Citations

While the cure rate of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) now exceeds ~90% with contemporary combination chemotherapy, the prognosis for adults with ALL remains significantly inferior with long-term overall survival ranging from 50% to 70%. Recent studies have uncovered marked differences in ALL genomics between children and adults, with some high-risk subtypes becoming more prevalent with age. However, the underlying biology of age-related disparities in ALL is not fully understood, especially with regard to differences in leukemia sensitivity to chemotherapy. To address this knowledge gap, we performed ex vivo drug sensitivity profiling (i.e., pharmacotyping) of 21 anti-leukemia agents on primary B-ALL diagnostic samples from 767 pediatric (age, 0-18 years) and 309 adult (19-84 years) patients. Drug sensitivity was measured as LC 50: the concentration of drug required to kill 50% of the leukemia cells (PMID: 36604538). A total of 7,975 unique LC 50 values were experimentally determined. RNA-seq was used for subtype classification and gene expression analysis. Among 21 drugs, seven showed significant differences in overall LC 50 between children and adults ( P<0.05 after Bonferroni correction): children displayed higher sensitivity to asparaginase, prednisolone, mercaptopurine, daunorubicin, and inotuzumab, while adults showed higher sensitivity to dasatinib and nelarabine. In multivariate models adjusting for 23 ALL molecular subtypes, only mercaptopurine remained significantly associated with age ( P=1.5×10 -5), suggesting that age-related differences in drug sensitivity can be primarily attributed to the variation in ALL subtypes between children and adults. For mercaptopurine, within KMT2A, CRLF2, and DUX4 subtypes, pediatric samples consistently showed a lower LC 50 than adults carrying the same genomic abnormality ( P=0.032, 0.0045, and 0.02, respectively). To explore intra-subtype heterogeneity, we performed unsupervised clustering using gene expression data for each of these three subtypes. Remarkably, within each of these subtypes, we identified two clusters with distinct transcriptomic profiles that were also largely segregated by age group, i.e., an adult-dominated cluster (C-a) and a pediatric-dominated cluster (C-p). In the KMT2A subtype, cases in C-a exhibited an over-representation of the KMT2A:: AFF1 fusion, and resistance to mercaptopurine ( P=0.029), prednisolone ( P=0.0039), vincristine ( P=0.046) and cytarabine ( P=0.0037). Within CRLF2 ALL, cases in C-a were associated with the presence of BCR:: ABL1-like signature and IGH:: CRLF2 rearrangements, and were more resistant to mercaptopurine ( P=0.0073) and prednisolone ( P=0.00036) compared to those in C-p. For DUX4 ALL, C-a was characterized by an under-representation of ERG deletions and resistance to mercaptopurine ( P=0.0056) and prednisolone ( P=0.0031), compared to C-p within DUX4. To explore the clinical relevance of this heterogeneity, we analyzed the in vivo treatment response of KMT2A (N=35), CRLF2 (N=59) and DUX4 (N=118) B-ALL enrolled in six frontline ALL trials. Compared to cases in C-p (usually drug-sensitive), those in C-a (usually drug-resistant) consistently had significantly poorer initial treatment responses as measured by persistent end-of-induction minimal residual disease (≥0.01%) in KMT2A (58% vs 9%; P=0.0063), CRLF2 (74% vs 41%; P=0.030), and DUX4 (66% vs 40%; P=0.0058) ALL. In conclusion, these studies have revealed important new insights into the pharmacogenomic basis of age-related differences in B-ALL treatment response. These results indicate that both inter- and intra-subtype heterogeneity contribute to inferior prognosis in adults with ALL, but also point to therapeutic opportunities to improve their outcomes.

Introduction: ECOG ACRIN E1910 is a randomized phase III trial that showed that adults with newly diagnosed BCR::ABL1 negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who become MRD negative (<0.01%) after induction chemo who receive blinatumomab with conventional chemotherapy (chemo) have improved survival compared with those who received chemo only (Litzow et al, Blood (2022) 140: Supplement 2, LBA-1). However, not all pts were able to receive all four planned cycles of blinatumomab in consolidation. In this report we assessed outcomes of pts in the blinatumomab arm of the trial who received all 4 cycles of blinatumomab compared to those who received 1-2 cycles. Methods: Patient between the ages of 30 and 70 with newly diagnosed BCR::ABL1 negative B-lineage ALL were enrolled and initially received 2.5 months of combination induction chemo utilizing a BFM-like regimen adapted from the E2993/UKALLXII clinical trial, with pegaspargase (after induction only for patients >=55 years of age) and addition of rituximab for CD20 positive patients. After remission induction (step 1) pts in morphologic complete remission (CR/CRi) received an intensification course of high dose methotrexate with pegaspargase for CNS prophylaxis (step 2). At the conclusion of step 2, remission and MRD status were determined centrally by 6-color flow cytometry with MRD negativity defined as <0.01%. In the primary analysis subset, MRD negative patients were randomized to receive an additional 4cycles of consolidation chemo or 2 cycles of blinatumomab at 28 mcg/day (flat dose) for 28 days each cycle followed by 3 cycles of consolidation chemo, another 4-week cycle of blinatumomab (3rd cycle of blinatumomab) followed by an additional cycle of chemo and then a 4th cycle of blinatumomab (step 3). Following completion of consolidation chemo +/- blinatumomab, pts were given 2.5 years of POMP maintenance therapy timed from the start of the intensification cycle (step 4). Estimates of OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of OS between treatment arms were conducted using the stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards model with age, CD20 status, rituximab use, and whether pts intend to receive HSCT or not as stratification factors. As the number of cycles needed to optimize outcome has not been studied, an unplanned landmark analysis was used to compare OS of pts in the blinatumomab arm who received all 4 cycles o those who received 1-2 cycles. Time 0 was chosen as 9 months post step 3 randomization (the time that patients were supposed to complete 4 cycles of blina). Four pts who received blinatumomab but died within 9 months post step 3 randomization were therefore excluded from this analysis. Results: The study was activated on December 17, 2013 and closed to enrollment on October 15, 2019. 