Citations

Abstract Abstract 2834 Poster Board II-810 Background: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) results arises from a clonal proliferation of differentiated plasma cells and is a necessary precursor to development of multiple myeloma and some other B cell malignancies. Despite a high incidence in the general population (1-2% of adults in the 6th and 7th decades) and increased relative risk for later malignancy, there are few reports about the clinical course and prognosis of MGUS in long-term immunosuppressed patients. We aimed to evaluate the significance of MGUS in patients undergoing solid transplants in terms of clinical outcomes and rate of transformation to secondary B cell malignancy. Material and methods: We reviewed the medical records of 1493 patients on which kidney (living donor related, living donor-unrelated and deceased donor), liver and pancreatic transplants were performed at Mayo Clinic Arizona, between January 1, 1999 and July 31, 2009 to determine the incidence of MGUS and to further evaluate long-term follow up. At MCA patients are routinely screened using SPEP and for those where an M-spike is detected or suspected immunofixation is required for confirmation. MGUS was defined as previously reported. Patients who had anemia unrelated to their PCD were included. Statistical Methods: Patients were observed until death or, for those still alive, until July 2009. The major goal of the study was to assess the impact of MGUS on transplant outcomes and progression to active myeloma or related disorders. Patients who did not experience progression were censored at the time of last follow-up. Nominal variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. A two-tailed P value less than .05 was considered significant. Results In this series, SPEP was performed in 1199 out of 1593 cases (75%) before transplantation. The most common abnormalities detected by SPEP included a normal pattern (70%), polyclonal pattern (16.8%), hypoalbuminemia (8%), hypogammaglobulinemia (2.4%) and the presence of M spike (2.8%). Immunofixation revealed the presence of a monoclonal immunoglobulin in 34 patients: IgG 30 cases (88%), IgM in 2 (6%) and biclonal disease in 2 (6%). The median age at diagnosis of MGUS was 60 years (range, 46 to 84 years), and included 63.7% of males. Clinical characteristics of the MGUS cases are seen in Table 1. Two MGUS patients were diagnosed only after the transplant was performed (338 and 1082 days respectively). There was no association between post-transplant lymphoproliferative (PTLPD) and MGUS and even when some MGUS patients died (7/34, 20%) death was not associated with progression of the monoclonal clone or development of a PTLPD or other malignancy. MGUS does not impact transplant outcomes. PTLPD disorders developed in 6 cases and none was associated with a MGUS. After a median of 88 months no MGUS patient developed transformation to active myeloma or a related disorder. Overall survival after transplantation was not significantly different among MGUS and Non- MGUS cases (6.48 vs 8.36 years p>0.05). Discussion Despite the frequency of MGUS in the general population there are few studies which have assessed MGUS in solid organ transplant patients. An increased incidence of monoclonal gammopathy in patients with autoimmune disease and in older non-transplant populations suggests that impaired immunity might lead to development of MGUS and later monoclonal B-cell malignancies. Interestingly, we identified two cases where MGUS appeared after transplant. In this series, we report on the incidence and follow/up of MGUS in patients screened before transplantation. The primary outcome for transplant recipients is unaffected by the presence of MGUS and incidence is in accordance with the expected frequency (2.8%). Patients with MGUS do not appear to be at risk for progression due to chronic immunosuppression. Testing for MGUS before transplantation is not cost-efficient and therefore would not be recommended. To our knowledge this is the largest series of MGUS and transplant outcome yet reported. Disclosures: Stewart: Takeda-Millenium, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda, Millenium: Research Funding; Genzyme, Celgene, Millenium, Proteolix: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 1876 Poster Board I-901 Background: Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains incurable in spite of new effective agents and combination regimens. SRC family kinases (SFK) are potential targets for therapy in MM: Hck, Fyn and Lyn are implicated in IL6-induced proliferation. Dasatinib is a potent inhibitor of not only BCR-ABL, but also SFK, c-KIT, PDGFRb, and EPHA. In myeloma and endothelial cells (ECs) isolated from MM patients (pts), dasatinib blocked proliferation, survival, adhesion, migration, and angiogenic potential, through a combined targeting of PDGFRβ as well as VEGF-triggered phosphorylation of SRC. Lenalidomide has clinical efficacy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone. The combination of dasatinib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone exhibits synergistic inhibition of MMIS cells. Methods: The primary objective of this Phase I, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of dasatinib, with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or refractory (RR) MM. Secondary objectives were to assess the tolerability of the combination, to establish the dose for future clinical investigations, and to assess the efficacy by International Uniform Response and EBMT Criteria. Pts ≥18 years with confirmed RR MM, measurable disease (at least 1 g/dL for IgG or 0.5 g/dL for IgA in serum or urinary excretion of 200 mg monoclonal light chain/24 hours), and at least one prior treatment were enrolled sequentially into increasing dose cohorts (using a 3+3 design). Pts received oral dasatinib daily on a continuous schedule, oral lenalidomide daily for 21 days, and oral dexamethasone 40 mg/day (Days 1, 8, 15, and 22). Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first cycle. If there was no DLT, dose escalation continued to MTD, followed by an expansion phase of the established dose. Results: Enrollment is ongoing. 16 pts (6 M, 10 F; median age 70.5 years, range 51–80) were treated in cohorts 1, 2, 3 and 4; MTD has not been established (as by July 2009). The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 1–6). Seven pts had prior autologous stem cell transplantation; 8 pts had prior thalidomide, 4 prior lenalidomide and 3 pts both. Baseline β2 microglobulin levels of >3.5mg/L were reported in 4 pts. The most common (310%) treatment related adverse events (AEs) diarrhea 6 (38%); nausea 4 (25%); constipation 2 (13%); stomatitis 2 (13%); asthenia 3 (19%); weight decrease 5 (31%); dyspnea 2 (13%); rash 2 (13%); vertigo 2 (13%); insomnia 2 (13%). The most common grade 3 / 4 hematologic AEs included neutropenia 6 (38%), anemia 4 (25%) and thrombocytopenia 3 (19%). Two DLTs were identified in cohorts 1 and 4: 1 pt had 2 point decline in ECOG Performance Status and other pt had a drug interruption > 15 days due to nausea and vomiting, respectively. Six out of 16 pts discontinued treatment: 1 due to death in first cycle (D19); 3 for AEs (2 study drug related and 1 unrelated), 1 withdrawal of consent, 1 following maximal clinical benefit (minor response) after 12+ cycles. As of July 2009, 10 pts remain on treatment, with a median duration of treatment of 4.2 months (range 0.6–12). Responses were observed in 13 pts: 8 partial responses (PR), and 5 minor responses (MR). 1 pt had stable disease (SD) and 2 pts were not evaluable (1 pts died before completion of cycle 1 and other pt was too early for assessment). Conclusion: Dasatinib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone is well tolerated and preliminary activity has been observed. Disclosures: Facon: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stewart:Takeda-Millenium, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda, Millenium: Research Funding; Genzyme, Celgene, Millenium, Proteolix: Honoraria. Garzon:BMS: Employment. Bleickardt:BMS: Employment. Gialelis:BMS: Employment. Tuozzoli:BMS: Employment. Derreumaux:BMS: Employment. Sonneveld:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 2403 Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) is a monoclonal plasma cell disorder characterized by the accumulation of monoclonal light chain fragments that have undergone a conformational transformation and deposit as amyloid fibrils in different tissues. High-dose melphalan (HDM) with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (ASCT) is increasingly used to treat patients (pts) with AL Amyloidosis. However, transplant-related mortality (TRM) is high, ranging between 13% to 43%. The survival benefit of HDM has been attributed to a patient-selection bias. Recently, a randomized clinical trial by Jaccard A et al, showed longer survival in the group assigned to receive melphalan plus dexamethasone (Mel/Dex) than in the group assigned to receive HDM. The present is a retrospective study aiming to define which pts with AL are most likely to benefit from HDM. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all the pts included in the Princess Margaret Hospital Amyloidosis Database who underwent ASCT from January 2004 to March 2010 to determine: a) TRM, b) Hematological response (HR) and Organ response (OR) and c) Overall survival (OS). We included transplanted pts who had received no more than two previous courses of any chemotherapy regimen who did not have concurrent myeloma, and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score of 2 or better. As part of the ASCT the stem cells were obtained from the peripheral blood with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (5 μ g/kg subcutaneously, twice daily). Pts then received HDM, 200 mg/m2 given intravenously on day 0, and stem cells were infused on day 1. The HDM was reduced to 140 mg/m2 for pts 65 years of age or older and for those with an important decrease of the ejection fraction, a calculated creatinine clearance of less than 30 ml per minute, or severe liver disease. HR and OR was assessed using 2004 Amyloidosis Consensus Response Criteria (Gertz, M et al, 2004). For statistical evaluation, HR was defined as observing complete or partial remission (CR or PR); stable disease (SD) or progression was considered as no HR. All statistical tests were 2-sided X2 t test and P values less than .05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results Seventy seven pts were evaluated with a median age of 56 years (33-74). Clinical characteristics are seen in Table 1. Only 18/77 pts (23%) received induction therapy: Dexamethasone alone n=9, Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone n=2, Mel/Dex n=4, VAD n=2 and Melphalan and Prednisone n=1. TRM observed was 12% mainly due to congestive heart failure and sepsis. Complete HR was achieved in 38 cases (49%) and OR was seen in 59%. Among the most common complications to ASCT, febrile neutropenia was reported in 67%, transient renal impairment in 10% and congestive heart failure in 3%. Median OS was significantly lower for patients with B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) >300 pg/ml (17.7 vs 64.46 months) (p0.0004), Troponin I >0.07 ng/ml (19.25 vs 97.4 months) (p0.00001) and those who achieved a complete HR (115 vs 88 months) (p0.0345). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that BNP>300 pg/ml and Troponin I >0.07 ng/ml (normal <0.07) were the most important factors to predict OS for patients with AL who underwent ASCT (p0.0002 and 0.04 respectively). Conclusions Based on this study of 77 patients, clinical selection is the most important factor to better improve outcomes for HDM in AL. Patients with BNP>300 pg/ml and/or abnormal levels of Troponin I (>0.07) should not be considered eligible for transplants due to a high degree of mortality. Our series showed a CR rate of 49% which is higher than 33% reported by Palladini et al with Mel/Dex. Stringent case selection may be the most important factor in decreasing mortality rate associated to ASCT leading to better outcomes. Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of patients with AL Amyloidosis undergoing ASCT (at initial diagnosis) Clinical Characteristics N Median Range % Age (years) 77 57 33–74 Hemoglobin (g/L) 77 138 104–182 Creatinine (μ mol/L) 77 129 37–700 **BNP (pg/ml) 44 180 10–1670 ***BMPC (%)– 77 7 1–30 24 Hr Proteinuria (g/d) 77 5.5 0–24.9 Intraventricular Septal Distance (mm) 77 13 9–23 Kappa/lambda ratio 53 4.4 0.001–71.2 Kidney Involvement 71 Heart Involvement 52 Liver involvement 23 GI involvement 10 3 or more organs involved by AL 16 ** B-Type Natriuretic Peptide *** BMPC: Bone marrow plasma cells Disclosures: Stewart: Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti: Celgene: Honoraria.

Abstract Multiple myeloma tumors universally target one of the three human cyclin D genes (CCND1, CCND2 or CCND3) for dysregulation (Bergsagel et al., 2005, Blood, 106:296). Using a lentivirus expressing CCND2 RNAi we first tested the effects of selective cyclin D2 knock down on My5 and H929 myeloma cell lines and found G0/G1 phase arrest, increased apoptosis and significant selective disadvantage in transfected cells. By comparison, knockout mouse models indicate that most somatic tissues can develop in the total absence of cyclin D1, D2 and D3 (Kozar et al., 2004, Cell,118:477). Targeted inhibition of specific cyclin D expression is therefore a rational therapeutic strategy in myeloma. To identify novel pharmaceutical inhibitors of CCND2 transactivation we developed an assay employing NIH 3T3 cells stably co-expressing the CCND2 transactivator c-Maf and the cyclin D2 promoter driving firefly luciferase (luc) and screened the Lopac (n=1280), Prestwick (n=1120) and Spectrum (n=2000) libraries of drugs and natural compounds. In a parallel MTS assay, the effect of each compound on 3T3 viability was determined, allowing exclusion of compounds that caused secondary suppression of CCND2 due to non-specific cytotoxicity. From the screen we identified 10 c-Maf independent putative CCND2 inhibitors. These included monensin, patulin, β-lapachone, camptothecin, dihydrogambogic acid, gentian violet, thapsigargin, brefeldin A, pristimerin and kinetin riboside. Three of the 10 compounds (gentian violet, thapsigargin and patulin) were not studied further due to toxicity cited in the literature. Subsequent validation studies using selected compounds in human myeloma cell lines (HMCL) confirmed successful suppression of both cyclin D2 and D1 proteins. Each of these compounds was then shown to be cytotoxic to a genetically diverse and standardized panel of 14 HMCL in MTT assays: monensin (10–760 nM), camptothecin (5–700nM), dihydrogambogic acid (250–800 nM), pristimerin (150–500 nM) and kinetin riboside (2.5–20μM). Cell cycle analysis confirmed induction of G0/G1 phase arrest for most compounds, consistent with cyclin D inhibition. However, camptothecin and b-lapachone induced S-phase arrest, suggesting secondary suppression of cyclin D by virtue of S-phase activity. Unsorted myeloma patient bone marrow samples demonstrated selective activity for pristimerin, dihydrogambogic acid and kinetin riboside against CD138+ myeloma cells compared with non malignant hematopoietic cells; by contrast monensin showed almost equal toxicity for normal cells. The triterpenoid, pristimerin, showed potent anti-myeloma activity and was examined in greater detail. Studies confirm that pristimerin rapidly inhibits cyclin D1, D2 and D3 expression (<6 hours) at nanomolar concentrations and induces apoptosis of primary myeloma cells characterized by caspase 9 cleavage and Annexin V binding. While pristimerin is cytotoxic to HMCL and patient myeloma cells at 0.1–0.15 mg/L, toxicity studies in vivo indicate that the drug is tolerated in mice at 2.5 mg/kg i.p. daily. In vivo activity against a xenograft model is currently being determined. Overall this targeted chemical biology screen has identified several compounds, including the triterpenoid, pristimerin, that are being further characterized for promising preclinical anti-myeloma activity.

