Citations

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter changes and Alzheimer’s disease pathology frequently co‐exist in the population. Recently we empirically derived subtypes of incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and found that there was significant heterogeneity not only in cognitive impairment profiles but also gray matter atrophy suggesting that multiple etiologies may contribute to cognitive impairment in these subtypes. The aim of this study was to examine differences in white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume in these same MCI subtypes and investigate amyloid deposition in a smaller subset.MethodWe analyzed data from 188 participants with incident MCI enrolled in the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) identified as having one of four MCI subtypes: subtle cognitive impairment (SCI), amnestic, dysnomic, and dysexecutive. All participants completed 3T imaging at the time of the MCI diagnosis. Using WMH volume scaled by TIV and PIB SUVR, we compared each MCI subtype to 344 cognitively impaired (CU) participants (mean age 78; 46% women) and each other.ResultThe amnestic (n = 83; mean age 80; 43% women), dysnomic (n = 30; mean age 84; 47% women) and dysexecutive subtypes (n = 49; mean age 83; 35% women) had significantly higher WMH volumes compared to CU (p < .02) while the SCI subtype (n = 26; mean age 80; 23% women) did not differ from CU (p = .76). Amongst the MCI subtypes, the amnestic (p = .04) and dysexecutive subtypes (p = .01) had significantly higher WMH volumes than the SCI subtype [Figure 1]. In a smaller subset of individuals who also completed PiB‐PET (17/26 SCI; 39/83 amnestic; 10/30 dysnomic, 28/49 dysexecutive), we found evidence for higher amyloid load in all MCI subgroups except the SCI group (p<0.05) in comparison to CU.ConclusionWe found significantly elevated levels of WMH and amyloid burden in amnestic, dysnomic, and dysexecutive subtypes of incident MCI supporting the notion that both vascular changes and amyloid contribute to the development of clinical symptoms. Surprisingly, WMH and amyloid positivity were not high in SCI suggesting that the pathophysiology in this group needs further investigation.

Abstract BACKGROUND Molecular parameters have been incorporated into the 2016 WHO Classification of CNS Tumors and subsequent cIMPACT-NOW updates to facilitate clinical management of glioma patients. However, there have been few reports of the overall clinical utility of comprehensive genetic testing in adult glioma patients. We report the results of sequencing and chromosomal microarray analysis of adult gliomas seen at the Mayo Clinic and through the Mayo Clinic Laboratories (MCL) reference practice. METHODS A consecutive series of 379 Mayo Clinic adult glioma patients were consented to receive targeted next generation sequencing and chromosomal microarray analysis, regardless of standard clinical ordering practices. Known diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive alterations were annotated for each case. These results were compared to the larger MCL reference practice of 2400 adult glioma samples that received one or both tests clinically. RESULTS Of the consecutive Mayo Clinic cases, 67% had alterations that fell into at least one of the diagnostic, prognostic, and/or predictive categories. Molecular testing generated diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information in 44%, 34%, and 36% of cases, respectively. Diagnostically, molecular testing mainly aided in arriving at a final integrated diagnosis, and only a small number of cases (n= 5; 1%) had a change in diagnosis. The consecutive cases represent the typical distribution of adult glioma types (47% IDH-wildtype glioblastoma/astrocytoma, 22% IDH-mutant astrocytoma/glioblastoma, 13% IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma, and 18% other tumor types). The MCL practice is enriched in tumors with atypical molecular patterns (37% IDH-wildtype glioblastoma/astrocytoma, 17% IDH-mutant astrocytoma/glioblastoma, 18% IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma, and 29% other tumor types). CONCLUSIONS Molecular testing provides useful diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information for the clinical management of adult glioma patients. While the current guidelines for ordering molecular testing are effective for diagnostic purposes, additional prognostic and predictive information can be gleaned from comprehensive molecular testing of adult gliomas.

Abstract Radio-resistance mechanisms limit the benefit of radiation therapy (RT) for melanoma brain metastases. A key pathway for radiation-induced DNA double-strand break repair is non-homologous end joining, which is critically mediated by DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs). Here we evaluated radio-sensitizing effects of M3814, a selective oral inhibitor of DNA-PKcs, in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of melanoma brain metastases. In a clonogenic survival assay, M3841 augmented RT-induced killing of M12 cells at concentrations of ≥300 nM, and a minimum of 16 h exposure with ~300 nM M3814 was required for effective sensitization. M3814 inhibited RT-induced (5 Gy) auto-phosphorylation of serine-2056 of DNA-PKcs in primary cultures of M12, M15 and M27 PDX lines. Interestingly, inhibition of RT-induced DNA-PKcs by M3814 coincided with increased KAP1 phosphorylation, a DNA damage signaling regulated via ATM. Persistent γH2AX foci were observed in 28% M12 cells at 24 hours after co-treatment with M3814 and RT as compared to 12% cells following RT alone. In vivo pharmacokinetic analysis after single oral dose of 20 mg/kg M3814, showed reasonably short half-life (~2.44 hours) and poor brain distribution in wild-type FBV mice (Kpuu, 0.027). Consistent with an efflux liability, brain distribution of M3814 in triple knockout mice for BCRP/MDR1A/B was ~11 fold higher (Kpuu, 0.215). Compared to normal brain, much higher M3814 concentrations were detected in intracranially implanted M12 tumors (~23 fold and ~20 fold) 2 and 6 hours after a single oral dose of 50mg/kg respectively. The relative exclusion of M3814 from normal brain as compared to brain metastases suggests that this drug may have a favorable toxicity profile when combined with radiation for treatment of melanoma brain metastases, and this hypothesis is being tested in ongoing efficacy studies.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Because treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPG remain challenging, we sought to establish evidence-based guidelines. We prospectively enrolled children with newly-diagnosed NF1-OPGs, and gathered standardized clinical neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments. METHODS Only children with NF1 and newly diagnosed OPGs, confirmed by central review, were eligible. Indications for obtaining the initial MRI, as well as factors associated with the decision to treat with chemotherapy or observe without treatment, were obtained. Quantitative visual acuity (VA), other ophthalmic features, and imaging were captured at standard time points. Goal enrollment is 250 subjects. RESULTS One-hundred thirty-three children (52% female) from 20 institutions met inclusion criteria, and were included in this preliminary analysis. Eighty-six percent of subjects were able to perform quantitative VA testing at enrollment. The most common reasons for the diagnostic MRI included screening related to NF1 diagnosis (36.8%), ophthalmologic concerns (29.3%), and non-ophthalmologic concerns (24.8%), such as headache. To date, twenty subjects have initiated treatment with chemotherapy, twelve (9%) at the time of the initial OPG diagnosis. Median age at OPG diagnosis was 3.1 years. Age and sex distribution were similar in subjects immediately entering the observation and treatment arms (median age 3.0 versus 3.5 years, respectively). CONCLUSION Most children with NF1-OPGs are observed at time of their initial OPG diagnosis, rather than treated. Importantly, a large proportion of children are able to complete quantitative VA testing at enrollment. Once enrollment is complete, these data will help to establish evidence-based guidelines for clinical management of NF1-OPGs.

Adenosine boasts promising preclinical and clinical data supporting a vital role in modulating vascular homeostasis. Its widespread use as a diagnostic and therapeutic agent have been limited by its short half‐life and complex biology, though adenosine‐modulators have shown promise in improving vascular healing. Moreover, circulating adenosine has shown promise in predicting cardiovascular (CV) events. We sought to delineate whether circulating plasma adenosine levels predict CV events in patients undergoing invasive assessment for coronary artery disease. Patients undergoing invasive angiography had clinical data prospectively recorded in the Cardiovascular and Percutaneous ClInical TriALs (CAPITAL) revascularization registry and blood samples collected in the CAPITAL Biobank from which adenosine levels were quantified. Tertile‐based analysis was used to assess prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and cerebrovascular accident). Secondary analyses included MACE subgroups, clinical subgroups and adenosine levels. There were 1,815 patients undergoing angiography who had blood collected with adenosine quantified in 1,323. Of those quantified, 51.0% were revascularized and 7.3% experienced MACE in 12 months of follow‐up. Tertile‐based analysis failed to demonstrate any stratification of MACE rates (log rank, P = 0.83), when comparing low‐to‐middle (hazard ratio (HR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68–1.78, P = 0.70) or low‐to‐high adenosine tertiles (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.56–1.57, P = 0.84). In adjusted analysis, adenosine similarly failed to predict MACE. Finally, adenosine did not predict outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome nor in those revascularized or treated medically. Plasma adenosine levels do not predict subsequent CV outcomes or aid in patient risk stratification.

BackgroundThe availability of novel agents (NAs), including blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), has improved the outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Because of the relative effectiveness, it is often a challenge for clinicians to determine how to best sequence these NAs with respect to efficacy and toxicity.MethodsIn this multicenter, retrospective study of patients with RR ALL treated with blinatumomab, InO, or both, their efficacy as a first or second NA was compared.ResultsAmong 276 patients, 221 and 55 received blinatumomab and InO, respectively, as a first NA therapy. The complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 65% and 67% for the blinatumomab and InO groups, respectively (P = .73). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was 4% and 7% in the blinatumomab and InO groups, respectively. Ninety‐two patients (43%) in the blinatumomab group and 13 patients (29%) in the InO group proceeded with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The median overall survival (OS) was 15 and 11.6 months in the blinatumomab and InO groups, respectively. A subset analysis was performed for 61 patients who received both NAs (blinatumomab and then InO [n = 40] or InO and then blinatumomab [n = 21]). The CR/CRi rate was 58% for patients who received InO as the second NA and 52% for patients who received blinatumomab as the second NA. The median OS was 10.5 for patients who received InO as the second NA and 5.9 months for patients who received blinatumomab as the second NA (P = .09).ConclusionsAlthough the limited power of this study to detect a significant difference between subgroups is acknowledged, the data suggest that blinatumomab and InO may have comparable efficacy as a first or second NA therapy in RR ALL.

Medical conditions co-occurring with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are associated with outcomes, and comorbidity indices such as Charlson and Elixhauser are used in TBI research, but they are not TBI specific. The purpose of this research was to develop an index or indices of medical conditions, identified in acute care after moderate to severe TBI, that are associated with outcomes at rehabilitation discharge. Using the TBI Model Systems National Database, the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes of 8988 participants were converted to Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) diagnostic categories. Poisson regression models were built predicting Disability Rating Scale and Functional Independence Measure Cognitive and Motor subscale scores from HCUP categories after controlling for demographic and injury characteristics. Unweighted, weighted, and anchored indices based on the outcome models predicted 7.5–14.3% of the variance in the observed outcomes. When the indices were applied to a new validation sample of 1613 cases, however, only 2.6–6.6% of the observed outcomes were predicted. Therefore, no models or indices were recommended for future use, but several study findings are highlighted suggesting the importance and the potential for future research in this area.

Background. There is limited information concerning whether social determinants of health affect postliver transplant (LT) outcomes. This study aims to understand to what extent the health of LT recipients’ counties of residence influence long-term LT outcomes. Methods. We used the United Network for Organ Sharing data to identify adult LT recipients transplanted between January 2010 and June 2018. Patient-level data were matched to county-level County Health Ranking (CHR) data using transplant recipient zip code, and nationwide CHRs were created. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations between CHRs and graft and patient survival post-LT. Results. Health outcomes rank was significantly associated with posttransplant graft and patient survival, with worst tertile counties showing a 13% increased hazard of both graft failure and patient mortality compared to the best tertile counties. Conclusions. Although county health is associated with LT outcomes, it also appears that LT recipient selection is effective at mitigating major disparities based on county of residence and helps yield equitable outcomes in this respect.

Abstract Background Glioblastomas (GBMs) are the main primary brain tumors in adults with almost 100% recurrence rate. Patients with lateral ventricle proximal GBMs (LV-GBMs) exhibit worse survival compared to distal locations for unknown reasons. One hypothesis is the proximity of these tumors to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and its chemical cues that can regulate cellular phenotype. We therefore investigated the role of CSF on GBM gene expression and the role of a CSF-induced gene, SERPINA3, in GBM malignancy in vitro and in vivo. Methods We utilized human CSF and GBM brain tumor-initiating cells (BTICs). We determined the impact of SERPINA3 expression in glioma patients using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. SERPINA3 expression changes were evaluated at mRNA and protein levels. The effects of knockdown (KD) and overexpression (OE) of SERPINA3 on cell migration, viability and cell proliferation were evaluated. Stem cell characteristics on KD cells were evaluated by differentiation and colony formation experiments. Tumor growth was studied by intracranial and flank injections. Results GBM-CSF increased BTIC migration accompanied by upregulation of the SERPINA3 gene. In patient samples and TCGA data, we observed SERPINA3 to correlate directly with brain tumor grade and indirectly with GBM patient survival. SERPINA3 KD induced a decrease in cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and stem cell characteristics, while SERPINA3 OE increased cell migration. In vivo, SERPINA3 KD BTICs showed increased survival in a murine model. Conclusions SERPINA3 plays a key role in GBM malignancy and its inhibition results in a better outcome using GBM preclinical models.