Citations

Abstract Background: Women with hereditary breast cancer risk, who develop breast cancer, face complex surgical decisions related to their breast cancer and risk to their contralateral breast. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the factors influencing decision making in these women and degree of decision conflict before and after consultation with breast specialized physicians (BSP). Methods: Women with hereditary breast cancer risk and recently diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective decision making questionnaire study. Questionnaires were completed prior to their initial breast clinic visit and after consultation with a breast clinic physician, nurse educator and a breast surgeon. Results: 68 women completed both questionnaires. Mean age was 52 (range 27–84). Prior to meeting with BSP, 10 (15%) women reported having made a decision for the cancer side and 18 (26%) reported being close to deciding. Of the 20 who expressed a surgical preference prior to consultation, 5 (25%) changed their decision after meeting with the BSP [1 to mastectomy (MTX), 4 to breast conservation (BC)]. After consultation with BSP, 65 (96%) reported having made a decision (BC in 29 (45%), MTX in 35 (54%), unspecified in one). The most commonly cited reasons influencing surgical choice were doctor's advice (79%), family history of breast cancer (74%) and worrisome findings on biopsy (50%). Prior to meeting with BSP, 9 (13%) women reported having made a decision regarding screening and/or risk-reducing options for the contralateral breast and another 11 (16%) reported being close to a decision. The choices in these 20 women were screening only in 10 (50%), contralateral prophylactic MTX (CPM) in 3 (15%), CPM and oophorectomy in 2 (10%), other combinations of options in 4, and unspecified in 1. After meeting with the BSP, 49 (72%) reported having made a decision regarding the contralateral breast; this decision was for screening only in 21 (43%), CPM only in 9 (18%), screening plus tamoxifen in 7 (14%), CPM and oophorectomy in 2 (4%), other combinations of options in 8, and unspecified in 2. The most commonly cited reasons for choices on the contralateral side were: family history (81%), doctor's advice (78%), and worrisome findings on biopsy (43%); only 25% cited psychological or emotional reasons. For both the cancer and contralateral sides, decisional conflict was significantly lower after meeting with BSP than prior to meeting with BSP. Decision-conflict scale total scores (possible range 0–100; higher scores indicate more decisional conflict) summarized for each side and compared between timepoints Conclusion: The BSP consult and family history have the greatest influence on decision making among women with hereditary risk diagnosed with breast cancer. After consultation most women felt they had made decisions for both the cancer and contralateral sides and reported significantly lower decision conflict compared to prior to the consultation. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-05.

Abstract Invasive breast carcinoma in African American (AA) women differs significantly from their Caucasian (CA) counterparts in its incidence, morphology and outcome. These tumors are more likely to be high grade, hormone receptor negative, present at a younger age and at a higher stage. Evaluation and a better understanding of precursor lesions may help delineate the mechanisms underlying the development of breast cancer in these two groups. Atypical hyperplasia (AH) in the breast has been associated with an increased risk of developing cancer (relative risk∼4.0). Risk stratification of these women by identification of predictive biomarkers would be beneficial for optimal patient care. In our study we evaluated the expression of the following prognostic biomarkers: estrogen receptor (ER), Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme and Ki-67 in AH in a cohort of AA women with benign breast biopsies. AA women with benign breast biopsies from years 1997–2000 were retrieved from our departmental database. Clinical and follow up data was obtained from the SEER database. The hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) slides for these cases were reviewed by 2 pathologists, who were blinded to the outcome, and those with atypia were included in this study. Paraffin blocks were retrieved for immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis and standardized scoring methods applied. A total of 1608 AA women had benign breast biopsies during the study period. We performed IHC analysis on 37 (2.3%) who were diagnosed with atypia (25 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and 12 cases of atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH)). Increased COX-2 expression was seen in 19 of 28 (67.8%) cases with AH. Of these, 13 of 19 cases (68.4%) were of ADH and 6 of 9 cases (66.7%) were of ALH. Twenty of 25 cases had a high expression of ER overall. Of these, 15 of17 (88.2%) of the positive cases was in the ADH category and 3 of 7 (42.8%) was in the ALH group. Of 32 cases, only 3 cases showed a proliferation rate of > 2% (9.4%) with Ki-67 IHC stain. All of these cases belonged to the ADH (21) category. In summary, the majority of AH cases showed increased COX-2 expression, although no differences were observed between lobular and ductal lesions. In contrast, ADH lesions appeared to exhibit increased reactivity for ER compared to ALH. Similarly, although rare, more ADH cases showed an increased proliferation rate compared to ALH. From our data, COX-2 and ER might be of prognostic significance in AA patients with AH. Larger studies with follow up are needed to understand this disease further. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-07.

