Citations

8565 Background: Previous studies using low-dose (250 ug/dose) aerosolized sargramostim (granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor: aero-GM-CSF) for the treatment of metastatic melanoma, revealed anecdotal clinical responses that appeared to correlate with an increase in the number of tumor specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) in blood. Herein, we address whether or not further dose escalation of aero-GM-CSF is safe, results in greater increase of melanoma specific CTLs, and affects clinical outcomes. Methods: A 5+5 dose escalation clinical trial was conducted to determine the dose of aero-GM-CSF that would increase in the frequency of peripheral blood melanoma specific CTLs in HLA-A2+ patients with metastatic melanoma to the lungs. Aero-GM-CSF was administered twice daily on days 1–7 and 15–21 of a 28 day cycle at doses of: 500, 750, 1,000, 1,250, 1,500, 1,750, and 2,000 ug per cohort. If at most 2 of 5 patients at a dose level reported a 5-fold increase in CTLs, dose escalation occurred. If not, 5 additional patients were treated at that dose. Dose escalation continued until =2 of 5 patients at a dose level developed severe toxicity, at least 7 of the 10 patients at a dose level reported a 5-fold increase in CTLs, or all dose levels were exhausted. Results: The study accrued 40 patients from August 2002 to July 2006. Four patients cancelled participation prior to treatment. One patient was replaced (500 ug) as he died within 13 days of registration. Among the 35 remaining patients, median age was 58 (23–84), 72% were male, and 72% had a PS=0. Dose escalation was not terminated due to toxicity. Toxicities = grade 3 (at least probably treatment related) included: grade 3 fatigue (1) at 1,000 ug; and grade 3 cough (1), and grade 4 dyspnea (1) at 1,750 ug. At the 2,000 ug dose, most patients (4 of 5) exhibited a greater than 2-fold increase in melanoma specific CTLs. Two of these patients remain on treatment: one with partial response at 14.0 months and the other with stable disease at 6.5 months. A 5-fold increase in tumor specific CTLs was not achieved in any patient. Conclusions: Aero-GM-CSF therapy administered at up to 2,000 ug/dose appears safe and seems to correlate with increased frequencies of tumor specific CTLs in a dose-dependent fashion. Further dose escalation followed by clinical efficacy testing is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

8530 Background: RAD-001 (Everolimus) is an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Interim analysis results from a phase II study of RAD-001 in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) were presented at ASCO 2005. This study was re-opened using a higher dose based on an improvement in the 16 week progression free survival (PFS) rate and good tolerability. Methods: A two- stage, phase II multi-institutional trial was conducted in patients with MM to assess that 16 weeks PFS rate was at least 50%. Inclusion criteria: measurable disease, ECOG performance score of 0–2. Exclusion criteria: presence of intracranial metastases, concurrent use of inducers of cytochrome 3A4 and abnormal organ function. The dose of RAD-001 in the second cohort was increased to 10 mg daily (increased from 30 mg weekly) based on evidence of safety of the higher dose. Results: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled; baseline information is available on 27. Median age was 63 yrs; 15 (56%) had >2 sites of metastatic disease. Most (48%) had stage M1c disease. PS was 0, 1 and 2 in 58%, 38% and 4%. All but 4 (15%) had received prior therapy. Grade 3 adverse events included stomatitis and fatigue (2 each), leukopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, anorexia, dehydration, dyspnea, hyperglycemia, and hypersensitivity (1 each). Planned interim analysis was done after 20 patients were enrolled. 14 (70%) had progressed 16 weeks, failing to meet the decision rule needed (PFS >30%) to restart accrual. The median PFS for all 29 patients was 56 days. The median overall survival (OS) has not been reached. For the entire cohort of 53 pts treated on this study (at both dose levels), the median PFS, median OS were 59 and 286 days respectively. Conclusion: Interim analysis after enrollment of 20 patients at a higher dose of RAD-001 demonstrated significantly more toxicity and no added clinical efficacy. The 16 week PFS rate target was not reached, and accrual was suspended. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