772 pts were screened for the trial and 488 were enrolled on step 1 induction therapy. The median age of the pts was 51 years (range 30-70). 224 MRD negative pts were randomized, 112 pts to each arm. In the blinatumomab arm 12 pts received 1 cycle (11%), 32 pts received 2 cycles (29%), 4 pts received 3 cycles (4%) and 63 pts received 4 cycles (57%). The OS of pts who received 1-2 cycles of blinatumomab was compared to control (Figure 1) The difference was not significant (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.34, p=0.22). Fig 2 compares the survival of those who received 1-2 cycles to those who received 4 cycles ( (HR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.16, p=0.076). Conclusion: The addition of blinatumomab to consolidation chemotherapy resulted in a significantly better overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone in pts with newly diagnosed B-lineage ALL who were MRD negative after intensification. This represents a new standard of care for pts aged 30-70 years with BCR::ABL1 negative ALL. The optimal dose and number of cycles is however unknown. In this unplanned subgroup analysis we demonstrate that a survival benefit can only be confirmed in patients who receive the intended 4 cycles of blinatumomab during consolidation. Further studies will be needed to determine if fewer cycles can provide a similar benefit.

Background: Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the preferred treatment for elderly/unfit patients with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Current prognostication for AML is based on European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic risk stratification which has limited applicability in patients treated with Ven-HMA ( Blood, 2022). Accordingly, our primary objective was to determine predictors of treatment response and survival outcomes in treatment-naïve AML patients receiving Ven-HMA. Methods: Our study population was recruited from Mayo Clinic (MN, FL, AZ), after institutional review board approval and based on documentation of newly-diagnosed AML treated with Ven-HMA outside of clinical trials between November 2018 and April 2023. Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed by conventional karyotype, and next-generation sequencing, respectively. Response was assessed according to the 2022 ELN criteria Results: Patient characteristics A total of 301 newly-diagnosed AML patients (median age 73 years, 66% male, 62% de novo) received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-48) of azacitidine 75 mg/m2 days 1-7 ( n=100) or decitabine 20 mg/m2 days 1-5 ( n=201) with Ven. ELN 2022 cytogenetic risk included favorable (1%, n=4), intermediate (61%, n=184) or adverse (38%, n=113). Mutations involved TP53 in 77/301 (25%), ASXL1 in 54/279 (19%), RUNX1 in 54/296 (18%), NPM1 in 44/299 (15%), DNMT3A in 40/296 (13%), K/NRAS in 41/296 (14%), IDH1 in 20/301 (6%), IDH2 in 30/301 (10%), FLT3-ITD in 25/301 (8%) and DDX41 in 9/247 (4%) of informative cases. Predictors of response Complete remission, with (CR) or without (CRi), count recovery, was documented in 182 (60%) patients, including CR in 36% and measurable residual disease (MRD) negative by flow cytometry in 77% of 105 informative cases that achieved CR/CRi. Median time to CR/CRi was 1.4 months. In univariate analysis, CR/CRi was more likely to occur in the presence of NPM1 mutation, (86% vs. 56%; p < .01), IDH2 mutation, (80% vs. 58%; p = .02), DNMT3A mutation, (78% vs. 57%; p = .01), or DDX41 mutation, (100% vs. 58%; p <.01), and in the absence of adverse karyotype, (71% vs. 42%; p < .01), TP53 mutation, (67% vs. 40%; p <.01), FLT3-ITD mutation, (63% vs. 36%; p = .01), or RUNX1 mutation, (64% vs. 44%; p = .01); in multivariable analysis, adverse karyotype, ( p < .01), FLT3-ITD ( p < .01), RUNX1 ( p < .01), NPM1 ( p = .03), IDH2 ( p = .04), and DDX41, ( p = .01) mutations remained significant. Predictors of survival After a median follow-up of 8.5 months (range 0.5-56), 13.2 months for living patients, 174 (58%) deaths, 73 relapses (40% of those achieving CR/CRi), and 41 (14%; including 35 in CR/CRi) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell tranplants (AHSCT) were documented. In univariate analysis of pre-treatment variables, thrombocytopenia < 100 x 10 9/l, (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.03-2.2; p = .03), adverse karyotype, (HR 2.8, 95% CI 2.1-3.8; p < .01) TP53 mutation, (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.8-3.5; p < .01), or absence of IDH2 mutation, (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-7.6; p < .01) predicted inferior survival. Failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 4.5, 95% CI 3.3-6.1; p < .01) was also associated with inferior survival and in multivariable analysis, failure to achieve CR/CRi, (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.5-4.8; p< .01), presence of adverse karyotype, (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.6; p = .02), TP53 mutation, (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.002-2.4; p = .04), and absence of IDH2 mutation (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.004-4.7; p = .04) were identified as risk factors for survival. Subsequent HR-weighted scoring resulted in three-tiered risk stratification: low (0-1 point; n= 130), intermediate (2-3 points; n= 105), and high (4-5 points; n= 66), with respective median survival (3-year rate) of 28.9 (48%), 9.6 (6%), and 3.1 (0%) months ( p < .01) (Figure). AHSCT had an independent favorable impact on survival (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.6; p < .01), most apparent in low ( p =0.04), and intermediate ( p <.01), as opposed to high ( p = .06) risk. Conclusions: In the current single institutional series of Ven-HMA treated newly-diagnosed AML, response to Ven-HMA was the foremost predictor of survival. Additional risk factors for survival included adverse karyotype, presence of TP53 and absence of IDH2 mutations. These observations allowed for a three-tiered genetics-enhanced survival model with CR/CRi as a backbone, and also confirmed survival advantage from AHSCT, regardless of risk category.

