Citations

Clear

173 citation(s) found for "Jentzer, Jacob C".

Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Settings
Exaire, J. Emilio, Sandoval, Yader , Cagin, Charles , Elgendy, Islam Y. , Tak, Tahir , Omer, Mohamed A, Exaire, Jose E, Sandoval, Yader B, Cagin, Charles R, Elgendy, Islam Y , Omer, Mohamed , Jentzer, Jacob C. , Singh, Mandeep

Mayo Clinic

International Journal of Angiology | February 14, 2021 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 01 | Pages: 053-066

10.1055/s-0041-1723941 | PMID 34025096 Get It

AbstractDespite the widespread adoption of primary percutaneous intervention and modern antithrombotic therapy, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains the leading cause of death in the United States and remains one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Certain high-risk patients present a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. The widespread adoption of primary percutaneous intervention in addition to modern antithrombotic therapy has resulted in substantial improvement in the short- and long-term prognosis following STEMI. In this review, we aim to provide a brief analysis of the state-of-the-art treatment for patients presenting with STEMI, focusing on cardiogenic shock, current treatment and controversies, cardiac arrest, and diagnosis and treatment of mechanical complications, as well as multivessel and left main-related STEMI.
Defining Shock and Preshock for Mortality Risk Stratification in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients
Burstein, Barry , Diepen, Sean van , Murphy, Joseph G. , Holmes, David R. , Bell, Malcolm R. , Barsness, Gregory W. , Henry, Timothy D. , Menon, Venu , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Naidu, Srihari S. , Murphy, Joseph, van Diepen, Sean , Jentzer, Jacob C. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Baran, David A.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Heart Failure | January 19, 2021 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circheartfailure.120.007678 | PMID 33464952 Get It

Background: Previous studies have defined preshock as isolated hypotension or isolated hypoperfusion, whereas shock has been variably defined as hypoperfusion with or without hypotension. We aimed to evaluate the mortality risk associated with hypotension and hypoperfusion at the time of admission in a cardiac intensive care unit population. Methods: We analyzed Mayo Clinic cardiac intensive care unit patients admitted between 2007 and 2015. Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg, and hypoperfusion as admission lactate >2 mmol/L, oliguria, or rising creatinine. Associations between hypotension and hypoperfusion with hospital mortality were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 10 004 patients with a median age of 69 years, 43.1% had acute coronary syndrome, and 46.1% had heart failure. Isolated hypotension was present in 16.7%, isolated hypoperfusion in 15.3%, and 8.7% had both hypotension and hypoperfusion. Stepwise increases in hospital mortality were observed with hypotension and hypoperfusion compared with neither hypotension nor hypoperfusion (3.3%; all P <0.001): isolated hypotension, 9.3% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4–2.2]); isolated hypoperfusion, 17.2% (adjusted odds ratio, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.9–3.0]); both hypotension and hypoperfusion, 33.8% (adjusted odds ratio, 2.8 [95% CI, 2.1–3.6]). Adjusted hospital mortality in patients with isolated hypoperfusion was higher than in patients with isolated hypotension ( P =0.02) and not significant different from patients with both hypotension and hypoperfusion ( P =0.18). Conclusions: Hypotension and hypoperfusion are both associated with increased mortality in cardiac intensive care unit patients. Hospital mortality is higher with isolated hypoperfusion or concomitant hypotension and hypoperfusion (classic shock). We contend that preshock should refer to isolated hypotension without hypoperfusion, while patients with hypoperfusion can be considered to have shock, irrespective of blood pressure.
Influence of age and shock severity on short-term survival in patients with cardiogenic shock
Jentzer, Jacob C. , Holmes, David R. , Dabboura, Salim , Anavekar, Nandan S., Kirchhof, Paulus , Barsness, Gregory W. , Blankenberg, Stefan , Bell, Malcolm R. , Westermann, Dirk , Kirchhof, Paulus , Jentzer, Jacob C , Westermann, Dirk , Blankenberg, Stefan , Schrage, Benedikt

Mayo Clinic

European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care | January 1, 2021 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 604-612

10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa035 | PMID 33580778 Get It

AbstractAimsCardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with poor outcomes in older patients, but it remains unclear if this is due to higher shock severity. We sought to determine the associations between age and shock severity on mortality among patients with CS.Methods and resultsPatients with a diagnosis of CS from Mayo Clinic (2007–15) and University Clinic Hamburg (2009–17) were subdivided by age. Shock severity was graded using the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) shock stages. Predictors of 30-day survival were determined using Cox proportional-hazards analysis. We included 1749 patients (934 from Mayo Clinic and 815 from University Clinic Hamburg), with a mean age of 67.6 ± 14.6 years, including 33.6% females. Acute coronary syndrome was the cause of CS in 54.0%. The distribution of SCAI shock stages was 24.1%; C, 28.0%; D, 33.2%; and E, 14.8%. Older patients had similar overall shock severity, more co-morbidities, worse kidney function, and decreased use of mechanical circulatory support compared to younger patients. Overall 30-day survival was 53.3% and progressively decreased as age or SCAI shock stage increased, with a clear gradient towards lower 30-day survival as a function of increasing age and SCAI shock stage. Progressively older age groups had incrementally lower adjusted 30-day survival than patients aged &lt;50 years.ConclusionOlder patients with CS have lower short-term survival, despite similar shock severity, with a high risk of death in older patients with more severe shock. Further research is needed to determine the optimal treatment strategies for older CS patients.
Mortality risk stratification using artificial intelligence-augmented electrocardiogram in cardiac intensive care unit patients
Jentzer, Jacob C. , Kashou, Anthony H. , López-Jiménez, Francisco , Attia, Zachi I. , Kapa, Suraj , Friedman, Paul A. , Noseworthy, Peter A. , Noseworthy, Peter A , Kapa, Suraj , Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco , Jentzer, Jacob C , Attia, Zachi I

Mayo Clinic

European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care | December 31, 2020 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 532-541

10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa021 | PMID 33620440 Get It

Abstract Aims An artificial intelligence-augmented electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) algorithm can identify left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). We sought to determine whether this AI-ECG algorithm could stratify mortality risk in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients, independent of the presence of LVSD by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Methods and results We included 11 266 unique Mayo Clinic CICU patients admitted from 2007 to 2018 who underwent AI-ECG after CICU admission. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) data were extracted for patients with a TTE during hospitalization. Hospital mortality was analysed using multivariable logistic regression. Mean age was 68 ± 15 years, including 37% females. Higher AI-ECG probability of LVSD remained associated with higher hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.05 per 0.1 higher, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.08, P = 0.003] after adjustment for LVEF, which itself was inversely related with the risk of hospital mortality (adjusted OR 0.96 per 5% higher, 95% CI 0.93–0.99, P = 0.02). Patients with available LVEF data (n = 8242) were divided based on the presence of predicted (by AI-ECG) vs. observed (by TTE) LVSD (defined as LVEF ≤ 35%), using TTE as the gold standard. A stepwise increase in hospital mortality was observed for patients with a true negative, false positive, false negative, and true positive AI-ECG. Conclusion The AI-ECG prediction of LVSD is associated with hospital mortality in CICU patients, affording risk stratification in addition to that provided by echocardiographic LVEF. Our results emphasize the prognostic value of electrocardiographic patterns reflecting underlying myocardial disease that are recognized by the AI-ECG.
364: Vasopressor Requirements and Echocardiographic Parameters After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Burstein, Barry , Anavekar, Nandan S., Tabi, Meir , Kashani, Kianoush , Jentzer, Jacob C.

Mayo Clinic

Critical Care Medicine | December 18, 2020 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 171-171

10.1097/01.ccm.0000727344.91366.b9 Get It

360: Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit
Barsness, Gregory W. , Ahmed, Abdelrahman , Tabi, Meir , Kashani, Kianoush , Jentzer, Jacob C.