Abstract African American (AA) women have higher mortality rates from breast cancer (BrCa) and are diagnosed at younger ages than their Caucasian counterparts. Women who have had a benign breast biopsy are at increased risk of the disease, although less is known about the risk of BrCa associated with benign breast disease in AA women. We examined 1428 breast biopsies from AA women which occurred from 1997–2000 and assessed various pathologic markers including: apocrine metaplasia, ductal hyperplasia including atypia, evidence of cysts, duct ectasia, fibrosis, intra-ductal papilloma, sclerosing adenosis, columnar alteration, and involution (atrophy). These women were followed for later BrCa through the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System, part of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program through 2008. Women who developed BrCa were compared to those in the cohort who did not, and to other AA women with BrCa in the SEER registry. AA women in our study were also compared to Caucasian women in the Mayo Clinic cohort. Differences in variables were assessed by chi-squared tests and 95% confidence intervals. Of the 1428 biopsies, 52 (3.6%) subsequent incident breast cancers were reported in SEER. The mean age at diagnosis was 59, and the mean time from biopsy to BrCa diagnosis was 6.1 years. Individuals with atypical ductal hyperplasia at biopsy (n=37, 2.6%) were more likely to develop breast cancer (n=7, 13.5%, p<0.01). No other pathologic variables were associated with increased risk. Women in our cohort with breast cancer did not differ from AA in the SEER database with respect to age at diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, or receptor positivity. Compared to the Caucasian women in the Mayo Clinic BBD cohort, AA women in our study were younger at biopsy (p<0.01), but had similar percentages of involution and atypia (p=0.50 and 0.15, respectively). Our preliminary findings among a relatively small group of AA women with prior benign breast biopsies and incident breast cancers suggest that results from the Mayo Cohort study are likely to apply to AA populations. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-16.

Abstract B39 Background The breast glandular epithelium is composed of lobules that undergo age-related involution that increases as women age and has been associated with lowered breast cancer risk. Mammographic density (MD) is an established risk factor for breast cancer that has been shown to decrease with age. This study examined the association of age-related lobular involution with mammographic breast density. Materials and Methods The study sample was selected from approximately 20,000 healthy women who were enrolled in a screening cohort at the Mayo Clinic (Mayo Mammography Health Study) from 2003 to 2006 and had a benign breast biopsy (BBD) within 2 years of the enrollment mammogram. A quantitative measure of mammographic density, percent density (PD) was estimated on the enrollment mammogram, in addition to its components dense and nondense area (NDA). All biopsies were reviewed by a breast pathologist for the type of benign breast disease (BBD) as well as lobular involution status. Involution was defined as the proportion of terminal ductal lobular units (TDLUs) in the background tissue on biopsy that showed at least 50% decrease in size and number of acini from normal lobules and was subjectively assessed as: No- 0% involution, Partial- 1 to 74%, or Complete- >75% involution. Mean density was estimated for the 3 categories of involution using generalized linear models and square root transformation. Confounders were assessed including age, parity, body mass index (BMI), type of BBD, menopausal status, age at first birth and family history Results A total of 317 women from the MMHS had BBD within 2 years of enrollment. Mean age at BBD diagnosis in this sample was 55 years. Age- and BMI- adjusted analyses suggested an inverse association of involution and percent density with adjusted mean PD values of 23.3 (95%CI [17.2, 30.3]) for no involution, 21.9 (95%CI [20.0, 23.9]) for partial involution, and 17.8 (95% CI [14.7, 21.3]) for complete involution (p for trend 0.05). This trend was driven primarily by the positive association of involution with nondense area with adjusted mean NDA values of 103.1cm2 (95% CI [86.1, 121.7]) for no involution, 104.9 cm2 (95% CI [99.4, 110.7]) for partial involution, and 126.2 cm2 (95% CI [115.0, 137.9]) for complete involution (p for trend 0.004). Discussion Our findings suggest that MD is inversely associated with involution of breast tissues, providing a plausible mechanism through which MD influences breast cancer risk. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2008;1(7 Suppl):B39.

