Citations

AbstractBackgroundThe causes of rapidly progressive dementia are heterogeneous, including neurodegenerative, vascular, and autoimmune/inflammatory diseases. Overlap in presenting symptoms and signs, results of cognitive testing, and findings on brain imaging and other common diagnostic tests confounds the etiologic diagnosis, contributing to diagnostic delays, missed opportunities for treatment, and poorer outcomes in patients with RPD. New tools and approaches are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy, with particular emphasis on improving early recognition of patients with potentially treatable causes of RPD.MethodsEstablished and emerging biomarkers of Alzheimer disease neuropathology (Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, p‐tau231), neuroaxonal and neuronal injury (neurofilament light [NfL], VILIP‐1, total tau), neuroinflammation (YKL‐40, sTREM2, GFAP, MCP‐1), and synaptic dysfunction (SNAP‐25, neurogranin) were measured in cerebrospinal fluid obtained at presentation from 78 prospectively accrued patients with RPD due to neurodegenerative (n = 35), vascular (n = 9), and autoimmune/inflammatory (n = 34) diseases, and 72 age‐ and sex‐similar cognitively normal individuals (controls). Causes of RPD were further classified as potentially treatment‐responsive or nonresponsive, referencing the extant literature. Biomarker levels were compared across etiologic diagnoses and by treatment responsiveness, referencing control values. Analyses were adjusted for the effects of age (ANCOVA).ResultsAlzheimer disease biomarkers (low Aβ42/40 and elevated p‐tau181 and p‐tau231) were associated with neurodegenerative causes of RPD (ANCOVA, p = 0.02 p = 0.30, p = 0.15), while high NfL (p = 0.61), low VILIP‐1 (p = 0.009), and elevated markers of inflammation (sTREM2, p = 0.009; YKL‐40, p<0.001) identified patients with autoimmune/inflammatory diseases (Figure). MCP‐1 levels were highest in patients with vascular causes of RPD (p = 0.08). 44 patients (56.4%) had potentially treatment‐responsive causes of RPD. Treatment responsiveness was associated with higher levels of CSF Aβ42/40 (p = 0.003), NfL (p<0.001), sTREM2 (p<0.001) and YKL‐40 (p<0.001); and lower levels of p‐tau‐181 and p‐tau231 (p<0.001, p<0.001) and VILIP‐1 (p<0.001).ConclusionSelected biomarkers measured in CSF at presentation associate with etiologic diagnosis and treatment responsiveness in patients with neurodegenerative, vascular, and autoimmune/inflammatory causes of RPD. Biomarker panels may be adapted to improve recognition of patients with treatment‐responsive causes of RPD early in the symptomatic course when treatments may be most effective.

Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the frequency of modifiable dementia risk factors and their association with cognitive impairment and rate of decline in diverse participants engaged in studies of memory and aging. Methods Modifiable dementia risk factors and their associations with cognitive impairment and cognitive decline were determined in community‐dwelling African American (AA; n = 261) and non‐Hispanic White (nHW; n = 193) participants who completed ≥2 visits at the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer Disease Research Center in Jacksonville, Florida. Risk factors and their associations with cognitive impairment (global Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] ≥ 0.5) and rates of decline (CDR Sum of Boxes) in impaired participants were compared in AA and nHW participants, controlling for demographics, APOE ɛ4 status, and Area Deprivation Index. Results Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, and diabetes were overrepresented in AA participants, but were not associated with cognitive impairment. Depression was associated with increased odds of cognitive impairment in AA (odds ratio [OR] = 4.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.13–8.67) and nHW participants (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.21–6.44) but uniquely associated with faster decline in AA participants (β = 1.71, 95% CI = 0.69–2.73, p = 0.001). Fewer AA participants reported antidepressant use (9/49, 18%) than nHW counterparts (57/78, 73%, p < 0.001). Vitamin B12 deficiency was also associated with an increased rate of cognitive decline in AA participants (β = 2.65, 95% CI = 0.38–4.91, p = 0.023). Interpretation Modifiable dementia risk factors are common in AA and nHW participants, representing important risk mitigation targets. Depression was associated with dementia in AA and nHW participants, and with accelerated declines in cognitive function in AA participants. Optimizing depression screening and treatment may improve cognitive trajectories and outcomes in AA participants. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:518–529