Citations

Abstract Batracylin (NSC 320846, BAT) is a heterocyclic arylamine and topoisomerase II inhibitor shown to be active in murine tumor models, but with demonstrated species differences in toxicity associated with metabolism to N-acetylbatracylin (NBAT) by N-acetyltransferase (NAT). BAT is a preferential substrate of human NAT2. Accordingly, production of NBAT should be subject to population variability as a function of NAT2 polymorphisms. A phase I clinical trial of BAT in patients with advanced cancer and slow acetylator NAT2 phenotypes to reduce the risk of NBAT-related toxicity found a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of cystitis/hemorrhagic cystitis. In subsequent in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies to elucidate metabolic pathways that might contribute to BAT toxicity, we found oxidative metabolites and thiol conjugates of BAT and NBAT (MM Ames et al, Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1303). Since these data are consistent with metabolic activation of BAT to potentially toxic metabolites, we assessed formation of reactive intermediates as measured by covalent binding (CB) to protein and DNA or by formation of glutathione conjugates. Radiolabeled BAT and NBAT were incubated with 3-MC-induced rat (r), human (h) and dog (d) liver microsomes (LM), as well as with recombinant human cytochromes P450 (CYPs) with or without added DNA. NADPH-dependent BAT protein and DNA CB were detected in all microsomal preparations (see table below). NADPH-dependent NBAT protein CB was detected in all microsomal preparations except hCYP1B1. NADPH-dependent NBAT DNA CB was detected in all microsomal preparations except 3MC-rLM. We also detected a glutathione conjugate of mono-hydroxy BAT by lc/ms/ms analysis when BAT was incubated with hLM in the presence of glutathione and NADPH. Thus, CYP-catalyzed oxidation of BAT yields reactive metabolites that that bind protein and DNA and may contribute to drug-related DLT. Supported in part by NCI Contract N01-CM-52206. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3769. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3769

AbstractBackgroundCancer‐specific anxiety (CSA) can affect treatment decisions and is common in men following surgery for prostate cancer (PCa). We hypothesized that CSA is also associated with factors affecting quality of life. Herein, we examine the association of CSA with psychosocial factors and PCa aggressiveness in a cohort of men 1 year after prostatectomy for localized PCa.MethodsFrom our prospective PCa Registry, we identified 365 men who underwent prostatectomy for localized PCa who completed the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX‐PC) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite at 1‐year follow‐up. We evaluated the association of scores on the MAX‐PC with demographics, clinicopathologic features, sexual function, and depression scores using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Kendall's tau correlation tests.ResultsHigher scores on the MAX‐PC (i.e., higher anxiety) are associated with younger age (p < 0.01) and non‐Caucasian race (p < 0.01). Men with higher MAX‐PC scores also reported poor sexual satisfaction/function (p < 0.01) and increasing depressive symptoms (p < 0.01). Finally, although higher anxiety is associated with several pathologic features of aggressiveness (stage, positive margins, PSA at 1 year; all p‐values < 0.01), we noted several men with clinically indolent disease who reported significant anxiety.ConclusionsOur data suggest that higher levels of CSA are associated with poor sexual function and increased depressive symptoms 1 year after prostatectomy. Moreover, we noted demographic and pathologic features associated with higher CSA as well. If confirmed, our data support development of models to predict men at high risk of CSA following PCa surgery and targeted referral for additional counseling. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract Introduction: The NSABP P-1 and P-2 breast cancer prevention trials have demonstrated that the SERMs tamoxifen and raloxifene can reduce the risk of breast cancer in high risk women. Methods: We performed a nested matched case-control GWAS utilizing DNA from participants enrolled in P-1 and P-2. 