Citations

Abstract In this study, we investigated tumor intrinsic mechanisms of resistance to cevostamab, a bispecific T-cell engager targeting Fc receptor-like protein 5 (FCRL5) and CD3 that has shown promising clinical activity and durable responses in advanced MM. Longitudinal bone marrow aspirates from nine MM patients treated with cevostamab were analyzed. All patients had previously been treated with both immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PI) and eight patients had received daratumumab prior to cevostamab, which was, on average, the 6th line of treatment (mean treatment duration 220±273 days). Five of nine patients responded with ≥PR. Whole genome and transcriptome sequencing was performed on sorted CD138+ MM cells at baseline, and whole exome and transcriptome sequencing was performed on five and three samples, respectively, following cevostamab discontinuation. Baseline FCRL5 expression levels did not correlate with clinical response. However, in one non-responder patient, FCRL5 expression increased four-fold after 28 days of treatment. Given the location of the FCRL5 gene on chromosome 1q—commonly amplified in advanced MM—we evaluated the presence of Gain(1q) in our study cohort. All patients whose best response was ≤PR (n=6) harbored a Gain(1q), whereas it was absent in those who achieved VGPR and sCR (n=3). Crucially, one of the patients that achieved sCR was initially treated with 60 mg of cevostamab for one year and then escalated to a higher dose cohort (90 mg) in the second year. At progression, a clonal FCRL5E115A missense mutation (allelic frequency = 56%) and a subclonal FCRL5G455Efs*19(allelic frequency = 5%) frameshift deletion mutation were detected, both absent at baseline. The missense mutation was located on the extracellular domain of FCRL5 targeted by cevostamab. To validate the functional impact of FCRL5E115Aand FCRL5G455Efs*19 on the sensitivity to cevostamab in vitro, we generated a FCRL5 knockout (KO) model utilizing CRISPR-Cas9 technology in OPM2 MM cells. In vitro cevostamab cytotoxicity assay with PBMCs and pan T cells from healthy donors at various effector to target (E:T) ratios confirmed a complete loss of cevostamab sensitivity in our FCRL5KO models. cDNA encoding patient-derived FCRL5 alterations (FCRL5E115Aand FCRL5G455Efs*19) as well as FCRL5wtwere cloned into mammalian expression vector and reintroduced into FCRL5KO cells. Cevostamab sensitivity was reinstated by FCRL5wt expression in KO cells. In contrast, FCRL5E115A conferred complete resistance to cevostamab (p<0,001) and FCRL5G455Efs*19 depicted a significant decline in cevostamab sensitivity relative to FCRL5wt expressing models. Additional experiment utilizing direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) are ongoing to monitor the membrane localization of FCRL5 mutants. By integrating genomic, transcriptomic and functional data with clinical outcomes, this work is the first to report on acquired FCRL5 mutations causing resistance to cevostamab. We hypothesize that the prolonged treatment duration may have contributed to the acquisition of the target mutations and note a subsequent durable sCR response to BCMA-targeted immunotherapy in the same patient, suggesting immune-related factors such as T cell exhaustion, were not drivers of cevostamab resistance. Due to the limited sample size, these findings require validation in larger cohorts. Nonetheless, our findings begin to elucidate tumor intrinsic mechanisms associated with cevostamab resistance.