Abstract Metformin is the most widely used drug for type 2 diabetes. Metformin activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which regulates cellular energy metabolism via its upstream kinase LKB1. Activation of AMPK has been shown extensively to cause growth arrest in multiple tumor types by inhibiting the TSC-mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway as well as by inducing cell cycle arrest. Our data indicate that metformin exerts an anti-proliferative effect on several chemo-responsive and -resistant ovarian cancer cell lines (A2780, CP70, C200, OV202, OVCAR3 and SKVO3ip, PE01, PE04), which is accompanied by activation of AMPK and cell cycle arrest. Interestingly, we have also determined that metformin is able to inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells when AMPK is silenced by siRNA, where both the expression and activation of AMPK is significantly reduced. Also, metformin was able to attenuate proliferation of AMPK (−/−) mefs, although to a lesser degree in AMPK (+/+) mefs. Additional results indicate that metformin activates p21 and inhibits cyclinD1 activities partially in AMPK (−/) mefs. These data suggest a novel mechanism of metformin action, namely, an AMPK independent pathway which can modulate proliferation and possibly cell cycle regulated events in ovarian cancer. Whether the AMPK independent effects of metformin require LKB1 activity is currently under investigation. Collectively, our preliminary observations indicate that metformin can modulate proliferation and cell cycle arrest in an AMPK independent manner. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(23 Suppl):C38.

