Citations

Clear

227 citation(s) found for "Hu, Zeng".

SETDB1 acts as a topological accessory to Cohesin via an H3K9me3-independent, genomic shunt for regulating cell fates
Warrier, Tushar , Farran, Chadi A. El , Zeng, Yingying , Ho, Benedict Shao Quan, Bao, Qiuye , Zheng, Zihao , Bi, Xuezhi , Ong, Derrick Sek Tong , Sanyal, Amartya , Fullwood, Melissa J. , El Farran, Chadi A , Ng, Huck‐Hui , Chu, Justin Jang Hann , Collins, James J , Li, Hu , Xu, Jian , Loh, Yuin‐Han

Mayo Clinic

Nucleic Acids Research | July 1, 2022 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 7326-7349

10.1093/nar/gkac531 | PMID 35776115 Get It

Abstract SETDB1 is a key regulator of lineage-specific genes and endogenous retroviral elements (ERVs) through its deposition of repressive H3K9me3 mark. Apart from its H3K9me3 regulatory role, SETDB1 has seldom been studied in terms of its other potential regulatory roles. To investigate this, a genomic survey of SETDB1 binding in mouse embryonic stem cells across multiple libraries was conducted, leading to the unexpected discovery of regions bereft of common repressive histone marks (H3K9me3, H3K27me3). These regions were enriched with the CTCF motif that is often associated with the topological regulator Cohesin. Further profiling of these non-H3K9me3 regions led to the discovery of a cluster of non-repeat loci that were co-bound by SETDB1 and Cohesin. These regions, which we named DiSCs (domains involving SETDB1 and Cohesin) were seen to be proximal to the gene promoters involved in embryonic stem cell pluripotency and lineage development. Importantly, it was found that SETDB1-Cohesin co-regulate target gene expression and genome topology at these DiSCs. Depletion of SETDB1 led to localized dysregulation of Cohesin binding thereby locally disrupting topological structures. Dysregulated gene expression trends revealed the importance of this cluster in ES cell maintenance as well as at gene ‘islands’ that drive differentiation to other lineages. The ‘unearthing’ of the DiSCs thus unravels a unique topological and transcriptional axis of control regulated chiefly by SETDB1.
Abstract 4001: Evaluation of novel therapeutics using the Mayo Clinic GBM Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX) collection
Tian, Shulan , Hu, Zeng, Carlson, Brett L. , Decker, Paul A. , Eckel‐Passow, Jeanette E. , Burgenske, Danielle M. , Mladek, Ann C. , Schroeder, Mark A. , Decker, Paul A. , Vaubel, Rachael A. , Sarkaria, Jann N.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 12_Supplement | Pages: 4001-4001

