Citations

Key Points Genetic testing of individuals suspected of monogenic urinary stone disease resolved 34% of families with 22 different genes detected. Resolved individuals had a lower baseline and last visit eGFR and earlier age of stone presentation than the unresolved group. Specific phenotypes and younger diagnostic age were associated with a monogenic cause, allowing refinement of future screenings. Background Urinary stone disease with a clear genetic cause, monogenic stone disease (MSD), is increasingly recognized as a significant proportion of the total population. When MSD is suspected, genetic testing provides a firm diagnosis that can alter management and treatment. Here, we present testing results from a large cohort with suspected MSD. Methods Patients with features suggestive of MSD (early onset, family history, frequent stones, nephrocalcinosis [NC], and/or CKD) were recruited by the Rare Kidney Stone Consortium and genotyped for up to 160 known or candidate MSD genes via a targeted massively parallel sequencing panel. We compared clinical and biochemical features between genetically resolved MSD and unresolved individuals. Results Of 426 families (657 patients) enrolled, 145 (34%) were resolved with identified disease associated variants in 22 known MSD genes. Ninety-nine families were biallelic, 37 monoallelic, and two digenic. An additional 21 of the 231 screened family members were resolved. Genes identified in ten or more families include the following: AGXT , HOGA1 , SLC34A3 , CYP24A1 , SLC3A1 , and CLCN5 . Compared with the unresolved group, MSD probands had a lower baseline and last visit eGFR, earlier age of stone presentation, and more stone events and procedures/year of life. The resolve rate was higher in those <16 years, and NC was seen earlier in the MSD group. Overall, NC was a risk factor for lower eGFR. Among the specific disorders, patients with primary hyperoxaluria had the earliest age of stone and NC diagnosis, and as expected, the highest urinary oxalate level. Conclusions Our study emphasizes the value of selecting patients enriched for factors associated with MSD, and comprehensive genetic testing to achieve a high yield of genetic diagnoses. Significant clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients with MSD were defined. A definitive MSD diagnosis facilitates individualized management and strategies to delay disease progression in probands and affected family members.

Abstract The landscape of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) diagnosis is evolving rapidly, driven by advances in disease understanding, biomarker tools, and disease‐modifying therapies. Modern diagnostic approaches emphasize biological precision, early detection, and dynamic frameworks that adapt to treatment‐induced changes in disease biology. These frameworks enable opportunities for personalized interventions—encompassing pharmacological and non‐pharmacological strategies—and for enhanced clinical trial design. However, implementing these advancements globally is influenced by diverse cultural, infrastructural, and regulatory factors. The 2024 Alzheimer's Association International Conference Advancements: Modernizing Diagnosis, held in Japan, provided a unique platform to explore these global dynamics, particularly from an Asian perspective. This article highlights key discussions from the conference, exploring the role of biomarker‐based diagnostic frameworks in shaping the future of AD/ADRD research, diagnosis, and treatment. We highlight regional challenges and successes and emphasize ethical considerations and practical strategies needed to ensure equitable access to diagnostic and therapeutic innovations. Highlights Advances in biomarkers are reshaping Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and treatment. Modern diagnostic frameworks highlight biological precision, early detection, and dynamic frameworks. The 2024 Alzheimer's Association International Conference Advancements: Modernizing Diagnosis explored challenges and opportunities in global biomarker implementation. The conference explored geographic‐specific impacts, focusing on Asia.

ABSTRACTCronkhite‐Canada Syndrome (CCS) is a rare non‐hereditary gastroenterological polyposis syndrome without a clear etiology. Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematological disorders. Immune dysregulation has been posited as a contributor to the development of both. A 70‐year‐old man developed chronic diarrhea, dysgeusia, and onycholysis. Endoscopic evaluation and testing to exclude hereditary polyposis syndromes resulted in a diagnosis of CCS. Approximately 1 year later, he was noted to have persistent anemia, which was ultimately diagnosed as MDS. He was evaluated with a myeloid disorder next‐generation sequencing panel and found to have mutations in IDH2, SRSF2, and JAK2. This is the second reported case characterizing concomitant MDS and CCS. This is the first case to report the development of MDS after the diagnosis and treatment of CCS. A successful management strategy for both disorders is outlined within this case report.