Mayo Clinic

Critical Care Medicine | December 18, 2020 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 169-169

10.1097/01.ccm.0000727328.43470.92 Get It

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Is Associated With Increased Mortality Across the Spectrum of Shock Severity in Cardiac Intensive Care Patients
Jentzer, Jacob C. , Lawler, Patrick R. , Diepen, Sean van , Henry, Timothy D. , Menon, Venu , Baran, David A. , Džavík, Vladimír, Barsness, Gregory W. , Holmes, David R. , Jentzer, Jacob C , Baran, David A , Lawler, Patrick , van Diepen, Sean , Kashani, Kianoush

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | December 7, 2020 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circoutcomes.120.006956 | PMID 33280435 Get It

Background: The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) frequently occurs in patients with cardiogenic shock and may aggravate shock severity and organ failure. We sought to determine the association of SIRS with illness severity and survival across the spectrum of shock severity in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 8995 unique patients admitted to the Mayo Clinic CICU between 2007 and 2015. Patients with ≥2/4 SIRS criteria based on admission laboratory and vital sign data were considered to have SIRS. Patients were stratified by the 2019 Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock stages using admission data. The association between SIRS and mortality was evaluated across SCAI shock stage using logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models for hospital and 1-year mortality, respectively. Results: The study population had a mean age of 67.5±15.2 years, including 37.2% women. SIRS was present in 33.9% of patients upon CICU admission and was more prevalent in advanced SCAI shock stages. Patients with SIRS had higher illness severity, worse shock, and more organ failure, with an increased risk of mortality during hospitalization (16.8% versus 3.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.7–2.5]; P <0.001) and at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.3–1.6]; P <0.001). After multivariable adjustment, SIRS was associated with higher hospital and 1-year mortality among patients in SCAI shock stages A through D (all P <0.01) but not SCAI shock stage E. Conclusions: One-third of CICU patients meet clinical criteria for SIRS at the time of admission, and these patients have higher illness severity and worse outcomes across the spectrum of SCAI shock stages. The presence of SIRS identified CICU patients at increased risk of short-term and long-term mortality. Further study is needed to determine whether systemic inflammation truly drives SIRS in this population and whether patients with SIRS respond differently to supportive therapies for shock.
Noninvasive Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Stroke Work Index Predicts Mortality in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients
Jentzer, Jacob C. , Anavekar, Nandan S., Burstein, Barry , Borlaug, Barry A. , Oh, Jae K. , Burstein, Barry J, Borlaug, Barry A , Jentzer, Jacob C

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging | November 16, 2020 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 11 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circimaging.120.011642 | PMID 33190537 Get It

Background: Reduced left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) has been associated with adverse outcomes in several populations of patients with chronic heart disease, but no prior studies have examined this metric in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. We sought to determine whether a low LVSWI, as measured noninvasively using transthoracic echocardiography, is associated with higher mortality in CICU patients. Methods: Using a database of unique Mayo Clinic CICU admissions from 2007 to 2018, we identified patients with LVSWI measured by transthoracic echocardiography within 1 day of CICU admission. Hospital mortality was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, and 1-year mortality was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis, adjusted for left ventricular ejection fraction and known predictors of hospital mortality. Results: We included 4536 patients with a mean age of 68±14 years (36% women). Admission diagnoses (not mutually exclusive) included acute coronary syndrome in 62%, heart failure in 46%, and cardiogenic shock in 11%. The mean LVSWI was 38±14 g×min/m 2 , and in-hospital mortality occurred in 6% of patients. LVSWI had better discrimination for hospital mortality than left ventricular ejection fraction ( P <0.001 by De Long test). Higher LVSWI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.72 per 10 g×min/m 2 higher [95% CI, 0.61–0.84]; P <0.001) and lower 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.812 per 1 g×min/m 2 higher [95% CI, 0.759–0.868]; P <0.001). Stepwise decreases in hospital and 1-year mortality were observed with higher LVSWI. Conclusions: Low LVSWI, reflecting poor left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance, is associated with increased short-term and long-term mortality among CICU patients. This emphasizes the importance of Doppler transthoracic echocardiography as a predictor of outcomes among critically ill patients. Further study is required to determine whether early interventions to optimize LVSWI can improve outcomes in the CICU setting.
Association Between Albumin Level and Mortality Among Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients
Padkins, Mitchell , Breen, Thomas , Anavekar, Nandan S., Barsness, Gregory W. , Jentzer, Jacob C. , Barsness, Gregory, Jentzer, Jacob C , Padkins, Mitchell R , Kashani, Kianoush