10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-4001 Get It

Abstract The Mayo Clinic collection of patient-derived xenograft (PDXs) has been developed from the direct implantation of glioblastoma (GBM) samples into immunodeficient mice. Over 105 models have been extensively characterized with regards to histology, invasion, flank and orthotopic growth rates, and molecular profiling. Evaluation of orthotopic tumors demonstrated infiltration of tumor cells into the brain parenchymal in 90% of models with contralateral hemisphere involvement in 64%. Extensive molecular profiling confirmed the PDX collection captures the genetic heterogeneity of GBM, with the majority of typical molecular alterations seen at a frequency similar to the TCGA including gain of chromosome 7 and loss of chromosome 10. TERT promoter mutations (86%) and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A (70%) were the most frequent. Additional alterations in the p53 pathway included TP53 mutations (36%) and MDM2/4 amplification (10%/2%). IDH mutations were found in three models while MGMT promoter methylation was observed in 45% of PDXs. The available molecular sequencing results are viewable on cBioPortal. These genetically diverse models are extremely useful for biomarker discovery and efficacy evaluations. Using an innovative 1x1x1 PDX preclinical trial design, we are establishing a workflow to evaluate control and drug treatment in an individual animal across PDX lines in the flank. As our first use of this strategy, a small molecule MDM2 inhibitor was evaluated in 17 PDX lines with variable MDM2 and TP53 statuses. Tumors harboring MDM2 amplification without TP53 mutation (n=5) showed profound response, with 4 PDXs showing a complete response that lasted >150 days. Response in TP53 wild-type tumors lacking MDM2 amplification was variable, with a 1.9 to 4.8 fold longer time to endpoint (mean 3; median 2.7). A more traditionally powered intracranial efficacy study performed with one MDM2 amplified (GBM108) and two non-amplified (GBM14, GBM10) PDX lines confirmed these findings of reduced and more variable response to therapy in MDM2 non-amplified TP53 wild-type tumors. Future studies will aim to examine novel biomarkers indicative of therapeutic response to better understand molecular features associated with MDM2 inhibitor efficacy. With over 20 years of experience, our group has extensive expertise in development of clinically relevant study designs focused on examining efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessments. Our diverse collection of clinically relevant GBM PDX models provides a highly sought-after resource which has been utilized by the pharmaceutical community with 58 working relationships to date (26 contracts, 32 collaborations). Through these collaborations, we aim to expand the use of our highly characterized GBM PDX panel for biomarker discovery using similar strategies. Citation Format: Danielle M. Burgenske, Ann C. Mladek, Shulan Tian, Mark A. Schroeder, Zeng Hu, Brett L. Carlson, Paul A. Decker, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Rachael Vaubel, Jann N. Sarkaria. Evaluation of novel therapeutics using the Mayo Clinic GBM Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX) collection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 4001.
Abstract 3305: WSD-0628, a novel brain penetrant ATM inhibitor, radiosensitizes GBM and melanoma patient derived xenografts
Tuma, Ann Mladek, Liu, Lily, Carlson, Brett L. , Hu, Zeng, Connors, Margaret A. , Tuma, Ann C. Mladek, Zhong, Wei, Burgenske, Danielle M. , Bakken, Katrina K. , Sarkaria, Jann N.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 12_Supplement | Pages: 3305-3305

10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-3305 Get It

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) are inherently resistant to radiation therapy (RT), and development of radiosensitizers is one strategy to overcome this limitation. Repair of DNA double strand breaks induced by RT are mediated by the protein kinase Ataxia Telangiectasia mutated (ATM). In this study, the novel ATM inhibitor WSD-0628 was evaluated in combination with RT using GBM and melanoma models. In vitro evaluation of 10uM WSD-0628 binding to a panel of potential drug targets, including receptors, ion channels, enzymes, and transporters, indicated a satisfactory safety profile with low risk for off-target liability. WSD-0628 potently inhibits ATM-mediated phosphorylation of the DNA damage response protein KAP1 in MCF-7 cells at sub-nanomolar (nM) concentrations (IC50 0.42nM) in comparison to much less potent inhibition of the related kinases ATR (phosphorylation of CHK1, IC50 742nM) or DNA-PKcs (auto-phosphorylation of DNA-PK, IC50 169nM) in HT29 cells assessed by ELISA. In U251 GBM cells, 30 nM WSD-0628 potently inhibited RT-induced phospho-KAP1 and robustly reduced clonogenic survival by 5-fold when combined with 5 Gy irradiation (combination vs RT alone, p<0.01). Similar potent radiosensitizing effects were seen in a melanoma brain metastasis PDX line M12 (10nM WSD-0628+IR-5Gy 1% survival vs 5% survival with IR-5Gy alone. p<0.01), and the SV-40 transformed astrocyte line SVG-A (10nM WSD-0628 + IR-2.5Gy survival 0.2% vs 15% with IR-2.5Gy alone. p<0.01). Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic profile of WSD-0628 in mice 2h after a single 5 mg/kg oral dose reveals a high level of free drug availability in the brain (34nM) and in the CSF (50nM) with little to no Pgp/BCRP substrate liability. An initial in vivo dose finding study in orthotopic GBM43 PDX yielded significant benefit with WSD-0628 at either 5 or 10 mg/kg PO daily when combined with radiation (2Gy QD for 5 days); Median survival for sham RT (29d) or RT alone (34d) were significantly different from RT combinations with 5 mg/kg (54d) and 10 mg/kg (73d; p<0.01 for both dose levels), although the higher dose combination was poorly tolerated with body weight loss between 15-20% one week after RT completion. Dosing of WSD-0628 (7.5 mg/kg PO, QD) given just before and 24h after a single dose of RT (12.5Gy) in mice with orthotopic M12 was well tolerated and provided robust radiosensitizing effects with median survival for combination treatment of over 180d vs 17d for control and 49d with RT alone groups (combination vs RT alone, p=0.04). Collectively, these results suggest a promising role for WSD-0628 in combination with RT in GBM and melanoma metastatic to the brain. Citation Format: Ann Mladek Tuma, Wei Zhong, Lily Liu, Danielle M. Burgenske, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina K. Bakken, Zeng Hu, Margaret A. Connors, Jann N. Sarkaria. WSD-0628, a novel brain penetrant ATM inhibitor, radiosensitizes GBM and melanoma patient derived xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3305.
Abstract 334: Convection enhanced delivery of EGFR-targeting antibody drug conjugates ABBV-321 and Depatux-M
Porath, Kendra A. , Carlson, Brett L. , Connors, Margaret A. , Hu, Zeng, Decker, Paul A. , Kitange, Gaspar J. , Feldsien, Thomas M. , Lefebvre, Didier R. , Mladek, Ann C. , Vaubel, Rachael A. , Regan, Michael S. , Jain, Sonia , Burgenske, Danielle M. , Bakken, Katrina K. , He, Lihong , Decker, Paul A. , Gupta, Shiv K. , Agar, Nathalie Y.R. , Sarkaria, Jann N.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 12_Supplement | Pages: 334-334