592 participants developed invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ, and were matched with 1171 controls who did not. Genome-wide genotyping with the Illumina 610-Quad chip and CYP2D6 genotyping for pertinent alleles were performed. Functional genomic studies involved the use of cultured cells, with siRNA knockdown, followed by qRT-PCR and Western blot analyses. Results: Eleven SNPs with p-values &lt; 3E-05 were identified. Twenty one additional SNPs with p &lt; 4E-05 were identified by imputation around the genotyped SNPs on chromosomes (Chrs) 4, 8, 9, 13, 16 and 22, which were then genotyped with the Invader platform. Initial functional genomic studies focused on 6 SNPs on Chr16 (p-values 1.81-9.55E-06), all of which were in ZNF423, a gene encoding a putative zinc-finger protein. The Chr16 minor variant SNP sequences had less risk than the common variant (OR=0.7). Our functional studies showed that incubation of Hs578T cells stably transfected with estrogen receptor (ER) α with 0.1 nM estradiol (E2) induced expression of ZNF423, BRCA1/2 for WT but not variant SNP sequences. There was also a striking difference between E2-induced ZNF423, BRCA1/2 expression for variant and WT SNPs in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) stably transfected with ERα, with only WT showing induction. ChIP assay showed that ZNF423 could bind to the 5’-flanking region of BRCA1, and reporter gene assays showed that ZNF423 could regulate BRCA1/2 transcription. In LCLs stably transfected with ERα and genotyped for ZNF423 SNPs, estrogen-dependent expression of all 3 genes occurred only in the presence of the WT, but not variant ZNF423 SNP sequences. Blockade of ERα with 4-OH tamoxifen prevented induction of expression in cells with WT sequences, but resulted in gene dose-dependent increases in BRCA1/2 expression in cells with variant SNP sequences-suggested that the minor variant has a “protective” effect during clinical SERM therapy and verified by ChIP assays. Conclusions: The SNPs in ZNF423 identified during GWAS were associated with differential E2-dependent induction of ZNF423, BRCA1 and BRCA2-implying that ZNF423 is “upstream” for the estrogen-dependent induction of BRCA1/2 expression. However, LCLs with variant SNP sequences showed greatly enhanced expression of ZNF423, BRCA1/2 during 4-OH tamoxifen exposure, while cells with WT sequences did not. These results may reveal a novel mechanism for SERM-dependent regulation of BRCA1/2 expression and may have implications for patient selection for SERM therapy. Funded by U10-CA37377, U10-CA69974 and U14-GM61388. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4727. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4727

Abstract Background: In estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is associated with resistance to tamoxifen (Tam). Endoxifen is the most abundant active metabolite of Tam, resulting in part from cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) metabolism. While Tam has been extensively used to model proliferative ER/HER2 cross-talk, there are no published data regarding endoxifen's effect on ER/HER2 nongenomic nor ER genomic signaling. Methods: Using ER+ cells (MCF7) and ER+/HER2+ cells (MCF7-HER2, BT474) we compared the effects of Tam and endoxifen on proliferation using crystal violet assays, Erk1/2 phosphorylation by western blotting, and E2-stimulated ER-regulated gene expression of amphiregulin (AREG), c-Myc (MYC) and progesterone receptor (PGR) by real-time RT-PCR assays. To examine the anti-proliferative affects of endoxifen compared to Tam in vivo we performed E2-stimulated MCF7-HER2 xenograft studies in athymic nude mice. Endoxifen doses of 25 (low) and 75 mg/kg (high) were used based on our prior pharmacokinetic studies showing achievable steady state levels of 100 nM and 1 uM, respectively. Z-Endoxifen HCl was synthesized by NCI. Results: Endoxifen, unlike Tam, potently inhibits growth in both ER+ and ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cell lines at concentrations observed in human CYP2D6 intermediate and extensive metabolizers (&gt;40 nM). Tam (10-1000 nM) stimulates phosphorylation of Erk1/2 in stark contrast to endoxifen at similar doses. Endoxifen (100-1000 nM) significantly decreases E2-stimulated transcription of ER-regulated genes in MCF7-HER2 cells; AREG 2-3 fold, MYC 1-2 fold, and PGR 2-4 fold. Conversely, Tam (10-1000 nM) maintains or stimulates transcription; AREG 2-3 fold, MYC 0.5-2.5 fold, and PGR 0-3 fold. After 7 weeks of treatment of MCF7-HER2 xenografts, both high (p=0.001) and low dose endoxifen (p=0.01) resulted in greater antitumor activity than Tam, with high dose superior to low dose endoxifen (p=0.024). MCF7-HER2 xenografts that progressed on Tam to 200% growth at 7 weeks were randomized to either continued Tam or endoxifen. Four weeks after randomization endoxifen was superior to Tam (p&lt;0.0001) with tumor size decreased by ≥ 20%. No significant toxicity was observed.Conclusions: We have demonstrated in both ER+ and ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cell lines that in contrast to Tam, endoxifen potently inhibits growth (both in vitro and in vivo), does not activate Erk1/2 signaling, and inhibits E2-stimulated transcription of ER-regulated genes. Endoxifen exhibited potent antitumor activity in MCF7-HER2 xenografts refractory to Tam. These data support the ongoing NCI sponsored phase I studies of Z-endoxifen at Mayo Clinic and NCI. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2283. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2283

