Citations

e16752 Background: Undifferentiated osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas is an aggressive malignancy only described by a few case reports in the literature. In this study, we sought to better characterize this entity by examining patients seen at Mayo Clinic. Methods: This study identified patients with osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas using Mayo Clinic databases (MN, AZ, FL) from the year 2000 to present. Patient demographics, genetic data, and treatment modalities were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate median overall survival (mOS) for the cohort as well as mOS and mPFS for treatment subgroups. Results: 15 patients were identified (9 female, 6 male). Median age at diagnosis was 59 years and mOS for all patients was 11.0 mos (95% CI 6.2-15.7 mos). 3 patients (20%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis with the liver being the most common site (n = 3). Metastatic disease was associated with significantly shorter OS (3.5 vs. 14.1 mos, p = 0.005; HR 7.98 [95% CI 1.43-44.4]) compared to locoregional disease (LRD). 4 patients underwent genetic testing. The most common mutation was CDKN2A (n = 3), followed by TP53 (n = 2) and KRAS (n = 2). 13/15 patients had detailed follow-up information. 6/7 patients undergoing chemotherapy received a gemcitabine-based regimen as first line: with capecitabine (n = 2), with nab-paclitaxel (n = 2), or as monotherapy (n = 2). 1 patient received FOLFIRINOX. In patients with LRD and adequate follow-up (n = 11), 8/11 underwent surgical resection and had longer OS compared to those without resection (17.0 vs. 8.4 mos, p = 0.09). No surgical patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 5/8 received adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 did not undergo chemotherapy, and 1 was lost to follow-up after surgery. PFS from time of surgery was 15.3mos (95% CI 5.0-25.6mos). 6 patients (40%) were alive at time of analysis; all 6 underwent surgical resection. Conclusions: Osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis, even when diagnosed at an early stage. OS for patients of all stages in this study was less than 1 year suggesting prognosis may be even worse than that of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The optimal therapy remains unknown but most patients received similar chemotherapy as in adenocarcinoma. Patients with LRD amenable to surgical resection experienced a PFS over 1 year from surgery, possibly associated with OS benefit, however overall prognosis is poor. Further study is warranted on a larger scale to better understand disease course and treatment options.

e16705 Background: The prevalence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) has increased in the last decade. Despite being clinically asymptomatic PNETs can be biologically aggressive. There is currently no reliable non-invasive diagnostic biomarker for PNETs. In this study we aimed to identify and validate methylated DNA marker (MDM) candidates that differentiate PNET from normal pancreas. Methods: For discovery, reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) was performed on DNA extracted from frozen normal pancreas (n = 13) and PNET (n = 51) tissues. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), fold-change, and p-value criteria selected candidates MDMs for blinded validation in independent FFPE tissues from primary PNET (n = 67; solid = 50, cystic = 17), normal pancreas controls (n = 24), and normal buffy coat (n = 36) using methylation specific PCR. MDM distributions in primary PNETs were compared to primary lung (n = 36) and small bowel (n = 36) NETs and metastatic PNET tissue (n = 25). The discrimination accuracy of candidate markers was summarized as the AUC with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: From the RRBS discovery, 31 candidate MDMs were selected for validation. Four MDMs ( SRRM3, HCN2, SPTBN4 and TMC6) achieved individual AUCs ≥0.95 in the validation set (Table). These MDMs were similarly discriminant in metastatic PNET tissue and in primary lung and small bowel NETs. Three out of these 4 MDMs perfectly differentiated PNET tissue from buffy coat with AUC of 1 and may be ideally suited for further development of a blood-based assay. Conclusions: We identified and validated novel MDMs in tissue that discriminate PNETs from controls with normal pancreas and buffy coat with high accuracy. These MDMs also differentiated metastatic PNETs from normal pancreas tissue. Further exploration of these candidate tissue MDMs in plasma can potentially guide diagnosis and management of PNETs. Funding: P30DK084567. [Table: see text]