8055 Background: mTOR inhibition with intravenous temsirolimus (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals) has been associated with responses in mantle cell lymphoma (J Clin Oncol 23;5347, 2005) as well as other lymphomas (Blood 108 (11) 2483; 2006). This phase II study tested the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) in three simultaneous two-stage phase II lymphoma studies - aggressive (group 1), indolent (group 2), or uncommon (group 3). The goals were to learn the toxicity profile and to assess the anti-tumor response. Planned interim analysis for groups 1 and 3 have been completed and are the subject of this report. Methods: Patients (pts) received 10 mg PO daily for each 28 day cycle (up to 12) and restaged after 2, 6, and 12 cycles. The primary endpoint is the confirmed response rate, including CR, CRu or PR. 12 pts were enrolled in stage 1 of each study. At least 1 success in 12 is required to proceed to stage 2, to a total of 37 pts. Overall, the treatment will be considered promising if 4 or more successes are observed in all 37 pts in each group. Results: The median age of the 12 pts in group 1 was 68.5 yrs (range: 53–80), with a median of 3 (range, 1–15) prior therapies. Four pts had a prior stem cell transplant (SCT). Pts completed a median of 7 (range, 1–12) cycles of therapy. 6 confirmed responses have been achieved (1 CR, 5 PR), meeting the overall criteria for promising results in this study. Common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) include thrombocytopenia (3 pts) and anemia (2 pts). For group 3, the median age was 49 yrs (range, 27–78), with a median of 7 (range, 1–13) prior therapies and 6 pts had a prior SCT. Pts have completed a median of 6.5 cycles (range, 1–11). 5 confirmed responses have been achieved (5 PR), meeting the criteria for this regimen to be considered promising. Of these 5 patients, 3 had HD, 1 T-cell NHL, and 1 had macroglobulinemia. Common grade 3 AEs include anemia (3 pts) and thrombocytopenia (2 pts). No grade 4 AEs were reported. Conclusions: Oral everolimus has activity in a spectrum of lymphomas with acceptable toxicity. The responses observed in both group 1 and group 3 met the criteria to continue accrual. These results provide the rationale for additional studies with this novel class of agents and to integrate mTOR inhibitors into salvage treatment regimens. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Background: A female survival advantage in cutaneous melanoma has been long recognized. However, whether this extends across all age groups, with risk stratification using the latest prognostic staging system or in the current era of efficacious systemic therapies is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated whether sex-based differences in melanoma survival persisted within a recent population-based patient cohort with consideration of these factors. Materials and Methods: We identified stage II−IV cutaneous melanoma patients from 2010 to 2014 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries data. We recalculated stage per American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition guidelines. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was estimated by using the Kaplan–Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Of 16,807 patients (39.8% female), 8,990 were stage II, 4,826 stage III, and 2,991 stage IV at diagnosis. Unadjusted 3-/5-year CSS estimates for females versus males were 64.2% versus 59.7%, and 53.5% versus 49.9%, respectively, p ≤ 0.0001. Five-year CSS varied within each stage and across age strata of <45, 45 − 59, and ≥60 years. Within each stage, females <45 had better CSS than all other sex/age groups ( p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis of stage II/III patients, female sex, younger age, and lower mitotic index retained favorable CSS prognostic significance ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Sex-based differences in melanoma survival persist in a contemporary patient cohort staged with the latest prognostic system. These data may guide decision marking regarding adjuvant therapy, highlight the importance of including sex as a pre-specified clinical trial variable, and suggest that investigation of underlying biologic mechanisms may drive discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets to improve patient care.

