Citations

Abstract Iliopsoas tendinitis following total hip arthroplasty has been linked to retroverted acetabular cup position with associated anterior overhang. For severely malpositioned components, preferred treatment is in the form of revision arthroplasty. However, for a substantial number of cases, iliopsoas tendinitis as well as associated pain and disability are observed in the presence of modest acetabular overhang. In such cases, patients may benefit substantially from arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening. Given altered postarthroplasty anatomy, we present an arthroscopic approach employing an iliopsoas air bursogram. In such a way, safe and predictable access can be provided for efficient tendon lengthening without capsular violation or inadvertent instrumentation of the nearby medial neurovascular bundle. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Background: Historically, symptomatic hip labral lesions were treated with arthroscopic debridement. Hip labral repair has become the standard treatment for labral pathology; however, to date, there are limited long-term studies regarding the outcomes of isolated labral debridement. Purpose: To (1) evaluate the long-term patient-reported outcomes of isolated labral debridement, (2) report reoperation and arthroplasty rates, and (3) identify risk factors contributing to reoperation or poor clinical outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4 Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively generated cohort of 59 hips in 57 patients from 1996 to 2010 who underwent hip arthroscopy with labral debridement was performed. Only patients with Tönnis grade <3 were included. Additionally, given the time period analyzed, resection of cam morphology was not performed, and the interportal capsulotomy was not repaired. The pre- and postoperative modified Harris Hip Score; Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living and -Sports scores; and reoperation, conversion to total hip arthroplasty, and risk factors were analyzed. Results: In total, 48 hips in 47 patients (14 men, 33 women; mean age, 48.0 ± 12.9 years) met inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 17 ± 3 years (range, 13-27 years). The mean preoperative Tönnis grade was 1.3 ± 0.6 (range, 0-2), the mean chondral acetabular International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) grade was 1.7 ± 1.6 (range, 0-4), the mean chondral femoral ICRS grade was 0.9 ± 1.4, and the mean acetabular labral articular cartilage grade was 2.5 ± 1.2 (range, 0-4). At the final follow-up, mean the modified Harris Hip Score, HOS-Activities of Daily Living score, and HOS-Sports score were 82.2 ± 16.6, 81.9 ± 20.5, and 82.2 ± 20.5, respectively. Nineteen hips underwent subsequent reoperation at a mean of 5.5 ± 6.2 years (range, 0.5-21.2 years) postoperatively, including 16 hips (33% overall) being converted to total hip arthroplasty. Higher acetabular ICRS chondral grades at the time of surgery were observed in patients who went on to subsequent surgery compared with those who did not (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 1.1 ± 1.5; P = .02). In reoperation-free hips, Tönnis grade demonstrated a trend of increasing over time (1.4 preoperatively vs 1.7 at radiographic follow-up; P = .08). At the final follow-up, 19 hips (40%) had undergone reoperation, and 5 additional hips (10%) were rated as “abnormal” or “severely abnormal” in function, resulting in an overall clinical failure rate of 50%. Conclusion: Isolated labral debridement was found to result in high rates of failure and reoperation, with a third of patients being converted to arthroplasty and half of patients meeting criteria for reoperation or clinical failure. Of note, for patients remaining reoperation-free, satisfactory outcome scores were observed.

Purpose To describe the patient‐reported clinical outcomes following medial meniscus root repair with meniscus centralization and to identify common complications and detail provisional results. Methods Patients undergoing medial meniscus root repair with meniscus centralization from 2020 to 2022 were identified using an institutional database. Patients were followed prospectively using postoperative Tegner Activity Scale, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement, International Knee Documentation Committee score, and a Likert score for improvement, surgery satisfaction, and subsequent surgeries at minimum 1‐year follow‐up with mean 2‐year follow‐up. Demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical details were also collected. Results Twenty‐five patients (age: 50 ± 11 years; sex: 76% female; body mass index: 33 ± 8) were included in this study. Postoperative Tegner score was maintained at preoperative levels ( P = .233), and VAS at rest, VAS with use, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement, and International Knee Documentation Committee improved significantly postoperatively ( P = .003; P < .001, P < .001, P = .023, respectively). Eighty‐eight percent of patients reported subjective improvement in their knee at final follow‐up. Postoperative radiographs did not show any significant osteoarthritis progression, and no patients had undergone a revision meniscus surgery or total knee arthroplasty at the time of follow‐up. Conclusions At minimum 1‐year follow‐up and mean 2‐year follow‐up, patients undergoing medial meniscus root repair with meniscus centralization demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in pain, function, and quality of life and reported high rates of surgery satisfaction. There was no evidence of significant arthritic progression on postoperative imaging, and no patients underwent revision meniscus surgery or total knee arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Level IV, case series.