Abstract Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, have identified novel susceptibility loci. GWAS for survival after EOC have had more limited success. The association of each single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) individually may not be well suited to detect small effects of multiple SNPs, such as those operating within the same biologic pathway. Gene set analysis (GSA) overcomes this limitation by assessing overall evidence for association of a phenotype with all measured variation in a set of genes. Methods: To determine gene sets associated with EOC overall survival, we conducted GSA using data from two large GWAS (N cases = 2,813, N deaths = 1,116), with a novel Principal Component-Gamma GSA method. Analysis was completed for all cases and then separately for high-grade serous histologic subtype. Results: Analysis of the high-grade serous subjects resulted in 43 gene sets with P < 0.005 (1.7%); of these, 21 gene sets had P < 0.10 in both GWAS, including intracellular signaling pathway (P = 7.3 × 10−5) and macrolide binding (P = 6.2 × 10−4) gene sets. The top gene sets in analysis of all cases were meiotic mismatch repair (P = 6.3 × 10−4) and macrolide binding (P = 1.0 × 10−3). Of 18 gene sets with P < 0.005 (0.7%), eight had P < 0.10 in both GWAS. Conclusion: This research detected novel gene sets associated with EOC survival. Impact: Novel gene sets associated with EOC survival might lead to new insights and avenues for development of novel therapies for EOC and pharmacogenomic studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(3); 529–36. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract The 19p13.1 breast cancer susceptibility locus is a modifier of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers and is also associated with the risk of ovarian cancer. Here, we investigated 19p13.1 variation and risk of breast cancer subtypes, defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status, using 48,869 breast cancer cases and 49,787 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Variants from 19p13.1 were not associated with breast cancer overall or with ER-positive breast cancer but were significantly associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk [rs8170 OR, 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–1.15; P = 3.49 × 10−5] and triple-negative (ER-, PR-, and HER2-negative) breast cancer (rs8170: OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13–1.31; P = 2.22 × 10−7). However, rs8170 was no longer associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk when triple-negative cases were excluded (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89–1.07; P = 0.62). In addition, a combined analysis of triple-negative cases from BCAC and the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Consortium (TNBCC; N = 3,566) identified a genome-wide significant association between rs8170 and triple-negative breast cancer risk (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.18–1.33; P = 3.31 × 10−13]. Thus, 19p13.1 is the first triple-negative–specific breast cancer risk locus and the first locus specific to a histologic subtype defined by ER, PR, and HER2 to be identified. These findings provide convincing evidence that genetic susceptibility to breast cancer varies by tumor subtype and that triple-negative tumors and other subtypes likely arise through distinct etiologic pathways. Cancer Res; 72(7); 1795–803. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract A positive association has been reported between greater bone density and higher breast cancer risk, suggesting that these women could be at reduced risk of fracture. To estimate fracture risk among unselected community women with breast cancer and to systematically assess associations with various risk factors including breast cancer treatments, we conducted a population-based historical cohort study of 608 Olmsted County, MN, USA, women with invasive breast cancer first diagnosed in 1990 to 1999 (mean age 61.6 ± 14.8 years), who were followed for 5776 person-years. Altogether, 568 fractures were observed in 270 women (98 per 1000 person-years). Overall fracture risk was elevated 1.8-fold, but the absolute increase in risk was only 9%, and 56% of the women did not experience a fracture during follow-up. Excluding pathologic fractures (15%) and those found incidentally (24%), to allow for ascertainment bias, the standardized incidence ratio was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99 to 1.3) for total fracture risk and 0.9 (95% CI 0.7 to 1.2) for osteoporotic fracture risk alone. Various breast cancer treatments were associated with an increased risk of fracture, but those associations were strongest for pathologic fractures, which were relatively more common among the women who were premenopausal when their breast cancer was diagnosed. Moreover, underlying clinical characteristics prompting different treatments may have been partially responsible for the associated fracture outcomes (indication bias). These data thus demonstrate that breast cancer patients in general are not at greatly increased risk of fracture but neither are they protected from fractures despite any determinants that breast cancer and high bone density may have in common. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Abstract p16, a nuclear protein encoded by the p16INK4a gene, is a regulator of cell-cycle regulation. Previous studies have shown that expression of p16 in tissue biopsies of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with increased risk of breast cancer, particularly when considered in combination with other markers such as Ki-67 and COX-2. Here, we evaluated how expression of p16 in breast tissue biopsies of women with atypical hyperplasia (AH), a putative precursor lesion to DCIS, is associated with subsequent development of cancer. p16 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in archival sections from 233 women with AH diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic. p16 expression in the atypical lesions was scored by percentage of positive cells and intensity of staining. We also studied coexpression of p16, with Ki-67 and COX-2, biomarkers of progression in AH. Risk factor and follow-up data were obtained via study questionnaire and medical records. Forty-seven patients (20%) developed breast cancer with a median follow-up of 14.5 years. Staining of p16 was increased in older patients relative to younger patients (P = 0.0025). Although risk of developing breast cancer was not associated with increased p16 expression, joint overexpression of Ki-67 and COX-2 was found to convey stronger risk of breast cancer in the first 10 years after diagnosis as compared with one negative marker (P < 0.01). However, the addition of p16 levels did not strengthen this association. p16 overexpression, either alone or in combination with COX-2 and Ki-67, does not significantly stratify breast cancer risk in women with AH. Cancer Prev Res; 4(12); 1953–60. ©2011 AACR.

Abstract Triple-negative breast cancers are an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with poor survival, but there remains little known about the etiologic factors that promote its initiation and development. Commonly inherited breast cancer risk factors identified through genome-wide association studies display heterogeneity of effect among breast cancer subtypes as defined by the status of estrogen and progesterone receptors. In the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Consortium (TNBCC), 22 common breast cancer susceptibility variants were investigated in 2,980 Caucasian women with triple-negative breast cancer and 4,978 healthy controls. We identified six single-nucleotide polymorphisms, including rs2046210 (ESR1), rs12662670 (ESR1), rs3803662 (TOX3), rs999737 (RAD51L1), rs8170 (19p13.1), and rs8100241 (19p13.1), significantly associated with the risk of triple-negative breast cancer. Together, our results provide convincing evidence of genetic susceptibility for triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res; 71(19); 6240–9. ©2011 AACR.