Abstract Background Immunosuppression in glioblastoma (GBM) is an obstacle to effective immunotherapy. GBM-derived immunosuppressive monocytes are central to this. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint molecule, expressed by GBM cells and GBM extracellular vesicles (EVs). We sought to determine the role of EV-associated PD-L1 in the formation of immunosuppressive monocytes. Methods Monocytes collected from healthy donors were conditioned with GBM-derived EVs to induce the formation of immunosuppressive monocytes, which were quantified via flow cytometry. Donor-matched T cells were subsequently co-cultured with EV-conditioned monocytes in order to assess effects on T-cell proliferation. PD-L1 constitutive overexpression or short hairpin RNA–mediated knockdown was used to determined the role of altered PD-L1 expression. Results GBM EVs interact with both T cells and monocytes but do not directly inhibit T-cell activation. However, GBM EVs induce immunosuppressive monocytes, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and nonclassical monocytes (NCMs). MDSCs and NCMs inhibit T-cell proliferation in vitro and are found within GBM in situ. EV PD-L1 expression induces NCMs but not MDSCs, and does not affect EV-conditioned monocytes T-cell inhibition. Conclusion These findings indicate that GBM EV-mediated immunosuppression occurs through induction of immunosuppressive monocytes rather than direct T-cell inhibition and that, while PD-L1 expression is important for the induction of specific immunosuppressive monocyte populations, immunosuppressive signaling mechanisms through EVs are complex and not limited to PD-L1.

362 Background: Most pts with mGEA do not respond to ICI or ramucirumab/paclitaxel (RAM/TAX). Emerging data suggest that ICI may potentiate subsequent therapy (Tx). In KN059 we unexpectedly observed durable responses in 2 pts on RAM/TAX after ICI (PMID 29674442). We examined if ICI impacts efficacy of subsequent RAM/TAX in a larger cohort and explored alterations in the tumor microenvironment. Methods: All pts with mGEA at Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL) who received RAM/TAX (2014-19) were included. We compared best objective response rate (ORR: complete [CR] or partial response [PR]) per RECIST1.1 and overall survival (OS) in pts who received RAM/TAX with (Group A) vs without (Group B) immediately preceding PD-1 blockade. Chi square and multivariate logistic and Cox regression were used. We adjusted for total lines of Tx received and the line of Tx in which RAM/TAX was given, to control for potential differences in the biology of heavily treated pts or those receiving RAM/TAX as 2nd vs 3rd line Tx. We also adjusted for age and ECOG PS. Results: In total 87 pts met inclusion criteria. In the 19 pts (Group A) who received RAM/TAX (usually as 3rd line Tx) after progression on ICI, there was a 77% relative risk reduction of death after initiation of RAM/TAX compared to the 68 pts (Group B) who received RAM/TAX (usually as 2nd line) without preceding ICI (median OS 15.0 vs 7.6 mo; HR 0.23; P < .001). The ORR was also significantly higher (58% vs 18%; P < .001) including the CR rate (16% vs 1%; P = .006). Two CRs in Group A are ongoing (10 - 34 mo). Of note, 95% of Group A pts did not respond to ICI, and all had irRECIST progression on ICI. Immunofluorescent analysis from a responder showed 65-fold reduction (post vs pre-Tx) in intratumoral density of immunosuppressive FOXP3+ Tregs, with preserved density of antitumor CD8+ T cells. Conclusions: Higher than expected efficacy was observed on RAM/TAX when immediately preceded by ICI, suggesting ICI may enhance efficacy of subsequent anti-VEGFR/taxane therapy. This serial immunotherapy combination may be a novel option for pts with primary resistance to ICI and will be tested prospectively in a new randomized phase 2 trial (NCT04069273).

