Citations

Background and Aims Many children with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) receive oral vancomycin therapy (OVT) or ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). There is a paucity of data on whether these medications improve outcomes. Approach and Results We analyzed retrospective data from the Pediatric PSC Consortium. Children treated with OVT were matched 1:1:1 to those treated with UDCA or managed with observation (no treatment) based on the closest propensity score, ensuring similar baseline characteristics. Two hundred sixty‐four patients (88 each with OVT, UDCA, or observation) had matching propensity scores and were similar in demographics, phenotype, immunosuppression, baseline biochemistry, and hepatic fibrosis. After 1 year in an intention‐to‐treat analysis, all outcome metrics were similar regardless of treatment group. In OVT, UDCA, and untreated groups, respectively: Gamma‐glutamyltransferase normalized in 53%, 49%, and 52% (P = not significant [NS]), liver fibrosis stage was improved in 20%, 13%, and 18% and worsened in 11%, 29%, and 18% (P = NS), and the 5‐year probability of liver transplant listing was 21%, 10%, and 12% (P = NS). Favorable outcome was associated with having a mild phenotype of PSC and minimal hepatic fibrosis. Conclusions We presented the largest‐ever description of outcomes on OVT in PSC and compared them to carefully matched patients on UDCA or no therapy. Neither OVT nor UDCA showed improvement in outcomes compared to a strategy of observation. Patients progressed to end‐stage liver disease at similar rates. Spontaneous normalization of biochemistry is common in children receiving no therapy, particularly in the majority of children with a mild phenotype and an early stage of disease. Placebo‐controlled treatment trials are needed to identify effective treatments for pediatric PSC.

Abstract Lessons Learned The combination of trametinib and sorafenib has an acceptable safety profile, albeit at doses lower than approved for monotherapy. Maximum tolerated dose is trametinib 1.5 mg daily and sorafenib 200 mg twice daily. The limited anticancer activity observed in this unselected patient population does not support further exploration of trametinib plus sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Background The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway is associated with proliferation and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Preclinical data suggest that paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway may be one of the resistance mechanisms of sorafenib; therefore, we evaluated trametinib plus sorafenib in HCC. Methods This was a phase I study with a 3+3 design in patients with treatment-naïve advanced HCC. The primary objective was safety and tolerability. The secondary objective was clinical efficacy. Results A total of 17 patients were treated with three different doses of trametinib and sorafenib. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity, including grade 4 hypertension and grade 3 elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/bilirubin over 7 days. Maximum tolerated dose was trametinib 1.5 mg daily and sorafenib 200 mg twice a day. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were elevated AST (37%) and hypertension (24%). Among 11 evaluable patients, 7 (63.6%) had stable disease with no objective response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.7 and 7.8 months, respectively. Phosphorylated-ERK was evaluated as a pharmacodynamic marker, and sorafenib plus trametinib inhibited phosphorylated-ERK up to 98.1% (median: 81.2%) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Conclusion Trametinib and sorafenib can be safely administered up to trametinib 1.5 mg daily and sorafenib 200 mg twice a day with limited anticancer activity in advanced HCC.

AbstractBackgroundAlthough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a mild infection in most children, a small proportion develop severe or critical illness. Data describing agents with potential antiviral activity continue to expand such that updated guidance is needed regarding use of these agents in children.MethodsA panel of pediatric infectious diseases physicians and pharmacists from 20 geographically diverse North American institutions was convened. Through a series of teleconferences and web-based surveys, a set of guidance statements was developed and refined based on review of the best available evidence and expert opinion.ResultsGiven the typically mild course of COVID-19 in children, supportive care alone is suggested for most cases. For children with severe illness, defined as a supplemental oxygen requirement without need for noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), remdesivir is suggested, preferably as part of a clinical trial if available. Remdesivir should also be considered for critically ill children requiring invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO. A duration of 5 days is appropriate for most patients. The panel recommends against the use of hydroxychloroquine or lopinavir-ritonavir (or other protease inhibitors) for COVID-19 in children.ConclusionsAntiviral therapy for COVID-19 is not necessary for the great majority of pediatric patients. For children with severe or critical disease, this guidance offers an approach for decision-making regarding use of remdesivir.