Abstract Abstract 302 Background: Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a proteasome inhibitor with unique target selectivity and an irreversible binding mechanism that results in sustained proteasome inhibition. In preclinical studies, CFZ lacks non-proteasome off-target activities associated with bortezomib (BTZ) (Kapur et al, Blood 2008). This may account for observed differences in tolerability with CFZ (e.g. minimal neuropathy and myelosuppression), permitting consecutive day dosing and treatment over an extended period of time. We previously observed higher response rates in multiple myeloma (MM) patients without prior BTZ exposure (BTZ-naïve) compared to those with relapsed disease following BTZ therapy (BTZ-treated). Here we present updated data on the BTZ-naïve cohort from PX-171-004, an ongoing Phase 2 study of single-agent CFZ in MM patients with relapsed or refractory disease following 1–3 prior therapies. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory (e.g, < 25% response or disease progression during last treatment) MM were enrolled and stratified into two cohorts: BTZ-naïve and BTZ-treated. CFZ 20 mg/m2 IV was administered on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 every 28 days, for up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was Overall Response Rate [≥ Partial Response (PR)] per International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma. Secondary endpoints included Clinical Benefit Response [CBR = ORR + Minor Reponse (MR)] and safety. Results: Fifty-seven BTZ-naive patients have been enrolled and 56 subjects have received at least one dose of CFZ. Prior therapies included alkylators (81%), stem cell transplant (SCT) (77%), thalidomide (THAL) (67%), lenalidomide (LEN) (42%), and anthracyclines (23%). Ten (18%) patients had received both LEN and THAL and 18 (32%) patients were refractory to their most recent regimen prior to study entry. At baseline, 30 (53%) patients had an ECOG score ≥ 1, 21 (37%) had neuropathy Grade ≥ 1, 12 (21%) had impaired renal function (CrCl < 60 mL/min) and 10 (18%) had diabetes. The mean time from diagnosis was 4 years (range 0.7–24). To date, the mean number of CFZ doses administered was 29.2 (∼5 four-week cycles; range 2–72 doses, 1–12 cycles). Fifty-one patients initiated therapy and were evaluable for response per protocol. The ORR was 45% (23/51 patients) and included 1 CR, 4 VGPR and 18 PR. An additional 9 (18%) patients had MR and 10 (20%) had stable disease (SD) for ≥ 6 weeks. The most common (>25%) adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (59%), nausea (41%), dyspnea (36%), and anemia (29%), and were primarily ≤ Grade 2. Grade 3/4 AEs occurring in ≥ 5% of patients were thrombocytopenia (9%), fatigue (9%), neutropenia (7%), lymphopenia (7%), anemia (5%), pneumonia (5%) and hyperglycemia (5%). One (1.7%) patient had febrile neutropenia. Dose modifications were rarely required. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) of any grade was infrequent (7 patients, 12%) with a single case of Grade 3 PN (2%) in a pt with a history of THAL-induced PN that lasted 41 days. The CFZ dose was reduced and the event resolved to Grade 1 while on CFZ and prior to study discontinuation. Of the12 patients with impaired renal function at baseline, none required dose modifications due to renal AE. Overall, 5 patients have completed the full 12-cycle protocol and another 5 (9%) have completed ≥ 9 cycles; 17 patients (30%) are continuing on study. Conclusions: The 45% ORR (CBR 63%) is noteworthy for a single-agent regimen in patients with tumor progression despite therapy with novel combinations. CFZ can be safely administered to patients with significant comorbidities (e.g. peripheral neuropathy, leukopenia, renal dysfunction, diabetes) when other anti-myeloma agents may not be well tolerated. Enrollment to PX-171-004 is continuing and, based on the safety profile, subjects are now permitted to dose escalate to 27 mg/m2. Disclosures: Wang: Proteolix: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: testing testing. Siegel:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jakubowiak:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Bahlis:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. McDonagh:Proteolix: Research Funding. Belch:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Le:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment. Bennett:Proteolix: Employment. Kunkel:Proteolix: Consultancy, Employment. Kauffman:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment. Vij:Proteolix, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2877 Poster Board II-853 Background and Objective: In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, treatment with lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (RD) was superior to high-dose dexamethasone in terms of both response rates and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (Zonder JA et al, Blood 2007;110:77). Preliminary results suggest that the combination lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) compared to the RD regimen yields significantly better 2-year overall survival (OS) (Rajkumar SV et al, J Clin Oncol 2008;26:8504). The combination of melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide (MPR) has been investigated in a phase I/II study showing promising results (Palumbo A et al, J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:4459-4465). The goal of this case –control study was to compare the efficacy and the toxicity of the lenalidomide/dexamethasone (len/dex) combination