4541 Background: Anti-VEGFR2 therapy (ramucirumab/paclitaxel [RAM/TAX]) and ICI are approved as 2nd- and 3rd-line therapy (Tx), respectively, for pts with mGEA. We unexpectedly saw durable responses in 2 pts on RAM/TAX after progression on an ICI trial (KN-059; PMID 29674442). We performed a pilot to examine the clinical activity of ICI followed by RAM/TAX. Then we retrospectively compared the outcomes of pts who received this serial Tx to pts who received RAM/TAX without prior ICI. Methods: All pts with mGEA at Mayo Clinic who received RAM/TAX (2014-19) were included (N = 87). Outcomes were best objective response rate (ORR: complete [CR] or partial response) per RECIST1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). Chi square and multivariate (MV) logistic and Cox regression were used. Results: 15 consecutive pts with measurable mGEA received ICI immediately followed by RAM/TAX after irRECIST progression. Most pts (95%) did not respond to ICI. Yet on RAM/TAX, 100% (15/15) had tumor reduction (range -8% to -100%) with an ORR of 73% (11/15), including 3 CRs. In these pts (who received ICI followed by RAMTAX), PFS on RAMTAX was longer than on last chemotherapy before ICI (12.3 vs 3.0 m, P < .001). Outcomes on RAM/TAX in these pts were significantly better than in pts who received RAM/TAX alone (see Table). Associations were strengthened after adjusting for total lines of Tx, line of Tx of RAM/TAX, age, and ECOG PS. Exploratory analysis of paired tumor biopsies collected pre-ICI and on RAM/TAX in a small subset revealed that the frequency of intratumoral immunosuppressive FOXP3+ Tregs decreased on RAM/TAX, whereas the frequency of antitumor CD8+ T cells was preserved. Conclusions: RAM/TAX immediately preceded by ICI was associated with significantly higher OS, ORR, and DOR than RAM/TAX alone, suggesting ICI may enhance efficacy of subsequent anti-VEGFR/taxane therapy. This novel sequence of therapy will be tested prospectively in a new randomized phase 2 trial (NCT04069273). [Table: see text]

4048 Background: PolyPEPI1018 is an off-the-shelf, multi-peptide vaccine containing 12 immunogenic epitopes derived from 7 cancer testis antigens (CTAs) frequently expressed in patients with CRC. Here we report the final results of the phase I study of PolyPEPI1018 vaccine as an add-on to maintenance therapy in mCRC patients. Methods: 11 patients with MSS mCRC were vaccinated with PolyPEPI1018 just after the transition to maintenance therapy with fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab after first-line combo chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Part A: n = 5, single dose; Part B: n = 6, 3 doses, Q12W. Primary endpoint was safety. Immunomonitoring was performed at both blood and tumor levels, as well as prospectively predicted. Results: The vaccine was well tolerated; most common side effects were transient skin reactions. No vaccine-related SAE occurred. Pre-existing immune responses were boosted by the vaccine for 7/10 patients. De novo responses were also induced, overall, 80% of patients had CD8+ T cell responses against at least 3 CTAs. The magnitude of immune responses as well as the density and the ratio of CD8+/CD3+ tumor infiltrating T cells increased with multiple vaccine doses. Three patients had objective tumor response according to RECIST v1.1: one of them in the single dose group and two of them in the 3 doses group. Both patients in the 3 doses group qualified for curative surgery. One of them had no viable tumor cells in his primary tumor at the time of surgery. Post-trial follow-up revealed PFS of at least 12 months for 3 patients. mPFS was longer for patients receiving multiple doses (9.9 months) compared to single dose (6.1 months). Both measured and predicted multiantigenic immune responses tend to correlate with PFS and tumor volume reduction. Conclusions: PolyPEPI1018 was effective in restoring immunological responses to CTAs in patients’ with spontaneous immunity against. Treatment with PolyPEPI1018 vaccine and maintenance therapy was safe and demonstrated evidence of early clinical activity in MSS mCRC tumors. Data support further randomized trials with PolyPEPI1018. Clinical trial information: NCT03391232 .

