Citations

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive of all the brain tumors with a median patient survival less than 15 months. Despite of surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, recurrence rate is almost 100%. A great percentage of GBM tumors (~60%) infiltrate and contact the ventricular-subventricular zone (V-SVZ). Interestingly, these tumors are the most aggressive, and invariably lead to higher distal recurrence rates, shorter time to tumor progression, and lower overall survival of the patient. The reason for this role of V-SVZ-proximity on the outcome of GBM patients is unknown. We suggest that a potential explanation is the interaction of GBM with the V-SVZ. This region is the largest neurogenic niche in the adult brain where neural stem cells (NSCs) give rise to newborn neuroblasts that migrate toward the olfactory bulb. In GBM there is a cell subpopulation called brain tumor stem cells (BTSCs) with NSCs-like characteristics, but with added potential for tumor initiation, recurrence and invasiveness. Tumor microenvironment plays an important role in migration and invasion process. In the present work, we used the total exosome isolation kit to purify Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) from human primary cultures of BTSCs. We determined that BTSCs-derived EVs contain specific information that is transfer to primary cultures of human Neural Progenitors Cells (NPCs) modulating their proliferation rate, cell viability, and migration. In addition, we identify that NPCs taken up BTSCs-derived EVs and significantly increase the expression levels of stemness-related genes such as Nestin, Nanog, and Sox2, suggesting that a phenotypic transdifferentiation is being carry out. These results support our hypothesis that GBM modulate the tumor microenvironment close to the V-SVZ by releasing EVs that target cellular components in this region and promote their phenotypic transformation, highlighting that NPCs biology changes in the context of tumor environment.

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), a subset of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), occurs when tumors develop in the cells that would normally form the placenta during pregnancy. The NCCN Guidelines for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia provides treatment recommendations for various types of GTD including hydatidiform mole, persistent post-molar GTN, low-risk GTN, high-risk GTN, and intermediate trophoblastic tumor.

