Citations

Abstract ALK-positive histiocytosis is a rare subtype of histiocytic neoplasm first described in 2008 in 3 infants with multisystemic disease involving the liver and hematopoietic system. This entity has subsequently been documented in case reports and series to occupy a wider clinicopathologic spectrum with recurrent KIF5B-ALK fusions. The full clinicopathologic and molecular spectra of ALK-positive histiocytosis remain, however, poorly characterized. Here, we describe the largest study of ALK-positive histiocytosis to date, with detailed clinicopathologic data of 39 cases, including 37 cases with confirmed ALK rearrangements. The clinical spectrum comprised distinct clinical phenotypic groups: infants with multisystemic disease with liver and hematopoietic involvement, as originally described (Group 1A: 6/39), other patients with multisystemic disease (Group 1B: 10/39), and patients with single-system disease (Group 2: 23/39). Nineteen patients of the entire cohort (49%) had neurologic involvement (7 and 12 from Groups 1B and 2, respectively). Histology included classic xanthogranuloma features in almost one-third of cases, whereas the majority displayed a more densely cellular, monomorphic appearance without lipidized histiocytes but sometimes more spindled or epithelioid morphology. Neoplastic histiocytes were positive for macrophage markers and often conferred strong expression of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase, confirming MAPK pathway activation. KIF5B-ALK fusions were detected in 27 patients, whereas CLTC-ALK, TPM3-ALK, TFG-ALK, EML4-ALK, and DCTN1-ALK fusions were identified in single cases. Robust and durable responses were observed in 11/11 patients treated with ALK inhibition, 10 with neurologic involvement. This study presents the existing clinicopathologic and molecular landscape of ALK-positive histiocytosis and provides guidance for the clinical management of this emerging histiocytic entity.

Abstract Introduction/Objective Amyloidosis encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by abnormal deposition of misfolded proteins leading to progressive organ failure. Accurate amyloid typing is essential for proper patient management, as treatment regimens vary dramatically across different types. Bone marrow (BM) biopsy, in conjunction with fat pad aspiration/biopsy, is often the first step in patients with suspected amyloidosis. Although BM involvement by AL amyloid has been previously characterized, little is known about the incidence, morphology and clinical phenotype of non-AL amyloid in BM. Methods/Case Report We retrospectively identified 1469 BM biopsies by querying our reference laboratory database of 19,298 specimens from myriad anatomic sites typed by mass spectrometry-based proteomics (LC-MS/MS). These were reviewed for frequency of amyloid types (N=1469), distribution of amyloid deposits (N=139), and clinical phenotypes (N=345), with particular emphases on cardiac involvement. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) We identified the following amyloid types: AL (N=1172; 79.8%), ATTR (transthyretin) (N=240; 16.3%), AH (immunoglobulin heavy chain) (N=38; 2.6%), AA (serum amyloid A) (N=17; 1.2%), and Aβ2M (β2-microglobulin) (N=2; 0.1%). ATTR deposits showed striking predilection for periosteal soft tissue and/or periosteal vessels, and rarely involved BM stroma and/or interstitial vessels, while AL variably involved these compartments. AA primarily involved interstitial vessels. Both AL and ATTR cases commonly had a monoclonal gammopathy (AL: 92.9%; ATTR: 62.5%) with concomitant cardiac amyloidosis (AL: 91.6%; ATTR: 100%). Compared to AL, ATTR patients had higher stage cardiac amyloidosis and lower overall survival. Conclusion ATTR is common in BM, constituting16.3% of cases in our cohort. Rarer amyloid types, such as AA, AH and AB2M can also occur in BM. ATTR was frequently identified in patients with concomitant monoclonal gammopathy, in whom AL may have been suspected. Although ATTR deposits have distinctive morphologic distribution, primarily involving periosteal soft tissue and/or periosteal vessels and rarely involving BM stroma and/or interstitial vessels, there is considerable morphologic overlap with AL. Therefore, it is imperative to type BM amyloidosis, preferably by LC-MS/MS, to ensure proper patient management. Furthermore, BM involvement by ATTR may be a marker for advanced stage of disease.

