groups included: lung cancer diagnosed by a screening chest X-ray, as an incidental finding from procedures taken for other medical reasons, or based on symptoms indicative for lung cancer and routinely diagnosed, and individuals who were LDCT screened but found no lung cancer (controls who participated in Mayo’s lung cancer CT screening trial). Methods: A total of 1,658 lung cancer patients (cared at Mayo Clinic) in the 4 groups (37, 151, 389, and 1081 respectively) and 488 controls were compared on following patient-reported outcomes (collected via validated tools): overall QOL, four symptoms (cough, pain, dyspnea, fatigue), mental/ physical/ emotional/ social/ spiritual QOL, and other concerns (e.g., family/ friends/ financial/ legal). A clinically significant deficit was defined as at least 10-points in difference (or <50 points) on a 0-100 scale. The rates of deficits were compared via Fisher’s exact tests and average QOL values via Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Overall QOL and individual symptoms were significantly worse (p<0.05) in all lung cancer groups than in controls, except for pain. LDCT-screened patients reported the greatest deficit among the 4 lung cancer groups in physical (41%), emotional (24%), social (38%), and spiritual QOL (24%); whereas chest X-ray detected patients had the least deficit in overall QOL (22%) and pain (32%). All 4 lung cancer groups experienced much worse fatigue (52-64%) than the controls (32%). Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest that LDCT-screening detected lung cancer patients reported a different QOL profile from other lung cancer patients and non-lung cancer controls. The clinical course, smoking behavior, and QOL related health issues associated with LDCT screening for lung cancer warrant thorough investigation.
Cystatin C: A Primer for Pharmacists
Teaford, Hilary R. , Barreto, Jason N. , Vollmer, Kathryn J., Frazee, Erin N. , Frazee, Erin N , Barreto, Jason N , Rule, Andrew D.

Mayo Clinic

Pharmacy | March 10, 2020 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 35

10.3390/pharmacy8010035 | PMID 32182861 Get It

Pharmacists are at the forefront of dosing and monitoring medications eliminated by or toxic to the kidney. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these medications, accurate measurement of kidney function is paramount. The mainstay of kidney assessment for drug dosing and monitoring is serum creatinine (SCr)-based estimation equations. Yet, SCr has known limitations including its insensitivity to underlying changes in kidney function and the numerous non-kidney factors that are incompletely accounted for in equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Serum cystatin C (cysC) is a biomarker that can serve as an adjunct or alternative to SCr to evaluate kidney function for drug dosing. Pharmacists must be educated about the strengths and limitations of cysC prior to applying it to medication management. Not all patient populations have been studied and some evaluations demonstrated large variations in the relationship between cysC and GFR. Use of eGFR equations incorporating cysC should be reserved for drug management in scenarios with demonstrated outcomes, including to improve pharmacodynamic target attainment for antibiotics or reduce drug toxicity. This article provides an overview of cysC, discusses evidence around its use in medication dosing and in special populations, and describes practical considerations for application and implementation.
Evaluation of platinum-based chemotherapy, glutathione metabolic genes, and survival in advanced non small cell lung cancer: A NCCTG 97–24–51 based study
Mandrekar, Sumithra J. , Hillman, Shauna L., Allen, Katie L., Cunningham, Julie M. , Jett, James R., Adjei, Alex A. , Perez, Edith A. , Yang, Ping , Sun, Zhifu , Wampfler, Jason A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 13013-13013