Background: Cholestatic liver diseases, including primary sclerosing cholangitis, are characterized by biliary fibroinflammation. TGFβ-activated cholangiocytes release signals that recruit immune cells and activate myofibroblasts, promoting inflammation and extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition. TGFβ also regulates stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), an enzyme involved in lipid signaling. Yet, the role of SCD or its inhibitor, Aramchol, in biliary fibroinflammation had not been studied. Methods and Results: Mdr2 -/- with established biliary fibrosis and 3,5-diethoxycarboncyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) diet-fed mice were treated with Aramchol meglumine (12.5 mg/kg/day). Hepatic fibrosis was assessed by qPCR, Picrosirius red staining, immunofluorescence, and hydroxyproline content. Human H69 or murine large cholangiocyte cell lines stimulated with TGFβ, as well as PSC-derived cholangiocytes (PSC-C), were treated with Aramchol or SCD siRNA. RNA-seq, fibroinflammatory marker expression, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) activity, and targeted fatty acid profiling were performed. Aramchol treatment significantly reduced hepatic ECM gene expression, inflammatory cytokines ( Il6 , Tnfa ), collagen content, and myofibroblast activation (aSMA staining) in both mouse models. In TGFβ-stimulated H69 cells, Aramchol suppressed hepatic fibrosis pathways and enhanced PPAR signaling. Aramchol also reduced the expression of fibrotic markers, myofibroblast-activating mediators ( VEGFA and PDGFB ), and IL6, mirroring the effects of SCD knockdown. In PSC-C, Aramchol significantly downregulated SCD, VEGFA and IL6 . Conversely, PPARα and -γ activity and fatty acid agonist, linoleic acid levels were increased in cholangiocyte cell lines. Conclusions: Aramchol attenuates and prevents biliary fibrosis in mouse models of cholestatic liver disease by inhibiting TGFβ-induced fibroinflammatory mediators and activating PPARa/γ in cholangiocytes. These findings, combined with its favorable clinical safety profile, support the potential of Aramchol as a therapeutic candidate for PSC.

Abstract Purpose It remains unclear whether increasing the frequency of administration of 0.01% atropine improves its effectiveness in slowing axial elongation or refractive progression. This study compared twice‐daily 0.01% atropine administration and traditional once‐nightly administration. Methods A hybrid design was adopted incorporating both retrospective and prospective elements, with participants observed for 1 year. The control group (received saline eye drops) and once‐daily 0.01% atropine group (Atropine‐1 group) were derived from two previous trials, while the twice‐daily 0.01% atropine group (Atropine‐2 group) was enrolled prospectively. A total of 163 participants were included in the intention‐to‐treat set, with 51, 70 and 42 participants in the control, Atropine‐1 and Atropine‐2 groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the change in axial length (AL), and the secondary outcome was the change in cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER). Results Compared with the control group (0.48 ± 0.22 mm), both Atropine‐1 (0.26 ± 0.17 mm) and Atropine‐2 (0.15 ± 0.18 mm) groups showed significantly reduced AL elongation ( p < 0.001). Notably, Atropine‐2 significantly improved slowing of AL elongation compared with Atropine‐1 ( p = 0.008). The result of the secondary outcome (adjusted SER change) was consistent. Atropine‐2 was significantly more effective in slowing SER progression (−0.15 ± 0.37 D) than Atropine‐1 (−0.41 ± 0.50 D) ( p = 0.02). Based on a multivariable model, age was identified as the key covariate to perform subgroup analyses. In the younger subgroup (8–10 years), AL elongation was significantly reduced in the Atropine‐2 group (0.16 ± 0.17 mm) compared with the Atropine‐1 group (0.36 ± 0.22 mm; p = 0.002). In the older subgroup (10–12 years), there was no significant difference in progression. Consistent results were observed in the sensitivity analyses based on the per‐protocol set. Conclusion Twice‐daily administration of 0.01% atropine was more effective than once daily in slowing AL elongation and SER progression in children 8 to 10 years of age. Further investigation with extended follow‐up is warranted to substantiate this finding.