» Gluteal tendinopathy/greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is the most prevalent of all lower limb tendinopathies, affecting 1 in 4 women older than 50 years and commonly individuals within their fifth and sixth decades of life regardless of activity level. » The condition is believed to originate from age-related degenerative changes about the hip abductor tendon insertions and the surrounding bursae, and is exacerbated by congenital and acquired abnormal hip biomechanics. » Treatment of gluteal tendinopathy/GTPS often begins with noninvasive nonoperative modalities such as activity modifications, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and physical therapy. For recalcitrant symptoms, additional nonoperative therapies have been used; however, there remains a lack of comparative efficacy between these adjunct treatments. » In this article, we examine the available literature regarding the nonoperative management of gluteal tendinopathy/GTPS and provide insight into the effectiveness of current treatment modalities.

Background: Hip arthroscopy continues to advance and become increasingly commonly performed. With the evolution of techniques and instrumentation, labral repair rather than debridement has emerged as the treatment of choice for labral pathology. There remains a lack of data on long-term outcomes after labral repair. Purpose: To (1) evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes of primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement, (2) report achievement rates of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and (3) investigate rates of reoperation and progression to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Prospectively collected data were reviewed for patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair between 2010 and 2013. Patients’ medical records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, reoperation, and progression to THA. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively using the following scales: visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; Tegner activity scale; modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS); 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12); Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL); HOS–Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS); and Non-Arthritic Hip Score. Patients were also surveyed for satisfaction, subjective improvement, and level of function. Results: A total of 32 patients (n = 24 women; n = 8 men) with a mean age of 27.7 years (range, 13.6-51 years) were evaluated for a mean of 9.4 years (range, 9-12.1 years). Patients achieved significant mean improvements in VAS pain at rest of 2 points, VAS pain with use of 1.9, mHHS of 19.9 points, iHOT-12 of 33.5 points, HOS-ADL of 17.4 points, and HOS-SSS of 29.5 points ( P≤ .015 for all). Eleven patients (34.4%) underwent reoperation and 4 (12.5%) progressed to THA during the study period. At the final follow-up, the MCID achievement rate was ≥68%, the PASS achievement rates ranged from 39% to 65%, and the mean patient satisfaction was 8.1 on a 1 to 10 scale, with 10 denoting most satisfied. Conclusion: Patients demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in pain, mHHS, iHOT-12, HOS-ADL, and HOS-SSS scores at 9 years postoperatively. The all-cause reoperation rate was 34.4%, and 12.5% of patients progressed to THA.