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.13013 Get It

13013 Background: The glutathione metabolic pathway is directly involved in the inactivation of platinum compounds. Our earlier work indicated that genotypes corresponding to varied glutathione-related enzyme activities may predict survival in patients with advanced lung cancer. Herein, we evaluated the role of glutathione-related genotypes on clinical outcomes in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer patients who were stable or responding from one prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: DNA samples from patients who had tumor regression or stable disease after treatment with one platinum based chemotherapy regimen were analyzed using 6 polymorphic DNA markers that encode 5 important enzymes in the glutathione metabolic pathway. The contrasting genotypes used in the analysis were GCLC (homozygous repeat 77 vs. heterozygous 7*), GPX1 (CC vs. other), GSTP1-I105V (AA vs. other), GSTP1-A114V (CC vs. other), GSTM1 (null vs. present), and GSTT1 (null vs. present). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, treatment arm, ECOG performance status, stage, and prior tumor response, were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of the genotypes at each locus. Results: Data from 112 patients with a median follow-up of 10.6 (range: 0.4–56.3) months was used. No significant difference in time to disease progression was observed for any of the genotypes. Among the 6 genomic DNA markers, the GCLC genotype was an important prognostic factor for overall survival after adjusting for other factors. In particular, patients carrying a 77 repeat genotype (homozygous) had a significantly worse survival (Hazard ratio = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.05–2.63). Conclusions: Genotypes of glutathione-related enzymes, especially GCLC, may be used as host factors in predicting patients’ prognosis after platinum-based chemotherapy. Further investigation to define and measure the effects of these genes in chemotherapeutic regimens is needed. (This work was partly supported by NIH research grants CA77118, CA80127, and CA84354.) No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Atorvastatin Reduces In Vivo Fibrin Deposition and Macrophage Accumulation, and Improves Primary Patency Duration and Maturation of Murine Arteriovenous Fistula
Cui, Jie , Kessinger, Chase W. , Jhajj, Harkamal S. , Grau, Madeleine S., Misra, Sanjay , McCarthy, Jason R. , Misra, Sanjay , Libby, Peter , Jaffer, Farouc A

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | March 9, 2020 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 931-945

10.1681/asn.2019060612 | PMID 32152232 Get It

Significance Statement Experimental studies have established that inflammatory and thrombogenic responses play critical roles in patency and maturation of arteriovenous fistulas placed surgically for dialysis vascular access. In this study of mice given atorvastatin or PBS starting 7 days before creation of an arteriovenous fistula, use of atorvastatin was associated with favorable outward remodeling, preserved arteriovenous blood flow, and longer duration of primary arteriovenous fistula patency. These statin-mediated benefits occurred following reductions in the thrombogenic and inflammatory macrophage response detected within 2 weeks after arteriovenous fistula creation. These findings provide insights into in vivo molecular mechanisms that underlie primary arteriovenous fistula failure, provide a foundation to test novel pharmacotherapeutics that aim to improve arteriovenous fistula maturation, and support further clinical evaluation of statin therapy to improve maturation and patency. Background Arteriovenous fistulas placed surgically for dialysis vascular access have a high primary failure rate resulting from excessive inward remodeling, medial fibrosis, and thrombosis. No clinically established pharmacologic or perisurgical therapies currently address this unmet need. Statins’ induction of multiple anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic effects suggests that these drugs might reduce arteriovenous fistula failure. Yet, the in vivo physiologic and molecular effects of statins on fistula patency and maturation remain poorly understood. Methods We randomized 108 C57Bl/6J mice to receive daily atorvastatin 1.14 mg/kg or PBS (control) starting 7 days before end-to-side carotid artery–jugular vein fistula creation and for up to 42 days after fistula creation. We then assessed longitudinally the effects of statin therapy on primary murine fistula patency and maturation. We concomitantly analyzed the in vivo arteriovenous fistula thrombogenic and inflammatory macrophage response to statin therapy, using the fibrin-targeted, near-infrared fluorescence molecular imaging agent FTP11-CyAm7 and dextranated, macrophage-avid nanoparticles CLIO-VT680. Results In vivo molecular-structural imaging demonstrated that atorvastatin significantly reduced fibrin deposition at day 7 and macrophage accumulation at days 7 and 14, findings supported by histopathologic and gene-expression analyses. Structurally, atorvastatin promoted favorable venous limb outward remodeling, preserved arteriovenous fistula blood flow, and prolonged primary arteriovenous fistula patency through day 42 ( P <0.05 versus control for all measures). Conclusions These findings provide new in vivo evidence that statins improve experimental arteriovenous fistula patency and maturation, indicating that additional clinical evaluation of statin therapy in patients on dialysis undergoing arteriovenous fistula placement is warranted.
Bladder Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Flaig, Thomas W. , Abern, Michael, Bangs, Rick , Begovic, Jovan, Brown, Jason, Buyyounouski, Mark K. , Chan, Kevin, Chang, Paul, Chin, Arnold I., Guru, Khurshid A. , Herr, Harry W., Hoffman‐Censits, Jean , Kaimakliotis, Hristos, Kundu, Shilajit, Lele, Subodh M. , Luckenbaugh, Amy, Maldonado, Jonathan, Mei, Lin, Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Parikh, Mamta, Patterson, Anthony, Peyton, Charles, Preston, Mark A. , Richards, Kyle, Seyedin, Steven, Stewart, Tyler, Sundi, Debasish, Swami, Umang, Tollefson, Matthew, Wright, Jonathan L. , Cassara, Carly J., Sliker, Bailee, Inman, Brant A. , Friedlander, Terence W. , Pagliaro, Lance C. , Inman, Brant A , Spiess, Philippe E. , Abern, Michael, Begovic, Jovan, Brown, Jason, Chan, Kevin, Chang, Paul, Chin, Arnold I., Kaimakliotis, Hristos, Kundu, Shilajit, Luckenbaugh, Amy, Maldonado, Jonathan, Mei, Lin, Parikh, Mamta, Peyton, Charles, Plimack, Elizabeth R. , Richards, Kyle, Seyedin, Steven, Siefker-Radtke, Arlene Odelia , Stewart, Tyler, Sundi, Debasish, Swami, Umang, Tollefson, Matthew, Cassara, Carly J., Sliker, Bailee