Objectives:With the introduction of novel immune therapeutics for the treatment of disseminated malignancies, we sought to evaluate whether deliberate sequencing of immunotherapy before/after conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy would have an impact on clinical outcomes in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. We sought to evaluate whether or not ipilimumab immunotherapy administered before or after cytotoxic chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel+bevacizumab, AB) would impact clinical outcomes.Methods:We conducted a randomized phase 2 clinical trial of patients with BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma (up to 2 prior therapies) who received either: (A) AB followed by ipilimumab therapy at progression; or (B) ipilimumab followed by AB treatment at progression. The primary goal of the study was a comparison of AB versus ipilimumab progression-free survival, with secondary clinical and laboratory endpoints.Results:This study did not reach full accrual due to concurrent Food and Drug Administration approval of anti-programmed cell death 1 agents. Nevertheless, the available data suggests a cumulative therapeutic advantage to the sequential use of ipilimumab followed by AB. Correlative laboratory data revealed a favorable effect on systemic immune homeostasis in patients receiving AB therapy, of potential interest in further investigations, especially in the context of chemotherapy/immunotherapy combinations.Conclusion:Albeit limited in scope, our data suggest that cytotoxic therapy with nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab appear to favorably alter systemic parameters of immune function of potential benefit in combination T-cell directed immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

65 Background: The addition of chemotherapy to immune checkpoint inhibitors has been explored clinically in solid tumors in order to overcome one of the challenges of immunotherapy: clinical outcomes are variable, with only a subset of patients achieving durable responses. Further understanding of the immunoregulatory mechanisms of chemotherapy in the setting of immunotherapy is crucial for the development of optimal combinatorial chemo-immunotherapeutic strategies to improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: Metastatic melanoma (MM) patients who failed anti-PD-1 single therapy were subsequently treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin in addition to PD-1 blockade. Using peripheral blood (PB) from MM patients and healthy donor, the phenotypic and functional changes in T cells induced by chemotherapy, in the setting of PD-1 blockade, were examined. Results: Paclitaxel and carboplatin, in combination with PD-1 blockade, were able to induce significant clinical responses in a subset of MM patients who were resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy alone. In patients who responded to this combination, a subset of tumor-reactive effector T cells (CD8+CD11a+PD1+GranzymeB+) survived the treatment, with increased frequency after the addition of chemotherapy. This T cell population preserved its effector phenotype, although ongoing PD-1 blockade was needed to improve its anti-tumor activity. In vitro experiments, using CD8+CD11a+PD1+GranzymeB+isolated from healthy donor PB, also demonstrated its ability to survive chemotherapy treatment. In addition, after cultured with chemotherapy, this T cell subset demonstrated higher cytotoxic T cell functions as well as increased chemotherapy efflux. Conclusions: Chemotherapy regulates a subset of tumor-reactive effector T cells (CD8+CD11a+PD1+GranzymeB+) and increases clinical efficacy of PD-1 blockade. This novel effector T cell population underlies the key cellular and molecular immunoregulatory mechanisms of chemotherapy. It serves as a meaningful marker to measure these collaborative effects and to develop the optimal chemo-immunotherapy strategy to improve clinical responses to current immune checkpoint blocking agents.

4 Background: Membrane expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells is associated with poor survival in patients with advanced malignancies including metastatic melanoma (MM). In addition, tumor-associated PD-L1 has been proposed as a predictor of response to anti-PD-1 therapy, although responses are observed in some cases of PD-L1 negative MM. We hypothesize that tumor-derived PD-L1 has additional systemic effects through the release of biologically active soluble forms of PD-L1 (sPD-L1) into the circulation, which further impedes the anti-tumor immune response and contributes to poor clinical outcomes in MM. Methods: We developed a sPD-L1 ELISA and biochemically confirmed the identity of the detected protein. We measured the levels of sPD-L1 in 276 patients with MM enrolled on 3 clinical trials who had stored pre-treatment plasma samples and 37 healthy volunteers (HV) undergoing blood donation at Mayo Clinic. We also measured sPD-L1 in baseline samples from 38 MM patients treated with anti-PD1 (pembrolizumab) 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. ROC analysis was used to compute sPD-L1 concentration cut-off value and Wald test was used to asses the difference of overall survival (OS) in patients with low versus high sPD-L1 concentration. Results: We found that sPD-L1 levels were significantly elevated in MM patients compared with HV (p=0.0011). Mean sPD-L1 level in MM was 1.73 ng/mL (range: 0.13-18.29) compared with 0.77 ng/mL (range: 0.11–6.02) for HV. Patients with higher levels (>0.293 ng/mL) had a median OS of 11.3 months compared to 14.8 months for patients with sPD-L1 level ≤ 0.293 ng/mL (p=0.040). Similarly to tumor-related PD-L1 findings, patients who had clinical benefit (OR/PR/SD) after 4 cycles of anti-PD1 had higher sPD-L1 levels at baseline (2.1 vs. 1.1 ng/mL). Conclusions: To our knowledge, our study is the first to report a correlation of sPD-L1 with MM patient outcome, although a larger study is needed to establish the utility of sPD-L1 as an independent prognostic and possibly predictive biomarker.

