Citations

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are increasingly used for medical imaging analysis and biological data modeling, where the integration of radiomics, topology, geometry, and generative artificial intelligence (AI) may improve representation learning from medical images and related biomedical data. Across the reviewed literature, GNNs show particular value for modeling spatial relationships, multimodal interactions, graph-structured biological networks, and non-Euclidean imaging features that are difficult to capture using conventional convolutional architectures alone. Topology- and geometry-aware approaches further expand this capability by encoding multi-scale structure, higher-order relationships, curvature, geodesic organization, and equivariant spatial priors. Hybrid graph–transformer models and generative graph methods represent emerging directions for modeling long-range dependencies, augmenting scarce datasets, supporting synthetic pretraining, and improving representation learning in low-label or heterogeneous biomedical settings. However, clinical translation remains limited by variability in graph construction, limited external validation, computational cost, scalability constraints, interpretability challenges, and uncertainty regarding the biological realism of synthetic data. Overall, this review highlights that GNN-based medical imaging analysis is most likely to advance when graph construction is biologically justified, model performance is evaluated across diverse clinical cohorts, and technical gains are paired with transparent validation, interpretability, and implementation strategies.

Abstract Horlock, CF, Allen, LE, Jagim, AR, Jones, MT, and Fields, JB. In-season assessment of dietary intake and match demands of men’s collegiate Rugby Sevens players. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—Limited research has examined the external workload demands and dietary intake of collegiate men's Rugby Sevens players. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to (a) quantify match demands in Division 1-AA collegiate Rugby Sevens across a competitive season, and (b) assess players' dietary intake relative to sport-specific nutrition guidelines. Division 1-AA men's collegiate Rugby Sevens players ( n = 13; age: mass: 87 ± 14 kg; body fat %: 20 ± 4%) wore a global positional system device during all matches ( n = 17). External load metrics were total distance (TD) (m), sprint distance (>20.1 km·h −1 ), high-intensity distance (>18.1–20.0 km·h −1 ), meters per minute (m·min −1 ), acceleration efforts (#), deceleration efforts (#), sprint efforts (#), high-speed efforts (#), player load (PL) (arbitrary unit [AU]), PL per minute (AU/min), and estimated energy expenditure (EE) (kcal). Dietary intake was assessed at the start of the season using a 4-day food log. Linear mixed models examined changes in workload parameters across tournament matches. Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression assessed relationships and predictability of EE and external workloads. One-samples t test compared dietary intake relative to established guidelines ( p ≤ 0.05). No significant differences in workload metrics were observed across individual matches. Total distance ( r = 0.968, p < 0.001), m·min −1 ( r = 0.973, p < 0.001), PL ( r = 0.912, p < 0.001), and PL/min ( r = 0.855, p < 0.001) had the strongest correlations with EE. Players significantly underconsumed calories ( p = 0.028) and carbohydrates ( p < 0.01). Monitoring external workloads and assessing dietary intake can provide coaches with strategies to optimize sports performance and nutrition support to prepare players for competition demands.

PURPOSE Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare cancer associated with poor prognosis. Pemigatinib was the first FGFR1-3 inhibitor approved for second-line therapy and beyond, on the basis of the phase II FIGHT-202 trial. Here, we assess efficacy and safety of first-line pemigatinib. METHODS FIGHT-302 is a phase III, randomized, global trial evaluating pemigatinib as first-line therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03656536 ). Adults with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 rearrangement were randomized 1:1 to receive pemigatinib (13.5 mg once daily) or chemotherapy (1,000 mg/m 2 gemcitabine plus 25 mg/m 2 cisplatin once per day on days 1 and 8 of every 3-week cycle for ≤8 cycles) and were stratified by prior receipt of chemotherapy, geographic region, and tumor burden. Pemigatinib crossover was allowed for patients progressing on chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary efficacy, safety, and exploratory end points were also analyzed. RESULTS Overall, 4,563 patients were prescreened, 196 were screened, and 167 randomly assigned to receive pemigatinib (n = 83) or chemotherapy (n = 84) before early closure of the study because of a change in standard of care. The median PFS was 8.3 months in the pemigatinib group versus 6.8 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87]; nominal P = .0078); objective response rate was 47% versus 15%, and the median duration of response was 14.2 versus 6.3 months. Median overall survival was similar (24.4 v 25.0 months, respectively). In the crossover group (n = 42, second-line pemigatinib), the median PFS was 8.1 months. Safety was consistent with the known profile of pemigatinib. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this was the largest, first-line, randomized, phase III trial of a targeted therapy for advanced FGFR2- rearranged cholangiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib demonstrated prolonged median PFS compared with chemotherapy, with no new safety findings.

Background: Perianal Crohn’s disease (PCD) is a severe and disabling phenotype of Crohn’s disease that often requires multidisciplinary medical and surgical management. Although ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) are widely used after antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) failure, direct comparative data specifically in PCD remain limited. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network to compare the effectiveness of UST versus VDZ in adults (18 y or older) with PCD between January 2017 and May 2023. Outcomes were perianal-specific clinical events, including definitive fistula surgery, incision and drainage, diversion procedures, and antibiotic use (metronidazole or ciprofloxacin), assessed at 1 and 2 years after biological initiation. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was performed to balance baseline variables. Time-to-event analyses were conducted in the matched population using Kaplan–Meier methods, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models within the matched cohorts. Results: A total of 2936 patients were identified before PSM: 1997 patients in the UST group and 939 patients in the VDZ group. After PSM, 936 patients were included in each cohort. In the matched cohorts, UST was associated with significantly lower risk of definitive perianal fistula surgery (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.89; P <0.01), and composite surgical events (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54-0.87; P <0.01) compared with VDZ at 1 year. Rates of antibiotic use, incision and drainage of perianal abscess, and diversion procedures were numerically lower but not statistically significant. At 2 years, these findings persisted, with significantly lower cumulative incidence of definitive perianal fistula surgery (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61-0.90; P =0.03), composite surgical events (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90; P <0.01), and antibiotic use (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93; P =0.04) in the UST cohort compared with VDZ. Rates of incision and drainage and diversion procedures remained similar between groups. Conclusion: In this large real-world cohort, UST was associated with lower risks of perianal surgical interventions at one and two years and reduced antibiotic utilization at two years compared with VDZ in patients with PCD. These findings highlight meaningful differences in real-world effectiveness between therapies and support the need for prospective studies to further evaluate comparative effectiveness in this population.

Background: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a key environmental risk factor for multiple sclerosis (MS), and tonsils and adenoids serve as a primary viral reservoir. This study investigates the potential role of adenotonsillectomy in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) risk and relapse rate. Objectives: POMS participants and controls were recruited from 16 pediatric MS clinics between 1 November 2011 and 1 July 2017. Clinical and demographic information, including history of adenotonsillectomy, EBV serostatus, and HLA-DRB1*15:01:01 status, were collected. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between adenotonsillectomy and MS risk. In addition, negative binomial regression offset by follow-up time was used to assess the relationship between adenotonsillectomy and relapse rate in POMS participants with available follow-up data. Results: The case-control analysis included 359 POMS participants and 560 pediatric controls. Individuals with a history of adenotonsillectomy had a 63% increased odds of MS (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01–2.64, p = 0.046). Among the 239 POMS participants with available follow-up data, adenotonsillectomy was associated with a twofold increase in annualized relapse rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.15–3.48, p = 0.013). Conclusions: Prior adenotonsillectomy was associated with increased risk of MS and greater relapse rate in pediatric patients, suggesting a potential interplay between EBV, immune regulation, and MS pathogenesis.