Abstract Introduction: T-PLL is a rare, aggressive leukemia with poor prognosis and limited therapies. Previous studies on T-PLL patients receiving an allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) are limited by small numbers with limited data on disease and transplant characteristics. Further, recent data from our large national cohort of patients demonstrated significant survival difference between TCL1A+ and TCL1A- T-PLL, and CD8+ T-PLL vs CD8- T-PLL. In this large multi-center series, utilizing comprehensive disease subtype and alloSCT clinical data, we evaluated prognostic and survival therapeutic outcomes in T-PLL patients that had an alloSCT with a particular focus on T-PLL disease subtypes. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 572 diagnosed with T-PLL at 21 academic cancer centers throughout the USA between 2000-2023, of which we performed a further evaluation on the169 that proceeded with alloSCT. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Among n=169 alloSCT recipients with T-PLL, the median follow-up time was 20.9 months post-alloSCT (range: 0.2-182.9), the median age at transplant was 59 years (range: 35-77) and 52% were male. In evaluated patients (n=109), TCL1A was positive by cytogenetics or FISH in 69%. As our recent analysis demonstrated significant differences in survival among specific subtypes of T-PLL, we evaluated outcomes in patients with CD4+CD8- T-PLL (n=90, 53%), CD4-CD8+ (n=17, 10%) T-PLL, and CD4+CD8+ T-PLL (n=52, 31%). 53% (87/164) had known nodal involvement at diagnosis identified by PET or CT scan and 45% (43/96) of known patients had minimal residual disease (MRD) at the time of transplant [defined as <5% T-PLL in marrow by flow, or +cytogenetics (e.g. TCL1A)] prior to alloSCT. At the time of alloSCT, 136 (80%) patients were in CR and 23 (14%) patients were in PR. Forty-nine (30%) had a myeloablative (MAC)conditioning regimen and 114 (70%) had a reduced intensity chemotherapy (RIC) conditioning regimen. Eighty (49%) patients had TBI as part of their regimen. The most common regimens were fludarabine (flu)/melphalan based regimens (n=44; 26.0%), flu/cyclophosphamide (cy) based regimens (n=33; 19.5%), flu/busulfan based regimens (n=22; 13.0%), flu/total body irradiation (TBI) (n=8; 4.7%), and cy/TBI (n=4; 2.4%). Across the whole cohort, the median OS and PFS post-alloSCT was 32.6 months (95% CI: 21.0-41.9) and 20.8 months (95% CI: 14.4-30.5) months while the 1-year cumulative incidences (CI) of NRM and relapse were 17% and 20%, respectively. The incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD and cGVHD were 19% and 23%. There was no difference between patients with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (n=49, 29%) when compared to patients that received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) (n=114, 67%) in OS (33.1 vs 29.2; p=0.68) and PFS (20.2 vs 20.8; p=0.97). Patients that were MRD+ (n=31) had worse OS (22.2 vs 48.6; p=0.1) and PFS (14.1 vs 32.5; p=0.04) and higher rates of relapse (1-year relapse 20% vs 8%; p=0.08) than patients that were MRD- (n=50). PFS was improved in those who received alloSCT though only trended towards significance due to low numbers (HR 0.76, p=0.09). In subtype analysis, TCL1A+ T-PLL had significantly worse outcomes compared to TCL1A negative T-PLL. TCL1A+ disease had significantly worse OS (21.6 vs 63.1; p=0.01) and PFS (12.4 vs 50.7; p=0.01) compared to TCL1A-. Additionally, in TCL1A+ disease CI of NRM (24% vs 3%; p=0.02) and relapse (25% vs 12%; p=0.86) was higher vs TCL1A- PLL. CD4+CD8-, CD4-CD8+, and CD4+CD8+ disease had no difference in survival via either OS (28.0 vs 34.4 vs 21.0; p=0.17) or PFS (29.4 vs 23.5 vs 13.6; p=0.09) as well as no difference 1-year CI of NRM ( 11.6 vs 23.5 vs 26.2; p=0.35) and relapse (18.5 vs 23.5 vs 20.0; p=0.67).Conclusions: AlloSCT significantly improved outcomes for patients with T-PLL compared to those who did not proceed to alloSCT and remains he only curative therapy for those with T-PLL. OS, PFS, and CI relapse were significantly worse for patients with TCL1A+ subtype of T-PLL, or those with MRD positivity or PR prior to alloSCT. Novel strategies to decrease relapse such as post-alloSCT maintenance therapy to improve outcomes are urgently needed in these patients.

