Citations

6575 Background: Delays in diagnosis (dx) and treatment (tx) affect breast cancer (BC) outcomes. We sought to identify factors associated with delays among young women, who do not undergo routine screening and often have pregnancy or breastfeeding-related breast changes that may mask a BC. Methods: The Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study is a multicenter, prospective cohort that enrolled 1302 women with newly dx BC age ≤40 between 2006-2016. Women reported the method and timing of cancer detection on the baseline survey. 231 were ineligible or excluded due to missing information. Among those reporting self-detected cancers, using multivariable regression we evaluated factors associated with delays ≥90 days (d) from symptom to presentation (self delay) and presentation to dx (care delay); in stage 0-III BC we evaluated delays ≥60d from dx to tx (tx delay). Results: 1071 eligible women had median age at dx of 37 yrs (17-40) and 74% reported self-detected cancers. Self delay or care delay ≥90d was reported in 17% and 13%, respectively. Factors inversely associated with self delay included pregnancy at dx (vs nulliparous, OR 0.10, CI 0.01-0.78) and perceived financial comfort (vs not, OR 0.62, CI 0.41-0.93). Women dx ≤1 year post-partum who breastfed (vs nulliparous, OR 2.60, CI 1.14-5.93) and those with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer (vs none, OR 1.79, CI 1.00-3.19) were more likely to have a care delay. Age was inversely associated with care delays (OR 0.94, CI 0.89-0.99). Tx delay was reported by 10% (105/1015), and associated with being single (vs partnered, OR 1.61, CI 1.02-2.56 ), non-white (vs white, OR 1.85, CI 1.09-3.13) and having Stage 0 BC (vs stage 1, OR: 3.08, CI 1.65-5.77); women with stage 3 BC (vs stage 1, OR 0.13, CI 0.03-0.56) were less likely to have a tx delay. Conclusions: In this cohort, most young women with BC underwent timely dx and tx initiation. Women dx ≤1 year post-partum who breastfed were more likely to experience a care delay, likely because lactational changes may mask BC signs and symptoms. The associations of perceived financial status with self delay and non-white race with tx delay underscore the need for additional support to ensure timely care for underserved populations with the goal of eliminating disparities in outcomes.

1049 Background: CALGB 40503 randomized HR+ MBC postmenopausal pts to Let alone or Let+Bev as first-line therapy. Adding Bev to Let prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) (Dickler JCO 2016). We performed a correlative study to assess prognostic and predictive value of CTCs in this population. Methods: Blood was collected prior to initiation of treatment. CTCs were enumerated using US FDA-cleared CellSearch assay; samples with ≥5 CTCs per 7.5 mLs of blood were considered CTC-positive (CTC+). Correlation of CTCs with PFS and OS was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Median follow-up was 39 months (mo). Results: Of 343 pts treated, 294 had CTC data and were included in this analysis. Original study results that showed improved PFS (HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59-0.96) but not OS (HR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.65-1.18) in pts receiving Let+Bev compared to Let were recapitulated in this subset. In multivariable analysis, CTC+ pts (31%) had significantly reduced PFS (HR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.12-1.97) and OS (HR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.49-2.93) compared to CTC- pts. Moreover, CTC+ pts who did not receive Bev had worse PFS (HR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.54-3.47) and OS (HR = 2.64; 95% CI: 1.59-4.40) (Table). CTC+ pts who received Bev had numerically longer median PFS (18.0 vs. 7.0 mo) and OS (33.6 vs. 27.1 mo) compared to CTC+ pts with no Bev; however, tests for interaction between CTC status and Bev (yes vs. no) were not statistically significant for PFS (p=0.70) or OS (p=0.84). Conclusions: CTCs were highly prognostic in this study involving addition of Bev to first-line Let in postmenopausal HR+ MBC. Further research to determine the potential predictive value of CTCs in the setting of both metastatic disease and early breast cancer is warranted. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Genentech; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; NCT00601900. Survival in HR+ MBC pts receiving Let or Let+Bev stratified by CTC status. Clinical trial information: NCT00601900. [Table: see text]