Abstract Prior in vitro work in the human hepatoma cell lines Huh7 and HEP3B indicated that combination treatment of the BH3 mimetic, navitoclax, and the multi-kinase inhibitor, sorafenib, was more effective at inducing apoptosis than either compound alone. This current study was part of a phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of concurrent navitoclax and sorafenib treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory solid organ tumors and sought to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of both agents in combination. Cleavage of cytokeratin 18 by caspase 3 was used as a biomarker for therapy-induced activation of apoptosis to determine if combination treatment results in an increase in apoptosis as previously observed in in vitro work. PK were assessed in 26 patients (ages 32 - 80) enrolled in a phase I clinical trial (NCT02143401). 150 mg of oral navitoclax was administered once daily for a seven day run-in (beginning Day -7) prior to 150 mg (Dose level 1) or 200 mg (Dose level 2) navitoclax concomitant treatment with 400 mg of twice daily oral sorafenib (Day 1). Samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained on Day -7 and Day 1 prior to dosing and at 1, 2, 4, 8-12, and 24 hours post dosing. PK parameters were estimated by noncompartmental analysis using Phoenix® WinNonlin® Version 6.4. To examine the PD of both agents in combination, cytokeratin 18 cleavage was quantified by ELISA after the 7-day navitoclax run-in and on Day 2 or 4 and Day 8 of navitoclax and sorafenib combination treatment. PK estimates of maximum concentration, exposure, volume of distribution, and clearance for navitoclax on Day -7 and Day 1 were not significantly different, indicating a lack of navitoclax accumulation. Finally, no correlation was found between navitoclax exposure and apoptosis as indicated by cytokeratin-18 cleavage. This work was supported by the NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA15083 and NCI Experimental Therapeutics Phase I Grant UM1 CA186686. Citation Format: Emily J. Koubek, Brian A. Costello, Jun Yin, Renee M. McGovern, Sarah A. Buhrow, Renee A. Schoon, Carrie A. Strand, Yixing Jiang, Mitesh J. Borad, Naoko Takebe, Scott H. Kaufmann, Alex A. Adjei, Joel M. Reid. Pharmacokinetic analysis of navitoclax in combination with sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory solid organ tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT114.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults with a median survival of 14 months despite multimodal treatment. Patients with GBM tumors exhibit a post-resection recurrence rate of almost 100%. The tumor recurrence and treatment resistance properties of GBM reside in a stem-like cell population called Brain Tumor Initiating Cells (BTIC). Among primary GBMs, periventricular tumors exhibit worse survival than tumors distal to the lateral ventricles (LV), the cause for this worse outcome is not known. A potential explanation is the proximity of these tumors to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the neurogenic niche in the sub-ventricular zone (SVZ). Chemotactic signals present in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regulate neural progenitor cells migratory response and differentiation profile. Our preliminary data show that cancer-derived CSF induces an increase in the migration and proliferation of GBM cells when compared to non-cancer CSF. We evaluated the transcriptome of human GBM cells in response to cancer and non-cancer CSF and identified alpha-1-antichymotrypsin (SERPINA3) as one of the genes that show higher over expression upon cancer CSF-stimulation. SERPINA3 is a circulating anti-protease that is produced and released in different tissues such as liver, prostate, lungs, endometrium and brain that is over-expressed in multiple cancers. We hypothesize that the overexpression of SERPINA3 in response to CSF is a contributing factor to the increase malignancy of periventricular GBM tumors. We tested this hypothesis in silico, in vitro and in vivo. Using TCGA and Rembrandt databases we observed a higher expression of SERPINA3 in brain tumor tissue compared to controls with no differences among GBM subtypes. In GBM patients, expression of SERPINA3 negatively affects survival expectancy. In vitro, Using intraoperative samples, we confirmed that SERPINA3 is overexpressed in brain cancer tissue by western-blot and qRT-PCR. Interestingly, we observed a higher nuclear localization of SERPINA3 in cancer tissue and cells. To determine if SERPINA3 has an effect on the malignancy of GBM cells, we silenced its expression using shRNA. SERPINA3 silencing induced a decrease in cell proliferation (p<0.05), as well as migration (p<0.05), and invasion (p<0.05). Remarkably CD133 expression and stem cell markers were decreased when SERPINA3 is silenced. In contrast, the addition of recombinant SERPINA3 induced an increase in cell migration (p<0.05) of GBM cells. Moreover, cancer CSF is no longer able to induce an increase in GBM cell migration in SERPINA3-KD cells (p<0.05). In vivo, mice orthotopically-injected with SERPINA3-KD cells showed a prolonged overall survival (p<0.05). In summary, our results support the hypothesis that SERPINA3 plays a key role in GBM malignancy in response to CSF and its inhibition results in a better outcome using GBM preclinical models. Targeting the CSF-GBM interaction is a potential therapeutic approach that remains to be explored. Citation Format: Montserrat A. Lara Velazquez, Natanael Zarco, Anna Carrano, Jordan Phillips, Paula Schiapparelli, Emily S. Norton, Stephanie Jeanneret, Teresita Corona, Jose Segovia, Kaisorn Chaichana, Yan Asmann, Alfredo Quinones Hinojosa, Hugo Guerrero-Cazares. Cerebrospinal fluid-responsive factor SERPINA3 induces an increase in the malignancy of glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3780.