Abstract Objectives Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is the second most frequent inflammatory rheumatic disease in older adults, after rheumatoid arthritis. Recommendations for the management of PMR, developed by the German, Austrian and Swiss societies of rheumatology and other organizations were published in 2018. Methods These recommendations are now updated based on a systematic literature search that covered the evidence published between July 2016 and January 2024 on therapeutic interventions and prognostic factors for PMR. The search string followed that used in the original recommendations, with an extension for targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Based on evidence and expert opinions, the task force (12 physicians, two healthcare professionals and two patients from three countries) developed a set of four overarching principles and seven specific recommendations. Results The current update reiterates previous guideline recommendations for glucocorticoids (15–25 mg prednisone equivalents per day) as initial treatment for PMR once diagnosis has been confirmed, with subsequent tapering over 4–12 months (depending on whether a glucocorticoid sparing agent is used), with monitoring of disease activity and treatment-related adverse effects. Interleukin-6 receptor blocking agents should be considered in addition to glucocorticoids in patients with relapsing disease and can be considered in patients with new-onset PMR at high risk for glucocorticoid-related adverse events. Methotrexate or rituximab may be alternatives. Older and frail patients should also be offered an individualized exercise program. Conclusion These updated recommendations should serve as an aid to evidence-based decisions ensuring high-quality care for all patients with PMR.

Three previously uncharacterized bacterial species, designated strains BD586 T , BD613 T and BD626 T , isolated from human clinical specimens, were identified at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. Initial identification efforts using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight MS and partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing proved inconclusive. Comprehensive analysis involving phenotypic characterization, biochemical assays and whole-genome sequencing was undertaken. The isolates were Gram-negative, motile, facultatively anaerobic rods, occurring singly, in pairs and in short chains; BD613 T additionally formed small aggregates. The isolates tested positive for catalase and negative for oxidase. Their colonies appeared smooth, white, opaque and non-haemolytic. Growth was observed at 35 °C under aerobic, anaerobic and CO₂-enriched conditions, as well as in media with NaCl concentrations up to 10% and at pH 7-9. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred from core gene alignments, average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization comparisons. Results confirmed the placement of BD586 T , BD613 T and BD626 T within the recently established Dryocola genus, while also indicating their novelty as distinct species. The major cellular fatty acids were C 16:0 and C 17:0 cyclo. Based on these findings, a formal description of three new species, Dryocola mayonis sp. nov. (type strain BD586 T =TSD 474 T , =NCTC 15089 T , =DSM 119465 T ), Dryocola sharpae sp. nov. (type strain BD613 T =TSD 475 T , =NCTC 15090 T , =DSM 119466 T ) and Dryocola baronae sp. nov. (type strain BD626 T =TSD 476 T , =NCTC 15091 T , =DSM 119479 T ), is proposed, and the genus description of Dryocola is emended to refine its genomic, morphological and chemotaxonomic boundaries.

Background Recent studies suggest that general surgery (GS) residents perform more operations related to their future specialty compared with their peers. In this multi-institutional study, we examined the process of early specialization among GS residents pursuing a career in vascular surgery (VS). Methods Data from the US Resident OPerative Experience (ROPE) Consortium, comprising 20 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited GS residency programs across the United States, were queried. Case volume and type were compared between GS residents pursuing vs fellowship and all other residents. Effect size was evaluated using Cohen’s d statistic. Effect size was considered large if d > 0.8, moderate if 0.5 ≤ d < 0.8, small if 0.2 ≤ d < 0.5, and inconsequential if d < 0.2. Results A total of 1343 GS residents graduated from 2010-2020 across all programs participating in ROPE, of which 135 (10.1%) pursued vs fellowship. Total major vascular case volume was significantly greater among residents pursuing vs fellowship (138 [100-207] vs 100 [80-139], P < 0.0001) with a large effect size (d = 1.81). Vascular cases reported in a surgeon chief role (27 [9-53] vs 10 [2-29], P < 0.0001, d = 0.76, moderate effect) and surgeon junior role (107 [79-154] vs 88 [62-118], P < 0.0001, d = 1.00, large effect) were also greater among GS residents pursing a vs specialty. Nearly all vascular operative categories demonstrated similar trends ( P < 0.01 each). Conclusions GS residents pursuing a vs fellowship perform more vascular cases compared with their peers. Given the differences in both surgeon chief and surgeon junior roles, career focus may begin as early as the junior resident years.