Purpose To describe the clinical and radiographic features associated with isolated hypermobile lateral meniscus (HLM), and report patient outcomes following surgically repaired isolated HLM. Methods All patients diagnosed with HLM from 2000 to 2020 at a single academic institution were identified and reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had concomitant ligament injury or lacked 2‐year follow‐up. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were determined from clinical notes. Statistical analysis was performed in JMP, and statistical significance was determined with use of a paired t ‐test. Results Eighteen knees in 17 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean patient age was 24.1 (range: 6‐61) years. Mean follow‐up was 73 months (25‐151 months). All 18 knees reported pain at presentation; 94% (17/18) had mechanical symptoms. All 18 knees had preoperative MRIs, but only 1 (5.6%) knee was correctly diagnosed by a musculoskeletal trained radiologist. Most repairs were performed with an all‐inside technique (61%, 11/18). VAS score improved significantly from 7.2 ± 2.9 preoperatively to 0.7 ± 1.9 postoperatively, with average improvement of VAS score of 6.5 ( P < .001). Only one (5.6%) knee required revision meniscal surgery. Conclusions Hypermobile lateral meniscus patients commonly see multiple providers, fail to have their HLM diagnosed on MRI, and undergo various treatments prior to a successful diagnosis. Localized lateral joint line pain, mechanical symptoms, and absence of distinct meniscus tear on MRI are the most frequent clinical presentations. Surgery with meniscus repair is a reliable solution to improve pain and mechanical symptoms. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Background: Arthrofibrosis (AF) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains a challenge. There is a paucity of data on arthroscopic interventions for AF after ACLR. Purpose: To (1) describe the patient, injury, and surgical characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of those requiring an arthroscopic intervention for loss of motion after ACLR and (2) compare outcomes between patients undergoing an early intervention (within 3 months) versus those undergoing a late intervention (after 3 months). Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients with a history of ACLR and a subsequent operative procedure for postoperative AF at a single institution between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Arthroscopic interventions included lysis of adhesions, capsular release with or without manipulation under anesthesia, and excision of cyclops lesions. Patients were excluded if they had a knee dislocation or multiple-ligament injury, a periarticular fracture, or less than 2-year follow-up from the arthroscopic intervention. PROs including the Tegner activity score, visual analog scale pain score, and International Knee Documentation Committee score as well as knee range of motion (ROM) were recorded. Results: A total of 40 patients were included with a mean age of 27.2 years (range, 11.0-63.8 years) at surgery and a mean follow-up of 10.0 years (range, 2.9-20.7 years). The mean preoperative flexion and extension were 102° (range, 40°-150°) and 8° (range, 0°-25°), respectively. The mean postoperative flexion and extension were 131° (range, 110° to 150°) and 0° (range, –10° to 5°), respectively. After the arthroscopic intervention, the mean ROM improved from 94° (range, 40°-140°) preoperatively to 131° (range, 107°-152°) at final follow-up ( P < .001), and the visual analog scale pain score improved from 3.0 preoperatively to 1.2 postoperatively ( P = .001). Overall, 13 patients (32.5%) underwent an intervention within 3 months and 27 (67.5%) after 3 months. The early intervention group had a higher postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score compared with the late intervention group (86.8 vs 71.7, respectively; P = .035). Conclusion: An arthroscopic intervention for AF after ACLR successfully improved knee ROM and pain. Patients who underwent either early or late surgery obtained satisfactory motion and function, although improved PROs were observed when the intervention occurred within 3 months of the primary procedure.

Purpose To evaluate long‐term patient‐reported outcomes and achievement rates of patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in young athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy, and to report long‐term sports continuance and reoperation. Methods Inclusion criteria consisted of age <24 years at surgery, femoroacetabular impingement undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair, and participation in sport with intent to return to sport after surgery. The enrollment period was from April 2009 to June 2014. Modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS), HOS Activities of Daily Living (HOS‐ADL), and HOS Sport (HOS‐Sport) were collected preoperatively, 2 years’ postoperatively, and final follow‐up. Patients were evaluated for PASS achievement, reoperation, and sports participation. Results Forty‐two hips in 37 patients (11 male, 26 female, age: 17.7 ± 2.1 years, range 13.6‐23.0, body mass index 22.8 ± 2.9, range 17.6‐33.7) met inclusion criteria and were followed for 10.0 ± 1.3 years (range 8.5‐13.0) postoperatively. Mean mHHS, HOS‐ADL and HOS‐Sports outcome scores at minimum 8.5 years were 82.2 ± 12.9, 89.6 ± 10.9, and 81.8 ± 16.4, respectively, with significant ( P < .001) postoperative improvements. Thirty survey respondents (83%) met PASS for mHHS, 27 (75%) for HOS‐ADL, and 24 (67%) for HOS‐Sports. At minimum 8.5‐year follow‐up, only 9 of 37 (24%) cited their hip as the reason for stopping sport. Of the remaining patients, 17 of 28 (61%), continued playing their initial sport. There was no difference in patient‐reported outcomes between patients who endorsed sports continuance and patients who did not report sports continuance and did not cite their hip as a reason ( P ≥ .229). At final follow‐up, 4 hips (10%) had undergone subsequent surgical intervention at a mean of 4.8 ± 3.3 years (range 1.0‐8.4) postoperatively. Conclusions Durable mid‐term outcomes and satisfactory PASS achievement rates are observed in young amateur athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. At minimum 8.5‐year follow up, approximately 1 in 4 patients discontinue their sports due to hip related reasons. Level of Evidence Level IV, case‐series.

