Citations

AbstractBackgroundSeveral programs are available for automatically “de‐facing” brain images. These are designed to prevent the potential use of face imagery to re‐identify research participants. Previous works have compared available software and mri_reface is frequently among the top methods. The “Minimally Invasive DeFacing of MRI images” (MiDeFace) program was more recently added to FreeSurfer, but minimal validation of MiDeFace has been published.MethodWe ran mri_reface 0.3.3 and MiDeFace 7.3.2 on two datasets: A) 207 participants with face photographs and 3D T1‐weighted and 3D T2‐weighted‐FLAIR MRI from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (all unimpaired, Siemens); and B) 300 participants from ADNI3 with 3D T1‐weighted MRI (50 unimpaired + 50 with clinical AD, from each of 3 vendors). For dataset A, we tested the rate at which Microsoft Azure face recognition matched each participant’s photographs with the correct MRI, comparing unmodified images, those from mri_reface, and those from MiDeFace. For dataset B, we compared measured regional brain volume and cortical thickness from original vs. de‐faced images with SPM12, FreeSurfer 7.4.1, and the FSL‐UK Biobank pipeline. For both datasets, images were visually rated to assess removal of the face and retention of brain tissue.ResultAutomated face recognition match rates were lower with mri_reface (17/207 8.2%) than with MiDeFace (24/207 11.6%), indicating stronger identity protection with mri_reface, but both were greatly reduced vs. unmodified images (203/207 98.1%). Example images with both programs are shown in Figure 1. From visual ratings (Table 1), rates of complete success (modification of the entire face while retaining the entire brain) were much higher with mri_reface, but the great majority of failures from MiDeFace were subtle and occurred in relatively less recognizable face regions. The effects of both programs on downstream imaging measurements (Figure 2) were small and very comparable, but MiDeFace was favored mildly for SPM12 and for FSL, while mri_reface was more favored for FreeSurfer.ConclusionAltogether, mri_reface more reliably removed the complete face, leading to smaller rates of potential re‐identification (8.2% vs 11.6%). Effects on downstream image measurements were small and comparable with both methods.

AbstractBackgroundThe Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) is a longitudinal, population‐based study of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA. MCSA is releasing de‐identified clinical and imaging data on GAAIN.org to benefit the research community.MethodWe included longitudinal clinical data from all participants of the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging 30‐90 years of age (average 70.0y) through the first 15 years of the study. Clinical data includes age, sex, self‐reported race/ethnicity, APoE4 allele status, cognitive impairment status (normal, MCI, dementia, or other), height, weight, blood pressure, multi‐domain neuropsychological scores, neuroimaging summary measurements, medications, cardiovascular risk factors, social activity, sleep, mood/anxiety, functional measures, and more. For our initial release of imaging data, we selected the first imaging timepoint acquired on 3T GE MRI scanners and amyloid (PiB) PET during the same visit, from all available imaging participants 50‐90 years of age (average 70.7y). Currently, we included 3D T1‐weighted (MPRAGE) MRI (1x1x1.2mm3), T2‐weighted FLAIR MRI (0.85x0.85x3.6mm3), diffusion MRI (2.7mm resolution with 41 directions at b=1000 and 5 b=0), and numeric cortical global SUVR and Centiloid values from PiB PET scans at 40‐60 minutes post‐injection. All images are released in DICOM format and thoroughly de‐identified using CTP while ensuring preservation of necessary fields for analyses. T1‐weighted and T2‐FLAIR MRI were also de‐faced (identifiable face imagery was removed and replaced with an average) using mri_reface version 0.3.3 to further protect participants’ privacy, and all de‐faced images were visually inspected by a trained data scientist for quality assurance.ResultThe first phase of our public data release includes clinical data from 5925 unique participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA), each ranging from 1‐12 visits at roughly 15‐month intervals, and three MRI sequences (T1‐w, T2‐w‐FLAIR, and diffusion) from 1802 unique participants. Demographic summaries are given in Table 1.ConclusionThis large, richly characterized, de‐identified clinical and imaging dataset is available to the research community at https://www.gaaindata.org/partner/MCSA, and it is suitable for a wide range of research uses. Additional data will be released over time, including de‐faced amyloid PET images.

