Citations

AbstractBackgroundAutologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the current standard of care for most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who are transplant eligible, yet the timing ofASCTis disputed due to a similar overall (OS) and progression‐free survival with an earlyASCT(eASCT) or a delayedASCT(dASCT) approach.ObjectiveWe developed a decision analytic model to perform cost‐effectiveness analysis of the two commonly used treatment strategies forMM.MethodsData on disease progression and treatment effectiveness came from 2001 to 2008 cohort treated at the Mayo Clinic and from published studies. Cost analysis was performed from a third‐party payer perspective.ResultsThe Consumer Price Index adjusted 2012 costs ofeASCTanddASCTwere $249 236 and $262 610, respectively.eASCTcohort had a benefit of 1.96 quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs), 0.23 QALYs more thandASCT, implying thateASCTis preferred (dominant) overdASCT. The most critical variables in one‐way sensitivity analysis were treatment‐related mortality and OS associated witheASCTstrategy.ConclusionsWe conclude thateASCTcould potentially be a relatively cost‐effective treatment option for appropriate patients with MM, and these results would help patients, providers, and payers in decision making for timing of ASCT.

Very effective combination chemotherapy using novel agents has become available in multiple myeloma (MM). Its impact on the use of high‐dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) as part of initial therapy is unknown. Using the National Cancer Data Base, we studied the rate of upfront AHCT use among 137,409 newly diagnosed MM patients from 1998 to 2010 in the United States and determined whether disparity exists among various sociodemographic as well as geographic subgroups. Overall, 12,378 (9.0%) patients received AHCT as part of initial treatment. The use of upfront AHCT increased steadily from 5.2% in 1998 to 12.1% in 2010 (trend test, P < 0.001), with no sign of plateau. This was seen across all socio‐geo‐demographic subgroups except among patients treated in the Northeast where the rate fell from 8.7% in 1998 to 6.6% in 2010. In multivariable analysis, patients with the following characteristics were the least likely to receive AHCT (odds ratio): year of diagnosis from 1998 to 2003 before the era of novel agents (0.67), older age (0.35), Black race (0.58), Hispanic ethnicity (0.78), low level of education or annual household income (0.55), residence in a metro area (0.66), no or unknown medical insurance (0.30), treatment at a community cancer center (0.16), and treatment facility located in the Northeast region (0.54). Even after the introduction of novel agents, the rate of upfront AHCT in MM continues to increase annually. Significant disparities exist dependent on demographic, social, and geographic factors. Am. J. Hematol. 89:825–830, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.