591 Background: Both Cb and Bev demonstrate activity when combined with standard chemotherapy in TNBC. CALGB 40603 is a 2x2 randomized trial that previously demonstrated that adding Cb to NACT significantly increased pathologic complete responses in the breast/axilla (pCR), while adding Bev did not (Sikov, JCO 2015). Here we report 5-year LTOs and assess factors that influenced them. Methods: 443 patients with clinical stage II-III previously untreated TNBC received 12 weeks of paclitaxel (wP) +/- Cb then dose-dense AC, +/- Bev before surgery. The primary endpoint was pCR. Analyses of LTOs (event-free survival (EFS), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and overall survival (OS)), impact of residual cancer burden and other variables were secondary. Results: Median follow-up was 5.7 years (y); 5y EFS was 70.9% (95% CI; 66.7%-75.4%), DRFI 76.3% (72.3%-80.5%) and OS 76.9% (72.9%-81.2%). Pretreatment clinical stage and achieving pCR correlated with LTOs, while age, race, subtype (basal-like vs. not) and tumor grade did not. Among pCR 5y EFS was 86.4% vs. 57.5% for non-pCR (HR 0.28, 0.19-0.43), OS was 88.7% vs 66.5% (HR = 0.28, 0.17-0.44). This relationship was similar in all trial arms. Any residual disease conferred poorer outcome; compared with pCR/Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) 0, EFS HRs were 2.29 (1.32-3.97), 3.01 (1.90-4.74), and 9.67 (5.66-16.51) for RCBI, II and III, respectively. There were no improvements in LTOs with Cb (EFS HR 0.99, 0.70-1.40) or Bev (EFS HR 0.91, 0.64-1.29). In an exploratory analysis, receipt of ≥11 doses of wP was associated with better EFS (HR 1.92, 1.33-2.77); this was particularly notable in Cb-treated arms. Conclusions: As expected, regardless of treatment arm pCR was associated with markedly better LTOs, and pts with any residual disease had significantly worse outcomes. The addition of Cb or Bev to standard NACT for TNBC did not improve LTOs in this trial, although it should be noted that the trial was not powered for this endpoint. Omission of chemotherapy doses may result in poorer outcomes, especially among Cb-treated pts, which may warrant further evaluation. Support: U10CA180821; U10CA180882; Genentech; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; NCT00861705 Clinical trial information: NCT00861705.

554 Background: HER2+ breast cancer (BC) is particularly common in young women. Genomic features of HER2+ tumors before and after H-based therapy have not been described in a population of young women and may point to clinically targetable mechanisms of resistance. Methods: From a large prospective cohort of women diagnosed with BC age ≤40 years, we identified those with HER2+ BC and tumor tissue available for sequencing before and after chemo+H. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on each tumor and on germline DNA from blood. Tumor-normal pairs were analyzed for mutations and copy number (CN) changes. Evolutionary analysis was performed for patients with both pre- and post-treatment (tx) samples. Results: 22 women had successful WES samples from at least one timepoint; 13 of these had paired sequencing results both before and after chemo+H. For the majority of women, post-tx sample was following neoadjuvant chemo + H, though post-tx timepoint for other women represented locoregional or distant metastasis (Table). TP53 was the only gene that was significantly recurrently mutated in both pre- and post-tx samples. Comparison of matched pre-tx and post-tx samples demonstrated that large changes in HER2 CN over the course of tx were uncommon, only 2/13 pts had > 2-fold change in HER2 CN. Other clonal and subclonal genomic alterations were found to be acquired in the post-tx sample compared to the pre-tx sample. One patient acquired a putative activating mutation in ERBB2. Another patient acquired a clonal hotpsot mutation in TP53. MYC gene amplification was observed in 4 post-tx tumors. NOTCH2 alterations were found in post-tx biopsies from 2 different patients, and mutations in STIL were also found in post-tx biopsies from 2 patients, though the function of these mutations is not known. Conclusions: HER2+ breast tumors in young women display genomic evolution following tx with chemo+H. HER2 CN changes are uncommon, but we identified several genes that warrant exploration as potential mechanisms of resistance to therapy in this population.[Table: see text]

Background Young age is a known factor associated with suboptimal adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) for adjuvant breast cancer (BC) treatment. This study was aimed at assessing nonadherent behaviors and associated factors among young women with early‐stage hormone receptor–positive BC. Methods As part of a multicenter, prospective cohort of women with a diagnosis of BC at or under the age of 40 years, participants were surveyed 30 months after their diagnosis about adherent behaviors. Among those who reported taking ET, adherence was measured with a 3‐item Likert‐type scale: Do you ever forget to take your ET? If you feel worse when you take your ET, do you stop taking it? Did you take your ET exactly as directed by your doctor over the last 3 months? Women reporting at least 1 nonadherent behavior were classified as nonadherers. Variables with a P value <.20 were included in a multivariable logistic model. Results Among 384 women, 194 (51%) were classified as nonadherers. Univariate factors that retained significance in the multivariable model included educational level (odds ratio [OR], 0.50 for high vs low; P = .04), level of social support according to the Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey (OR, 0.98 per 1 point; P = .01), and confidence with the decision regarding ET measured on a 0 to 10 numerical scale (OR, 0.63 for high vs low; P = .04). Conclusions Findings from this study could help to identify young patients at higher risk for nonadherence. Interventions adapted to the level of education and aimed at reinforcing support and patients' confidence in their decision to take ET could improve adherence and associated outcomes in this population.

