Citations

Abstract Background Immunosuppression in glioblastoma (GBM) is an obstacle to effective immunotherapy. GBM-derived immunosuppressive monocytes are central to this. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint molecule, expressed by GBM cells and GBM extracellular vesicles (EVs). We sought to determine the role of EV-associated PD-L1 in the formation of immunosuppressive monocytes. Methods Monocytes collected from healthy donors were conditioned with GBM-derived EVs to induce the formation of immunosuppressive monocytes, which were quantified via flow cytometry. Donor-matched T cells were subsequently co-cultured with EV-conditioned monocytes in order to assess effects on T-cell proliferation. PD-L1 constitutive overexpression or short hairpin RNA–mediated knockdown was used to determined the role of altered PD-L1 expression. Results GBM EVs interact with both T cells and monocytes but do not directly inhibit T-cell activation. However, GBM EVs induce immunosuppressive monocytes, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and nonclassical monocytes (NCMs). MDSCs and NCMs inhibit T-cell proliferation in vitro and are found within GBM in situ. EV PD-L1 expression induces NCMs but not MDSCs, and does not affect EV-conditioned monocytes T-cell inhibition. Conclusion These findings indicate that GBM EV-mediated immunosuppression occurs through induction of immunosuppressive monocytes rather than direct T-cell inhibition and that, while PD-L1 expression is important for the induction of specific immunosuppressive monocyte populations, immunosuppressive signaling mechanisms through EVs are complex and not limited to PD-L1.

725 Background: The impact of surgical resection of renal tumors on peripheral immune related cells is not well characterized, and has potential implications as biomarkers for systemic immune therapy are being developed. We sought to assess the effect of surgical resection on circulating cytotoxic T-cells (CTLs) for patients with renal tumors. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 40 patients undergoing partial, radical, or cytoreductive nephrectomy (PN, RN, CN) for unilateral primary renal tumors between 2016 and 2018. Blood draws were performed pre-op, 1 day post-op, and 3 months post-op. Flow cytometry was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The % of PBMCs expressing CD11a/CD8 (CTLs) were assessed. The % of CTLs expressing PD-1, Bim (a downstream PD-1 pathway pro-apoptotic mediator), CX3CR1/GZMB (an effector memory T-cell phenotype), and Ki67 (a proliferation marker) were assessed. Median changes in % of CTLs were evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Comparisons between aggressive (pT3-4, N1, M1, or aggressive histology (high-grade, coagulative necrosis, sarcomatoid dedifferentiation, or specific RCC-variant histologies)) versus indolent tumors were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Twenty, 12, and 8 patients underwent RN, PN, and CN, respectively. Thirty, 7, and 3 patients had clear-cell RCC, non-clear cell RCC, and oncocytoma, respectively. Twenty-three and 17 patients had aggressive and indolent tumors, respectively. While there was no significant change at 1 day, by 3 months there were significantly increased CTLs among PBMCs (+1.3%; p=0.004). There was significant decrease in CX3CR1+GZMB+ CTLs (-2.9%; p<0.001) and significant increase in Bim+ CTLs (+3.0%; p=0.03) at 1 day but not 3 months. Interestingly, Ki67+ CTLs increased at day 1 (+0.6%; p<0.001) but decreased by 3 months (-0.6%; p=0.001). There were no significant changes in PD-1+ CTLs at either time point. There were no significant changes in any CTL characteristics at 1 day or 3 months between aggressive and indolent tumors. Conclusions: These findings characterize changing CTL profiles over time with surgical resection of renal tumors which may help guide biomarker development.