vs MPR as primary therapy for newly diagnosed elderly MM patients, to determine the additive value of melphalan compared to a regimen of lenalidomide plus corticosteroid. Patients and methods: Data from 51 newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in Italy in a phase I/II dose-escalating trial, from January to October 2005, with MPR, were analyzed. For comparison of their outcome, 37 patients were identified among newly diagnosed patients seen at the Mayo Clinic from March 2005 to December 2008 who received len/dex as primary therapy and were enrolled in phase II or III trials. Patients treated with MPR received 9 monthly cycles of oral melphalan (doses ranging from 0.18 to 0.25 mg/kg on days 1-4), prednisone (2 mg/kg on days 1-4) and lenalidomide (doses ranging from 5 to 10 mg/day on days 1-21). After 9 cycles, patients started maintenance with lenalidomide alone (10 mg, days 1-21) until relapse or progression. Patients treated with len/dex received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day, days 1-21) plus dexamethasone, either at low-dose (n=17) (40 mg orally days 1, 8, 15, 22) or at high-dose (n=21) (40 mg orally on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20). Treatment was continued until progression, relapse or unacceptable toxicity, or could be stopped at the physician's discretion. Patients (n=13) were allowed to receive transplant if they wished and were deemed eligible. Outcome was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The Chi-square or the rank sum tests were used to compare variables. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were determined by the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: On intention-to-treat analysis, 15.7% versus 23.7% patients, respectively in the MPR and in the len/dex group, (p=0.342) achieved a complete response, and 43.2% vs 47.4%, (p=0.691) achieved at least a very good partial response. Time-to-progression (TTP) (median: 24.7 vs 27.5 in MPR and len/dex groups, respectively; HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.55-1.98; p=0.903), PFS (median: 24.7 vs 27.5 in MPR and len/dex groups, respectively; HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.55-1.92; p=0.926) and OS (2-year OS: 86.2% in MPR group vs 89.1% in len/dex, HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.38-1.98; p=0.730) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. No significant differences in TTP, PFS and OS were reported when MPR patients were compared with the subgroup of patients treated with low-dose dexamethasone plus lenalidomide. Similar results were found when the analysis was restricted to MPR patients and len/dex pair mates receiving lenalidomide plus low/dose dexamethasone, matched according to age and sex, and who did not received transplant. The toxicity profile was different in the two groups. Hematologic grade 3-4 toxicities were more common with MPR compared with len/dex, in particular neutropenia (66.7% vs 21.1%, p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (31.4% vs 2.6%, p < 0.001), respectively. Grade 3-4 gastrointestinal events (13.2% vs 2.0%, p= 0.080), thrombotic events (13.2 vs 5.9, p= 0.279) and fatigue (10.5% vs 3.9%, p= 0.395) were more common with len/dex compared with MPR. Conclusion: Results of this case-control study show that both MPR and Rd are efficacious regimens for elderly MM patients. Data need however to be carefully evaluated and randomized control trials are needed to confirm these results. Disclosures: Off Label Use: research drug in combination to standard of care. Kumar:celgene: Research Funding; millenium: Research Funding; bayer: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; genzyme: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; genzyme: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria. Lacy:celgene: Research Funding. Musto:celgene: Honoraria. Fonseca:medtronic: Consultancy; genzyme: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; otsuka: Consultancy. Petrucci:celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Greipp:celgene: Research Funding. Boccadoro:jansen Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; pharmion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Palumbo:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 2865 Poster Board II-841 BACKGROUND: The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, which has been shown to be an essential cellular degradative system in myeloma cells, can also regulate bone formation through its effects on osteoblast differentiation. Retrospective analysis of variation of ALP during treatment with bortezomib indicates a close correlation between myeloma response and serum ALP levels which multiple studies have shown to be of bone origin. To determine if this effect is a class effect of proteasome inhibitors (PIs), this retrospective study analyzed variation of ALP in relationship to myeloma response during treatment with carfilzomib, the first in a new class of selective epoxyketone PIs that has demonstrated encouraging safety and efficacy in two phase 2 studies of relapsed or refractory myeloma patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of serum ALP was performed on relapsed or refractory myeloma patients enrolled on two phase 2 studies (PX-171-003 and PX- 171-004) evaluating the safety and efficacy of single agent carfilzomib. We analyzed data from 38 patients in the first cohort of the PX-171-003 study, a relapsed and refractory myeloma trial for patients who have received ≥ 3 prior therapies including bortezomib and an IMiD and 29 patients in PX-171-004, a relapsed or refractory myeloma trial that included bortezomib naïve patients. All patients received 20 mg/m2 of carfilzomib on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were enrolled. The median age was 63 years with a median time since diagnosis of 4.6 years, 52% were male, 84.