Abstract Background CDI is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in SOT and HCT patients (pts). In retrospective single-center analyses, severe disease and relapse were common. We undertook a multicenter prospective observational study to evaluate outcomes of CDI among both SOT and HCT patients. Methods Adults with a first episode of CDI, defined as 3 liquid stools/24 h with the detection of C. difficile toxin in stool, within the first 2 years of SOT or HCT were recruited from 12 centers internationally in the INSIGHT network. At enrollment, demographics, comorbidities, medication histories and outcomes were collected prospectively over 90 days to assess clinical cure, recurrences and complications and to define baseline risk factors for clinical cure and recurrent CDI. Results 132 patients (81 SOT, 51 HCT (32 allogeneic)) were enrolled: median age 56 years, 62.1% were males, 97% were hospitalized. 80.3% were diagnosed by DNA assay. CDI occurred a median of 20 days post transplant (IQR: 6–133). 108 patients were on PPIs. 98.5% were on antibiotics before CDI. 1st line treatment regimen was oral vancomycin in 66 patients (40 SOT, 26 HCT), metronidazole in 48 patients (27 SOT, 21 HCT), both drugs in 14 (10 SOT, 4 HCT), fidaxomicin (3) and linezolid (1). Rejection within 60 days before CDI was uncommon (6.2% SOT) as was GVHD (27.5%). 110 patients (83%, 95% CI: 46–89)) (65 SOT, 45 HCT) had clinical cure; 18% (95% CI: 11–27) had recurrent CDI, 2 were admitted to the ICU due to CDI, 11 (8.3%) died (2 HCT related to CDI). Among baselines variables, only first-line regimen was associated with a higher rate of clinical cure (P = 0.003), most notably for SOT. Factors that did not have a statistically significant negative impact on clinical cure included sex, age > 60, race, country, transplant type, steroids, diabetes, CMV viremia/disease, WBC > 15,000, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, or specific antibiotic given prior to CDI. Higher recurrence rates were associated with metronidazole-only regimen (OR: 4.6, 95% CI: 1.6–12.8; P = 0.004) and a history of CMV after transplant (OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.7–15.7; P = 0.003). Conclusion Despite their immunosuppressed state, recurrence, ICU admission and mortality occurred in a minority of SOT and HCT with CDI. Initial use of metronidazole and CMV viremia/disease were associated with higher recurrence rates. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract Background CDI is a 2-hit process requiring C. difficile spores and antibiotic-mediated dysbiosis, a low diversity state of the gut microbiome. Recurrent CDI (rCDI) is common and may be related to inadequate antibiotic concentrations (e.g., metronidazole; MET) or persistent dysbiosis (e.g., vancomycin; VAN). SER-262 is an oral investigational microbiome drug rationally designed to reduce rCDI by restoring colonization resistance. Methods SERES-262-001 was a Phase 1b randomized placebo (PBO)-controlled single and multidose study. Subjects with primary CDI (n = 96) were enrolled in 8 cohorts (SER-262: PBO, 5:1). Subjects were dosed after MET (n = 57) or VAN (n = 39) per investigator discretion. Engraftment of SER-262 strains was evaluated using strain-specific molecular probes in fecal samples; microbial diversity was measured via whole metagenomic shotgun sequencing. Endpoints included safety and rCDI rates up to 8 weeks posttreatment and strain engraftment at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. Results SER-262 safety was comparable to PBO. Although overall rCDI rates were similar in SER-262 (n = 80) and PBO (n = 16) subjects (18.8% vs. 12.5%, respectively), in a post-hoc analysis we observed reduced rates of rCDI in the VAN+SER-262 arm compared with MET+SER-262 (6.3 vs. 27.1%, respectively, P = 0.02, Figure 1). Overall, 8 of 12 SER-262 strains showed significant engraftment relative to PBO. However, greater SER-262 strain engraftment was observed in VAN-treated subjects compared with MET-treated subjects (P < 0.001, Figure 2). To better understand the impact of dysbiosis on engraftment, we evaluated baseline microbial diversity by prior antibiotic received and observed that the diversity of Bacteroidetes and Firmicute species was lower in VAN-treated subjects compared with MET-treated subjects (P < 0.001, Figure 3). Conclusion In this first phase 1b study of a fermented microbiome drug in subjects with primary CDI, SER-262 was safe and well-tolerated. The higher efficacy rates of SER-262 in reducing rCDI among VAN-treated subjects may be due to low baseline microbial diversity, which creates an ecologic niche for greater engraftment of dose species. Treatment of C. difficile with VAN, followed by restoration of colonization resistance with SER-262, is a promising 2-pronged therapeutic paradigm to reduce rCDI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can cause severe lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in immunocompromised children. There is no standard effective treatment, though ribavirin (inhaled or oral), pooled human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and monoclonal anti-RSV antibody (palivizumab) have been described. RI-002 (ADMA Biologics Inc.) is a pooled human polyclonal IVIG that contains standardized levels of neutralizing anti-RSV antibodies. It was recently FDA-approved for prophylaxis in primary immunodeficiency patients and has been used as compassionate treatment for RSV LRTI in stem cell transplant patients. Methods Two children with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma, both undergoing delayed intensification chemotherapy, were diagnosed with RSV LRTI. They were both treated with RI-002 under an emergency FDA Investigational New Drug protocol. Results Patient 1, a 4-year-old boy, was admitted with fever, neutropenia and nasal congestion, and diagnosed with RSV infection on hospital day (HD) 5. On HD17, he was intubated for respiratory failure. IVIG, palivizumab, and daily oral ribavirin were administered. On HD18, he required high frequency oscillator ventilation, nitric oxide, and paralysis. He was given RI-002 (1.5 g/kg on HD20 and 0.75 g/kg on HD22). He was placed on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on HD23. RSV PCR crossing point (Cp) values trended higher, but remained positive (table). On HD33, RI-002 was re-dosed (0.75 g/kg). Pulmonary compliance and chest CTs improved (figure). On HD52, ECMO support was discontinued. He was discharged on HD88, and currently requires no respiratory support. Patient 2, a 5-year-old boy, was admitted with fever, neutropenia, nasal congestion, cough, and stridor and diagnosed with RSV infection (HD1). He required nasal cannula oxygen. IVIG and daily oral ribavirin were administered. He was given RI-002 (1.5 g/kg on HD3 and 0.75 g/kg on HD5). By HD5, he was afebrile; oxygen was discontinued. He was discharged HD6. Conclusion Human polyclonal IVIG containing standardized levels of neutralizing anti-RSV antibodies may be useful in the treatment of RSV LRTI in immunocompromised children. Future studies on the role of RI-002 in treatment of RSV infection in immunocompromised children are warranted. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Testing asymptomatic individuals for unsuspected conditions is not new to the medical and public health communities and protocols to develop screening tests are well-established. However, the application of screening principles to inherited diseases presents unique challenges. Unlike most screening tests, the natural history and disease prevalence of most rare inherited diseases in an unselected population are unknown. It is difficult or impossible to obtain a “truth set” cohort for clinical validation studies. As a result, it is not possible to accurately calculate clinical positive and negative predictive values for “likely pathogenic” genetic variants, which are commonly returned in genetic screening assays. In addition, many of the genetic conditions included in screening panels do not have clinical confirmatory tests. All of these elements are typically required to justify the development of a screening test, according to the World Health Organization screening principles. Nevertheless, as the cost of DNA sequencing continues to fall, more individuals are opting to undergo genomic testing in the absence of a clinical indication. Despite the challenges, reasonable estimates can be deduced and used to inform test design strategies. Here, we review test design principles and apply them to genetic screening.

Testing asymptomatic individuals for unsuspected conditions is not new to the medical and public health communities and protocols to develop screening tests are well-established. However, the application of screening principles to inherited diseases presents unique challenges. Unlike most screening tests, the natural history and disease prevalence of most rare inherited diseases in an unselected population are unknown. It is difficult or impossible to obtain a “truth set” cohort for clinical validation studies. As a result, it is not possible to accurately calculate clinical positive and negative predictive values for “likely pathogenic” genetic variants, which are commonly returned in genetic screening assays. In addition, many of the genetic conditions included in screening panels do not have clinical confirmatory tests. All of these elements are typically required to justify the development of a screening test, according to the World Health Organization screening principles. Nevertheless, as the cost of DNA sequencing continues to fall, more individuals are opting to undergo genomic testing in the absence of a clinical indication. Despite the challenges, reasonable estimates can be deduced and used to inform test design strategies. Here, we review test design principles and apply them to genetic screening.

Testing asymptomatic individuals for unsuspected conditions is not new to the medical and public health communities and protocols to develop screening tests are well-established. However, the application of screening principles to inherited diseases presents unique challenges. Unlike most screening tests, the natural history and disease prevalence of most rare inherited diseases in an unselected population are unknown. It is difficult or impossible to obtain a “truth set” cohort for clinical validation studies. As a result, it is not possible to accurately calculate clinical positive and negative predictive values for “likely pathogenic” genetic variants, which are commonly returned in genetic screening assays. In addition, many of the genetic conditions included in screening panels do not have clinical confirmatory tests. All of these elements are typically required to justify the development of a screening test, according to the World Health Organization screening principles. Nevertheless, as the cost of DNA sequencing continues to fall, more individuals are opting to undergo genomic testing in the absence of a clinical indication. Despite the challenges, reasonable estimates can be deduced and used to inform test design strategies. Here, we review test design principles and apply them to genetic screening.