e13681 Background: Cell-free tumor DNA or circulating tumor DNA tests are increasingly used in clinical care to detect somatic mutations from solid tumors. However, data on laboratory performance characteristics using standardized samples is limited. Methods: Well-characterized reference materials were used for the College of American Pathologists (CAP) cell-free tumor DNA proficiency testing surveys, which consisted of stabilized DNA fragmented to simulate cell-free DNA in a synthetic plasma matrix. For the 2018A, 2018B, 2019A and 2019B surveys, laboratories tested for hotspot mutations (single and dinucleotide sequence changes) in EGFR, BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and IDH1 at variant allele fractions ranging from 0.1% - 1.0%. As per CAP proficiency testing standards, results were scored according to the known mutation(s) engineered at designated variant allele fractions in each PT sample. Nine laboratories were excluded from analysis because they provided incomplete results. Statistical significance was calculated using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: In 2018 and 2019, 101 laboratories submitted survey results for at least one proficiency testing mailing. There were 5088 total proficiency testing responses for EGFR, BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and IDH1 mutations across 12 different samples. For the 3585 responses submitted for BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and IDH1, sensitivity ranged from 94.6 – 100%, while specificity exceeded 99%. There were no significant differences in performance between analytical methodologies for BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and IDH1 mutations. Performance characteristics for EGFR mutations among the 1503 responses showed a combined sensitivity of 87.1% and specificity of 98.7%. For laboratories detecting mutations in EGFR, next-generation sequencing methods exhibited a sensitivity (true positivity) of 95.7% while the sensitivity of non-NGS methods was lower at 81.7% ( P= 0.02). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity for clinical laboratories performing cell-free tumor DNA tests. For EGFR mutations, NGS outperformed non-NGS methods. These data suggest excellent overall agreement among laboratories performing clinical cell-free tumor DNA tests. Further investigation across variant allele fractions and additional variant types is warranted.

Angiosarcoma of the colon is rare, as is colonic amyloidosis. To our knowledge, there have been no reported cases of angiosarcoma arising in association with amyloid deposition. Herein, we described a case of 77-year-old man who presented with hematochezia, and a sigmoid mass was found on colonoscopy. Histologic examination of the resected specimen showed extensive nodular deposition of AL-lambda amyloid material in the colonic wall, as well as high-grade angiosarcoma which was closely intermingled with the amyloid deposits. While the occurrence of both colonic amyloidosis and angiosarcoma in this patient may represent pure coincidence, given the intimate association of the angiosarcoma and the amyloid deposition and the rarity of both of these lesions, we hypothesize that angiosarcoma could be secondary to amyloid deposition.

751 Background: Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinomas (PASC) are rare malignancies, with limited evidence regarding best treatment options. The Mayo Clinic Pancreatic Cancer SPORE Registry was utilized to compare/contrast outcomes for pancreatic cancers with a squamous component to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: Patients were identified from the SPORE Registry (2000-2019), were reviewed and confirmed by expert pathologists. Demographic and clinical information was ascertained from medical records and risk factor questionnaires. A case control study of patients with PASC vs PDAC was constructed. PASC patients were also followed for outcome and treatment records were extracted. Results: Of 2,584 total patients with pancreatic cancers, 45 cases of PASC and 2,438 with PDAC were identified. There were no differences in age (median 69 vs 67 years, p=0.42), sex (male 64.4vs 56.6%, p= 0.29), BMI (27.41 vs 27.78 kg/m2, P=0.50), or ever-smoking (61.0 vs 55.3%, P=0.47), with a borderline association with reported diabetes (17.8 vs 29.9%, p =0.08). Compared to PDAC, PASCs were more likely to involve the body/tail (48.9 vs 33.2%, p= 0.02) and had poorer overall survival, adjusted for age, gender, and stage (median 7.1 m vs 12.8m, HR 1.89, p=0.0004). Of 9 PASC pts treated with neoadjuvant intent, 4 were surgically resected, median survival was 7 months. Eleven pts underwent upfront surgery, with variable adjuvant treatments. Median OS post- surgery was 18m (range 7-51). Of 14 patients presenting with metastatic disease, median survival was 4.5 m (range 1-22). With regard to systemic chemotherapy, for neoadjuvant or metastatic disease median duration of treatment was 3 months (range 0.5-7m) for Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (N=9) and also 3 months (range 2-6m) for FOLFIRINOX (N-13). Conclusions: The diagnosis of PASC carries an even poorer outcome than pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Tumors are more likely to arise in the distal pancreas, and patients may be less likely to report associated diabetes. Limited antitumor activity was noted with multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimens. Prospective trials will be needed to clarify choice of regimen in the future.