Background There is limited prospective or comparative data evaluating the HRQoL impact of intensive chemotherapy (IC) in older adults (age ≥60 years) with AML. In the recent EA E2906 phase 3 study of '7&3' (daunorubicin & cytarabine) vs. clofarabine (CLO), a putative lower intensity therapy, we incorporated a prospective patient-reported outcomes (PRO) assessment of HRQoL and fatigue to understand treatment impact from the patients' (pts) perspective. Methods E2906 study design and results have been presented previously [n=727, med. age 68 years (range 60-86), randomized 1:1 to ‘standard’ ‘7&3‘ & high dose cytarabine (Arm A) vs. single agent CLO (Arm B), as remission induction (Step 1) and consolidation (Step 2), respectively]. There was no difference in composite complete remission (CCR, 50%) or 30-day mortality rates (8.5%), and in primary analysis CLO was inferior for Overall Survival. HRQoL was a key secondary protocol endpoint. PROs assessed HRQoL and leukemia-specific symptoms and concerns using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia scale (FACT-Leu), & Fatigue using FACT-Fatigue subscale. PROs were administered at prespecified time points: (1) Baseline; (2) Cycle 1 at nadir (approx. Day 15); (3) End of Step 1 restaging (approx. D 40); (4) Beginning of Step 2 (1 st consolidation, approx. D 45); and (5) 2 nd cycle consolidation/End Step 2 (approx. D 60). The FACT-Leu Trial Outcome Index ( TOI) was calculated by summing physical well-being, functional well-being, and leukemia-specific concerns subscales to create a single composite score. Higher TOI scores correspond to better HRQoL. The primary endpoint was to evaluate TOI difference from randomization to day 30 after induction therapy between arms, evaluated using Wilcoxon rank sum test. We also compared Clinically Meaningful differences (CMiD) in TOI (defined as patient change ≥½ standard deviation from baseline TOI) between arms, using the X2 test. Pts not completing at least 2 assessment forms (including baseline) were excluded. Testing of constructs of Physical Well-being (PWB), Functional, Leukemia & Fatigue scales demonstrated high Cronbach's a values (a >0.7) except for PWB (a=0.672) at a single time point (End of Step 2). Results Baseline TOI was available for n=489, and 364 pts (n=182 each Arm) were evaluable in this planned analysis. Evaluating CMiD during Cycle 1 induction, pts in Arm B were less likely to experience ‘Worse’ TOI score (32% vs. 40.7%, Arm A), more likely to maintain stable TOI scores (49.1% vs. 39%, Arm A), and had a similar proportion of ‘Better’ TOI scores (20.3%, A vs. 18.9%, B) although differences were not significant (p=0.1389). Conversely in cycle 1 consolidation, more patients in Arm A experienced Better TOI (45.1% vs. 29.2%, Arm B), fewer had stable TOI (45.1% vs. 58.3%, Arm B), and rates of ‘Worse’ TOI were similar (9.8%, A vs 12.5%, Arm B), again differences were not significant (p=0.2616). There was no difference in Fatigue scores between Arms (p=0.49). We evaluated whether TOI and Fatigue scores could predict the ability to complete protocol therapy. In univariate analysis baseline TOI (p=0.0059) and Fatigue (p=0.0057) were associated with Step 1 completion, however on multivariate analysis (adjusting for age, sex, and Arm) were no longer significant [TOI, Odds Ratio (OR) 1.03 (0.98-1.08, p=0.27); Fatigue, OR 1.03 (0.96-1.11, p=0.42)]. There was a borderline association of TOI with Step 2 completion [TOI OR 1.10 (1.00-1.23, p=0.06)]. Using a multivariable linear mixed effects model, we observed similar and significant changes in TOI scores in both Arms, demonstrating the effect of IC & CLO on HRQoL (Figure). Comparing to baseline, TOI scores decreased significantly at C1 induction nadir (-4.0873, p<0.0001), and increased by 5.0762 (p=0.0004) at end Step 1, by 6.9047 at cycle 1 consolidation (p<0.0001), and by 11.4601 (p<0.0001) at end Step 2. Differences were mainly apparent in those who achieved CCR, and there was significant attrition in PRO responses in non-CCR pts. Conclusions Older adults experienced significant improvement in HRQoL after nadir regardless of therapy, and those achieving CCR report significantly higher scores. We did not observe differences in leukemia specific HRQoL or fatigue between treatment Arms (7&3 vs. CLO). Patient-reported HRQoL & Fatigue was not predictive of completion of protocol therapy. These results serve as a benchmark for expectations with IC in older adults.