362 Background: Most pts with mGEA do not respond to ICI or ramucirumab/paclitaxel (RAM/TAX). Emerging data suggest that ICI may potentiate subsequent therapy (Tx). In KN059 we unexpectedly observed durable responses in 2 pts on RAM/TAX after ICI (PMID 29674442). We examined if ICI impacts efficacy of subsequent RAM/TAX in a larger cohort and explored alterations in the tumor microenvironment. Methods: All pts with mGEA at Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL) who received RAM/TAX (2014-19) were included. We compared best objective response rate (ORR: complete [CR] or partial response [PR]) per RECIST1.1 and overall survival (OS) in pts who received RAM/TAX with (Group A) vs without (Group B) immediately preceding PD-1 blockade. Chi square and multivariate logistic and Cox regression were used. We adjusted for total lines of Tx received and the line of Tx in which RAM/TAX was given, to control for potential differences in the biology of heavily treated pts or those receiving RAM/TAX as 2nd vs 3rd line Tx. We also adjusted for age and ECOG PS. Results: In total 87 pts met inclusion criteria. In the 19 pts (Group A) who received RAM/TAX (usually as 3rd line Tx) after progression on ICI, there was a 77% relative risk reduction of death after initiation of RAM/TAX compared to the 68 pts (Group B) who received RAM/TAX (usually as 2nd line) without preceding ICI (median OS 15.0 vs 7.6 mo; HR 0.23; P < .001). The ORR was also significantly higher (58% vs 18%; P < .001) including the CR rate (16% vs 1%; P = .006). Two CRs in Group A are ongoing (10 - 34 mo). Of note, 95% of Group A pts did not respond to ICI, and all had irRECIST progression on ICI. Immunofluorescent analysis from a responder showed 65-fold reduction (post vs pre-Tx) in intratumoral density of immunosuppressive FOXP3+ Tregs, with preserved density of antitumor CD8+ T cells. Conclusions: Higher than expected efficacy was observed on RAM/TAX when immediately preceded by ICI, suggesting ICI may enhance efficacy of subsequent anti-VEGFR/taxane therapy. This serial immunotherapy combination may be a novel option for pts with primary resistance to ICI and will be tested prospectively in a new randomized phase 2 trial (NCT04069273).

The expression of B7‐H1 on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes usually correlates with poor prognosis in cancer patients. It has also been observed that B7‐H1 can deliver signals into T cells, and therefore we hypothesized that B7‐H1 on T cells reduces T cell‐mediated anti‐tumor immunity. B7‐H1 knockout (KO) mice, when compared to their WT counterparts, have increased numbers of CD8 T cells with memory effector phenotype, the population of T cells that quickly respond upon antigen restimulation. In addition, B7‐H1 KO CD8 T cells proliferate more rapidly during homeostatic expansion. Once activated, these cells exhibit improved CTL function, as demonstrated by increased degranulation and IFN‐gamma production. Blocking the B7‐H1/PD‐1 pathway not only improved the CTL function of CD8 T cells when mixed with PD‐1+ tumors in vitro but also improved their ability to reject established tumors in vivo. This novel functional role for B7‐H1 on CD8 T cells provides us with a new approach to manipulate anti‐tumor T cell response and to improve current tumor immunotherapy. (This work is funded by Mayo Foundation).

AbstractObjectivesPrevious studies noted discordance of programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) and one of its ligands (PD‐L1) across patient‐matched primary and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). There are inconsistencies if the primary or metastatic tumor has higher expression, and whether metastatic tumor expression is associated with patient outcome. Thus, we examined PD‐1 and PD‐L1 in patient‐matched tumors using a large number of ccRCC patients with long follow‐up.Materials and MethodsWe analyzed PD‐1 and PD‐L1 using immunohistochemistry in patient‐matched primary and metastatic tumors from 110 ccRCC patients. Concordance was assessed among longitudinal metastatic tumors, as well as across patient‐matched primary and metastatic tumors. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the associations of metastatic tumor expression with cancer‐specific survival.ResultsWe observed inter‐metastatic tumor heterogeneity of PD‐1 in 25 (69%) of the 36 patients and of PD‐L1 in seven (19%) patients. Concordance between patient‐matched primary and metastatic tumors was 73% (Kappa = 0.16, 95% CI: −0.003‐0.32). Similarly, concordance of PD‐L1 between metastatic and patient‐matched primary tumors was 78% (Kappa = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09‐0.46). Both markers demonstrated higher expression in primary vs metastatic tumors. Metastatic tumor expression of PD‐1 was significantly associated with metastatic location (P < .0001) and ccRCC‐specific survival (HR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.06‐4.36, P = .035).ConclusionsThe expression of PD‐1 and PD‐L1 is discordant across patient‐matched ccRCC tumors, with higher expression in primary tumors. Higher PD‐1 expression was associated with metastatic location and lower cancer‐specific survival. If validated, these results highlight the importance of evaluating these biomarkers in metastatic tissue specifically.

65 Background: The addition of chemotherapy to immune checkpoint inhibitors has been explored clinically in solid tumors in order to overcome one of the challenges of immunotherapy: clinical outcomes are variable, with only a subset of patients achieving durable responses. Further understanding of the immunoregulatory mechanisms of chemotherapy in the setting of immunotherapy is crucial for the development of optimal combinatorial chemo-immunotherapeutic strategies to improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: Metastatic melanoma (MM) patients who failed anti-PD-1 single therapy were subsequently treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin in addition to PD-1 blockade. Using peripheral blood (PB) from MM patients and healthy donor, the phenotypic and functional changes in T cells induced by chemotherapy, in the setting of PD-1 blockade, were examined. Results: Paclitaxel and carboplatin, in combination with PD-1 blockade, were able to induce significant clinical responses in a subset of MM patients who were resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy alone. In patients who responded to this combination, a subset of tumor-reactive effector T cells (CD8+CD11a+PD1+GranzymeB+) survived the treatment, with increased frequency after the addition of chemotherapy. This T cell population preserved its effector phenotype, although ongoing PD-1 blockade was needed to improve its anti-tumor activity. In vitro experiments, using CD8+CD11a+PD1+GranzymeB+isolated from healthy donor PB, also demonstrated its ability to survive chemotherapy treatment. In addition, after cultured with chemotherapy, this T cell subset demonstrated higher cytotoxic T cell functions as well as increased chemotherapy efflux. Conclusions: Chemotherapy regulates a subset of tumor-reactive effector T cells (CD8+CD11a+PD1+GranzymeB+) and increases clinical efficacy of PD-1 blockade. This novel effector T cell population underlies the key cellular and molecular immunoregulatory mechanisms of chemotherapy. It serves as a meaningful marker to measure these collaborative effects and to develop the optimal chemo-immunotherapy strategy to improve clinical responses to current immune checkpoint blocking agents.

4 Background: Membrane expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells is associated with poor survival in patients with advanced malignancies including metastatic melanoma (MM). In addition, tumor-associated PD-L1 has been proposed as a predictor of response to anti-PD-1 therapy, although responses are observed in some cases of PD-L1 negative MM. We hypothesize that tumor-derived PD-L1 has additional systemic effects through the release of biologically active soluble forms of PD-L1 (sPD-L1) into the circulation, which further impedes the anti-tumor immune response and contributes to poor clinical outcomes in MM. Methods: We developed a sPD-L1 ELISA and biochemically confirmed the identity of the detected protein. We measured the levels of sPD-L1 in 276 patients with MM enrolled on 3 clinical trials who had stored pre-treatment plasma samples and 37 healthy volunteers (HV) undergoing blood donation at Mayo Clinic. We also measured sPD-L1 in baseline samples from 38 MM patients treated with anti-PD1 (pembrolizumab) 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. ROC analysis was used to compute sPD-L1 concentration cut-off value and Wald test was used to asses the difference of overall survival (OS) in patients with low versus high sPD-L1 concentration. Results: We found that sPD-L1 levels were significantly elevated in MM patients compared with HV (p=0.0011). Mean sPD-L1 level in MM was 1.73 ng/mL (range: 0.13-18.29) compared with 0.77 ng/mL (range: 0.11–6.02) for HV. Patients with higher levels (>0.293 ng/mL) had a median OS of 11.3 months compared to 14.8 months for patients with sPD-L1 level ≤ 0.293 ng/mL (p=0.040). Similarly to tumor-related PD-L1 findings, patients who had clinical benefit (OR/PR/SD) after 4 cycles of anti-PD1 had higher sPD-L1 levels at baseline (2.1 vs. 1.1 ng/mL). Conclusions: To our knowledge, our study is the first to report a correlation of sPD-L1 with MM patient outcome, although a larger study is needed to establish the utility of sPD-L1 as an independent prognostic and possibly predictive biomarker.

Introduction Tumor surface matrix metalloproteases ADAM10 and ADAM17 are associated with poor outcomes in multiple malignancies. We previously showed that these proteases shed PD-L1 from lymphoma cell line Karpas-299 to produce soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) that induces CD8+ T cell apoptosis (1). While higher levels of soluble PD-L1 are associated with worse prognosis in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy (cutoff of 1.52 ng/ml, 3-year OS of 76% versus 89%) (2), it is unknown whether the loss of PD-L1 on the surface of B cell lymphoma cells affects clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that tumors expressing low PD-L1 levels despite high PD-L1 mRNA levels would (1) produce higher ADAM10 or ADAM17 transcript levels and (2) predict poorer prognosis in diffuse large B cell lymphomas. Methods We queried the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) public database for cases of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) for which PD-L1 (CD274) protein levels are reported by reverse phase protein array (RPPA). We then queried TCGA for RNA-Seq data for CD274, ADAM10, and ADAM17 expressed as transcripts per million (FPKM). We re-normalized RPPA data and calculated a PD-L1 protein-to-mRNA ratio for each tumor sample. We then compared groups of high and low PD-L1 protein-to-mRNA ratios for ADAM10 and ADAM17 mRNA expression. We further compared groups of high and low PD-L1 protein-to-mRNA ratios for survival (adjusted for age at diagnosis). All statistical analyses were performed using R Statistical Software (R Foundation). Unpaired student's t-test assessed statistical differences in experimental groups except where otherwise indicated. Figures comprise box plots showing quartile values and individual data points. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. In figures, p values are denoted <0.05 with *, <0.01 with **, and <0.001 with ***. Results Data were available for a total of 33 diffuse large B cell (DLBC) lymphomas. 18 of those samples were categorized as having low PD-L1 protein-to-mRNA ratios (cutoff 6.38e-6) with the remaining categorized as high ratio. DLBCL tumors demonstrating low PD-L1 protein-to-mRNA ratios expressed significantly higher ADAM10 (p=0.0237) and ADAM17 (p<0.0001) transcripts than tumors expressing low PD-L1 protein-to-mRNA ratios (Figure 1). Furthermore, patients with tumors demonstrating low PD-L1 protein-to-mRNA ratios experienced significantly poorer survival according to likelihood ratio (6.6, p=0.01) and log rank (4.67, p=0.03) tests (Figure 2). Conclusions Our findings may explain a crucial phenomenon seen in diffuse large B cell lymphoma, namely that many purportedly PD-L1-positive tumors appear to express PD-L1 but do not respond to PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy (3,4). This may be caused by the activity of ADAM10 and ADAM17 to cleave PD-L1, which we previously showed in lymphoma cell line Karpas-299 (1). This posits pre-treatment ADAM10/ADAM17 inhibition to "boost" PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy in lymphoma. Our results contrast with previous findings that PD-L1-positive DLBCL progression free survival is inferior to PD-L1-negative DLBCL (5). This may be due to different methods of protein detection (immunohistochemistry versus RPPA) and the lack of localization of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells versus the microenvironment. Notably, this study is only correlative with a limited case number. Larger prospective studies will be needed to further elucidate this relationship. Acknowledgments The results shown here are in whole or part based upon data generated by the TCGA Research Network: https://www.cancer.gov/tcga. References 1. Orme et al. AACR Adv Malig Lymphoma 2018. Pres 423 2. Rossille et al. Leukemia 2014. 28:2367-75. 3. Moskowitz et al. Blood 2014 124:290. 4. Armand et al. J Clin Oncol 2013. 31:4199-206. 5. Kiyasu et al. 2015.126:2193-201. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor, and novel therapeutic strategies that make a substantial impact on outcomes are sorely needed. Immunotherapies have shown great promise in the treatment of a number of cancers in recent year, and a concerted effort is being made to apply these treatment paradigms to GBM. However, many GBM patients exhibit profound immunosuppression, likely limiting the efficacy of such approaches. The mechanisms of this immunosuppression are poorly understood, but tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), may play a role. We demonstrate that GBM-derived EVs induce the development of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and non-classical monocytes (NCMs). We further demonstrate that these EV-induced monocytic cells are immunosuppressive, resulting in impaired T cell proliferation upon co-culture. We found that the immunosuppressive effects of tumor-derived EVs appear to be driven by the induction of these immunosuppressive monocytes, as EV treatment of T cells did not significantly impact T cell proliferation. Further, we sought to characterize the important of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in the induction of these immunosuppressive monocyte populations. We found PD-L1 to be expressed in the EVs from GBM cell lines, and that modulation in PD-L1 expression via either constitutive overexpression or shRNA-mediated knockdown resulted in concordant changes in expression in tumor-derived EVs. We demonstrate that PD-L1 is important for the induction of NCM but not for MDSCs. Taken together, these findings point to a significant role for tumor-derived EVs in the induction of immunosuppressive monocytes in GBM, and that these cells may be a driving force of systemic immunosuppression. PD-L1 is one factor expressed in EVs that has immunomodulatory properties, but additional EV cargo likely plays a major role in the induction of immunosuppressive cells.