ABSTRACT Purpose To explore the opioid decision‐making process of prescribers in primary care, surgery, and subspecialty pain management. Methods This was a multistage qualitative‐qualitative study with clinicians involved in opioid prescribing and management from a single healthcare organization with locations in Minnesota, Florida, Arizona, and Wisconsin. Clinicians in this study included physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), and physician assistants (PAs) practicing in primary care, surgery, or pain medicine. The interview guide was organized in three domains of a conceptual model for opioid use: (1) prescriber characteristics, (2) patient characteristics, and (3) practice environment characteristics. Individual interviews ( N = 20) were performed first, and data were summarized using a rapid template‐based approach. Subsequently, focus groups (FGs) ( N = 4) were conducted with an additional 21 clinicians to confirm and explore interview results. Data from interviews and FGs were analyzed using a common codebook. Results Findings were organized as decision factors into the three domains. Factors in the prescriber domain included characteristics such as formal pain management training, as well as factors that influenced knowledge and beliefs (e.g., advice from or observation of supervising clinicians and expert colleagues). Decision factors in the patient domain included patient pain etiology, comorbid medical or mental health conditions, and demographic characteristics. Clinicians' perceptions of these factors, such as viewing older age as having lesser risk for opioid misuse, influenced prescribing decisions. Clinicians also described challenges associated with “legacy patients” whose therapy was previously managed by a different clinician. Primary care clinicians, in particular, expressed difficulties managing post‐surgical or trauma‐related pain after care transition. Relevant decision factors reported by prescribers in the practice environment domain included guidelines and practice oversight. Most participants reported practicing in an environment that promoted conservative opioid use and having access to standardized institutional guidelines that reduced perceived decision‐making burden. Clinicians described how they used prescribing guidelines to help them communicate with patients about opioid use and prescribing decisions. Conclusions Intersecting prescriber, patient, and practice environment factors shape opioid analgesic prescribing decisions. Available resources in the practice environment, including peer input and institutional guidelines, may support clinician decision‐making and conversations with patients at the point of care, including in cases where patients have complex histories or personal characteristics that influence decision making.

Abstract Repetitive head impacts sustained during American football have been associated with neuropathological changes such as white matter shear injuries. However, the impact of specific factors, such as age of first exposure and cumulative head impact burden, on white matter integrity remains unclear. This study investigated in vivo white matter microstructural changes using diffusion tensor imaging and tract-based spatial statistics in 165 male former American football players (mean age 57.3 years, range 45–74) and 52 unexposed asymptomatic male controls (mean age 59.4 years, range 45–74) in the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project. Compared to controls, former football players exhibited significantly higher fractional anisotropy (FA) in 1.97% of the white matter skeleton (1552 voxels; Cohen’s d = 0.587) and higher tissue-corrected FA (FAt) in 1.48% of the white matter skeleton (1004 voxels; Cohen’s d = 0.616). No significant differences were observed for mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, or free water between football players and controls. Among football players, there were no significant differences in the white matter microstructure between players diagnosed with traumatic encephalopathy syndrome and those without the diagnosis. Lower FA was significantly associated with older age (P &lt; 0.00001) and an earlier age of first exposure to tackle football (P &lt; 0.01), while lower FAt was associated with greater cumulative head impact burden, specifically higher linear acceleration (P &lt; 0.04) and rotational force (P &lt; 0.02). This study highlights the influential role of exposure factors on white matter microstructure in former American football players, as well as the utility of diffusion tensor imaging to aid in characterizing the long-term effects of repetitive head impacts in contact sport athletes.