Introduction Atrial fibrillation/flutter (Afib) contributes independently to the hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCTCI) and is a known complication of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (AlloHCT) which has been linked to inferior outcomes, particularly in older patients. An electrocardiogram (ECG)-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to predict Afib and cardiac contractile dysfunction risk has been validated (Lancet 394:861, 2019). We hypothesized that assessment of pre-transplant Afib risk using the AI algorithm may predict future development of Afib and help identify patients at higher risk for this complication. Methods 191 consecutive MDS patients undergoing AlloHCT with curative intent using myeloablative (28.3%) or reduced intensity conditioning (62.3%) in the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center (Rochester, Jacksonville, Phoenix) between November 2015 and January 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. Primary outcome was Afib within 100 days and 365 days of transplantation, and we also assessed the outcomes of Death and Relapse. Revised IPSS (IPSS-R) and HCTCI scores were included for all patients. Elevated Afib risk score using the AI algorithm was calculated from pre-transplant ECG, performed during vital organ testing at AlloHCT clearance. In addition to left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) we evaluated detailed echocardiographic (Echo) parameters including LV volume and mass indices, left atrial volume index (LAVI), maximum trans mitral flow velocities during LV filling (E velocity) and during the diastolic phase due to atrial contraction (A velocity), the velocity of the annulus away from the apex during the protodiastolic phase (e' velocity), E/A and E/e' ratios, the presence of valvular disease, and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP). We performed an analysis using a Cox proportional hazards regression models (adjusting for age and sex) to evaluate associations with Afib risk, Relapse, and Overall Survival. Results The median age was 64 years (18-75), 58.6% were male, 6.9% non-white race, and 3.7% Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Most patients had an HCTCI score of 0-3 (76.3%). GVHD prophylaxis was predominantly with calcineurin inhibitor-based regimes plus/minus methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil (83.8%). 5.2% of patients had a history of Afib before transplant. Non-relapse mortality was 7.9% at 100 days, and 18.3% at 365 days. N=25 patients (13.1%) developed Afib within 100 days, and n=28 (14.7%) within 1-year after AlloHCT. On multivariable analysis, Age [Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.83, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.36-5.89, p=0.0055] and Echo parameters [including LAVI (HR 2.10, CI 1.23-3.58, p=0.0067), E velocity (HR 3.28, CI 1.29-8.80, p=0.013), E/A ratio (HR 3.74, CI 1.75-7.97, p=0.0006), E/e ' ratio (HR 1.81, CI 1.07-3.07, p=0.026) and RVSP (HR 1.68, CI 1.04-2.70, p=0.032)] were significantly associated with Afib risk; elevated AI risk score was significant in the univariate model (HR 2.74, CI 1.15-6.53, p=0.023) but was borderline in the multivariate model (HR 2.34, CI 0.98-5.60, p=0.056) ( Table 1). Based on previous observations we evaluated the association of AI and Echo parameters with Relapse and Death after AlloHCT ( Table 1). Age (HR 1.32, CI 1.01-1.71, p=0.041) and IPSS-R (HR 1.20, CI 1.08-1.33, p=0.0009) were significantly associated with Death after AlloHCT, while HCTCI (HR 1.10, CI 1.00-1.22, p=0.052) and higher LV EF (HR 0.63, CI 0.38-1.06, p=0.084) were borderline. For Relapse, only IPSS-R (HR 1.52, CI 1.31-1.75, p=1.22E-08) was significant, while increase Echo E velocity was of borderline significance (HR 0.45, CI 0.20-1.02, p=0.057). Conclusions Afib is a common post-AlloHCT complication and is more frequent with increasing Age. Echo parameters (specifically E/A ratio) predict significantly higher Afib risk, while the baseline ECG AI algorithm was of borderline significance. The selection of patients with lower HCTCI scores, and the low background prevalence of Afib in this cohort (i.e., selection of patients with lower baseline cardiac morbidity) are possible explanations for non-significance of the AI algorithm. As anticipated Age and IPSS-R are the greatest predictors of Death after AlloHCT, although the suggestion of an association with baseline Echo parameters highlights the importance of identifying those who may benefit from preemptive Cardiology intervention.