617 Background: Currently, there is no published data on the efficacy of SSAs for well-differentiated G3 NETs. Randomized trials have demonstrated a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit and limited tumor response for lower grade 1-2 NETs, but the optimal systemic therapy for metastatic/unresectable G3 NETs is unknown. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of SSAs in G3 NETs. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of Mayo Clinic patients treated with SSAs for metastatic/unresectable G3 NETs, querying data from 1992 - present. Inclusion criteria were: centrally reviewed pathology confirming well-differentiated morphology, G3 based on WHO classification, SSA monotherapy, and radiological data available to assess response. Patients who had prior lines of treatment were included as long they subsequently were treated with single-agent SSA. Poorly-differentiated tumors were excluded. The primary endpoint was PFS. Best overall response was determined by radiographic regression, stabilization, or progression of tumor size. Results: Ninety patient records were reviewed, with 14 meeting inclusion criteria (diagnosed 2014 – 2018). Median Ki-67 proliferative index was 25%. Two patients (14%) had a partial response to SSA therapy, five (36%) had stable disease, and seven (50%) had progressive disease. The estimated median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.9 – 24). Of the 7 patients with stable disease or partial response, the median time to progression was 8.7 months. Three patients had stable disease for greater than 9 months (24, 29 and 42 months, respectively). Overall survival was not estimable. There was no association of Ki-67 index with PFS based on a proportional hazards model. Conclusions: This is the first report on the efficacy of SSAs for G3 NETs. Although half of the patients in our series had at least stable disease, the PFS was modest at only 4.4 months. Given their favorable side-effect profile compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy, SSAs may present an attractive option to be further explored in a prospective fashion. We are presently updating this data by reassessing response using RECIST criteria.

362 Background: Most pts with mGEA do not respond to ICI or ramucirumab/paclitaxel (RAM/TAX). Emerging data suggest that ICI may potentiate subsequent therapy (Tx). In KN059 we unexpectedly observed durable responses in 2 pts on RAM/TAX after ICI (PMID 29674442). We examined if ICI impacts efficacy of subsequent RAM/TAX in a larger cohort and explored alterations in the tumor microenvironment. Methods: All pts with mGEA at Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL) who received RAM/TAX (2014-19) were included. We compared best objective response rate (ORR: complete [CR] or partial response [PR]) per RECIST1.1 and overall survival (OS) in pts who received RAM/TAX with (Group A) vs without (Group B) immediately preceding PD-1 blockade. Chi square and multivariate logistic and Cox regression were used. We adjusted for total lines of Tx received and the line of Tx in which RAM/TAX was given, to control for potential differences in the biology of heavily treated pts or those receiving RAM/TAX as 2nd vs 3rd line Tx. We also adjusted for age and ECOG PS. Results: In total 87 pts met inclusion criteria. In the 19 pts (Group A) who received RAM/TAX (usually as 3rd line Tx) after progression on ICI, there was a 77% relative risk reduction of death after initiation of RAM/TAX compared to the 68 pts (Group B) who received RAM/TAX (usually as 2nd line) without preceding ICI (median OS 15.0 vs 7.6 mo; HR 0.23; P < .001). The ORR was also significantly higher (58% vs 18%; P < .001) including the CR rate (16% vs 1%; P = .006). Two CRs in Group A are ongoing (10 - 34 mo). Of note, 95% of Group A pts did not respond to ICI, and all had irRECIST progression on ICI. Immunofluorescent analysis from a responder showed 65-fold reduction (post vs pre-Tx) in intratumoral density of immunosuppressive FOXP3+ Tregs, with preserved density of antitumor CD8+ T cells. Conclusions: Higher than expected efficacy was observed on RAM/TAX when immediately preceded by ICI, suggesting ICI may enhance efficacy of subsequent anti-VEGFR/taxane therapy. This serial immunotherapy combination may be a novel option for pts with primary resistance to ICI and will be tested prospectively in a new randomized phase 2 trial (NCT04069273).

Objective. We explore the clinicopathologic features of Ewing sarcoma (ES) presenting in older adulthood. Methods. Cases of molecularly confirmed ES arising in patients aged ≥40 years were evaluated. Results. Fifty patients were identified (33 males/17 females; 41-86 years). The majority of tumors (41) arose at extraskeletal sites, while 9 were bone primaries. Twenty-eight cases showed nested architecture, while the remaining cases showed sheet-like growth. Tumor cytology was categorized as conventional (n = 39), crushed (n = 5), clear cell (n = 4), rhabdoid (n = 3), and epithelioid (n = 2). Fifty percent had necrosis, while rosettes were noted in 1 case. Immunostains performed ranged from 1 to 28 (median = 10). Follow-up (n = 43, 1-147 months) revealed 15 patients with metastasis. Conclusion. Although rare, ES should be considered in the differential diagnosis for round cell malignancies in older adult patients. In this cohort, ES is most often extraskeletal, and may show unusual morphologic features, closely simulating more common neoplasms in this age group.