10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-334 Get It

Abstract Introduction: EGFR targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) show promise as a novel treatment in a subset of glioblastoma (GBM). Two EGFR targeting ADCs include first generation Depatux-M, with an antimitotic toxin monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF), and ABBV-321, with a DNA crosslinking agent pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer (PBD) toxin. Due to the large molecular weight, poor drug distribution across the blood-brain barrier significantly limits the efficacy in EGFR-amplified GBM. We studied whether convection enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse these two EGFR-targeted ADCs in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFR-amplified GBM. Methods: The efficacy of Depatux-M and ABBV-321 was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in two EGFRviii-amplified PDXs (GBM6 and GBM108). Immunofluorescence staining was used to evaluate drug distribution along with pharmacodynamics of the ADCs. CED was performed by stereotactic placement of an infusion catheter in the same location as the original tumor implantation. Immunohistochemistry was used to explore mechanisms of normal cell toxicity. Results: Despite potent activity in vitro (high ng/ml IC50), systemic administration of either ADC conferred minimal extension in survival for either GBM6 or GBM108. In contrast, CED significantly enhanced ADC delivery to tumor and peri-tumoral regions and extended survival. In a pilot study in GBM6 with n=3 mice per group, a single CED infusion of 0.002mg ABBV-321 resulted in extended survival beyond 365 days for two mice, while other doses and placebo were associated with shorter median survival (0 mg - 39 days; 0.03 mg - 105 days; 0.3 mg - 49 days). In a subsequent trial evaluating serial infusions performed every 21 days, four infusions at 0.002 mg ABBV-321 resulted in lethal toxicity. In contrast, limiting ABBV-321 to only two serial CED infusions in GBM108 was associated with extended survival of more than 300 days vs. 53 days for AB095 antibody control infusion. In contrast, serial infusion with Depatux-M was much better tolerated. In a single infusion in GBM6, a 0.06 mg dose was well tolerated and associated with a 49-day extension in median survival. Further, four serial infusions at 0.06 mg given every 21 days in GBM6 and GBM108 was associated with 100 day and more than 250-day extension in survival as compared to AB095 antibody control infusion. To investigate the mechanism of toxicity, infusion of non-tumor bearing C57Bl6 mice with ABBV-321 resulted in a marked loss in NeuN staining and elevated CD68 and GFAP staining 7 days later; Depatux-M infusion was only associated with modest elevation in GFAP without loss of NeuN staining or elevated CD68-positive cells. Conclusion: Depatux-M is well tolerated when infused into normal brain and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, ABBV-321, with a distinct PBD toxin, had a much narrower therapeutic window when delivered by CED. Citation Format: Kendra A. Porath, Ann Mladek, Rachael A. Vaubel, Michael S. Regan, Sonia Jain, Danielle Burgenske, Katrina Bakken, Brett Carlson, Margaret Connors, Zeng Hu, Lihong He, Paul A. Decker, Gaspar Kitange, Shiv Gupta, Nathalie Y. Agar, Thomas M. Feldsien, Didier R. Lefebvre, Jann N. Sarkaria. Convection enhanced delivery of EGFR-targeting antibody drug conjugates ABBV-321 and Depatux-M [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 334.
A novel humanized PD-1/PD-L1 mouse model permits direct comparison of anti-tumor immunity generated by FDA-approved PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors
Liu, Xin , Harrington, Susan M. , Hirdler, Jacob B. , Gicobi, Joanina K. , Zhu, Xingxing , Yan, Yiyi , Hsu, Michelle A. , Barham, Whitney , Hsu, Michelle, Zeng, Hu , Pavelko, Kevin D. , Mansfield, Aaron S. , Dong, Haidong