% had relapsed after autologous transplants, 82.% were previously exposed to bortezomib, and 92% were previously exposed to an IMiD. Sixty seven patients with ALP data were evaluable for response. In PX-171-003 the ORR (≥PR) was 18% and the clinical benefit response (CBR; ≥MR) was 26%, while in PX-171-004 the ORR was 35.5% overall and 57% in bortezomib naive patients. ALP increment from baseline, which was most evident during the second cycle of treatment, was statistically different in patients who achieved ≥VGPR compared to all others on Days 1 (P=0.0049) and 8 (P=0.006) of Cycle 2. In all patients achieving a VGPR or better, ALP increased more than 15 units per liter at Cycle 2 Day 1 over baseline An ALP increase over the same period of time was seen in 26 %, 13%, and 11% of patients achieving PR, MR, and SD, respectively. None of the patients with progressive disease exhibited a similar increase. Our study indicates that response first assessed on Day 15 of Cycle 1 parallels the ALP elevation which returned to baseline levels at the end of Cycle 3. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis on a subset of patients in these ongoing phase 2 studies of single agent carfilzomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma suggests that elevation in ALP may be associated with best response. Taken with previous publications describing bortezomib treatment, these results suggest that this specific anabolic bone phenomenon could be a class effect of proteasome inhibitors. These phase 2 studies are ongoing with a higher dose of carfilzomib (27 mg/m2) being evaluated. The data from this small subset analysis suggests that further exploration of this relationship is warranted. Disclosures: Zangari: Milllennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; OrthoBiotech: Honoraria; Optum Health: Honoraria; Educational Concepts Group, LLC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vij:Proteolix: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Siegel:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Stewart:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Proteolix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Wang:Proteolix: Honoraria, Research Funding. Belch:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Bahlis:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Lonial:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding. Singhal:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Abstract 2868 Poster Board II-844 Background and Objective: In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), the combination of lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (RD) is superior to high-dose dexamethasone (Zonder JA et al, Blood 2007;110:77). Preliminary results show that lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) has better 2-year overall survival (OS) compared with RD (Rajkumar SV et al, J Clin Oncol 2008;26:8504). The addition of clarithromycin (Biaxin) to lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (BiRd) has been investigated in a phase II study, demonstrating a high response rate and 2-year OS (Niesvizky R at al, Blood 2008;111:1101-1109). However, the additive value of clarithromycin is not known. No randomized trials have compared Rd versus BiRd, none are planned. The objective of this case–matched study was to compare the efficacy and the toxicity of BiRd vs Rd as initial therapy for newly diagnosed MM. Patients and methods: Data from 72 newly diagnosed MM patients treated at the New York Presbyterian Hospital–Cornell Medical Center, from December 2004 to December 2006, with BiRD, were analyzed. For comparison, an equal number of pair mates were selected among newly diagnosed patients seen at the Mayo Clinic who received Rd, from March 2005 to December 2008. Case matching was performed with respect to age, gender, and transplant status. Patients treated with BiRd received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day, days 3-21 of cycle 1; days 1-21 of subsequent cycles); dexamethasone (40 mg days 1, 2, 3, 8, 15, 22 of cycle 1; days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each subsequent cycle); clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily, from day 2 of cycle 1). Patients treated with Rd received oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day, days 1-21) plus low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg days 1, 8, 15, 22). In both groups patients were allowed to discontinue treatment to pursue transplant, but treatment until progression, relapse or unacceptable toxicity was permitted at the physician's discretion. Outcome was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The Chi-square or the rank sum tests were used to compare variables. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method; comparisons were determined by the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Median duration of treatment was 11.8 months in the BiRd group vs 6 months in the Rd group. On intention-to-treat analysis, complete response was significantly higher with BiRd compared to Rd (45.8% vs 13.9%, respectively, p<0.001); similarly very good partial response (VGPR) or better was higher with BiRd (73.6% vs 33.3%, p<0.001). Rates of VGPR or better, after 6 months and 1 year of therapy, were significantly higher in BiRd patients. Both time-to-progression (TTP) (median 48.3 months vs 27.5 months; HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.25-1.06; p=0.071) and PFS (median 48.3 months vs 27.5 months, HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.25-0.98; p=0.044) were higher with BiRd. Median time to next treatment (TTNT) was not reached in BiRd group compared to 29.9 months in Rd patients (HR 0.37 95% CI 0.20-0.66, p<0.001). There was a trend toward better OS with BiRd, (3-year OS: 89.7% vs 73.0%), but the difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.17-1.37; p=0.170). Thirty-two patients in each group received transplant; median time to transplant was longer in BiRd group (13.5 vs 5.9 months). Results of survival, for patients who received transplant and patients who did not, were similar to those of the total population. On subset analysis, among patients presenting with International Staging System (ISS) stage I/II at diagnosis, TTP, PFS and TTNT were significantly longer in BiRd patients; no significant differences were found among patients with ISS stage III. Main grade 3-4 toxicities of BiRd were hematological, in particular thrombocytopenia (23.6% vs 8.3%, p=0.012); rate of neutropenia was similar between the 2 groups (19.4% vs 16.7%, p=0.665). Infections (16.7% vs 9.7%, p=0.218) and dermatological toxicity (12.5% vs 4.2%, p=0.129) were higher in patients who received Rd. Rate of venous thromboembolism was similar in the 2 groups (9.7% vs 12.5%, respectively in Rd and BiRd patients, p=0.596). Conclusion: Results of this case-control analysis suggest superiority of BiRd in terms of response rate and survival, compared with Rd, and suggest that there may be a significant additive value when clarithromycin is added to Rd. These data indicate the need for randomized prospective phase III studies to evaluate BiRd versus Rd in the treatment of MM. Disclosures: Off Label Use: research drug in combination to standard of care. Kumar:celgene: Research Funding; millenium: Research Funding; bayer: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; genzyme: Research Funding. Mark:celgene: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; genzime: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria. Leonard:celgene: Consultancy. Lacy:celgene: Research Funding. Witzig:celgene: Research Funding. Fonseca:medtronic: Consultancy; genzyme: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; otsuka: Consultancy. Greipp:celgene: Research Funding. Niesvizky:celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Proteolix: Research Funding, data monitoring committee.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: PR-171 is a novel, irreversible proteasome inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of hematological malignancies. In preclinical studies, PR-171 was well tolerated in rats and monkeys when given daily × 5 (QDx5), every two weeks. Proteasome inhibition determined in blood and other tissues one hour after dosing at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was >80%. Despite the irreversible mechanism of action, the half-life of recovery of proteasome inhibition in tissues was approximately 24 hours. PR-171 was effective in suppression of tumor growth in xenograft studies in mice when administered QDx2 every week for three weeks. Two phase I dose-escalation studies have been initiated, aimed at determining the safety, tolerability, and clinical response to PR-171. METHODS: Two different dose-intensive schedules were employed in these phase I studies. In PX-171-001, PR-171 was administered on a two week cycle, QDx5 with nine days rest, while in PX-171-002, PR-171 was administered on a four week cycle, QDx2 weekly for three weeks with 12 days rest. The objective of these studies was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of single-agent PR-171 administered according to a modified Fibonacci dose escalation scheme in cohorts of three. Patients with multiple myeloma (MM), non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin disease, or Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia who received two or more prior treatments were eligible. RESULTS: Both studies were initiated with a dose of 1.2 mg/m2. Thus far, a total of 15 and 23 subjects have been enrolled in PX-171–001 and -002, respectively. PR-171 has been well tolerated at the highest doses thus far, 8.4 and 15 mg/m2, respectively. Proteasome inhibition in whole blood at the highest dose levels exceeded 75%, and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells inhibition exceeded 65%, one hour after the first dose. There have been no dose-limiting toxicities, no adverse events (AEs) considered probably related to study medication, no dose-related increases in the incidence or severity of AEs, and no incidence of painful peripheral neuropathy on either study. Although the MTD has not yet been identified on either study, preliminary evidence of efficacy has been observed with reduction in myeloma paraprotein levels and symptomatic improvement in patients on both protocols. Eleven subjects remain on study with stable disease (SD), which has been observed in MM and NHL patients on both studies, lasting up to eight months. CONCLUSION: PR-171 is well-tolerated in relapsed and refractory MM and NHL patients at proteasome inhibition levels of more than 75%. Several subjects have achieved long-lasting SD, reduction in paraprotein levels or symptomatic improvement. Further data from these ongoing trials will be discussed at the meeting.