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter (WM) damage is seen with neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathologies and contributes to cognitive dysfunction. We hypothesized that there are multiple disease progression patterns in WM microstructural changes related to aging and dementia, and these can be identified using SuStaIn (data‐driven clustering algorithm for disease subtype and stage discovery) on multishell diffusion MRI (NODDI) data. NODDI provides information on cellular tissue architecture – neurite density index (NDI) measures packing density of axons and dendrites, and free water fraction (FWF) measures unrestricted water, e.g., interstitial and cerebrospinal fluid.MethodWe identified 1136 participants (mean age=70 years, 51% male, 40% Aß‐positive, 19% MCI/AD dementia) from the Mayo ADRC and Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. We analyzed NDI and FWF in 55 WM regions. We selected a subset of WM features that monotonically changed with clinical disease progression and then applied the Z‐score SuStaIn algorithm.ResultNDI in seven regions and FWF in six regions survived selection criteria (Figure 1). Noteworthy, the NDI regions were predominantly located in the temporal lobe, while FWF regions were primarily distributed in the frontal and subcortical regions. The SuStaIn algorithm discovered two stable clusters: the NDI‐First (Temporal) and FWF‐First (Frontal) groups (Figure 2). For the NDI‐First group, temporal lobe NDI changed early followed by frontal FWF. The FWF‐First group had the reverse order. There was clear phase separation based on which measure changed first. Stages of the NDI‐First group correlated better with meta‐ROI Tau‐PET SUVR and with MMSE than the FWF‐First group (p<0.01), suggesting that NDI‐First may be indicative of a primarily AD pathway.ConclusionGiven NDI changes are likely degenerative and FWF are suggested to be other processes such as neurodegeneration or inflammatory, the observed changes in the temporal and frontal regions may be due to distinct etiologies, i.e., neurodegenerative in the temporal lobes vs. vascular dysfunction often observed in the frontal lobes. The SuStaIn algorithm showed promise in discovering disease subtypes of WM microstructural changes. Further work is needed to understand the mechanistic basis of these observed changes and integrate WM changes for differential etiology identification and disease staging.

AbstractBackgroundBiomarker cutpoints have received significant importance in AD research. Reliable worsening method based on serial biomarker data has been proposed (Jack et al., 2017 Alz & Dem). Advanced machine learning models (ML) and explainable AI provide an opportunity to enhance existing techniques. We aimed to estimate biomarker cutpoints on cross‐sectional data using ML by identifying important transitions in the biomarker values.MethodWe first trained an ML model with the biomarker of interest as an input including other available biomarkers, demographics, and diagnosis, and predicted global cognition z‐score. We then obtained SHAP values (Shapley Additive exPlanations), fit a curve between the SHAP values and biomarker values, and calculated the first derivatives (slope) of the curve. Then, a CUSUM (Cumulative Sum) analysis was used to identify SHAP change points and cross‐referenced to values where the slopes were steepest near the zero‐crossing location of the curve. A zero SHAP is an important indicator of a feature’s progressive importance for model prediction because a feature’s influence on prediction significantly shifts when its SHAP values go from positive to negative or vice versa. However, relying on zero‐crossing alone may be insufficient when the relationship is non‐linear. Consequently, we calculated the second derivatives to identify inflection points (peaks and troughs) along the curve. Lastly, we compiled all the potential cutpoints and performed post‐processing as shown in Fig. 1.ResultThe algorithm identified cutpoints at 1.44 SUVR for all and at 1.42 SUVR for CU participants (Fig. 2). At age 70, both cutpoints estimated the percentage of abnormals at less than 40% (Fig. 3).ConclusionTPE amyloid‐PET SUVR cutpoints for CUs equal the reported RW values (1.42 SUVR). A strength of the TPE is its application on cross‐sectional data making it versatile for various biomarkers across different cohorts.

AbstractBackgroundImaging and plasma markers are used as key indicators of disease for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but their usefulness in predicting regional tau pathology is relatively understudied. Our objective was to construct predictive models for regional tau pathology measured on postmortem brain tissue using multiple ante‐mortem AD biomarkers. We focused on hippocampal and parietal regions that were immunostained with AT8 and 2E9 that reflect early and advanced aspects of tangle maturity, respectively.MethodsUsing autopsy data from 63 participants enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) where the last clinical visit is within three years of death, we analyzed three ante‐mortem plasma markers ‐ phosphorylated tau protein at the threonine 181 residue, glial fibrillary acidic protein, total ß‐amyloid Aß42 relative to Aß40 ratio (Quanterix Simoa HD‐X Analyzer), and three regional MRI markers computed using SPM12 ‐ parietal thickness, parietal volume relative to total intracranial volume ratio, and hippocampal volume adjusted for total intracranial volume. Based on eight separate cross‐sectional linear regression models weighted by the inverse of time from last visit to death, we estimated the multiple and partial R2 predicting post‐mortem pathology measures, including AT8 and 2E9 in both the hippocampal and parietal regions. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular and metabolic conditions score.ResultsThe MRI models (R2 of 0.26‐0.53) had greater predictive power compared to the plasma models (R2 of 0.17‐0.26). The best multiple R2 was 0.53 for prediction of hippocampal AT8 using antemortem hippocampal volume adjusted for total intracranial volume followed by R2 of 0.43 for prediction of hippocampal 2E9 using hippocampal volume adjusted for total intracranial volume. Though the model prediction of parietal AT8 and 2E9 measurements was low (R2 of 0.21‐0.26), parietal thickness exhibited better predictive performance than parietal volume relative to total intracranial volume ratio.ConclusionsThe data we presented here may be utilized to validate biomarkers using regional pathology. Our results support that regional MRI is sensitive to tau pathology. Newer MRI methods should be tested to examine the specificity of newer quantitative measurements to tau pathology.

AbstractBackgroundQuantifying white matter using diffusion MRI (dMRI) has been proposed for measuring early microstructural tissue changes due to cerebral small vessel disease and aid in quantifying vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID). Our goal was to compare the usefulness of longitudinal white matter changes in the commonly available diffusion MRI measures for VCID prevention trials.MethodWe included 718 participants over 50 years of age (mean age: 71.1(9.6) years) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, a population‐based sample, with at least two dMRI scans and structural imaging. We computed the commonly available single‐shell dMRI measures (fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and two MarkVCID measures ‐ free water and peak‐width skeletonized mean diffusivity [PSMD]) at each time point. We tested for voxel‐wise associations between dMRI markers and vascular risk measured by cardiovascular metabolic condition (CMC) and observed a region‐specific dependance across all dMRI measures. Using both global and regional dMRI measures, we (i) examined the longitudinal association of dMRI measures with cognition and (ii) computed sample size estimates for a hypothetical clinical trial. We also included white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and our previously proposed composite vascular white matter score (combination of WMH and fractional anisotropy of the genu) as a comparison.ResultVascular risk was associated with all single shell dMRI measures in the genu of the corpus callosum, which we included as a regional dMRI marker for comparison (Figure 1). All dMRI markers correlated with cognitive performance longitudinally (Table 1) and had comparable sample size estimates required for hypothetical VCID clinical trials (Figure 2). Further, global free water and the composite vascular white matter score had the smallest sample size estimates.ConclusionAll commonly used dMRI markers had significant frontal lobe changes due to vascular risk. Both global and regional corpus callosum dMRI markers were sensitive to longitudinal cognitive decline, suggesting their utility in measuring the slowing down of VCID. The composite vascular white matter score, global free water, and WMH show promise as VCID biomarkers. Further work is needed to validate these markers on multiple populations.

AbstractBackgroundThere has been a recent proliferation of various quantities based on single shell Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) for capturing overall cerebrovascular health, especially Small Vessel Disease (SVD) as a single number. The existing literature has gaps in the comparison of these measures, so we evaluated them as predictors of both current and future White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) as a proxy of SVD.MethodUsing baseline 3T MRI examinations (T1, DTI, FLAIR scans) of 598 participants (>60 years, amyloid negative, to limit to those on the SVD pathway) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, we calculated five summary DTI quantities with varying degree of complexity. We estimated their partial R2 from cross‐sectional linear regression models and computed semi‐partial R2 from mixed models predicting WMH volume as a percentage of Total Intracranial Volume (TIV). All models were adjusted for age, sex, and scanner model, and the WMH and based were log‐transformed before fitting. We also conducted subset analyses with high (WMH+) vs. low (WMH‐) baseline WMH load (cut at 1.62%) to compare the performance of the measures in early vs. widespread WMH.ResultAll MD‐based quantities computed on the whole brain, including FWF, performed similarly to each other, but Genu FA underperformed at explaining WMH variance (Table 1). PSMD (skeletonized or atlas based) was more sensitive in WMH+ but dramatically less so in WMH‐. In WMH‐ and overall cohort, FWF and JHU MD (which is a simple averaging of MD in the JHU atlas) performed well.ConclusionAll MD‐based measures performed similarly to each other in the whole dataset but dichotomizing by WMH load showed interesting differences. PSMD measurements are driven by the extreme end (95th percentile) of the MD distribution and therefore more sensitive in WMH+. Genu FA, a regional measure, was not useful for predicting whole brain WMH change. We noticed some variation in how the quantities are affected by scanner model (GE Signa HDxt and Discovery 750) which needs broader investigation. Simply averaging MD over WM avoids additional processing and is more sensitive to WM degeneration that is not (yet) severe.

AbstractBackgroundChronic medical conditions increase dementia risk, and the mechanism may be captured computationally by measures of accelerated brain aging. We hypothesized that quantifying the impact of chronic conditions on GM and WM aging will aid in measuring the differential impact of each condition on brain aging and shed light on the mechanisms through which they increase dementia risk. We specifically focused on microstructural brain changes with Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) based on advanced diffusion MRI ‐ neurite density index (NDI), free water fraction (FWF), and orientation dispersion index (ODI).MethodWe identified 1123 participants [913 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 114 with MCI, 96 with AD] from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and Mayo ADRC with multi‐shell diffusion MRI. MCSA participants had chronic medical conditions’ diagnosis (based on US Dept of HHS) extracted from the electronic health care records. Using the BorutaSHAP algorithm on NDI, ODI, and ISOVF features from GM and WM separately, we constructed two distinct brain age models for GM and WM. First, we evaluated the usefulness of the predicted age gap (PAG), which is the difference between predicted age by model and chronological age, for both WM and GM NODDI models in CU/MCI/AD. We then developed separate GM and WM models for each condition using samples from condition‐negative participants to compare PAG of GM and WM for that condition.ResultThere was greater PAG in GM (avg = ) than WM (avg = 9.15 yrs) in MCI/AD participants (Fig. 1A). Each condition shifted the GM PAG by 0.10 to 3.56 years and WM PAG by 0.38 to 3.72 years with stroke and congestive heart failure showing the greater PAG overall for GM and WM PAD respectively (Fig. 2). COPD, stroke, chronic kidney disease, hypertension had comparatively greater GM PAG than WM PAG; while hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease had greater WM PAG than GM PAG (Fig. 1B).ConclusionChronic conditions are associated with increased GM and WM Brain aging models can aid in quantifying the impact of chronic conditions on dementia risk and understanding mechanisms.

AbstractRecent breakthrough findings in clinical trials on amyloid‐lowering therapies have led to the approval of these drugs for the treatment of amyloid‐ positive elderly individuals who show symptoms of mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. The next frontier is the testing the efficacy of treatments for secondary prevention of AD dementia. Phase III trials in asymptomatic AD are already under way, raising a host of novel questions on the sequelae of trial participation such as the emotional and social repercussions of biomarker disclosure, understanding the risk of side effects and eventually weighing the risk‐benefit ratio of amyloid‐lowering treatment. In this session jointly organized by the Neuroimaging and Partnering with Research Participants PIAs, I will focus on the participants’ perspective on the role of imaging in outcomes and safety monitoring of preclinical interventional studies. I will outline the importance of a partnership between the study team and participants in the design and conduct of study procedures to ensure that they are both efficient and ethical.

AbstractBackgroundFew normative data for computerized measures administered in unsupervised remote environments are available. We aimed to determine what variables to include in normative models for remote self‐administered assessments, develop normative data for measures administered through Mayo Test Drive (MTD, a multi‐device remote cognitive assessment platform) and evaluate application of norms.Method1240 adults ages 33‐100 (96% White) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center met normative sample inclusion criteria that included a concordant Cognitively Unimpaired (CU) diagnosis (3 independent raters all diagnosed CU) and CDR = 0 (see Table 1 for sample characteristics). Raw test scores were converted to normalized scaled scores. We derived regression‐based normative data that adjusted for age, age2, sex and education (base model); alternative models are also provided (age+age2+sex; age+ age2). We evaluated whether additional model terms beyond the base model were needed using an a priori cut‐off of 1% variance improvement in adjusted R2 over and above the base model. We examined rates of low test performance defined as performance below ‐1 SD in independent validation samples (n = 167 concordant CU, n = 64 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), n = 14 dementia). Rates are considered significantly different than expected when 95% confidence intervals (CIs) do not include the expected 14.7% base rate frequency.ResultNo additional potential model terms met our a priori cut‐off for inclusion beyond the base model (see Table 2), including other quadratic and cubic terms or interactions, device type, response input type, potential session interference, and national area deprivation index (ADI available in subset; N = 776). Application of norms showed expected rates of low test performance among CU participants (95% CI includes expected base rate) and significantly greater than expected rates of low test performance for all variables in MCI (e.g., 62.5% for composite) and dementia (e.g., 71.4% for composite; see Table 3).ConclusionTypical normative models appear appropriate for remote self‐administered measures and are sensitive to cognitive impairment. Device type and response input did not explain enough variance to warrant inclusion in normative models but are important for individual level interpretation. Future work will improve representation of individuals from under‐represented groups.