Citations

SummaryBackgroundCurrent approaches to the detection of colorectal neoplasia associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD‐CRN) are suboptimal.AimTo test the feasibility of using stool assay of exfoliated DNA markers to detect IBD‐CRN.MethodsThis investigation comprised tissue and stool studies. In the tissue study, gene sequencing and methylation assays were performed on candidate genes using tissue DNA from 25 IBD‐CRNs and from 25 IBD mucosae without CRN. Mutations on p53, APC, KRAS, BRAF or PIK3CA genes were insufficiently informative, but several aberrantly methylated genes were highly discriminant. In the stool study, we evaluated candidate methylated genes (vimentin, EYA4, BMP3, NDRG4) in a prospective blinded study on buffered stools from 19 cases with known IBD‐CRN and 35 age‐ and sex‐matched IBD controls without CRN. From stool‐extracted DNA, target genes were assayed using quantitative allele‐specific real‐time target and signal amplification method.ResultsIBD‐CRN cases included 17 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and two with Crohn's disease (CD); nine had cancer and 10 had dysplasia. Controls included 25 with UC and 10 with CD. Individually, BMP3, vimentin, EYA4 and NDRG4 markers showed high discrimination in stools with respective areas under the ROC curve of 0.91, 0.91, 0.85 and 0.84 for total IBD‐CRN and of 0.97, 0.97, 0.95 and 0.85 for cancer. At 89% specificity, the combination of BMP3 and mNDRG4 detected 9/9 (100%) of CRC and 80% of dysplasia, 4/4 (100%) of high grade and 4/6 (67%) of low grade.ConclusionThese findings demonstrate the feasibility of stool DNA testing for non‐invasive detection of colorectal neoplasia associated with inflammatory bowel disease.

Abstract Aberrantly methylated genes represent attractive and broadly informative markers for colorectal cancer (CRC). As demographics, numerous ingestants, environmental exposures, and obesity variably influence both gene methylation rates and CRC incidence, it is important to understand the effects of such covariates on the clinical performance of CRC screening tests that incorporate assay of methylated gene markers. Based on a recent multicenter study (Ahlquist et al. Gastroenterology 2012 (in press)), stool assay of carefully selected methylated gene marker candidates (NDRG4, BMP3, vimentin, TFPI2), alone or in combination, yield high detection rates of both CRC and large adenomas. Aim: To assess the impact of demographic, exposure, body mass, and other patient variables on stool levels of the above 4 methylated gene markers. Methods: We studied buffered stools collected within 3 years of a normal colonoscopy from 500 patients undergoing average-risk screening or polyp surveillance (median age 64 (range 44-85); 53% women). Upon receipt, stools were promptly homogenized, aliquoted, and frozen at –80°C. On supernatants from thawed/spun aliquots, target genes were purified by hybrid capture, bisulfite treated, and assayed using the analytically-sensitive QuARTS method (quantitative allele-specific real-time target and signal amplification), as described (above citation). The reference gene β-actin was assayed along with methylation of NDRG4, BMP3, vimentin, TFPI2. Log-converted data were normalized to allow comparison of effects between markers, and effect size was expressed as % change relative to standard deviation for each marker (standardized relative change (SRβ)). Results: The only patient characteristic that significantly influenced all methylated marker levels in stool was age (p<0.0001 for each marker); SRΔ was greatest with TFPI2 at +91.3 (p<0.001 vs other markers), least with BMP3 at +29.7 (p<0.001 vs others), and intermediate with vimentin at +46.0 and NDRG4 at +45.1. In contrast to methylation markers, levels of β-actin did not change across age. The other demographic variables of sex, race, and geographic residence had no effect on methylation markers. Marker levels were also not affected by exposure variables (smoking, alcohol consumption, or analgesic use), by family history of CRC or polyps, or by personal history of polyps. Finally, neither overweight status (n=176) nor obesity (n=148) had an effect on marker levels. Conclusions: Age significantly affects stool levels of tumor-associated methylated gene markers in colonoscopy-normal patients, and the degree of this age effect differs across markers. In contrast, other key patient variables had no effect on stool marker levels. Comment: Optimal use of these methylation markers for stool screening of CRC may require age-adjustment of normal cutoff levels to maximize test specificity. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3572. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3572