Introduction: Fludarabine combined with melphalan 140 mg/m2 (FluMel140) is a commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen in patients undergoing matched related (MRD) and unrelated donor (MUD) allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Ciurea et al Blood 2020, described outcomes of Flu 160 mg/m2 and Mel 100 mg/m2. In this study, we describe our experience of attenuated melphalan dosing 100-120 mg/m2 versus 140 mg/m2 with fludarabine 125 mg/m2 (attenuated FluMel versus regular dose FluMel). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients from November 2016 to April 2023 with AML, ALL or MDS undergoing alloSCT who received fludarabine and melphalan. Patients who received the lower dose of melphalan were considered to be the attenuated FluMel cohort, whereas patients receiving the melphalan 140 mg/m2 were considered to be the control cohort. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to estimate OS. NRM and relapse incidence (RI) was calculated using competing risk analysis. R 4.2.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) was used for statistical analyses. Results: A total of 134 patients [92 (68.7%) males] were evaluated. Thirty-seven (27.6%) patients received attenuated FluMel and 97 (72.4%) patients received regular dose FluMel (controls). Among the patients in the attenuated FluMel cohort, 5 (13.5%) patients also received fludarabine at doses less than 125 mg/m 2 [median 20 mg/m 2 (range 87.5-112.5 mg/m 2]. Median age at transplant was 65 years (range 30 - 76 years). The most common disease was AML [75 (56.0%) patients] ( Table 1). Patients in the attenuated FluMel group had comparable iothalamate clearance compared to control cohort (clearance <65 ml/min/1.73 m2: 18.9% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.52). Patients in the attenuated FluMel group had comparable rates of high/very high DRI to those in control cohort (51.4% vs. 43.3%, P = 0.91). Compared to the control cohort, patients in the attenuated FluMel group were less likely to have a matched related donor (21.6% vs. 45.4%, P = 0.02) and were more likely to receive PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis (37.8% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.02). Among the patients receiving attenuated FluMel, the median melphalan dose administered was 100 mg/m2. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 19 days (IQR 16-21 days), and median time to platelet engraftment was 18 days (range 12-25 days). Eleven (29.7%) patients developed post-alloSCT mucositis, and 3 (8.1%) patients developed grade 3-4 mucositis. All the patients in the attenuated FluMel group achieved 100% CD33 donor chimerism at day +30 (n=35) and day +100 (n=28) after alloSCT. Similarly, 26 (74.3%, n = 35) patients achieved ≥ 95% CD3 donor chimerism at day +30 after alloSCT and 23 (82.1%, n = 28) patients achieved ≥ 95% CD3 donor chimerism at day +100 after alloSCT. Median follow-up of the entire cohort after alloSCT was 2.3 years (95% CI 2.1-2.5 years). Median follow-up was 1.5 years in the attenuated FluMel cohort and 2.5 years for the control cohort ( P<0.001) . Survival was similar among patients receiving attenuated FluMel vs. control cohort (2-year OS 74.7% vs. 65.0%, P = 0.28). At 2 years post-alloSCT, the attenuated FluMel and control cohort had similar non-relapse mortality (19.9% vs. 24.4%, P=0.58) and relapse (22% vs. 15.2%, P=0.51). The attenuated FluMel was not associated with an increased incidence of relapse (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.50-3.73, P=0.55) or NRM (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.28-1.95, P = 0.55). GVHD-free relapse free (GRFS) survival was also similar among the attenuated Flu/Mel and control cohort (1-year GRFS rate 41.1% vs. 45.6%, P = 0.8). Among the patients receiving PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis, the 2-year OS in patients receiving attenuated FluMel was higher than the control group, but it was not statistically significant (2-year OS rate: 90% vs. 55%, P=0.37, Figure 1). Compared to the control group, the attenuated FluMel group had similar rates of NRM at 100 days (10% vs. 12.5%), 1 year (NA vs. 25%) and at 2 years after alloSCT (NA vs. 25%, P=0.54). GRFS at 1 year was also similar between the attenuated FluMel and control group (68.6% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.69). Conclusion: The attenuated dosed FluMel conditioning is a safe and effective regimen for elderly patients with acute leukemia and MDS, and is non-inferior to regular dose FluMel. Among patients receiving PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis, the lower dose of melphalan was non-inferior to regular dose FluMel for survival outcomes. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Introduction: Detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) in AML patients during remission is associated with adverse clinical outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT), including recent strong evidence from our group regarding residual NPM1 and/or FLT3-ITD variants (PMID: 36881031). Large studies examining the significance of other potential MRD targets, including isocitrate dehydrogenase isoform 2 ( IDH2), are needed. IDH2, which is mutated in approximately 12% of AML patients, is of particular interest due to the possibility of targeted clinical intervention. Methods: Patients over the age of 18 in first complete remission (CR1) with IDH2 mutated AML undergoing alloHCT transplant at a CIBMTR site between 2013-2019 with remission blood samples within 100 days of alloHCT and available clinical data were included in this study. Residual variants in IDH2, NPM1, and