Abstract Batracylin (NSC 320846, BAT) is a heterocyclic arylamine and topoisomerase II inhibitor that was shown to be active in several murine tumor models. Pharmacology and toxicology studies demonstrated marked species differences in sensitivity to the toxic effects of BAT attributed to metabolism to N-acetylbatracylin (NacBAT) by N-acetyltransferase (NAT). It was subsequently shown that BAT is a preferential substrate for human NAT2; thus production of NacBAT is likely subject to population variability as a function of known NAT2 polymorphisms. A phase I clinical trial of BAT in patients with advanced cancer and slow acetylator NAT2 genotypes to reduce the risk of toxicity due to NacBAT is ongoing and a potentially dose-limiting toxicity of cystitis/hemorrhagic cystitis was observed in several patients. In order to determine if this toxicity is due to BAT, NacBAT, and/or other metabolites, we investigated the in vitro metabolism of BAT and NacBAT in human (h) and rat (r) liver microsomes (LM) and hepatocytes, and the in vivo metabolism of BAT and NacBAT in rats. 14C-BAT and differentially deuterated (d3- and d4-) BAT were provided to facilitate metabolic profiling. d3- and d4- NacBAT were generated in situ. BAT, NacBAT and their metabolites were detected and quantified by HPLC with diode array, fluorescence, radiochemical and mass spectrometry as appropriate. The goals of these investigations were to obtain a detailed metabolic profile for BAT in rats and humans and to elucidate pathways that might contribute to BAT toxicity. In NADPH-fortified microsomal preparations, loss of BAT was accompanied by formation of one hydroxylated metabolite in hLM and three hydroxylated metabolites in rLM. The single hydroxylated metabolite found in incubations of NacBAT with hLM was attributed to deacetylation by microsomal carboxlesterase. Six mono- and di- hydroxy NacBAT metabolites were found in incubations of NacBAT with rLM. Hydroxylation sites were identified with deuterated BAT and NacBAT. Incubation with recombinant cytochomes P450 (CYPs) identified rCYP1A1, rCYP1A2, hCYP1A1 and hCYP1B1 as the major CYP isoforms that metabolize BAT and NacBAT. Glucuronide conjugates of BAT and NacBAT were identified in rat and human hepatocyte incubations. NacBAT, hydroxylated BAT and NacBAT, and glucuronide conjugates were detected in in vivo metabolism and pharmacokinetic studies with BAT and NacBAT in rats. Finally, thiol-containing adducts, consistent with metabolic activation of BAT, were identified in kidney and urine samples from in vivo metabolism and pharmacokinetic studies with rats. In conclusion, we characterized the in vitro and in vivo metabolism of BAT and identified a pathway for metabolic activation of BAT to potential toxic metabolites. Supported by NCI Contract N01-CM-52206. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1303. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1303

Abstract Background: ABT-888 is an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase1 (PARP1) and PARP2, two highly conserved enzymes implicated in DNA repair, maintenance of genomic stability, and regulation of transcription. Topotecan (TPT) is a water soluble camptothecin derivative with antitumor activity against ovarian tumors. The combination of ABT-888 with TPT is under investigation in phase I trials because PARP inhibition sensitizes tumors cells to TPT in vitro and in vivo. In those trials, the pharmacokinetics of TPT and ABT-888 are being studied to determine if ABT-888 levels are sufficient to modulate PARP activity and to investigate the potential interaction between TPT and ABT-888. Methods: Advanced cancer patients with ECOG performance scores 0-2, adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function were treated with ABT-888 on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17 every 28 days. Topotecan was administered on days 2, 9 and 16 every 28 days. DLTs were defined as grade 4 neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 anemia or ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities despite maximal supportive care. ABT-888 and Toptoecan pharmacokinetics were characterized in all patients. Analysis of urinary recovery is ongoing. Results: In this ongoing Phase I trial, 13 female patients with