Abstract Radio-resistant properties of melanomas undermine benefit of radiation therapy (RT). DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) is essential for the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) mediated repair DNA double-strand break (DSB). We evaluated radio-sensitizing effects of M3814, a selective oral inhibitor of DNA-PKcs, in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of melanoma brain metastases. M3814 (≥300 nM) inhibited RT-induced (5 Gy) auto-phosphorylation of serine-2056 of DNA-PKcs in primary cultures of M12, M15 and M27 PDX lines. Interestingly, inhibition of RT-induced DNA-PKcs by M3814 coincided with increased KAP1 phosphorylation, a DNA damage signaling regulated via ATM. As a measure of lasting DNA damage, persistent γH2AX foci were observed in 28% cells 24 hours after co-treatment with M3814 and RT as compared to RT controls, where only 12% cells had persistent γH2AX foci. In a clonogenic survival assay, M3841 augmented RT-induced killing of M12 cells in a dose dependent manner. However, a minimal 16 h exposure with ~300 nM M3814 was most effective treatment. Pharmacokinetics (PK) after single oral dose of 20 mg/kg M3814, showed considerably short half-life (~2.44 hours) and poor brain distribution in wildtype (WT) FBV mice (Kpuu, 0.027). Suggesting liability to efflux transporters, brain distribution of M3814 in TKO mice (triple knockouts for efflux transporters Mdr1a, Mdr1b and BCRP1) was ~11 fold higher than WT animals (kpuu, 0.215). Using this preliminary PK data, simulations were performed using simBiology software to define dosing regimen and schedule to maximize drug exposures in brain. Based on this in silico modeling, two regimens- (A: 125 mg/kg twice a day (at 0 and 7 hours), and B: 50 mg/kg dose followed by three additional doses of 35 mg/kg per day at 4 hour intervals), combined with a single fraction RT (3 Gy) delivered 10 min after the first M3814 dose in each regimen, were tested in athymic nude mice carrying M12 flank tumors. In this study, drug levels achieved in brain and plasma (121±95, 1914±1661 nM with regimens A and 79±51, 1205±664 nM with regimen B, respectively at 24 h), exceeded predictions. Consistent with a much higher accumulation of M3814 in flank tumor tissues (1.5 to 3.4 fold higher than plasma), therapy with M3814/RT had robust pharmacodynamics effects on DNA damage signaling both at 6 and 24 hours of treatment as compared to RT alone. In summary, M3814 is a promising radio-sensitizer in melanoma brain metastases. Further studies will determine efficacy and pharmacodynamics effects of M3814/RT regimens in relevant orthotopic models of brain metastases and address potential concerns of normal tissue toxicity. Citation Format: Jianxiong Ji, Emily J. Smith, Paige Sarkaria, Ann C. Mladek, Surabhi Talele, Katelyn Swanson, Afroz S. Mohammad, Lihong He, Zeng Hu, Katrina K. Bakken, Shiv K. Gupta, Danielle M. Burgenske, Gaspar J. Kitange, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. Inhibition of DNA-PKcs by M3814 potentiates efficacy of ionizing radiation in patient derived xenografts of melanoma brain metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1381.

Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of most lethal malignancies with few known risk factors and biomarkers. Identification of disease biomarkers is critical for understanding the pathogenesis of this cancer and identifying high risk individuals for close surveillance. Several blood protein biomarkers have been linked to PDAC in previous studies, but these studies have assessed only a limited number of biomarkers usually in small samples. To identify novel circulating protein biomarkers of PDAC, we studied 8,280 cases and 6,728 controls of European descent from the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium and the Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium, by using genetic instruments. Protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) for 1,226 plasma proteins identified in a large INTERVAL study of 3,301 healthy European descendants were used as instruments to evaluate associations between genetically predicted protein levels and PDAC. For proteins showing a significant association, we further conducted conditional analysis with adjustments for previously identified risk variants to assess whether the observed associations between genetically predicted protein concentrations and PDAC risk were independent of the risk variants identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Furthermore, for the proteins that were associated with PDAC risk, we performed an enrichment analysis of the genes encoding these proteins to examine whether they are enriched in specific pathways, functions or networks. We observed associations between predicted concentrations of 38 proteins and PDAC risk at a false discovery rate of < 0.05, including those of 23 proteins that showed a significant association even after Bonferroni correction (4.08 × 10−5). These include Histo-blood group ABO system transferase encoded by ABO, which has been previously implicated as a potential target gene of PDAC risk variant identified in GWAS. Eight of the identified proteins (Beta-crystallin B2, Dedicator of cytokinesis protein 9, VIP36-like protein, Erythrocyte band 7 integral membrane protein, Tensin-2, Transmembrane protease serine 11D, Alcohol dehydrogenase 1B, and C-X-C motif chemokine 10) were associated with PDAC risk after conditioning on previously reported pancreatic cancer risk variants (odds ratios ranged from 0.79 to 1.52, P-values from 1.28 × 10−3 to 6.47 × 10−4). Pathway enrichment analysis showed that the encoding genes for the implicated proteins were significantly enriched in cancer-related pathways, such as STAT3 and IL-15 production. In conclusion, we identified 38 protein biomarker candidates for PDAC risk, which if validated by additional studies, may contribute to the etiological understanding of PDAC tumor development. Citation Format: Jingjing Zhu, Xiang Shu, Xingyi Guo, Duo Liu, Jiandong bao, Roger Milne, Graham G Giles, Chong Wu, Mengmeng Du, Emily White, Harvey A Risch, Nuria Malats, Eric J. Duell, Phyllis J. Goodman, Donghui Li, Paige Bracci, Verena Katzke, Rachel E Neale, Steven Gallinger, Stephen Van Den Eeden, Alan Arslan, Federico Canzian, Charles Kooperberg, Brian Wolpin, Laura Beane-Freeman, Ghislaine Scelo, Kala Visvanatha, Christopher A. Haiman, Loïc Le Marchand, Herbert Yu, Gloria M Petersen, Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon, Alison P Klein, Laufey T Amundadottir, Qiuyin Cai, Jirong Long, Xiao-Ou Shu, Wei Zheng, Lang Wu. Associations between genetically predicted blood protein biomarkers and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1200.

Bioactive surfaces and materials have displayed great potential in a variety of tissue engineering applications but often struggle to completely emulate complex bodily systems. The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a crucial, bioactive component in all tissues and has recently been identified as a potential solution to be utilized in combination with biomaterials. In tissue engineering, the ECM can be utilized in a variety of applications by employing the biochemical and biomechanical cues that are crucial to regenerative processes. However, viable solutions for maintaining the dimensionality, spatial orientation, and protein composition of a naturally cell-secreted ECM remain challenging in tissue engineering. Therefore, this work used soft lithography to create micropatterned polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates of a three-dimensional nature to control cell adhesion and alignment. Cells aligned on the micropatterned PDMS, secreted and assembled an ECM, and were decellularized to produce an aligned matrix biomaterial. The cells seeded onto the decellularized, patterned ECM showed a high degree of alignment and migration along the patterns compared to controls. This work begins to lay the groundwork for elucidating the immense potential of a natural, cell-secreted ECM for directing cell function and offers further guidance for the incorporation of natural, bioactive components for emerging tissue engineering technologies.

Abstract Introduction Medical education is moving to conceptualise feedback as a bidirectional learning conversation. Within this conversation, learners experience a tension between assessment and feedback. That perceived tension affects learners’ outward performances. In this study, we aimed to characterise residents’ experiences with this tension and its effect on learner authenticity within feedback conversations. Methods In this constructivist grounded theory study, the authors were informed by Goffman's theory of impression management. During data analysis, Dweck's theory of mindset was adopted. The authors conducted semi‐structured interviews with 15 internal medicine residents. Data collection and analysis were conducted iteratively, using constant comparison to identify themes coinciding with impression management and mindset, ultimately developing a theoretical model to help explain residents’ responses to tensions within feedback conversations. Results Residents constantly felt ‘scrutinized’, and this affected their engagement in feedback conversations. They staged a performance within those conversations, linked to their underlying mindset: growth or fixed. Growth mindset was characterised by a focus on development as a physician and was associated with asking questions and seeking opportunities for growth. Fixed mindset was characterised by a focus on achieving a favourable evaluation and was associated with a hesitation to ask questions when faced with uncertainty and admit opportunities for growth, because they were concerned about impression management. Context influenced mindset and impression management. Residents adopted a fixed mindset and managed impressions when they perceived the permanence or consequences of evaluations within feedback. Residents adopted a growth mindset when they trusted the supervisor. Discussion Residents assess the context of feedback conversations, altering the authenticity of their behaviours. Context, including the perceptions of formal assessment and relationships with supervisors, affected residents’ mindset and impression management. Providing space for relationship‐building and clarifying the purpose and structure of assessment may be helpful in supporting effective learning conversations in graduate medical education.