Purpose To (1) evaluate the efficacy of surgery for arthrofibrosis (AF), as measured by preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), and (2) evaluate patient‐reported outcomes at mid‐ to long‐term follow‐up. Methods We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database including patients who sustained multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) managed surgically, sustained loss of ROM after surgical intervention, and underwent subsequent lysis of adhesions (LOA) and/or manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Loss of ROM was defined as clinically symptomatic loss of terminal extension (flexion deformity) and/or flexion compared with the contralateral side. Results In total, 12 patients (6 male and 6 female patients; age, 36.0 ± 8.7 years; body mass index, 36.3 ± 8.7) met the inclusion criteria and underwent LOA and/or MUA at a mean of 14 ± 27 months (median, 4.0 months; interquartile range, 3.5‐9.3 months) after MLKI surgery. Prior to AF intervention, patients showed mean flexion of 75.9° ± 36.0° (range, 30°‐129°), mean extension of 3.2° ± 5.2° (range, 0°‐12°), and a mean arc of motion of 72.7° ± 34.1° (range, 30°‐117°). At a mean follow‐up of 7.0 ± 3.9 years (range, 2.4‐16.6 years) after AF intervention, patients showed a significant increase in knee flexion of 49° ( P = .003), a significant increase in arc of motion of 51° ( P = .002), and an increase in extension of 3° ( P = .086). The mean final International Knee Documentation Committee score was 59.5 ± 23.9; Lysholm score, 72.1 ± 20.6; Tegner activity scale score, 5.6 ± 2.8; visual analog scale score at rest, 1.0 ± 1.6; and visual analog scale score with use, 3.3 ± 2.5. At final follow‐up, 2 patients (17%) had undergone conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at 10.3 and 24.8 years after MLKI surgery. Of the 10 patients who did not go on to TKA, 9 (90%) reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with their AF knee surgery. Conclusions At mid‐term follow‐up, LOA and/or MUA for symptomatic AF after multiligamentous knee surgery results in high rates of patient satisfaction and improved knee ROM and pain scores, as well as durable and satisfactory functional outcomes in patients not undergoing TKA. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) have gained popularity in recent years as biologic approaches to potentially augment healing after meniscus repair. There have been few studies comparing outcomes in patients undergoing meniscus repair with versus without biologic augmentation and, furthermore, little clarity on the role of biologic augmentation for meniscus repairs performed with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose: To determine the association of BMAC or PRP augmentation with revision surgery after both isolated meniscus repair and meniscus repair performed concomitantly with ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The PearlDiver Mariner dataset was queried to identify all patients who underwent primary meniscus repair, both with and without concomitant ACLR, and who received ipsilateral BMAC or PRP at the time of surgery. Patients who underwent similar surgery but without BMAC or PRP augmentation were then identified and matched in a 5:1 ratio according to age, sex, body mass index, and various comorbidities to 3 separate BMAC/PRP augmentation groups: overall cohort (with and without ACLR), repair with concomitant ACLR, and isolated repair. The primary outcome was revision meniscus surgery (meniscectomy or revision meniscus repair). Results: Overall, 3420 patients (570 with BMAC/PRP augmentation; 2850 matched controls without augmentation) were included. There were no significant differences in the reported demographics or comorbidities between any of the BMAC/PRP groups and their respective matched controls ( P > .05 for all comparisons). There was no difference in revision rate between BMAC/PRP-augmented isolated meniscus repairs and matched controls ( P = .235). Patients who underwent BMAC/PRP-augmented meniscus repair with concomitant ACLR experienced a significantly lower incidence of revision surgery compared with matched controls without BMAC/PRP augmentation (5.2% vs 7.9% respectively; odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27-0.63; P < .001), but the number of revisions was relatively small. Conclusion: There was no association between BMAC or PRP augmentation and the incidence of revision surgery after isolated primary meniscus repair. There was a statistically significant decrease in the rate of revision meniscus surgery when BMAC or PRP was used to augment meniscus repairs in the setting of concurrent ACLR; however, the overall revision rates were small.