TPS7100 Background: Bruton tyrosine kinase covalent inhibitors (cBTKi) have been transformative in CLL treatment. Despite achieving extended remissions, in most patients disease still relapses despite cBTKi therapy, often associated with BTK C481 mutations. Non-covalent BTKi (ncBTKi), including pirtobrutinib, can overcome this resistance (Sharman et al. ASCO . 2025). Pirtobrutinib received FDA approval in Dec 2025, for R/R CLL/CLL patients pretreated with cBTKi. Rocbrutinib (LP-168) is a highly selective next-generation BTKi that can covalently bind wild-type and gatekeeper mutations (T474X, commonly seen in patients relapsed after pirtobrutinib) and non-covalently target C481-mutated BTK , with preclinical efficacy in treatment-naïve and BTKi-resistant CLL (Gordon et al. IWCLL . 2025). In the rocbrutinib phase 1 trial (NCT04775745), encouraging safety and efficacy have been observed in CLL patients with prior exposure to BTKi and/or BCL2 inhibitor (BCL2i) (Woyach et al. Blood. 2025). Presented here is the design of a phase 3 trial aiming to compare the efficacy of rocbrutinib versus pirtobrutinib in cBTKi-pretreated R/R CLL/SLL patients. Methods: ROCKET-CLL (NCT07342478) is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study comparing rocbrutinib (Arm 1) to pirtobrutinib (Arm 2) in R/R CLL/SLL subjects who previously received treatments including covalent BTKi. Eligible subjects must require treatment per 2018 iwCLL criteria, have measurable lesions by CT, an ECOG performance score of 0-2, and adequate hematologic and other organ functions. About 306 subjects will be randomized 1:1 based on stratification factors such as 17p deletion/ TP53 mutation presence, reasons for discontinuing prior cBTKi, prior BCL2i treatment, and geographic region. Participants assigned to each arm will receive rocbrutinib (200 mg QD) or pirtobrutinib (200 mg QD) tablets continuously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or other study discontinuation criteria are met. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) per iwCLL 2018 criteria with CLL (Hallek et al. 2018) and Lugano 2014 criteria with SLL (Cheson et al. 2014). Important secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), event-free survival (EFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), PFS assessed by investigator (INV), concordance between IRC and INV PFS, safety and tolerability, and population PK. Exploratory endpoints include health-related quality of life and biomarker assessment. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT07342478 .

TPS3182 Background: MTAP deletion in solid tumors causes intracellular accumulation of methylthioadenosine (MTA) which partially inhibits activity of the key methylating enzyme, protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) and creates synthetic lethal dependencies on PRMT5 and methionine adenosyltransferase 2A (MAT2A), the rate limiting step in the synthesis of PRMT5 substrate, S-adenosyl methionine. PRMT5 and MAT2A are essential to transcription modulation, gene splicing, and DNA damage response. IDE892 is an MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitor designed to exploit this vulnerability in MTAPdel tumors. Preclinical studies report robust antitumor activity with IDE892 monotherapy in MTAPdel xenograft models and an enhanced response when combined with IDE397 (an allosteric MAT2A inhibitor). IDE892-001 is a Phase 1 study evaluating safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary antitumor activity of IDE892 alone and in combination with IDE397. Methods: IDE892-001 is an ongoing, open-label, multicenter four-part study: IDE892 monotherapy dose escalation (Part 1), monotherapy dose expansion in MTAPdel NSCLC (Part 2), IDE892 + IDE397 dose escalation (Part 3), and combination expansion in MTAPdel NSCLC (Part 4). Adults with advanced or metastatic MTAPdel solid tumors including lung, urothelial, gastrointestinal cancers (including pancreatic and biliary tract cancers) and mesothelioma are eligible following disease progression on standard therapies. Key exclusion criteria include symptomatic brain metastases, cardiac disease, active severe infection, and prior treatment with a PRMT5 or MAT2A inhibitor. Part 1 uses a Bayesian optimal interval design to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended doses for expansion (RDE). Part 3 uses a modified toxicity probability interval design to evaluate escalating combinations of IDE892 and IDE397. Oral treatment is given QD in 21-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Serial blood samples are collected for PD analyses. Imaging will be performed every 6 weeks through week 24, then every 9–12 weeks. Efficacy endpoints will be assessed by RECIST v1.1. Primary objectives for dose-escalation cohorts (Parts 1 and 3) are safety and tolerability, including determination of MTD/RDE. In expansion cohorts (Parts 2 and 4), co-primary objectives include safety and preliminary antitumor activity (objective response rate and duration of response). Secondary endpoints for all parts include PK of IDE892 alone and in combination with IDE397. Exploratory assessments include progression free survival, changes in circulating and tumor-based markers of PRMT5 pathway modulation, molecular predictors of response, exposure–response relationships, and metabolite characterization. Clinical trial information: NCT07277413 .