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 5, 2020 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 329-354

10.6004/jnccn.2020.0011 | PMID 32135513 Get It

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Bladder Cancer focuses on the clinical presentation and workup of suspected bladder cancer, treatment of non–muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer, and treatment of metastatic urothelial bladder cancer because important updates have recently been made to these sections. Some important updates include recommendations for optimal treatment of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the event of a bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage and details about biomarker testing for advanced or metastatic disease. The systemic therapy recommendations for second-line or subsequent therapies have also been revised. Treatment and management of muscle-invasive, nonmetastatic disease is covered in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer available at NCCN.org . Additional topics covered in the complete version include treatment of nonurothelial histologies and recommendations for nonbladder urinary tract cancers such as upper tract urothelial carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma of the prostate, and primary carcinoma of the urethra.
Peripheral nerve repair throughout the body with processed nerve allografts: Results from a large multicenter study
Safa, Bauback , Jain, Sonu A. , Desai, Mihir J., Greenberg, Jeffrey A., Niacaris, Timothy, Nydick, Jason A. , Leversedge, Fraser J. , Megee, David M., Zoldos, Jozef, Rinker, Brian, McKee, Desirae , MacKay, Brendan J. , Ingari, John V. , Nesti, Leon J. , Cho, Mickey, Valerio, Ian L. , Kao, Dennis S. , El‐Sheikh, Yasser, Weber, Renata V., Shores, Jaimie T. , Styron, Joseph F. , Thayer, Wesley P. , Przylecki, Wojciech, Hoyen, Harry A. , Buncke, Gregory M.

Mayo Clinic

Microsurgery | February 26, 2020 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 527-537

10.1002/micr.30574 | PMID 32101338 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPeripheral nerve damage resulting in pain, loss of sensation, or motor function may necessitate a reconstruction with a bridging material. The RANGER® Registry was designed to evaluate outcomes following nerve repair with processed nerve allograft (Avance® Nerve Graft; Axogen; Alachua, FL). Here we report on the results from the largest peripheral nerve registry to‐date.MethodsThis multicenter IRB‐approved registry study collected data from patients repaired with processed nerve allograft (PNA). Sites followed their own standard of care for patient treatment and follow‐up. Data were assessed for meaningful recovery, defined as ≥S3/M3 to remain consistent with previously published results, and comparisons were made to reference literature.ResultsThe study included 385 subjects and 624 nerve repairs. Overall, 82% meaningful recovery (MR) was achieved across sensory, mixed, and motor nerve repairs up to gaps of 70 mm. No related adverse events were reported. There were no significant differences in MR across the nerve type, age, time‐to‐repair, and smoking status subgroups in the upper extremity (p > .05). Significant differences were noted by the mechanism of injury subgroups between complex injures (74%) as compared to lacerations (85%) or neuroma resections (94%) (p = .03) and by gap length between the <15 mm and 50–70 mm gap subgroups, 91 and 69% MR, respectively (p = .01). Results were comparable to historical literature for nerve autograft and exceed that of conduit.ConclusionsThese findings provide clinical evidence to support the continued use of PNA up to 70 mm in sensory, mixed and motor nerve repair throughout the body and across a broad patient population.