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | June 13, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1659209/v1 Get It

Abstract Seven different anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies are now widely used in the US to treat a variety of cancer types, but there have been no clinical trials comparing them directly. Furthermore, because many of these antibodies do not cross react between mouse and human proteins, no preclinical models exist in which to consider these types of questions. Thus, we produced humanized PD-1 and PD-L1 mice in which the extracellular domains of both mouse PD-1 and PD-L1 were replaced with the corresponding human sequences. Using this new model, we sought to compare the strength of the immune response generated by FDA-approved antibodies. To do this, we performed an in vivo T cell priming assay in which anti-PD-1/L1 therapies were given at the time of T cell priming against surrogate tumor antigen (OVA), followed by subsequent B16-OVA tumor challenge. We found that anti-PD-1/L1-treated mice exhibited significantly better tumor rejection than controls, although both the control and antibody-treated mice generated comparable numbers of OVA-specific T cells at the time of priming. To determine what could mediate this strong antitumor immune response, we identified the increased production of CX3CR1+PD-1+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in the anti-PD-1/L1-treated mice, the same subset of effector T cells known to increase in clinical responders to PD-1/L1 therapy. Thus, our model permits the direct comparison of FDA-approved anti-PD-1/L1 monoclonal antibodies and further correlates successful tumor rejection with the level of CX3CR1+PD-1+CD8 + T cells, making this model a critical tool for future studies to optimize and better utilize anti-PD-1/L1 therapeutics.
Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients Receiving B-Cell Targeted Therapy
Marty, Paige K. , Shah, Manisha H. , Keulen, Virginia Van, Erskine, Courtney L. , Theel, Elitza S. , Escalante, Patricio , Peikert, T., Keulen, Virginia P. Van , Zeng, Hu , Specks, Ulrich

Mayo Clinic

C13. IMMUNE RESPONSES AND POTENTIAL INFLAMMATORY BIOMARKERS IN SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION | May 2, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A3687-A3687

10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a3687 Get It

Abstract P2-08-08: Concurrent predictors of an immune responsive tumor microenvironment within tumor mutational burden-high breast cancer
Sammons, Sarah , Force, Jeremy , Chumsri, Saranya , Tan, Antoinette R. , Zeng, Jia , Kahsraw, Mustafa, Torres, Evanthia T. Roussos , Sammons, Sarah L , Elliott, Andrew , Anders, Carey K. , Magee, Daniel , Korn, Wolfgang Michael

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 8, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: P2-08-08-P2-08-08