Introduction Neutropenic fever following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a common (incidence 63-100%) and potentially life-threatening complication. Recommended time to antibiotic (TTA) administration is within 1 hr of fever onset with delays associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality. Standard of care guidelines emphasize patient self-monitoring for fever, with instructions to seek immediate medical attention if body temperature (temp) reaches 100.4°F or higher. In this study, we evaluated if a novel wearable, continuous temp monitor, tPatch, could reliably estimate core body temp and detect fever in an outpatient setting following ASCT. Additionally, we gathered preliminary data to explore early detection and prediction of clinically relevant temp rise in this clinical setting. Methods Patients (N = 86) with hematologic malignancies (62% multiple myeloma) who underwent high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT at Mayo Clinic, MN were prospectively enrolled between June 2018 and March 2019. Patients (82% male) wore an axilla-placed tPatch continuously for 7 days in an outpatient setting during the post ASCT period and were asked to record self-measured oral temp in 3-4 hr intervals daily using a standardized thermometer after appropriate training . Patients followed standard of care procedures with daily clinic assessment of temp, blood counts, and vital signs. An optional patient questionnaire was given at end-of-study. A model was trained using both patient- and clinic-assessed oral temp measures to estimate core temp from 2 sensors on the tPatch device. Core temp estimates and trends were then compared to patient- and clinic-assessed measurements. Fever was defined as a temperature ≥100.4°F for at least 1 hr. Results When compared to all oral temp reads, the tPatch estimated core temp within 0.03 ± 0.7℉. Among the 86 patients, clinic-assessed fever incidence was 29.4% while tPatch-assessed incidence was 58.8%. Using all clinic-recorded temp readings as "ground truth," the sensitivity and specificity of the tPatch algorithm in detecting fevers were 88% and 86%, respectively, while patient self fever detection sensitivity was 62% and specificity 93%. With "fever episode" defined as a temp ≥100.4°F for at least 1 hr, tPatch detected 9.6 times the number of fever episodes vs. clinic reads. The average lead time of tPatch detection of clinic-recorded fevers was 3.7 hours. In 25% of all intervals between clinic temp readings, either tPatch or patients detected at least 1 fever episode. The tPatch was well-tolerated, the only adverse events reported were grade 1 skin irritation and discomfort in 4 (5%) patients. Of 65 patients who completed the survey, 95% reported the tPatch as "quite" or "somewhat" comfortable and 94% stated no difficulty in using the tPatch. Exploration of tPatch temp trends over various time intervals for use in fever prediction is ongoing. Conclusions Patient self-monitoring of temp has low sensitivity and is not feasible for long intervals of time (e.g., overnight). Continuous temperature monitoring by a wearable device overcomes these challenges and has the potential to improve early detection and consequently shorten time to antibiotic initiation. A follow-up randomized study is planned to assess the clinical benefits of continuous temp monitoring through patient and clinician alerts triggering early clinical intervention for febrile neutropenia. Figure Disclosures Vera-Aguilera: Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding. Haji-Abolhassani:Verily Life Sciences: Employment. Kulig:Verily Life Sciences: Employment. Heitz:Verily Life Sciences: Employment. Paludo:Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding; Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Ghoreyshi:Verily Life Sciences: Employment. Scheevel:Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding. Schimke:Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding. Markovic:Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding.