Citations

ABSTRACT The COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, version 1.5 (CAP/CA), and the COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, version 1.5, were compared. CAP/CA reduced and consolidated labor while modestly increasing assay throughput without increased failure rates or direct costs, regardless of batch size and assay format.

ABSTRACT TaqMan hepatitis B virus (HBV) analyte-specific reagent (ASR; Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ) is designed for the quantification of HBV DNA in serum or plasma. The performance characteristics of TaqMan HBV ASR following automated sample processing with the MagNA Pure LC instrument (MP; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) were evaluated in this study. Analytical sensitivity and precision were assessed with commercially available HBV standards, while clinical serum specimens from HBsAg-seropositive patients and healthy blood donors were used to determine clinical sensitivity, specificity, and correlation with other commercially available assays. Analytical studies yielded a limit of detection of 2.4 IU/ml, with good linearity and correlation ( R 2 = 0.9958) with expected HBV DNA titers over a wide range (6.0 × 10 0 to 2.1 × 10 8 IU/ml). Clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay combined with automated sample processing were both 100%. Comparison of TaqMan HBV ASR and VERSANT HBV DNA 3.0 assay (bDNA; Bayer HealthCare LLC, Tarrytown, NY) results among clinical specimens yielded good correlation ( R 2 = 0.9237), with a mean difference in titer of −0.213 log 10 IU/ml (95% confidence interval, −0.678 to 1.10 log 10 IU/ml). The overall test failure rate was 2.0% among 204 clinical serum specimens tested. Total time required for MP sample processing and automated postelution handling of 24 samples was 224 min, with 57 min of actual hands-on time. MP is a reliable, labor-saving platform suitable for use with TaqMan HBV ASR, providing sensitive and accurate quantification of HBV DNA levels over a range of 8 log 10 IU/ml.

ABSTRACT A total of 563 specimens (234 dermal and 329 genital swabs) from patients suspected of having herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections were processed using two different extraction methods (the MagNA Pure LC system and the swab extraction tube system [SETS]); HSV DNA was amplified by LightCycler PCR. HSV DNA was detected in 157 of 563 specimens (27.9%) processed by the MagNA Pure LC system and in 179 of 563 specimens (31.8%) processed by SETS ( P < 0.0001). There was no specimen processed by the MagNA Pure LC extraction method that was positive only for HSV DNA. Of 157 specimens positive by both methods, HSV DNA copy levels were higher (using cycle crossover points [cycle threshold { C T }]) with SETS (mean C T , 25.9 cycles) than with the MagNA Pure LC system (mean C T , 32.0 cycles) ( P < 0.0001). The time to process 32 samples was longer with the MagNA Pure LC extraction system (90 min) than with SETS (35 min). HSV DNA extraction using SETS is faster, less expensive, and more sensitive than the MagNA Pure LC system and could replace the latter for the laboratory diagnosis of HSV infections using LightCycler PCR.