Abstract Abstract 2801 Poster Board II-777 To provide a rationale basis for targeted drug development for multiple myeloma patients, we have conducted high-throughput genome-scale RNA interference (RNAi) synthetic lethality studies in human myeloma cell lines (HMCL) to generate a comprehensive map of critical genes and molecular vulnerabilities in human myeloma tumor cells. KMS11 human myeloma cells were screened with a 13,982-oligo library targeting the ‘druggable' genome (6,991 genes) using optimized conditions that resulted in >95% transfection efficiency. Each gene was screened with 2 or more distinct oligos, in duplicate, using a single-siRNA-per-well format, testing >34,000 wells. Replicate high throughput experiments yielded highly reproducible results (R2=0.82). Viability was measured at 96h by ATP-dependent luminescence. Universally lethal siRNA and non-targeted siRNA were employed as controls. The specificity (FDR) of lethal RNAi was evaluated by custom-developed statistical methods based on RNAi result concordancy. From screening, 5.8% of druggable genome siRNA caused statistically relevant reductions in HMCL viability (greater than three standard deviations from control samples treated with non-silencing siRNA, compared with an anticipated rate due to chance of only 0.135%). Of these, two hundred and nineteen genes, targeted by the most lethal siRNA, were forwarded to validation studies. Validation high-throughput RNAi studies, using 4 oligos per gene, were conducted in order to verify target gene vulnerability. Ultimately, seventy two genes were validated as highly critical for myeloma cell survival (each with multiple concordant siRNA hits plus high reproducibility of R2 =0.94). Among top-ranked lethal molecular vulnerabilities in KMS11 myeloma cells we recurrently identified the proteasome (8 PSM subunits were independently identified as highly vulnerable); and BCL2 family member MCL1; both known therapeutic targets, validating a functional genomics approach to target discovery. In addition, a number of novel, equally lethal, molecular vulnerabilities were identified in KMS11 including WEE1, kinetochore complex component KNTC2, the aurora kinases, polo-like kinase 1, a previously uncharacterized DNA methyl transferase, ribonucleotide reductase, ribosomal protein L38, leptin receptor overlapping transcript LEPROT and SLC25A23 (a carrier responsible for mitochondrial adenine nucleotide flux). Various ubiquitous cellular proteins involved in RNA or protein processing (e.g. SF3a, SNW1, SNRPA1, EIF3s8, amongst others) were also identified as non redundant and critical for cellular viability. Thirty nine top-ranked molecular vulnerabilities in KMS11 were evaluated for comparative vulnerability in a second myeloma cell line, JJN3, and in A549 and 293 epithelial cells. A majority were vulnerable in JJN3. While 25 genes proved equally lethal on silencing in A549 and 293 epithelial cells, several, notably including MCL1 and three proteasome subunits, appear differentially susceptible in myeloma cells versus epithelial cells. From this genome scale study, MCL1 ranks third as a target capable of inducing cell death in myeloma cells, highlighting the potent vulnerability of myeloma cell viability to alterations in this anti-apoptosis regulator. Moreover, from active comparative studies of molecular vulnerability in myeloma versus epithelial cell lines, MCL1 as an RNAi target demonstrates perhaps the greatest cytotoxic selectivity between myeloma and epithelial cell lines of all targets examined. Gene expression studies indicate that MCL1 is highly expressed in myeloma tumor cells but is absent or only weakly expressed in human primary somatic tissues. Overall, therefore, from an unsupervised genome-scale screening approach, our data support MCL1 as an optimal Achilles heel molecular target in multiple myeloma, potentially offering greater specificity and deeper cytotoxic effect than proteasome inhibition. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.