FLT3genes were detected by ultrasensitive error-corrected next-generation sequencing (NGS-MRD) on genomic DNA from pre-conditioning blood and validated by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse with non-relapse mortality as a competing risk. The day of transplant was considered as time 0, and the median follow-up time was calculated for censored patients. Kaplan-Meier estimation (log-rank tests), Cox proportional hazards models, and Fine-Gray regression models were fitted to examine the clinical outcomes. Results: Among the 257 IDH2-mutated AML patients in this study, 57 (23%) experienced relapse, with 41 events occurring within 12 months after alloHCT. The median follow-up time was 25 months. Among 247 patients with pre-transplant remission flow cytometry results reported, 25% were positive, but no difference in rates of relapse or OS was observed between positive and negative patients. NGS MRD analysis detected residual IDH2 variants in remission samples of 130 patients (51%) with variant allele fraction (VAF) ranging from 0.05-56% (median: 3%), and 100% validation by ddPCR. NGS MRD IDH2 positive patients had increased rates of relapse (p = 0.03; 3yr: +11%, 95% CI: 0.2% to 22%) and decreased OS (p < 0.001; 3yr: -25%, 95% CI: -13% to -38%) compared to those who tested negative (Figure 1A). These OS differences were still observed between NGS MRD IDH2 positive and negative patients, regardless of age stratification (under 60yr p < 0.001, 3yr: -28%, 95% CI: -12% to -43%; over 60yr p = 0.04, 3yr: -19%, 95% CI: -1% to -40%); however, only patients over 60yrs had increased rates of relapse (p = 0.007; 3yr: +21, 95% CI: 6% to 36%). The impact of co-mutation status was examined by subdividing the cohort based on the presence of NPM1 or FLT3-ITD mutations at baseline. Residual IDH2 variants in patients without baseline NPM1 or FLT3-ITD co-mutations (n = 151) were associated with decreased OS and increased relapse ( IDH2+ vs IDH2-; OS p = 0.005, 3yr: -23%, 95% CI: -6% to -40%; Relapse p = 0.01, 3yr: +19, 95% CI: 6% to 32%; Figure 1B). In contrast, residual IDH2 variants were not predictive of relapse in co-mutated patients (n=106, p = 0.5). In these patients, the only prognostic marker for relapse was NPM1 and/or FLT3-ITD MRD, with similar relapse risk between IDH2 only positive and MRD negative groups (p < 0.001; 3yr: 83% vs. 11% vs. 15%; Figure 1B). In multivariable analysis, IDH2 MRD positivity was associated with decreased OS (HR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.5-4.2, p < 0.001) and increased rates of relapse (HR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4-5.7, p = 0.003) after adjusting for other characteristics. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate that adult patients with IDH2-mutated AML who have IDH2 variants detected in CR1 prior to first alloHCT experienced increased relapse rates and decreased overall survival. However, this association is significant only in patients without baseline NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations. In co-mutated patients, NPM1 and/or FLT3-ITD MRD serve as superior prognostic markers. Subgroup analyses show the potential influence of factors such as conditioning intensity and age on clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, larger studies with balanced subgroups and more comprehensive baseline mutational information, including IDH2 mutation subtype, are needed to better define the clinical relevance of IDH2 MRD in this context.

Introduction: Germline DEAD-box RNA helicase-1 mutant (DDX41) predisposition syndrome ( DDX41-MT-GPS) is one of the most frequent hereditary predisposition syndromes in adults with myeloid neoplasms (MN-2-5%). Somatic mosaicism involving the unmutated DDX41 allele (e.g., R525H) as a potential mechanism for myeloid evolution has been reported in 39-50% of patients (pts). In addition, given the later age of onset, somatic mosaic states composed of age-related clonal hematopoiesis (ARCH) (e.g., DNMT3A, ASXL1, TET2, and TP53), with reported frequencies less than expected in MDS and AML, have been documented. We conducted this study to define the somatic mosaic landscape in DDX41-MT-GPS . Methods: After approval from the Mayo Clinic IRB the prospective GPS database was queried for pts with DDX41-MT GPS. Germline confirmation was conducted on skin fibroblast-, or hair follicle-derived DNA. Somatic CH testing was conducted using a targeted NGS panel as previously described. Given the high frequency of variants of undetermined significance (VUS), comparisons were made between pathogenic ( DDX41path) and DDX41VUS. Results: We identified 106 pts with DDX41-MT-GPS, of which 83 (78%) met criteria for MN, 16 (15%) for CH/CCUS (clonal cytopenias of undetermined significance), while 7 (6%) were unaffected carriers. Somatic mosaicism in DDX41-GPS patients without MN Sixteen DDX41-MT pts without MN met criteria for CH/CCUS ( DDX41path [n=4] and DDX41VUS [n=12]; median age 69 years (yrs) (range [R], 19-78) ( DDX41path [69 yrs] and DDX41VUS [67 yrs], p=0.85), with a male predilection (75%). Four (25%) pts had somatic DDX41 MT (R525H [n=3] and A376T [n=1]) with median variant allele frequency (VAF) 10.5% (R, 5-27); 2 (50%) pts with germline DDX41path had R525H (VAF; 5% and 13%) and 1 (8%) pt each with germline DDX41VUS had R525H (VAF 5%) and A376T (VAF 27%) somatic variants, respectively. Abnormal cytogenetics (CG) were observed in 2/13 evaluable (15%) pts ([+8 and del20q]) in the germline DDX41path group only (p= 0.05). ARCH co-mutations were observed in 11 (69%) pts, not significantly (NS) different between DDX41path (75%) and DDX41VUS (75%), p= 0.66. Individual co-mutations: DNMT3A (25% vs 16%, p= > 0.99), ASXL1 (25% vs 8%, p=0.71), TET2 (25% vs 8%, p= >0.99), and JAK2 (0% vs 8%, p= >0.99) were NS different between the two groups. Somatic mosaicism in DDX41-GPS patients with MN Eight-three pts met criteria for MN ( DDX41path [n=43] and DDX41VUS [n=40]; median age 67 yrs (range [R], 27-92), with a male predilection (58%). Fifty-four (65%) pts had MDS ( DDX41path [55%] and DDX41VUS [45%], p=0.55) and 29 (35%) had AML ( DDX41path [41%] and DDX41VUS [59%], p=0.65). Overall, 15 (18%) pts had somatic DDX41 MT; 12 (80%) pts with DDX41path and 3 (20%) pts with DDX41VUS (p= 0.003). The median VAF of somatic DDX41 MT was 12% (R, 5-37), NS different between DDX41path (10.5%) and DDX41VUS (12%) (p=0.08). The most common somatic DDX41 MT was R525H (66% [n=10]), significantly associated with DDX41path (9/10 [90%]), p=0.01. ARCH was observed in 17 (20%) pts, significantly higher in DDX41path (76%) compared to DDX41VUS (24%), p= 0.03. Abnormal CG were observed in 10/73 evaluable (14%) pts (-Y [n=2], del 20 [n=3], del 5q [n=2], del 7q [n=1], t (3;8) [n=1] and complex CG [n=1]), higher in DDX41path (70%) compared to DDX41VUS (30%) with p value >0.99. We compared the spectrum of CH between DDX41 MT CH/CCUS and MN pts ( Table 1) and found no difference in the proportion of pts with somatic DDX41 MT (p= 0.52) and ARCH/myeloid MT (p= 0.56). The individual occurrences of DNMT3A (p= 0.49), ASXL1 (p= 0.71), TET2 (p=0.59), JAK2 (p>0.99) and TP53 (p= 0.56) mutations were NS different between the two groups ( Figure 1). Conclusion: We define the somatic mosaic landscape in DDX41-MT GPS and demonstrate that somatic mutations involving the other allele, especially R525H, are seen in ~20% of pts (>80% of R525H present in MN). The frequency and composition of ARCH and myeloid driver mutations was lower than expected for the age of presentation, in comparison to de novo and secondary MDS/AML and occurred more frequently in DDX41path compared to DDX41VUS. Forty-two % (n=41), including 37% with MN, did not have somatic mosaicism, underscoring the fact that mechanisms of leukemia progression remain to be defined in subsets of affected pts.

BACKGROUND: Recently proposed World Health Organization (WHO, 5 th edition) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) recognized myeloid neoplasms (MN) harboring TP53-mutated ( TP53mut) as a separate entity. However, there are critical differences between the two classifications regarding allelic-status, variance allele frequency (VAF) cut-off and blast categories, that may lead to under- or overestimation of the risk. METHODS: We analyzed MN harboring TP53mut (VAF ≥2%, n=536) managed at Mayo Clinic (USA) and South Australia Health Network (Australia). ICC (Arber et al, Blood 2022) and WHO (Bluebook, Beta v2) definitions were used to stratify MN harboring TP53mut. RESULTS: Of 536 cases, 379 (71%) had myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (<20% blasts) and 157 (29%) had acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Using WHO, 160 (42%) of 379 were classified as MDS-bi TP53 as they harbored 2 TP53mut (n=115; 30%) or 1 TP53mut plus confirmed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or copy neutral LOH (cnLOH) of TP53 locus (n=45; 12%). Sixty-two (16%) TP53mut MDS with VAF >49% were classified as presumptive MDS-bi TP53. Of the 157 cases with 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49%, 17 confirmed to have an intact wild-type TP53 copy and were classified as monoallelic. While 140 (89%) cases did not have copy number variation (CNV) analysis. We next evaluated the number of TP53mut cases classified differently by WHO and ICC. As WHO does not recognize TP53mut AML as a separate entity, 157 (29%) TP53mut AML were not classifiable. 46% (174/379) of the TP53mut MDS including 48 (30%), 12 (19%) and 79 (65%) of bi TP53, presumptive bi TP53 and monoallelic TP53mut MDS according to WHO were classified differently by ICC ( Figure 1A). Discordance between the two classifications were predominantly driven by: (i) The difference in VAF cut-off. Sixty patients (11%) with TP53mut VAF <10% were excluded from the ICC classification of TP53mut MN as it mandates TP53mut VAF cut-off ≥10%. 11 (18%) and 41 (68%) of these had bi TP53, monoallelic TP53mut MDS by WHO criteria while 8 (13%) had AML. Importantly, within the VAF <10% cohort, median overall survival (OS) of 2 TP53mut or 1 TP53mut with 17p13.1 (hereafter 17p) deletion or complex karyotype (CK, n=30) was significantly poor compared to 1 TP53mut VAF <10% (11.6 vs 32.4 months; P =0.002, Figure 1B), suggesting that ICC may underestimate the poor prognosis of multi-hit or multi-hit equivalent TP53mut MN with VAF <10%. (ii) The difference in bone marrow blast cut-off. The underlying assumption by WHO is that prognosis of bi TP53mut MDS is poor irrespective of blast percentage category (0-9% vs 10-19%). In contrast, ICC considers that TP53mut MDS/AML (blasts 10-19%) is associated with poor prognosis irrespective of TP53 allelic status. Median OS of TP53mut MDS with 10-19% blasts was significantly poor compared to blast 0-9% (6.4 vs 11.6 months, P <0.0001). Second, median OS of bi TP53mut was significantly poor than monoallelic TP53mut in MDS- blast 0-9% (10.1 vs 15.9 months; P =0.0001) but not in blasts 10-19% (6.8 vs 6.2 months; P =0.19). Hence, exclusion of monoallelic TP53mut MDS with blast 10-19% as TP53mut MN from the WHO classification may underestimate the poor prognosis. (iii) The difference in the definition of biallelic and multi-hit TP53 loss. 35 cases with 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49%, had 17p deletion but did not have CNV analysis to confirm the loss of TP53 locus and could not be classified further using WHO. ICC classified 18 (50%) of these cases as multi-hit. Median OS of 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49%, and 17p deletion on karyotype was significantly poor than 1 TP53mut (VAF ≤49%without 17p deletion on karyotype (6.4 vs 14.6 months, P =0.001). (iv) The difference in the definition of multi-hit equivalent. 32% (33/104) WHO defined monoallelic cases without available CNV data, were classified as multi-hit-equivalent by ICC as they harbored CK. However, WHO does not consider CK as presumptive evidence of bi TP53. Median OS of 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49% with CK was significantly poor compared to 1 TP53mut without CK (8.2 vs 26.9 months, P =0.0008). CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that poor prognosis of ‘multi-hit’ TP53 with VAF <10% is underestimated by ICC. On the other hand, poor prognosis of monoallelic TP53 MDS with 10-19% blasts as well as 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49% in the presence of CK is underestimated by WHO. These data suggest that both classifications can be further refined.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved the outcomes of patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Many older patients (pts) are not good candidates for intensive chemotherapy and are treated with TKIs plus corticosteroids or low-intensity chemotherapy. Although the remission rates with this approach have been high, the median disease-free survival (DFS) has been short. Therefore, novel treatment strategies are needed. This trial evaluated the feasibility of combining the TKI dasatinib with prednisone and blinatumomab in older pts with Ph+ ALL. Here we present updated results (median follow-up, 4.3 years). Methods: This trial was activated through the NCTN in January 2015 and closed to accrual in April 2021. Pt eligibility included: age ≥ 65 years; Ph+ or Ph-like ALL (with dasatinib-sensitive fusions or mutations); newly diagnosed or relapsed/ refractory; no evidence of central nervous system (CNS) disease; and adequate organ function. Treatment: For induction, pts received dasatinib 140 mg/d orally (PO) Days 1-56 along with prednisone 60 mg/m 2/d PO Days 1-24. Pts achieving complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (Day 28 or Day 56) continued dasatinib until Day 84, followed by 3 cycles of post-remission therapy (PRT) with blinatumomab/ dasatinib. Pts not achieving CR or CRi by Day 56 received re-induction with blinatumomab. The response rate was assessed on Day 35 of blinatumomab. Pts not achieving CR/ CRi could receive a second cycle of blinatumomab. This was followed by 3 cycles of PRT with blinatumomab/ dasatinib. Maintenance therapy consisted of prednisone 60 mg/m 2/d x 5 days every 28 days for a total of 18 cycles, along with dasatinib 140 mg po qd indefinitely. CNS prophylaxis included intrathecal (IT) methotrexate every 4-6 weeks x 8 doses. IT methotrexate was given at least 2 days apart from blinatumomab. Response was assessed at Days 28, 56, and 84, and additional time points were dependent on response. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed centrally by multi-color flow cytometry on Day 28. Statistics: A total of 24 eligible patients were accrued. The primary objective was the feasibility of the combination therapy. The combination was to be deemed feasible if the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was < 33%. DLT included: > Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities (excluding nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) and Grade 4 neutropenia lasting > 42 days. The primary results were reported in 2022 with a median of 2.7 years of follow-up. Herein, we report long-term outcomes for these patients. Results: The median age was 73 years (range 65-87). All pts had newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL; 79% of Ph+ pts had additional cytogenetic abnormalities. During induction, 2 pts experienced treatment-related non-hematologic Grade 4 toxicities. No Grade 4 or higher treatment-related non-hematologic toxicities occurred during post-remission therapy or maintenance. The toxicity of the combination was deemed acceptable. Twenty-two of 24 pts (92%) achieved a CR during dasatinib and prednisone induction therapy. Four did not receive PRT (2 due to adverse events, 1 to receive a transplant, and 1 because of insurance issues). Sixteen pts who achieved CR had MRD data. Six of 16 pts (38%) were MRD undetectable by multi-color flow cytometry on Day 28. Most sites also monitored patients' blood or bone marrow with real-time quantitative PCR to quantify the BCR-ABL1 transcript for molecular response. Of 19 patients analyzed, 17 (89%) were in a major or complete molecular remission at some time point after treatment, with at least 12 of these patients achieving complete molecular remission. Four patients remain on maintenance. The median follow- up for pts who are alive is 4.3 years (range 2.6-6.5 years). The median overall survival (OS) is 6.5 years (95% CI 3-NA) and the median DFS has not been reached as of June 29, 2023. Kaplan-Meier 3-year estimates of OS and DFS are 75% (95% CI 52%-88%) and 72% (95% CI 49%-87%), respectively (Figure). Of the 8 relapses, 4 patients were CD19+ and 3 had T315I mutations. Conclusions: Median DFS and OS with dasatinib and blinatumomab in this older group of Ph+ ALL patients remain excellent despite only 1 patient proceeding to an allogeneic transplant. Further correlative studies (single cell transcriptomics and DNA methylation sequencing) are being planned to evaluate predictors of relapse and will be presented at the meeting.