Abstract Background This phase 1 study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of rucaparib (RUB), a poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, combined with liposomal irinotecan (nal‐IRI) and 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) in metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. RUB targets DNA repair pathways, showing efficacy in tumors with homologous recombination deficiency, such as BRCA mutations. Preclinical data suggest synergy with irinotecan, but overlapping toxicities pose challenges. Methods Eighteen patients with metastatic GI cancers, who previously progressed on at least one systemic therapy, were enrolled. A novel sequential dosing regimen, informed by nal‐IRI pharmacokinetic analysis, was used. Twelve patients were evaluable for dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) and 12 for response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 criteria. Results The MTD was established as RUB 600 mg twice daily, nal‐IRI 50 mg/m 2 , and 5‐FU 2400 mg/m 2 over 46 hours. The objective response rate (ORR) was 33% (4 of 12), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 75% (9 of 12). Common grade 3 adverse events included diarrhea (33%) and neutropenia (25%), with no grade 4/5 events. Responses were notable in patients with somatic ATM and BRCA mutations, especially those with prior platinum exposure. No DLTs occurred at the recommended phase 2 dose. Conclusions This optimized dosing schedule successfully established the MTD for RUB with nal‐IRI and 5‐FU, overcoming prior challenges with PARP inhibitor and irinotecan combinations. The promising ORR and DCR support further evaluation of this regimen in advanced GI malignancies.

Abstract Description Broad spectrum antibiotics are being increasingly used in obstetric patients without long term follow up on neonatal risks. Previous data have suggested antibiotics for preterm premature rupture of membranes increases neonatal late onset sepsis and nectrozing enterocolitis (NEC), but the mechanism is unknown. We analyzed samples from the Mechanisms of Maternal Immunoglobulin A control over the neonatal microbiota and the development of NEC (MAMI) trial. MAMI enrolled infants born under 32 weeks and collected maternal-infant biospecimens. We performed a detailed chart review for maternal antibiotic exposure and analyzed breast milk samples collected 10-45 days post delivery by ELISA. Data were compared by t test and one way ANOVA. Breast milk IgA was higher than IgG and IgM (p &lt; 0.0001, p &lt; 0.005). When compared by antibiotic exposure, IgA and IgM were decreased with any antibiotic exposure (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). IgA was decreased by length of antibiotic exposure (p = 0.02). We stratified by the antibiotic spectrum of activity into narrow (penicillin, ampicillin) and broad (2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporin, gentamicin, etc) and found that the spectrum of antimicrobial activity was associated with a decrease in maternal IgA with broad spectrum antibiotics with the least amount of IgA (p &lt; 0.004). Our data demonstrate mammary IgA and IgM are decreased with antenatal antimicrobial exposure. These data suggest a mechanism by which antenatal antibiotics may lead to neonatal sepsis and NEC. Topic Categories Mucosal and Regional Immunology (MUC)

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (nICIs) have demonstrated high response rates in deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability–high (dMMR/MSI-H) gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). The NEONIPIGA and INFINITY trials demonstrated high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in this patient population. Furthermore, the INFINITY trial explored the feasibility of managing these patients nonoperatively, demonstrating promising results. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of nICIs in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GEA, with a focus on the feasibility of nonoperative management (NOM). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients with resectable dMMR/MSI-H GEA and treated with nICIs ± surgery at the Mayo Clinic. Patients were identified from institutional records, and clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes were clinical complete response (cCR) and pCR. Secondary outcomes included event-free survival (EFS), radiologic complete response (rCR), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). RESULTS A total of 26 patients treated between April 1, 2017, and July 30, 2025, were identified. Nine patients (34.6%) underwent surgery, of whom six (66.7%) achieved pCR. Seventeen patients (65.4%) pursued NOM, with 10 (71.4%) of 14 evaluable patients achieving cCR and 14 (82.4%) of 17 evaluable achieving rCR. One patient who initially achieved cCR had a local recurrence on surveillance endoscopy and underwent salvage endoscopic resection. At a median follow-up of 19.3 months, 15 (88.2%) of 17 patients in the NOM cohort were alive and metastasis-free, with EFS rates of 87.3% at 12 and 24 months for all patients. irAEs occurred in nine patients (34.6%), with no grade ≥3 toxicities. CONCLUSION In this retrospective cohort study, nICIs led to high cCR and pCR rates in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GEA, supporting the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting and the feasibility of NOM in select patients.