Abstract Background Young women are more likely than older women to present with higher stage breast cancer (BC) and may benefit to a greater extent from downstaging with neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). Young age is also associated with greater likelihood of pathologic complete response (pCR). Using a large prospective cohort of young women with BC, we investigated response to neoadjuvant therapy, eligibility for breast conserving surgery (BCS) pre- and post-NST, and surgical treatment. Methods The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (YWS) is a multi-center cohort of women diagnosed with BC at age ≤40, that enrolled 1302 patients from 2006 to 2016. Disease characteristics and treatment information were obtained through medical record and central pathology review. Surgical recommendation before and after NST, conversion from BCS borderline/ineligible to BCS eligible, surgery, documented reasons for choosing mastectomy (MTX) among BCS eligible women, and final pathologic response were independently reviewed. Results Among 1302 women enrolled in YWS, 801 (62%) presented with unilateral stage I-III breast cancer and 317(40%) received NST. Median age was 36 years old (22-40). Pre-NST, 85/317 (27%) were BCS eligible, 49 (15%) were borderline, and 169 (53%) were not eligible (16 inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), 88 large tumor size /cosmetic, 48 diffuse calcifications, and 83 multicentricity). Among the 218 patients who were BCS ineligible/borderline pre-NST, 82 (38%) became eligible for BCS after NST. 4 patients who were BCS eligible pre-NST became ineligible. Of all patients eligible for BCS post-NST (n=163), 80 (49%) attempted BCS, 74 (93%) of whom were successful, and 83 (51%) chose MTX. Reasons for choosing MTX included: patient preference (38/83 (46%)), BRCA or TP53 mutation (31 (37%)), family history (3 (4%)), unknown (11 (13%)). On final pathology, 75 (24%) patients had pCR. Among patients who achieved a pCR, 48 (64%) underwent MTX, fewer than half (21/48 (44%)) were for anatomic indications (IBC, large tumor at diagnosis, diffuse calcifications, multicentric disease). Conclusion While NST doubled the proportion of young women eligible for BCS, nearly half chose MTX regardless of response to NST, mostly for personal preference or high-risk preventative reasons. These data highlight that surgical decision making among young women with breast cancer is often driven by factors beyond extent of disease and clinical response to therapy. Table 1.Clinical-pathologic characteristicsCharacteristicsNumber%Pre NST surgical recommendation BCS eligible8526.8Borderline4915.5BCS ineligible16953.3Unknown144.4Clinical Response Complete20263.7Partial9229.0Stable30.9Progressing72.2Unknown134.1Pathologic Response pCR (No invasive or DCIS)7524No pCR24276Post NST Surgical recommendation BCS eligible16351.4BCS ineligible14445.4Unknown103.2Attempted surgery BCS8025.2MTX23674.1Unknown20.6Final Surgery BCS7423.3MTX24176unknown20.6 Citation Format: Kim HJ, Dominici L, Rosenberg S, Pak LM, Poorvu PD, Ruddy K, Tamimi R, Schapira L, Come S, Peppercorn J, Borges V, Warner E, Vardeh H, Collins L, King T, Partridge A. Surgical treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in young women with breast cancer: Results from a prospective cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-01.

Abstract Background Less than 3% of older patients with cancer are enrolled in clinical trials. To reverse this underrepresentation, we compared older patients enrolled with older-patient-specific trials, defined as those designed for older patients with cancer, with those enrolled in age-unspecified trials. Materials and Methods We focused on individual patient data from those ≥65 years (younger patients excluded) and included all Alliance phase III adjuvant breast cancer trials from 1985–2012. Results Among 2,277 patients, 1,014 had been enrolled to older-patient-specific and 1,263 to age-unspecified trials. The median age (range) in the older-patient-specific trials was 72 (65–89) years compared with 68 (65–84) years in the cohort of older patients in age-unspecified trials; p &lt; .0001. A greater percentage of patients 75 years or older had enrolled in older-patient-specific trials compared with the cohort of age-unspecified trials: 26% versus 6% (p &lt; .0001). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9–13.7) and 13.5 years (95% CI, 12.9–14.1) for older-patient-specific and age-unspecified trials, respectively. OS was comparable (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.92–1.28; p = .34; referent: age-unspecified trials), after adjusting for age, estrogen receptor status, tumor size, and lymph node status. Similar findings were reached for recurrence-free survival. A lower rate of grade 3–5 adverse events (hematologic and nonhematologic) was reported in older-patient-specific trials (43% vs. 58%; p &lt; .0001). Sensitivity analysis with chemotherapy only trials and subset analysis, adjusted for performance score, yielded similar OS results. Conclusion Older-patient-specific trials appear to address this underrepresentation of older patients with ostensibly comparable outcomes. Clinical trial identification numbers. NCT00003088 (CALGB 9741); NCT00024102 (CALGB 49907); NCT00068601 (CALGB 40401); NCT00005970 (NCCTG N9831)