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine | October 5, 2020 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1475-1482

10.1177/0885066620963875 | PMID 33016174 Get It

Purpose: To study the effect of hypoalbuminemia on short- and long-term mortality in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) patients. Methods: We reviewed 12,418 unique CICU patients from 2007 to 2018. Hypoalbuminemia was defined as an admission albumin level <3.5 g/dL. Predictors of hospital mortality were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results: We included 2,680 patients (22%) with a measured admission albumin level. The median age was 68 (39% females). Admission diagnoses included acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock. The median albumin level was 3.4 g/dL and 55% of patients had hypoalbuminemia. Hospital mortality occurred in 16%, and patients with hypoalbuminemia had higher hospital mortality (21% vs. 9%, adjusted OR 2.64, 95% CI 2.09-3.34, p < 0.001). Albumin level was inversely associated with hospital mortality (adjusted OR 0.60 per 1 g/dL higher albumin level, 95% CI 0.47-0.75, p <0.001), with a stepwise increase in the hospital mortality at lower albumin levels. Post-discharge mortality was higher in hospital survivors with hypoalbuminemia, and increased as a function of lower albumin levels. Conclusion: Hypoalbuminemia is common in CICU patients and associated with higher short- and long-term mortality. Progressively lower serum albumin was incrementally associated with higher hospital and post-discharge mortality.
Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial of Early Coronary Angiography Versus No Early Coronary Angiography After Cardiac Arrest Without ST-Segment Elevation
Kern, Karl B. , Radšel, Peter , Jentzer, Jacob C. , Seder, David B. , Lee, Kwan , Janardhanan, Rajesh, Stub, Dion , Hsu, Chiu‐Hsieh , Noč, Marko , Jentzer, Jacob C , Lee, Kwan S , Lotun, Kapildeo

Mayo Clinic

Circulation | September 28, 2020 | Volume: 142 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 2002-2012

10.1161/circulationaha.120.049569 | PMID 32985249 Get It

Background: The benefit of emergency coronary angiography after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is uncertain for patients without ST-segment elevation. The aim of this randomized trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early coronary angiography and to determine the prevalence of acute coronary occlusion in resuscitated patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation. Methods: Adult (>18 years) comatose survivors without ST-segment elevation after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were prospectively randomized in a 1:1 fashion under exception to informed consent regulations to early coronary angiography versus no early coronary angiography in this multicenter study. Early angiography was defined as ≤120 minutes from arrival at the percutaneous coronary intervention–capable facility. The primary end point was a composite of efficacy and safety measures, including efficacy measures of survival to discharge, favorable neurologic status at discharge (Cerebral Performance Category score ≤2), echocardiographic measures of left ventricular ejection fraction >50%, and a normal regional wall motion score of 16 within 24 hours of admission. Adverse events included rearrest, pulmonary edema on chest x-ray, acute renal dysfunction, bleeding requiring transfusion or intervention, hypotension (systolic arterial pressure ≤90 mm Hg), and pneumonia. Secondary end points included the incidence of culprit vessels with acute occlusion. Results: The study was terminated prematurely before enrolling the target number of patients. A total of 99 patients were enrolled from 2015 to 2018, including 75 with initially shockable rhythms. Forty-nine patients were randomized to early coronary angiography. The primary end point of efficacy and safety was not different between the 2 groups (55.1% versus 46.0%; P =0.64). Early coronary angiography was not associated with any significant increase in survival (55.1% versus 48.0%; P =0.55) or adverse events (26.5% versus 26.0%; P =1.00). Early coronary angiography revealed a culprit vessel in 47%, with a total of 14% of patients undergoing early coronary angiography having an acutely occluded culprit coronary artery. Conclusions: This underpowered study, when considered together with previous clinical trials, does not support early coronary angiography for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest without ST elevation. Whether early detection of occluded potential culprit arteries leads to interventions that improve outcomes requires additional study. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02387398.