Abstract IntroductionRadiotherapy is considered standard of care for adjuvant peri-operative treatment of many spinal tumors, including those with instrumented fusion. Unfortunately, radiation treatment has been linked to increased risk of pseudoarthrosis. Newerfocused radiotherapy strategies with enhanced conformalitycould offer improved fusion rates for these patients, but this has not been confirmed.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients at three tertiary care academic institutions withprimary and secondary spinal malignancies that underwent resection, instrumented fusion, and peri-operative radiotherapy. Two board certified neuro-radiologists used theLenke fusion score to grade fusion status at6 and 12-months after surgery. Secondary outcomes includedclinical pseudoarthrosis, wound complications, and the effect of radiation timing, radiobiological dose delivered, the use of photons versus protons, tumor type, tumor location,and use of autograft on fusion outcomes.ResultsAfter reviewof 1252 spinal tumor patients, there were 60 patients with at least 6 months follow-up that were included in our analyses. Twenty-five of these patients received focused radiotherapy,20 patients received conventional radiotherapy, and 15 patients were treated with protons. There was no significant difference between the groups for covariates such assmoking status,obesity, diabetes, intraoperative use of autograft, and use of peri-operative chemotherapy. There was a significantly higher rate of fusion for patients treated with focused radiotherapy compared to those treated with conventional radiotherapy at 6-months (64.0% versus 30.0%, Odds ratio: 4.15, p=0.036) and 12-months (80.0% versus 42.1%, OR: 5.50, p=0.022). There was a significantly higher rate of clinical pseudoarthrosis in the conventional radiotherapy cohortcompared to patients in the focused radiotherapy cohort (19.1% versus 0%,p=0.037). There was no difference in fusion outcomes for any of the secondary outcomes except for use of autograft. The use ofintra-operative autograft was associated with an improved fusion at 12-months (66.7% versus 37.5%, OR: 3.33, p=0.043). ConclusionFocused radiotherapy may be associated withan improved rate of fusion and clinical pseudoarthrosis when compared to conventional radiation delivery strategiesin patients with spinal tumors.Use of autograft at the time of surgery may be associated with improved 12-month fusion rates.Further large-scale prospective and randomized controlled studies are needed to better stratify the effects of radiation delivery modality in these patients.

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for complications in breast reconstruction. Thus, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction in obese women may be controversial. The authors analyzed obese patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy using Wise-pattern incisions (Goldilocks procedure) and compared outcomes between two groups: Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction and Goldilocks only. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher who underwent the Goldilocks procedure at the Mayo Clinic Health System from 2012 to 2019. Data were extracted from electronic medical records. Minor complications (partial-thickness wound dehiscence or flap necrosis, or tissue expander/implant malposition) and major complications (full-thickness wound dehiscence or flap necrosis, capsular contracture, tissue expander/implant explantation, or unplanned reoperation or readmission) were compared between groups. Patient-reported outcomes using BREAST-Q questionnaires were also assessed. Results: One hundred five patients (181 breasts) were included. Mean ± SEM age and body mass index were 57.1 ± 10.4 years and 37.9 ± 5.8 kg/m2 for the Goldilocks-only group and 51.5 ± 1.1 years and 35.5 ± 0.4 kg/m2 for the Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction group, respectively. Median follow-up time was 15.1 months (interquartile range, 10.0 to 28.6 months). Overall, 96 breasts underwent the Goldilocks-only procedure and 85 Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction. Multivariable analyses revealed a higher rate of minor complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.83; 95 percent CI, 1.22 to 7.02) and major complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.26; 95 percent CI, 1.25 to 4.24) in the Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction group compared with the Goldilocks-only group, at any given time. Patient satisfaction was not statistically different between groups. Conclusions: The Goldilocks procedure is a feasible breast reconstructive option in obese patients; however, when it is performed with immediate breast reconstruction, it is associated with higher rates of complications. For patients with a body mass index of 40 kg/m2 or greater, the authors recommend the Goldilocks-only procedure or delayed reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Abstract Background: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare ovarian cancer histotype that tends to be resistant to standard platinum-based chemotherapeutics. We sought to better understand the role of DNA methylation in clinical and biological subclassification of OCCC. Methods: We interrogated genome-wide methylation using DNA from fresh frozen tumors from 271 cases, applied nonsmooth nonnegative matrix factorization (nsNMF) clustering, and evaluated clinical associations and biological pathways. Results: Two approximately equally sized clusters that associated with several clinical features were identified. Compared with Cluster 2 (N = 137), Cluster 1 cases (N = 134) presented at a more advanced stage, were less likely to be of Asian ancestry, and tended to have poorer outcomes including macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery (P < 0.10). Subset analyses of targeted tumor sequencing and IHC data revealed that Cluster 1 tumors showed TP53 mutation and abnormal p53 expression, and Cluster 2 tumors showed aneuploidy and ARID1A/PIK3CA mutation (P < 0.05). Cluster-defining CpGs included 1,388 CpGs residing within 200 bp of the transcription start sites of 977 genes; 38% of these genes (N = 369 genes) were differentially expressed across cluster in transcriptomic subset analysis (P < 10−4). Differentially expressed genes were enriched for six immune-related pathways, including IFNα and IFNγ responses (P < 10−6). Conclusions: DNA methylation clusters in OCCC correlate with disease features and gene expression patterns among immune pathways. Impact: This work serves as a foundation for integrative analyses that better understand the complex biology of OCCC in an effort to improve potential for development of targeted therapeutics.