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p2-08-08 Get It

Abstract Background: Data supporting high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) as a lone biomarker for an immune responsive tumor microenvironment (TME) or of response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is weak; yet the tumor agnostic approval in TMB-H advanced tumors makes ICI an option in the clinic. PDL-1 positivity (PDL-1+) is the only consistent biomarker for ICI benefit in metastatic triple-negative BC (mTNBC). We sought to further evaluate concurrent predictors of an immune responsive or non-responsive TME within TMB-H MBC. Methods: Tumor samples (N=5621) obtained from patients with MBC were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA (592-gene panel or whole exome sequencing) and RNA (whole transcriptome sequencing) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Friends of Cancer Research TMB Harmonization Project (Merino et al., 2020) recommendations, with the TMB-H threshold set to ≥ 10 muts/Mb, were used. PDL-1+ (≥1% immune cells stained) assessed by IHC (Ventana SP142). Deficient-mismatch repair (dMMR) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) were determined by IHC and NGS, respectively. Gene expression profiling assessed 21 immune-related signatures and TMEs using MCP-counter (Betch et al., 2016) and quanTIseq (Finotello et al., 2019). Immune cell types were classified as immune-responsive (CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, B cells, myeloid dendritic cells, M1 macrophages, NK cells, and neutrophils) or non-responsive (Tregs, M2 macrophages, and monocytes). P-values adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Exploratory p-values reported for sub-analyses of TMB-H responsive vs nonresponsive TME and PDL1+ vs PDL1- subgroups. Results: TMB-H was identified in 461/5621 (8.2%) MBC samples. TMB-H tumors exhibit significant enrichment of dMMR/MSI-H (7 vs 0%, p<0.0001) and IHC-PDL1+ (36 vs 28%, p<0.05) compared to TMB-L. TMB-H was not associated with increased abundance or proportion of immune responsive cell types or immune response gene signatures (e.g. antigen presentation), yet positive trends were observed. To identify predictive biomarkers of immune responsive (hot) or non-responsive (cold) TME profiles within TMB-H MBC, we generated a composite TME score representing the overall proportion of hot vs cold immune cell types. APOBEC mutagenesis was common in TMB-H tumors (72%) and was more frequently associated with an immune cold TME (77 vs 66% in hot TME subgroup, p=0.068). Within TMB-H tumors, cold TMEs were enriched with mutations (muts) in PIK3CA (61 vs 47%), CHEK2 (5 vs 0%), CBFB (4 vs 0%), amplifications (amp) of CCND1 (13 vs 4%), FGF19 (16 vs 5%), FGF4 (11 vs 4%), and MMLT6 (6 vs 0%), and expression of IHC-AR (75 vs 58%) compared to hot TMEs (all p<0.05). Hot TMEs had increased frequency of MSI-H (12 vs 5%) and KMT2D muts (12 vs 3%) compared to cold TMEs (all p<0.05). Amongst TMB-H and TMB-L tumors, PDL1+ was significantly associated with increased proportion of immune responsive cell types (ie CD8+) compared to PDL1- tumors (0.14 vs -0.08 TME score, p<0.0001). Comparison of TMB-H tumors by PDL1 status revealed enrichment of TP53 (67 vs 53%) and B2M (8 vs 0%) muts in PDL1+ tumors, while IHC-ER positivity (68 vs 54%) and CDH1 muts (32 vs 16%) were increased in PDL1- tumors (all p<0.05). Conclusions: High TMB alone does not strongly correlate with immune infiltrate or immune response gene signatures in MBC. Within TMB-H MBC, concurrent mutations in MSI-H and KMT2D are associated with an immune responsive TME while mutations in PIK3CA, CHEK2, CBFB, amplifications of CCND1, FGF19, FGF4, and MMLT6, and expression of IHC-AR are associated with an immune non-responsive TME. Co-occurring biomarkers within TMB-H breast cancer warrant evaluation in prospective cohorts for response or resistance to ICI to help develop composite biomarkers in breast cancer. Citation Format: Sarah Sammons, Andrew Elliott, Jeremy Force, Saranya Chumsri, Carey Anders, Antoinette R Tan, Daniel Magee, Jia Zeng, W. Michael Korn, Mustafa Kahsraw, Evanthia T Roussos Torres. Concurrent predictors of an immune responsive tumor microenvironment within tumor mutational burden-high breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-08.
RBBP4-p300 axis modulates expression of genes essential for cell survival and is a potential target for therapy in glioblastoma
Mladek, Ann C. , Yan, Huihuang , Tian, Shulan , Decker, Paul A. , Hu, Zeng, Connors, Margaret A. , Carlson, Brett L. , Wilson, Jonathan E. , Bommi‐Reddy, Archana, Conery, Andy, Eckel‐Passow, Jeanette E. , Kitange, Gaspar J. , Burgenske, Danielle M. , Bakken, Katrina, Sarkaria, Jann N , Mladek, Ann C , Decker, Paul A. , Bakken, Katrina K. , He, Lihong , Sarkaria, Jann N.