Background/Objectives: Proton therapy delivers highly conformal doses to the target area without producing an exit dose, minimizing cumulative doses to healthy liver tissue. This study aims to evaluate current practices, challenges, and variations in the implementation of proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionated therapy for liver malignancies, with the goal of providing a technical assessment to promote broader adoption and support future clinical trials. Methods and Materials: An extensive survey was conducted by NRG Oncology across North American proton treatment centers to assess the current practices of proton liver SBRT and hypofractionated therapy. The survey focused on key aspects, including patient selection, prescription and normal tissue constraints, simulation and motion management, treatment planning, quality assurance (QA), treatment delivery, and the use of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Results: This survey captures the current practice patterns and status of proton SBRT and hypofractionated therapy in liver cancer treatment. Proton therapy is increasingly preferred for treating inoperable liver malignancies due to its ability to minimize healthy tissue exposure. However, the precision required for proton therapy presents challenges, particularly in managing uncertainties and target motion during high-dose fractions and short treatment courses. Survey findings revealed significant variability in clinical practices across centers, highlighting differences in motion management, dose fractionation schedules, and QA protocols. Conclusion: Proton SBRT and hypofractionated therapy offer significant potential for treating liver malignancies. A comprehensive approach involving precise patient selection, treatment planning, and QA is essential for ensuring safety and effectiveness. This survey provides valuable insights into current practices and challenges, offering a foundation for technical recommendations to optimize the use of proton therapy and guide future clinical trials.

Purpose: To describe an improved snare technique for the removal of an intraocular foreign body (IOFB) from the posterior segment. Methods: The snare is fashioned from a 23 or 25-gauge blunt-tipped cannula, a 5-0 or 6-0 nylon suture, and a cotton-tipped applicator. The snare is introduced through a 23 or 25-gauge vitrectomy port and tightened around the IOFB, maintaining a closed system. The IOFB can be extracted from the eye by pulling the cannula and extending the circumferential sclerotomy. Results: Four cases of IOFBs were treated using the improved nylon suture snare technique. Three of the four were traumatic open-globe injuries with retained IOFB, for which the snare technique was suitable for removal of the object. In the fourth case, the snare technique was used to remove a posteriorly dislocated silicone intraocular lens optic. No cases of postoperative retinal detachments or endophthalmitis were observed. Conclusion: This snare is fashioned from readily available, inexpensive materials and provides a safe and reliable method for IOFB removal through the vitrectomy port. By maintaining a closed system during IOFB mobilization and removal, the view through the cornea remains stable and intraocular pressure remains constant. Moreover, the snare can grasp irregularly shaped or large IOFBs.

ABSTRACT Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT, Osler‐Weber‐Rendu disease) is the second most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide, affecting approximately 1 in 5000 people. Development of disease‐modifying and efficacious hemostatic agents to treat HHT has finally begun after decades without such medical therapies. However, the lack of consensus on standardized severity definitions, outcome criteria, and terminology remains a major obstacle to clinical investigation and therapeutic development in HHT. Additionally, with the ongoing repurposing of antiangiogenic agents and emerging development of novel HHT‐specific therapies, comparative clinical trials are expected in the future. Therefore, to end the problematic heterogeneity hindering these efforts, the Global Research and Medical Advisory Board (GRMAB) of the Cure HHT Foundation, an international group of recognized HHT experts, convened a conference of expert HHT clinician‐investigators from within GRMAB as well as invited external experts in HHT and bleeding disorders generally, patients with HHT, and patient advocates to define standard terminology and definitions for outcomes and severity classification for bleeding and anemia in HHT. These criteria and definitions should be adopted by regulators, investigators, and the pharmaceutical industry in the development and performance of interventional clinical trials and cohort studies to allow improved comparability between clinical trials, facilitate communication between clinicians and investigators, improve therapeutic guideline development, and provide a standardized framework for regulatory agencies. Search Strategy and Selection Criteria Evidence for this report was systematically identified and evaluated utilizing two search strategies in Ovid MEDLINE, described in full detail in the Appendix, pp.4–13. The searches were conducted on January 7, 2025. The titles and abstracts of each record were reviewed, and the inclusion criteria were applied to all search results to identify full text articles to be retrieved for further review. All retrieved full texts were then reviewed to reach a final determination if a study met the inclusion criteria. Included references were then compiled into evidence tables, which were then utilized by the International Consensus Report Working Group throughout the development of report recommendations.