ovarian (n=12) or breast (n=1) cancer have been enrolled to date and pharmacokinetic data is available for 12 of those patients. ABT-888/TPT dose levels are: Level 1- 10 mg/ 2 mg/m2, Level 2- 20 mg/2 mg/m2, Level 3- 10 mg/3 mg/m2, and Level 4- 20 mg/3 mg/m2. The combination of ABT-888 with topotecan has been tolerable, with no dose limiting toxicity, and dose escalation continues at dose level 5. Topotecan t1/2 and clearance values were 3.0 ± 0.5 hrs and 9.50 ± 1.51 L/hr/m2 when administered alone, and were not affected by administration with ABT-888. When administered alone, ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC0-∞ values after the 10 mg dose were 8.2 ± 2.4 hrs, 432 ± 217 nM, and 2568 ± 1300 nM*hr, respectively. ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC values after the 20 mg dose were 5.7 ± 3.1 hrs, 600 ± 165 nM, and 3870± 934 respectively. When administered with TPT, ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC values after the 10 mg dose were 7.2 ± 2.1 hrs, 412 ± 283 nM, and 2705± 1089 nM*hr are: nM*hr respectively. ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax and AUC values after the 20 mg dose combined with TPT were 5.8 ± 2.2 hrs, 664 ± 97.6 nM, and 4283± 936 nM*hr respectively. Conclusions: Plasma clearance of TPT and ABT-888 does not appear to be altered when they are administered together. The effect of co-administration of these agents on renal clearance is presently under investigation and those results will be presented. This work was supported by NIH grants R25 GM75148-04, U01CA069912-16S and MM01-RR00585. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1301. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1301

Abstract Background: First in human studies of Z-endoxifen hydrochloride (E), the active metabolite of tamoxifen (T), are underway in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Previous data have demonstrated the superiority of aromatase inhibitors (AI's) over T in estrogen receptor (ER) + BC. Using an in vivo aromatase expressing model (MCF7/AC1), we compared the antitumor activity of E with T and Letrozole (L), as well as the antitumor activity and global gene expression changes of E with T in an L-resistant model. Methods: MCF7/AC1 tumors were stimulated with androstenedione. Once tumor size reached 300 mm3, mice (30/group) were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: control (daily, po), T (500 μg/day, sc), endoxifen 25 mg/kg/day p.o.(LDE) endoxifen 75 mg/kg/day p.o. (HDE) or letrozole, 10 μg/day s.c for 4 weeks. Tumors were harvested from control, T, and E groups while the L group continued treatment until the development of resistance defined as an increase in tumor volume of at least 300% from day 1. Mice with L-resistant tumors were randomly assigned to T (n=4) or E (n=5) for 4 weeks and then sacrificed. Gene expression in L-resistant tumors was quantified using Affymetrix U133+2 and changes in gene expression profiles [comparing T and E with L-resistant (n=3)] were analyzed. Genes identified as significantly different were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR assays. Results: At the 4 week time point, both doses of E and L resulted in greater anti-tumor activity than control (Wilcoxon rank sum test: all p &lt; 0.0001); however, tumor burden did not differ between T and control (p=0.095). HDE resulted in significantly less tumor burden than T (p=0.002) but was similar to L. In mice that continued on L, resistance developed at 24 weeks in 9/25 mice. These mice were randomly assigned to either T (n=4) or E (n=5) for 4 weeks. Tumor volume (expressed as a% of its size prior to randomization) was significantly different comparing E (73.3%; range: 69.3 to 80.75%) versus T (148.39%; range: 114.07 to 165.99%) (Wilcoxon rank sum test p=0.016). Compared to control, microarray studies identified 1518 unique probe sets regulated by E (p&lt;0.001) compared to 441 for T including estrogen-regulated genes such as progesterone receptor (PGR) and amphiregulin (AREG) that were significantly down-regulated in the E group [PGR (−6.2 fold, p=0.000008) and AREG (−3.2 fold, p=.0006) but unchanged or up-regulated in the T group (PGR unchanged and AREG +9.2 fold p=0.00002). These findings were confirmed by RT-PCR. Conclusions: Using the MCF7/AC1 model previously used to show the superiority of AI's over T, HDE demonstrated similar antitumor activity to L and was superior to T. In cells resistant to L, E was superior to T and gene expression changes demonstrate that E down-regulates while T activates estrogen regulated genes. These findings support the ongoing development of E for the treatment of ER+ BC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD01-06.