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | February 28, 2022 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1261-1272

10.1093/neuonc/noac051 | PMID 35231103 Get It

Abstract Background RBBP4 activates transcription by histone acetylation, but the partner histone acetyltransferases are unknown. Thus, we investigated the hypothesis that RBBP4 interacts with p300 in a complex in glioblastoma (GBM). Methods shRNA silencing of RBBP4 or p300 and RNAseq was used to identify genes co-regulated by RBBP4 and p300 in GBM43 patient-derived xenograft (PDX). RBBP4/p300 complex was demonstrated using proximity ligation assay (PLA) and ChIPseq delineated histone H3 acetylation and RBBP4/p300 complex binding in promoters/enhancers. Temozolomide (TMZ)-induced DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) were evaluated by γ-H2AX and proliferation by CyQuant and live cell monitoring assays. In vivo efficacy was based on survival of mice with orthotopic tumors. Results shRBBP4 and shp300 downregulated 4768 genes among which 1485 (31%) were commonly downregulated by both shRNAs, while upregulated genes were 2484, including 863 (35%) common genes. The pro-survival genes were the top-ranked among the downregulated genes, including C-MYC. RBBP4/p300 complex was demonstrated in the nucleus, and shRBBP4 or shp300 significantly sensitized GBM cells to TMZ compared to the control shNT in vitro (P < .05). Moreover, TMZ significantly prolonged the survival of mice bearing GBM22-shRBBP4 orthotopic tumors compared with control shNT tumors (median shNT survival 52 days vs. median shRBBP4 319 days; P = .001). CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300 inhibitor CPI-1612 suppressed H3K27Ac and RBBP4/p300 complex target proteins, including C-MYC, and synergistically sensitized TMZ in vitro. Pharmacodynamic evaluation confirmed brain penetration by CPI-1612 supporting further investigation to evaluate efficacy to sensitize TMZ. Conclusions RBBP4/p300 complex is present in GBM cells and is a potential therapeutic target.
CDK7 inhibition augments the response against multidrug chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer
Zeng, Siyuan , Lan, Bin , Ren, Xiaofan, Zhang, Shuman , Schreyer, Daniel , Eckstein, Markus , Kutschick, Isabella, Pfeffer, Susanne, Grützmann, Robert , Zeng, Siyuan, Yang, Hai , Britzen‐Laurent, Nathalie , Dahl, Andreas , Mukhopadhyay, Debabrata , Chang, David K. , Bailey, Peter J. , Biankin, Andrew V. , Pilarsky, Christian

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | February 16, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1333955/v1 Get It

Abstract Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer with a dismal prognosis. Although combined treatment with gemcitabine and albumin-bound paclitaxel has improved the prognosis of PDAC, both intrinsic and acquired chemoresistance cloud the outcomes. Hence, there is an urgent need to explore new therapeutic targets and formulate innovative strategies for the more effective treatment of PDAC.Methods: We transduced pancreatic cancer cells with a protein kinase library, and transfected cells were selected by puromycin treatment, followed by continuous exposure to vehicle control or gemcitabine/paclitaxel chemotherapy for 21 days. Next-generation sequencing as well as MAGeCK-VISPR analysis were performed to the identify candidate genes. Finally, we used the CRISPR-Cas9 to knockout the target gene, confirming that it is a viable target for overcoming chemoresistance in vivo and in vitro.Results: We identified several cell cycle checkpoint kinases and DNA damage-related kinases as targets for overcoming chemoresistance. Among them, cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) ranked highly in both screenings. We demonstrated that both gene knockout and pharmacological inhibition of CDK7 by THZ1 result in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis induction. Furthermore, THZ1 synergized with gemcitabine and paclitaxel in vitro and in vivo, resulting in enhanced antitumor effects.Conclusions: Our findings support the application of CRISPR-Cas9 screening in identifying novel therapeutic targets and provide new strategies for overcoming chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer.