Citations

Introduction Despite continuous improvement of clinical outcome in multiple myeloma (MM), disease relapse remains a major challenge, leading to progressively shorter remissions and fewer treatment options. Strategies attempting to counteract this challenge include recent efforts resulting in an increase in the availability of novel promising anti-MM agents and targeting specific genetic profiles of the disease. In this context, we aim to develop predictive models of sensitivity and resistance to novel compounds by connecting an ex vivo high-throughput drug screen with genetic, transcriptomics, FISH, and clinical features. Methods Twenty compounds (afatinib, afuresertib, belinostat, buparlisib, cobimetinib, CPI-0610, crenolanib, dinaciclib, dovitinib, JQ1, LGH447, osimertinib, OTX015, panobinostat, romidepsin, selinexor, sunitinib, trametinib, venetoclax, and vorinostat) were selected based on overall promising anti-MM activity from an ex vivo high throughput drug screen with a panel of 79 single agents incubated for 24 hours. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to rank order the ex vivo responses for each compound and the lowest and highest quartile samples were identified for further analysis. Clinical data and FISH data, including t(11;14), t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p), +1q, monosomy 13, and MYC rearrangement, were collected. Targeted DNA sequencing was performed using a 2.3 Mb custom capture panel covering 139 MM-relevant genes. mRNA-sequencing was performed and differential gene expression analysis in the highest and lowest quartile identified subsets of markers positively and negatively associated with the AUC response for a given compound. An additional unbiased selection of markers using lasso techniques was performed, resulting in predictive generalized linear models (GLM) for each agent. Responses from the remaining intermediate samples were estimated with the predictive models, with overall predictive ability assessed by correlating predicted AUCs with their actual counterparts. Results Our integrative analysis was performed on 50 primary patient samples (36% untreated and 64% relapsed MM). Venetoclax, dinaciclib, romidepsin, panobinostat, osimertinib, belinostat and selinexor were the most active compounds in the cohort. Interestingly, LGH447, dovitinib, selinexor, JQ1, OTX-015, cobimetinib, and trametinib showed increased activity in relapsed MM when compared to untreated samples (Wilcoxon Test; p<0.05). We generated GLMs using an average of 92 markers (range 64-107) per compound, combining mRNA-sequencing expression with FISH and mutation data. The analysis proposed in the present study was validated through the unbiased selection of BCL2 among the subset of markers included in the GLM predicting sensitivity to venetoclax, a first-in-class orally bioavailable selective BCL2 inhibitor. Expression level of critical NF-kB and cell cycle genes, such as BIRC3, CKS1B, PAX5, NFKB2, and CCND2, were included in 60% of our predictive models. Mutations of DNA repair genes (ATM,TP53) were included in the GLMs of three epigenetic therapies, one histone deacetylase inhibitor and two BET inhibitors, associated to ex vivo resistance to the drugs. The presence of monosomy 13 was also a marker for ex vivo resistance for five epigenetic therapies, four HDAC inhibitors and one BET inhibitor. The three BET inhibitors, JQ1, CPI-0610, and OTX015, were among the compounds most accurately predicted by our integrative approach, with Spearman correlation values between 0.773-0.858. Overall, our models accurately predicted the ex vivo response for 16 (80%) of the compounds (r>0.7). Five (25%) of these compounds displayed a remarkably accurate prediction model in both training (highest and lowest quartiles) and validation (intermediate quartiles) samples (r>0.8). Conclusions The GLM data integration approach enabled the establishment of effective predictive models, identifying FISH, transcriptomics, and mutations of putative driver genes important in anti-MM agent responsiveness. In addition, the resulting dataset is promising for future research focusing on the discovery of novel mechanisms of action and establishing markers of sensitivity and resistance to novel compounds. We are currently increasing our dataset and seek to create an omnibus approach that predicts responses to multiple anti-MM agents simultaneously. Disclosures Bergsagel: Celgene: Consultancy; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Stewart:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ionis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Ono: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.

Abstract MYC expression is frequently dysregulated in multiple myeloma (MM). In one comprehensive study, MYC structural variations (SV) were found in nearly half of MM cases (Affer et al. Leukemia 2014). The prevalence was higher in hyperdiploid (HRD) tumors (65%) compared to non-hyperdiploid (NHRD) tumors (36%). The large amount of tumor DNA required for all of the genomic studies performed may have biased the samples analyzed (e.g., to those with higher tumor burdens). To validate the findings of recurrent MYC SV in another dataset, we analyzed the CoMMpass data. We analyzed long-insert whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from diagnostic samples in 420 patients from the IA7 release (dbGAP phs000748) for SV. The results of clinical data, processed WES (SNV), RNASeq (gene expression) and WGS (copy number) data from IA8 (http://research.themmrf.org) were used to calculate survival, RAS and NFKB pathway mutation (WES), TC class (RNA), NFKB index (RNA) and hyperdiploid index (WGS). MYC SVs were identified in 38% of tumors. They were present in 53% HRD and 28% NHRD, and by TC in 55% D1, 43% D2, 36% MMSET, 26% MAF, 13% CCND. Juxtaposition of an Ig enhancer (IgH, IgK, IgL) close to MYC was the most common MYC SV, representing ~40% of the MYC SV. Other enhancers identified have mostly been reported previously, with the most frequent being NSMCE2 (12% of SV) and TXNDC5 (5% of SV). Intrachromosomal SV (deletions, inversions, duplications) not associated with any known enhancer were also frequent (18% of SV). As expected, MYC expression was higher in tumors with MYC SV compared to those without (~2.4 fold, p-value<0.0001). We used Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to identify activated pathways that might substitute for MYC in HRD patients without MYC SV and observed significant activation of the NFkB pathway. Interestingly, examining patients with RAS/MAPK pathway (NRAS, KRAS, BRAF, FGFR3 - abbreviated RAS) mutations (identified in 50% of all patients) the same pattern was observed: in the absence of RAS mutation, there was a significantly higher NFkB index. In general, the HRD tumors seem to have either activation of RAS and/or MYC, or activation of NFkB (Figure). There was no difference in overall survival in patients with versus those without MYC SV. We developed a clinically applicable sequencing platform to identify MYC SV, which cannot be reliably identified by FISH. We sought to validate this targeted capture approach, where in addition to the coding exons of 81 interesting genes described previously (M3P), we also pulled down the region surrounding MYC (2 Mb), IgH (0.5 Mb), IgK (50 kb) and IgL (100 kb) allowing us to additionally identify SV in MYC and Ig loci. Using this approach we identified IgH translocations in 29/30 samples with translocations previously identified by FISH (97%). Moreover, we identified MYC SV in 19/22 patients with SV previously identified by mate-pair WGS (86%). Importantly, sequencing identified the precise translocation breakpoint, and identity of the enhancer dysregulating MYC, which may be important variables. In one informative patient two different MYC SV were present at diagnosis, only one of which was still present following a partial response to four cycles of lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This suggests that the two MYC SV are in different subclones, one of which was much more sensitive to the treatment. Interestingly, the enhancer dysregulating MYC in the sensitive subclone harbors 5 strong Ikaros binding sites identified by ChIPseq, suggesting one intriguing mechanism for sensitivity to lenalidomide. To summarize, we verified in a large dataset that MYC expression is frequently dysregulated by SV in MM (38%), and the RAS/MAPK (50%) and NFKB (23%) pathways are frequently activated by mutations. Surprisingly, given their generally good prognosis, nearly half of HRD tumors seem to be MYC driven, while this is true for only a quarter of NHRD tumors. HRD tumors not driven by MYC or RAS appear to be driven by NFKB. Remarkably, the pathways most commonly activated by mutation in MM: CCND, MYC, RAS, NFKB are common to many cancers and have been studied extensively individually. To understand their clinical impact in MM we have developed a comprehensive custom capture sequencing panel that identified 97% of IgH translocations, 86% of MYC SV, and as well as SNV and CNV of 81 recurrently mutated genes. It will be important to include such a comprehensive genetic analysis to complement clinical trials in the future. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Stewart: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Abstract Introduction: Monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is an asymptomatic expansion of clonal CD19+/CD5+ B cells with less than 5x109/L cells in the peripheral blood and without other manifestations of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Approximately 1% of MBL evolves to CLL requiring therapy per year; thus it is critical to develop more precise tools to identify which MBL will progress to CLL and require treatment. Patients and Methods: In this study, we performed targeted deep sequencing (TDS) on 49 high-count MBL individuals (median B-cell count 3.7x109/L; range 0.8-4.9x109/L) and explored the mutation status of 20 driver genes recurrently mutated in CLL. We analyzed the clonal evolution in 45 of these 49 MBLs by screening 2-4 sequential samples (average time between samples 56 months, range 10-119 months). At last follow-up, 19 cases (39%) had progressed to Rai>0, and 10 cases (20%) required treatment. Tumor and germ line DNAs were isolated from sorted CD5+/CD19+ and CD5-/CD19- cell populations, respectively. Overall, 154 samples from 49 MBL cases (105 tumor and 49 germ line) were screened using semiconductor sequencing technology. The latter genetic information was integrated with relevant clinical and biological parameters, and we evaluated the effect of driver mutations and clonal expansion on time to CLL progression and time to treatment (TTT). Results and Discussion: Our cohort consisted in 17 women and 32 men, with a median age of 66 years (range: 44-80). Five cases presented secondary diseases, including melanoma, lung and bladder cancer. Clinical and biological parameters were collected, including IGHV mutation status (mutated 66%, unmutated 34%), ZAP70 and CD49 expression (25% each). At presentation, 46% of cases had del(13q), 27% trisomy 12, 6% del(11q), and 4% del(17p). Overall, we found somatic non-synonymous mutations in 23 of 49 MBLs (47%) at the initial time point including 22% of cases with more than one mutated driver gene. The average depth of coverage was 730x, thus allowing the identification of small subclonal mutations. Recurrent mutations were found in most of the drivers: CHD2, DDX3X (8% of cases), FBXW7, NOTCH1, SF3B1 (6% each), ATM, BCOR, BIRC3, BRAF, KRAS, MED12, MYD88 and ZMYM3 (4% each). Furthermore, ITPKB, POT1, SAMHD1 and XPO1 were mutated in only one case, whereas no mutations were found in HIST1H1E, RIPK1 and TP53. In 4 individuals, we found two mutations in the same gene (BRAF, DDX3X, KRAS and SAMHD1). Genes that are known to be associated with disease progression in CLL were either mutated with significantly lower incidence (NOTCH1, SF3B1) or not mutated (TP53). Mutations were detected on average 45 months (range 9-73) prior to progression to CLL Rai>0 indicating the early origin of most driver gene mutations in the MBL/CLL continuum. The presence of driver mutations in MBL was associated with shorter TTT (median TTT: present: 96 months vs. not present: not reached, HR: 5.52, 95% CI: 1.2-26.2, P =0.015). Next, we looked at clonal expansion of driver mutations over time (defined as >2-fold change in the allelic frequency of driver mutations between time points). Of 20 MBLs with mutations at baseline who had sequential samples available, 10 cases showed clonal expansion. Seven out of 10 MBLs who required therapy showed clonal expansion, which was detected on average 15 months (range 6-30 month) prior to treatment. Finally, the detection of clonal expansion was significantly associated with reduced TTT (median TTT: clonal expansion: 21 months vs. no clonal expansion: 84 months, HR: 7.79, 95% CI: 1.94-31.3, P <0.001). Conclusion: We have confirmed the existence of recurrent mutations in most CLL putative driver genes at the premalignant MBL stage many years before progression to CLL. Furthermore, the early identification of driver mutations and its clonal expansion predicts a shorter TTT. Of note, clonal evolution under selective pressure has recently been linked to the onset of CLL progression after therapy. In this study, we characterized the clonal dynamics in the pre-malignant stages of the disease and underlined its impact on clinical outcome. Despite the relatively small size of the cohort, these findings suggest that the sequential monitoring of MBL individuals with a simple and reliable technique, such as TDS, will be at least of prognostic use and thus its incorporation in the disease stratification and clinical management should be further tested. Disclosures Fonseca: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Applied Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Binding Site: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Onyx/Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kay:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Tolero Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding.

Introduction We have shown that in myeloma (MM) the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) lenalidomide and pomalidomide, in a CRBN dependent fashion, inhibit thioredoxin reductase and thus increase intracellular oxidative stress as a consequence of peroxide accumulation (Sebastian et al. 2017). Accordingly, we have also shown that CRBN expression alone does not fully correlate with lenalidomide sensitivity, as the cells ability to decompose H2O2 is important - MM cells with lower H2O2 decomposition capacity are more sensitive to IMiDs. We hypothezised that the specific metabolic pathways used by cells for biomass production would influence IMiD sensitivity since they also influence this cellular oxidative capacity. Cellular proteins are key elements of this biomass, and required for the proliferation of MM cells and production of immunoglobulin proteins. Methods We cultured MM cells under various nutrients conditions to understand its effect on cell proliferation and drug responses. Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay, the Luminescent Assay, and direct cell counting. MM cells glycolytic rate was measured using the Seahorse XF analyzer. Western blots were performed to quantify various protein expression levels in MM cells cultured under different nutrients conditions. CRBN CRISPR/Cas9 KO plasmid was used to generate CRBN knockout cells and a lentivirus system was used to over-express CRBN in MM cells. Results MM cells resistant to lenalidomide, but still expressing functional CRBN, show a higher glycolytic pathway use than sensitive cells. We found that the lenalidomide sensitive cell line MM1.S is highly dependent on extracellular glutamine for cell proliferation. In contrast, JJN3, a lenalidomide resistant cells line with wild type CRBN, preferentially consumes glucose. We found that glutamine depletion from culture media completely abolished lenalidomide sensitivity in MM1.S cell line. Western blot analysis revealed that antibody production by MM1.S was primarily dependent on glutamine availability, and that JJN3 antibody production was dependent upon glucose availability. While glutamine depletion from culture medium completely abolished lenalidomide sensitivity in MM1.S cell line, IKZF1, and IKZF3 degradation was unchanged. We further studied the role of CRBN in glutamine dependent cellular biomass protein production using isogenic cell lines (+/- wtCRBN). We found that wtCRBN expressing cells proliferate more and show higher antibody production in the presence of glutamine, over CRBN negative isogenic cell lines. Lenalidomide treatment further increased glutamine dependent antibody production in wtCRBN expressing cells. One possibile explanation is that activation of glutamine catabolism can facilitate protein demethylation via the supplementation α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). Therefore, we tested whether lenalidomide treatment could induce protein demethylation in sensitive cell lines. Western blot probed with mono-methyl lysine antibody showed lenalidomide induced protein demethylation. We further confirmed that protein demethylation, and lenalidomide sensitivity is a consequence of elevated α-KG by treating cells with cell-permeable 5-octyl- α-ketoglutarate which act as a substrate of the lysine demethylases. 5-Octyl-α-ketoglutarate treatment inhibited cell proliferation preferentially in wtCRBN expressing cells, and also enhanced lenalidomide induced sensitivity. Protein demethylation is associated with protein ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. We thus hypothesize that lenalidomide induced protein demethylation also likely increases proteasome inhibitors sensitivity in MM. Conclusion MM cells with preferential glutamine consumption are likely to be more sensitive to lenalidomide, and extracellular glutamine depletion can induce lenalidomide resistance. MM cells expressing CRBN, but not dependent on glutamine for protein biomass production are more likely to be resistant to lenalidomide. Our study postulates that CRBN protein requirement in lenalidomide sensitivity cells is restricted to high glutamine dependency, and that it is quite likely CRBN has a role in glutamine metabolism. Moreover, MM cells that consume more glutamine are under higher oxidative stress and exhibit less H2O2 decomposition capacity and therefore increasing sensitivity to IMiDs. References Sebastian , S., et al., Blood 2017 129:991-1007 Disclosures Stewart: Ono: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ionis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Bergsagel:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Fonseca:AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Kite, Janssen, Juno, Merck, Pharmacylics, Sanofi, Takeda: Other: Consultant/Advisor; Prognosticatin of MM based on Genetic Categorization by FISH: Patents & Royalties; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Other: Scientific Advisory Board.

Background Bortezomib (BTZ) is highly effective in the treatment of multiple myeloma; however, emergent drug resistance is common. The underlying mechanisms of such proteasome inhibitor resistance are still incompletely understood. Methods To further understand its resistant mechanism, we generated eight multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines resistant to bortezomib (BTZ) by exposure to increasing drug concentration: five of them acquired novel PSMB5 mutations. Given the rarity of similar mutations in over 1,500 analyzed MM patients, we explored in depth the role of the proteasome on MM cell viability and BTZ sensitivity by systematically deleting the major proteasome targets of BTZ by CRISPR. Results We demonstrated that MM cell lines without PSMB5 were surprisingly viable (mutation corresponding yeast gene pre2 is lethal). PSMB5 mutated, BTZ resistant, MM cell lines were re-sensitized to BTZ when PSMB5 was experimentally deleted, implying that this mutation is activating in its drug resistance function. In contrast PSMB6 knockout was lethal to MM cell lines, which were efficiently rescued by re-introduction of wild type PSMB6. Interestingly, reduction in PSMB6 levels also prevented the splicing of the major catalytic subunits PSMB5, PSMB7, PSMB8 and PSMB10. PSMB6 engineered with no splicing function or catalytic activity, also restored viability, inferring that the contribution of PSMB6 to proteasome structure is more important than functional activity. Supporting this observation, BTZ sensitivity was restored in resistant MM cells line by introducing low level expression of mutated PSMB6 lacking splicing function. As with PSMB6, PSMB7 knockout was lethal to MM cell lines. In contrast, loss of immunoproteasome subunits PSMB8 and PSMB9 was neither lethal nor restored sensitivity to BTZ. Our results demonstrate that expression of the three constitutive proteasome subunits PSMB5, PSMB6 and PSMB7 is highly co-dependent. This dependence is relying on the structure, but not the function, of PSMB5 and PSMB6. Conclusions In summary, PSMB5 and PSMB6, but not PSMB8 and PSMB9, are highly relevant for BTZ sensitivity in MM. Absence of PSMB6 or PSMB7, but not PSMB5, was lethal in MM cell lines. Expression of PSMB5, PSMB6 and PSMB7 was highly co-dependent. Together these findings suggest that the modulation of expression rather than function of PSMB5, PSMB6 or PSMB7 may be a new therapeutic strategy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: The 2018 iwCLL guidelines recommend close observation of early stage CLL pts who do not meet indications for therapy ("watch and wait" strategy). Prior attempts at early therapeutic intervention in unselected early-stage CLL pts using alkylating agents such as chlorambucil and chemoimmunotherapy failed to show a significant benefit; and these therapies were associated with substantial toxicities. The introduction of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment landscape of CLL. The German CLL Study group recently presented results of the CLL12 study which demonstrated a significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS) among untreated early stage high risk CLL pts who received ibrutinib compared to placebo (median EFS not reached vs. 47.8 months, respectively; Langerbeins, EHA, 2019). Acalabrutinib is a more selective second-generation BTK inhibitor that has fewer adverse events in pts with CLL, and has shown equally impressive clinical activity for CLL pts. We are conducting an investigator initiated randomized phase 2 study to compare acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab (a glycoengineered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved in the treatment of CLL) among high risk early stage CLL pts. Study Design: All pts with newly diagnosed (<2 years from registration) previously untreated early stage CLL who do not meet the 2018 iwCLL guidelines for initiation of therapy are eligible for enrollment in this study. Pts undergo risk stratification according to the CLL-International prognostic index (CLL-IPI) which consists of the following 5 variables: age >65 years (1 point), Rai stage I-IV (1 point), del17p and/or TP53 mutation (4 points), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGHV) genes (2 points), and serum β2-microglobulin >3.5 g/dL (2 points). Pts with high (4-6) and very high (7-10) risk CLL-IPI are randomly (1:1) assigned to acalabrutinib 100 mg orally twice daily (Arm A) or acalabrutinib with obinutuzumab at a standard approved schedule (Arm B). Treatment with acalabrutinib is continued for a minimum of 2 years unless the patient has unacceptable side effects or withdraws consent. Pts with low (0-1) and intermediate (2-3) risk CLL-IPI score are assigned to an observation arm with follow-up once every 6 months for 2 years, and then according to routine clinical practice (Arm C). Endpoints: The primary endpoint of the intervention arms (Arms A and B) is the achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission in the bone marrow after 2 years of therapy. MRD is assessed using an 8-color flow cytometry with a detection limit of 0.01%. The primary endpoint of the observation arm (Arm C) is time to first therapy. Secondary endpoints for all arms are: progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Statistical design: A randomized trial comparing the experimental arm (acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab) against the control arm (acalabrutinib alone) will be conducted as described by Rubinstein. A sample size of 36 pts per arm provides 80% power to detect an improvement in MRD-negative complete response rate from 10% to 30%, using a one-sided test at a significance level of 0.10 (EAST 6.4). We anticipate accruing an additional 8 high/very high risk pts (4 in each arm) to account for ineligibility, cancellation, or major treatment violation. The total enrollment for Arms A and B will be 80 pts. We will enroll 40 pts to Arm C; for a total enrollment of 120 pts. Key correlatives: Comprehensive profiling to assess the innate and adaptive immune system in paired peripheral blood and bone marrow will be conducted in all pts registered to Arms A and B at baseline, 12 and 24 months after enrollment. In addition, bone marrow hematopoietic function will be assessed in all pts at these time points. We will employ a CLL focused custom 61-gene panel to estimate tumor mutational burden as well as mutational profiles for each patient at baseline, 12, and 24 month time points, as well at the time of disease progression. Preliminary results: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT03516617. The trial opened to accrual at all three Mayo Clinic sites (Rochester, MN; Jacksonville, FL; and Scottsdale, AZ) in September 2018. Twenty-eight pts have been registered; the baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The trial is expected to complete enrollment in September 2020; and the primary analysis will be available in September 2022. Disclosures Parikh: Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria. Ding:DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Ailawadhi:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding. Chanan-Khan:Mayo Clinic: Employment; Ascentage: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Kay:Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Other: DSMB; MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. OffLabel Disclosure: Drug: Acalabrutinib Purpose: treatment of CLL

INTRODUCTION Mutations in BTK and PLCG2 have been reported to occur in ~80% of CLL patients (pts) who have progression of disease on ibrutinib therapy (Woyach, JCO 2017; Ahn, Blood 2017). These mutations are described as appearing months before actual relapse and thus considered as a potential predictive biomarker for future relapse (Quinquenel, Blood 2019). However, the outcomes of these pts after disease progression are not well described. In this study, we seek to investigate time to next therapy and overall survival (OS) following progression among CLL pts on ibrutinib therapy with and without these resistance mutations. METHODS Between 10/2012 and 6/2019, we identified 34 pts in the Mayo Clinic clinical CLL resource who progressed while receiving ibrutinib therapy and also had testing for BTK and PLCG2 mutation performed as part of routine clinical practice at either NeoGenomics Laboratories or The Ohio State University. OS was calculated from time of ibrutinib progression to last known alive or death date; OS was plotted using Kaplan Meier methods and was compared using the log-rank test between various groups (e.g., mutation positive vs negative; CLL progression vs Richter's). Cumulative incidence of time to next treatment in those who had a treatment after progression was adjusted for the competing risk of death. RESULTS Of 34 pts who progressed while receiving ibrutinib, 26 pts experienced CLL progression and 8 pts had Richter's transformation; baseline characteristics in Table 1A. The presence of a BTK or PLCG2 mutation was found in 20/34 (59%) pts (specific mutations in Table 1B). BTK mutation alone was present in 9 pts, 7 pts had PLCG2 mutation alone, and 4 pts had both mutations. Median time between a positive test and start of next therapy was 4 months (range 1-19 months) and did not vary between BTK vs PLCG2 mutations. Among the 26 pts with CLL progression, 18 (69%) pts had a mutation present: BTK alone (n=8), PLCG2 alone (n=6), both (n=4). Therapy following progression on ibrutinib in these pts was as follows: venetoclax (n=16; 11 pts who continued ibrutinib in combination), idelalisib (n=4), investigational treatments (n=2), continued ibrutinib alone (n=2), dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab; n=1), and unknown (n=1). Twelve of the 26 pts with CLL progression on ibrutinib, including 8 pts with a prior resistance mutation detected, had subsequent progression of disease on the aforementioned next line therapy. Treatment of these patients consisted of the following: restarted ibrutinib in addition to current treatment of venetoclax (n=5), venetoclax (n=2), pembrolizumab (n=2; 1 pt with continued ibrutinib), obinutuzumab with continued ibrutinib (n=1), gemcitabine and vinorelbine with continued ibrutinib (n=1), and no further treatment (n=1). Among the 8 pts with Richter's transformation as the initial progression event on ibrutinib after mutation testing, 1 pt had a BTK mutation and 1 pt had a PLCG2 mutation. Treatments following progression on ibrutinib included multi-agent chemoimmunotherapy (n=3; 2 pts received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone [R-CHOP] with continued ibrutinib and 1 pt received doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine [ABVD] alone), pembrolizumab (n=3; 1 pt in combination with continued ibrutinib), venetoclax in combination with continued ibrutinib (n=1), and venetoclax and obinutuzumab (n=1). The median time to next treatment (second line of treatment beyond ibrutinib) for the 31 pts who started another therapy following progression on ibrutinib was 16.7 months (95% CI 9.6-NE; Figure 1A) and was not significantly different for pts with or without a resistance mutation (p=0.57). Median OS for all 26 pts with CLL progression was 28.7 month and there was no difference according to presence or absence of a resistance mutation (median 28.7 months vs 18.2 months, p=0.53; Figure 1B). The 8 pts with Richter's transformation had a median OS of 7.1 months (95% CI 2.0-NE). CONCLUSION Approximately 60% of pts tested in this progression cohort had a BTK or PLCG2 mutation at time of or preceding progression on ibrutinib therapy. OS and time to next therapy did not differ statistically between pts with mutated vs non-mutated clones; however, caution should be applied with the conclusions given the limited sample size. Disclosures Ding: DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding. Kay:MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Other: DSMB. Parikh:Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding.

Monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL) has been shown to be the precursor condition that precedes overt diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Whereas CLL is classified with greater than or equal to 5 × 109/L B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood, MBL is a clonal expansion of B-cells below this threshold. MBL can be further divided into high- or low-count based on whether the B-cell count is above or below 0.5 × 109/L. Approximately 10% of the population over 40 is estimated to have MBL, increasing to >50% over the age of 90. While low-count MBL is unlikely to progress, 1-2% of high-count (HC) MBL individuals progress to CLL requiring therapy per year. It is debatable if all patients with detectable MBL should be classified as an entity requiring monitoring by a hematologist, especially for low-count MBL. In addition, the diagnosis of leukemia is distressing to patients; therefore, it is important to identify HC MBL patients that are more likely to progress to disease requiring treatment and thus should be monitored more closely. As the majority of MBL cases phenotypically resemble CLL, established prognostic markers including recurrent chromosomal aberrations, beta-2 microglobulin levels, and the mutational status of the Immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region locus (IGHV) have been shown to predict time to treatment (TTT) and overall survival (OS) in a large retrospective study of MBL1. CLL patients can also be divided into three distinct epigenetic subtypes that reflect progressive DNA methylation changes that occurs during B cell development. These 'epitypes' termed low-programmed (LP), intermediate-programmed (IP), and high-programmed (HP) independently predict clinical outcomes irrespective of disease stage and treatment2. LP-CLL patients follow a generally unfavorable clinical course compared to the more indolent HP-CLL patients, while IP CLL patients display an intermediate outcome. Here we sought to determine if epitype forecasts progression to CLL and eventual clinical outcome for individuals with MBL. We analyzed 66 individuals diagnosed with HC MBL at the Mayo Clinic with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Developmental epitype was determined using our novel Methylation-iPLEX technique that interrogates 34 CpGs and assigns epitype using a random forest model2. Seventy-seven percent of the MBL cases were assigned to one of the three epitypes: 42.4% HP, 19.7% IP, and 15.2% LP. The residual 23% remained unclassified due to ambiguous (low confidence) epigenetic patterns or insufficient purity (Figure 1A). The overall proportion of HP and IP epitypes in MBL were significantly greater than proportions observed in CLL cohorts (P<0.01). Epitypes remained stable over time as 20/21 cases for which we obtained a high-confidence epitype classification at multiple time points remained unchanged. Epitype significantly predicted MBL individuals progressing to treatment (P=0.001) with LP individuals progressing in a median of 5.6 years (P=0.049 and P=0.0002 versus IP and HP, respectively); median was not reached in HP or IP (Figure 1B). Epitype also predicted overall survival (OS) in MBL (P=0.04), with LP individuals having a significantly shorter OS (median of 11 years versus not reached in IP and HP; P=0.056 and P=0.048 versus IP and HP, respectively). In this study we evaluated a cohort of 66 HC MBL cases and determined that classification using developmental DNA methylation epitypes can be employed in HC MBL to aid in risk stratification. HC MBL patients classified as LP are more likely to progress to requiring treatment and have a significantly reduced OS. The epigenetic classification may help clinicians decide how closely and frequently a HC MBL individual needs to be monitored. Figure 1: (A) Breakdown of the epigenetic subtype assigned to 66 HC MBL samples. (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to treatment and (C) overall survival of MBL patients separated by epitype. 1. Parikh, S. A. et al. Outcomes of a large cohort of individuals with clinically ascertained high-count monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. Haematologica103, e237-e240 (2018). 2. Giacopelli, B. et al. Developmental subtypes assessed by DNA methylation-iPLEX forecast the natural history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood blood.2019000490 (2019). doi:10.1182/blood.2019000490 Disclosures Byrd: Ohio State University: Patents & Royalties: OSU-2S; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Ohio State University: Patents & Royalties: OSU-2S; Gilead: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Research Funding. Shanafelt:Patent: Patents & Royalties: US14/292,075 on green tea extract epigallocatechin gallate in combination with chemotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Merck: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Glaxo-SmithKline: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Parikh:Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding. Kay:Agios: Other: DSMB; MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board.

ROR1 is a transmembrane receptor with tightly controlled expression during development. It is present on multiple tumor types but not on normal adult tissues. Hematological malignancies are often ROR1-positive, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Given its unique pattern of expression, ROR1 represents a tumor-specific therapeutic target. The anti-ROR1 antibody, UC-961, is ahumanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds with high affinity to a specific extracellular epitope of human ROR1 receptor and can block Wnt5a-induced ROR1 signaling. Nonclinical studies document that UC-961 does not react with normal adult human tissues and selectively binds to tumor cells. Because of the antibody high specificity, rapid internalization, and trafficking to lysosomes, UC-961 appears ideally suited to serve as the targeting moiety for an anti-ROR1 ADC. Accordingly, we have developed VLS-101, a UC-961-linker-monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) ADC that preserves the high-affinity binding and specificity of UC-961 and allows for ROR1-targeted intracellular release of MMAE. RS is an aggressive lymphoma, typically of DLBCL type, arising as transformation of CLL. Despite, progressive improvements in the therapy of CLL, very few effective treatment options exist for patients with RS. Using our recently established RS patient-derived xenografts (RS-PDXs), we explored the expression and signaling properties of ROR1 in RS and investigated the ex-vivo and in vivo effects of VLS-101. When assessed by flow cytometry (FACS), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), 3 of 4 RS-PDXs showed ROR1 positivity (2 highly positive: 99% and 80% of cells; 1 medium/low positive: 25% of cells by FACS). The extent of ROR1 expression correlated among the 3 assays methods and was consistent with ROR1 expression data reported for non-RS DLBCL samples. When engaged by its ligand Wnt-5a, ROR1 activated downstream targets, Rac1 and RhoA, and induced phosphorylation of the p65 subunit of NF-kB and Jnk in RS cells. When cells purified from RS-PDX tumor masses were exposed to VLS-101 ex-vivo, the drug induced time- and dose-dependent apoptosis, as shown by increases in annexin V/propidium iodide and by Caspase-3 and PARP cleavage. VLS-101 efficacy was then assessed in vivo in both subcutaneous and systemic RS-PDX models. When palpable masses had formed in subcutaneous models, mice were randomly assigned to vehicle or VLS-101, bi-weekly treated for 3 consecutive weeks, and then compared for tumor growth and survival. In the 3 ROR1-expressing RS-PDX models, VLS-101 caused highly significant disease regressions. Complete regressions were observed even in RS-PDXs without universal ROR1 expression, suggesting a MMAE bystander effect. After treatment discontinuation, VLS-101-treated animals showed no tumor regrowth for several months and had significantly extended survival. Data were confirmed in systemic ROR1-expressing RS models in which tumor cells were intravenously injected and allowed to engraft for ~14 days before starting treatment. VLS-101 was administered with the same schedule adopted for the subcutaneous model. VLS-101 eliminated RS cells in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and spleen, increasing survival in VLS-101-treated animals relative to controls (approximately 20-50 days, depending on the RS-PDX model). Of note, no in vivo VLS-101 efficacy was observed in the ROR1-negative RS-PDX, confirming the specificity of VLS-101 targeting. VLS-101 showed no adverse effects on animal well-being or body weight. Collectively, these results indicate that ROR1 is expressed on RS cells where it can transduce pro-survival signals and can be diagnostically evaluated for selective targeting. Nonclinical data document that the MMAE-containing ADC, VLS-101, can cause RS-PDX apoptosis in vitro and can safely and selectively induce complete tumor regressions in in vivo models of RS derived from patient tumors with heavy prior clinical treatment and variable levels of ROR1 expression. Building on these types of results, a Phase 1 clinical trial of VLS-101 (NCT03833180) is ongoing in patients with lymphoid cancers. Disclosures Vaisitti: VelosBio Inc.: Research Funding; Verastem Inc: Research Funding. Jessen:VelosBio Inc.: Employment. Vo:VelosBio Inc: Employment. Ko:VelosBio Inc: Employment. Allan:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem Oncology, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy. Furman:Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Oncotracker: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Miller:VelosBio Inc.: Employment. Lanutti:VelosBio Inc.: Employment. Deaglio:iTeos Therapeutics: Research Funding; Verastem Inc: Research Funding; VelosBio Inc.: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: The drug used in this project is an anti-ROR1-toxin-conjugated antibody