Citations

Abstract Purpose: The 2024 ASHP Pharmacy Forecast identifies and contextualizes emerging issues and trends that will influence healthcare, health systems, and the pharmacy profession and provides recommendations to inform long-term strategic planning that should prompt action by pharmacists and health-system leaders. Methods: Drawing on the “wisdom of crowds” concept, a survey was constructed with 6 general themes, each with 6 to 9 focused statements and a seventh theme on preparedness (58 survey items in total). The size of and representation within the survey panel were intended to capture opinions from a wide range of pharmacy leaders. The survey instructed panelists to consider the likelihood of the events/scenarios described in the statements occurring in the next 5 years as being likely, somewhat likely, somewhat unlikely, or very unlikely. Then, survey panelists assessed the preparedness (from very unprepared to very prepared) for 12 of the statements. Results: The 6 survey themes identified were Urgent Public Health Priorities, Responding to the Mental Health Crisis, Achieving Care Equity, New Disease Paradigms and Treatment Innovations, Workforce: Focus on Culture for the Future, and Artificial Intelligence: Can Ethics and Regulators Catch Up? The survey was completed by 250 respondents, yielding an 88% response rate. Analysis of survey results was provided by chapter authors along with strategic recommendations to guide actions for each theme. Conclusion: The focus of the Pharmacy Forecast is on large-scale, long-term trends that will influence healthcare and the pharmacy profession over months and years and not on day-to-day situational dynamics. The report provides insight to stimulate thinking and discussion and provides a starting point to proactively position leaders, their teams, and departments for potential future events and trends.

Abstract Sequencing efforts have identified key oncogenic drivers and transcriptomic subtypes of high-grade gliomas (HGGs), but this knowledge has not resulted in individualized therapy or improved patient outcomes. Here, we used a functional genomics approach combining integrated genomic/transcriptomic analyses with patient-derived 3D micro-cancers (mCancers) to rapidly identify individualized therapeutic vulnerabilities and determine predictive response biomarkers. 30 primary/recurrent HGGs, including 20 glioblastomas, 5 astrocytomas, and 5 oligodendrogliomas, were included for drug testing. mCancers recapitulated the structural and molecular alterations, cellularity, and heterogeneity, of parental patient tumors. A total of 119 single-agent drugs and 183 drug combinations were tested, while a pre-selected drug panel comprising 25 glioma-relevant treatment strategies was tested across all cases. In general, mCancer efficacy corresponded well to historical responses to previously tested agents (EGFR, HDAC inhibitors, etc.). Combined, strong efficacy (i.e. >70% growth inhibition at Cmax) of single treatments targeting deregulated receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), p53/apoptosis, cell cycle, DNA damage repair, IDH, or telomere maintainance pathways, was observed in 14 out of 30 cases. Surprisingly, transcriptional signatures, but not specific genetic alterations, were found to stratify drug responses. For example, mCancers enriched for the most aggressive mesenchymal (MES) and glycolytic/plurimetabolic (GPM) transcriptional subtypes exhibited stronger response to the BET inhibitor JQ1 (and other clinical BET inhibitors) and the DNA-PKcs/mTOR dual inhibitor CC-115. This therapeutic vulnerability was associated with enrichment of YAP/TAZ signaling, and the glioblastoma stem cell G-STEM signature. Notably, individual combination strategies were effective across tumors, with strong responses ranging from 38% to 77% of all tumors tested. Overall, this study underscores the value of functional genomics in identifying novel vulnerabilities of HGGs and associated response biomarkers. It also highlights the need for further clinical validation of several novel therapies and especially drug combination strategies with strong efficacy in the ex vivo setting.

AbstractCancer and its treatment produce deleterious symptoms across the phases of care. Poorly controlled symptoms negatively affect quality of life and result in increased health-care needs and hospitalization. The Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium was created to develop 3 large-scale, systematic symptom management systems, deployed through electronic health record platforms, and to test them in pragmatic, randomized, hybrid effectiveness and implementation trials. Here, we describe the IMPACT Consortium’s conceptual framework, its organizational components, and plans for evaluation. The study designs and lessons learned are highlighted in the context of disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is standard of care for T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, data on outcomes in high-risk T1a EAC are limited. We assessed and compared outcomes after EET of low-risk and high-risk T1a EAC, including intraluminal EAC recurrence, extraesophageal metastases, and overall survival. METHODS: Patients who underwent EET for T1a EAC at 3 referral Barrett's esophagus endotherapy units between 1996 and 2022 were included. Patients with submucosal invasion, positive deep margins, or metastases at initial diagnosis were excluded. High-risk T1a EAC was defined as T1a EAC with poor differentiation and/or lymphovascular invasion, with low-risk disease being defined without these features. All pathology was systematically assessed by expert gastrointestinal pathologists. Baseline and follow-up endoscopy and pathology data were abstracted. Time-to-event analyses were performed to compare outcomes between groups. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-eight patients with T1a EAC were included (high risk, n = 45; low risk, n = 143) with a median age of 70 years, and 84% were men. Groups were comparable for age, sex, Barrett's esophagus length, lesion size, and EET technique. Rates of delayed extraesophageal metastases (11.1% vs 1.4%) were significantly higher in the high-risk group ( P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the rates of intraluminal EAC recurrence ( P = 0.79) and overall survival ( P = 0.73) between the 2 groups. DISCUSSION: Patients with high-risk T1a EAC undergoing successful EET had a substantially higher rate of extraesophageal metastases compared with those with low-risk T1a EAC on long-term follow-up. These data should be factored into discussions with patients while selecting treatment approaches. Additional prospective data in this area are critical.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted endoscopy practices, creating unprecedented decreases in cancer screening and surveillance services. We aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic on the proportion of patients diagnosed with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and BE-related dysplasia and adherence to established quality indicators. METHODS: Data from all esophagogastroduodenoscopies in the GI Quality Improvement Consortium, a national repository of matched endoscopy and pathology data, were analyzed from January 2018 to December 2022. Four cohorts were created based on procedure date and COVID-19 data: pre-pandemic (January 2018 to February 2020), pandemic-phase I (March 2020 to July 2020), pandemic-phase II (August 2020 to May 2021), and pandemic-phase III (June 2021 to December 2022). Observed and expected number of BE and BE-related dysplasia cases per month and adherence to the Seattle biopsy protocol and recommended surveillance intervals for nondysplastic BE (NDBE) were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 2,446,857 esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed during the study period, 104,124 (4.3%) had pathology-confirmed BE. The histologic distribution was 87.4% NDBE, 1.8% low-grade dysplasia, 2.4% indefinite for dysplasia, and 1.4% high-grade dysplasia. The number of monthly BE (−47.9% pandemic-phase I, −21.5% pandemic-phase II, and −19.0% pandemic-phase III) and BE-related dysplasia (high-grade dysplasia: 41.2%, −27.7%, and −19.0%; low-grade dysplasia: 49.1%, −35.3%, and −26.5%; any dysplasia: 46.7%, −32.3%, and −27.9%) diagnoses were significantly reduced during the pandemic phases compared with pre-pandemic data. Adherence rates to the Seattle protocol and recommended surveillance intervals for NDBE did not decline during the pandemic. DISCUSSION: There was a significant decline in the number of BE and BE-related dysplasia diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an approximately 50% reduction in the number of cases of dysplasia diagnosed in the early pandemic. The absence of a compensatory increase in diagnoses in the pandemic-phase II and III periods may result in deleterious downstream effects on esophageal adenocarcinoma morbidity and mortality.