Citations

Abstract Cerebral malaria is the deadliest complication that can arise from Plasmodium infection. CD8 T-cell engagement of brain vasculature is a putative mechanism of neuropathology in cerebral malaria. To define contributions of brain endothelial cell major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I antigen-presentation to CD8 T cells in establishing cerebral malaria pathology, we developed novel H-2Kb LoxP and H-2Db LoxP mice crossed with Cdh5-Cre mice to achieve targeted deletion of discrete class I molecules, specifically from brain endothelium. This strategy allowed us to avoid off-target effects on iron homeostasis and class I-like molecules, which are known to perturb Plasmodium infection. This is the first endothelial-specific ablation of individual class-I molecules enabling us to interrogate these molecular interactions. In these studies, we interrogated human and mouse transcriptomics data to compare antigen presentation capacity during cerebral malaria. Using the Plasmodium berghei ANKA model of experimental cerebral malaria (ECM), we observed that H-2Kb and H-2Db class I molecules regulate distinct patterns of disease onset, CD8 T-cell infiltration, targeted cell death and regional blood–brain barrier disruption. Strikingly, ablation of either molecule from brain endothelial cells resulted in reduced CD8 T-cell activation, attenuated T-cell interaction with brain vasculature, lessened targeted cell death, preserved blood–brain barrier integrity and prevention of ECM and the death of the animal. We were able to show that these events were brain-specific through the use of parabiosis and created the novel technique of dual small animal MRI to simultaneously scan conjoined parabionts during infection. These data demonstrate that interactions of CD8 T cells with discrete MHC class I molecules on brain endothelium differentially regulate development of ECM neuropathology. Therefore, targeting MHC class I interactions therapeutically may hold potential for treatment of cases of severe malaria.

Abstract Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the main cause of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Ann Arbor (AA) scores derived from serum biomarkers at onset of GVHD quantify GI crypt damage; AA2/3 scores correlate with resistance to treatment and higher NRM. We conducted a multicenter, phase 2 study using natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks T-cell trafficking to the GI tract through the α4 subunit of α4β7 integrin, combined with corticosteroids as primary treatment for patients with new onset AA2/3 GVHD. Seventy-five patients who were evaluable were enrolled and treated; 81% received natalizumab within 2 days of starting corticosteroids. Therapy was well tolerated with no treatment emergent adverse events in >10% of patients. Outcomes for patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids were compared with 150 well-matched controls from the MAGIC database whose primary treatment was corticosteroids alone. There were no significant differences in overall or complete response between patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids and those treated with corticosteroids alone (60% vs 58%; P = .67% and 48% vs 48%; P = 1.0, respectively) including relevant subgroups. There were also no significant differences in NRM or overall survival at 12 months in patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids compared with controls treated with corticosteroids alone (38% vs 39%; P = .80% and 46% vs 54%; P = .48, respectively). In this multicenter biomarker–based phase 2 study, natalizumab combined with corticosteroids failed to improve outcome of patients with newly diagnosed high-risk GVHD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT02133924.

Importance During the COVID-19 pandemic, many US states issued or revised pandemic preparedness plans guiding allocation of critical care resources during crises. State plans vary in the factors used to triage patients and have faced criticism from advocacy groups due to the potential for discrimination. Objective To analyze the role of comorbidities and long-term prognosis in state triage procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data gathered from parallel internet searches for state-endorsed pandemic preparedness plans for the 50 US states, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico (hereafter referred to as states), which were conducted between November 25, 2021, and June 16, 2023. Plans available on June 16, 2023, that provided step-by-step instructions for triaging critically ill patients were categorized for use of comorbidities and prognostication. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence and contents of lists of comorbidities and their stated function in triage and instructions to predict duration of postdischarge survival. Results Overall, 32 state-promulgated pandemic preparedness plans included triage procedures specific enough to guide triage in clinical practice. Twenty of these (63%) included lists of comorbidities that excluded (11 of 20 [55%]) or deprioritized (8 of 20 [40%]) patients during triage; one state’s list was formulated to resolve ties between patients with equal triage scores. Most states with triage procedures (21 of 32 [66%]) considered predicted survival beyond hospital discharge. These states proposed different prognostic time horizons; 15 of 21 (71%) were numeric (ranging from 6 months to 5 years after hospital discharge), with the remaining 6 (29%) using descriptive terms, such as long-term. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of state-promulgated critical care triage policies, most plans restricted access to scarce critical care resources for patients with listed comorbidities and/or for patients with less-than-average expected postdischarge survival. This analysis raises concerns about access to care during a public health crisis for populations with high burdens of chronic illness, such as individuals with disabilities and minoritized racial and ethnic groups.

Background: The results of a recent pilot study suggest that steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) is safe and more effective in stone removal than basketing following laser lithotripsy. The objective of this retrospective study was to further assess the safety and efficacy of SURE using the CVAC ® Aspiration System (Calyxo, Inc., Pleasanton, CA) in patients with large stone burdens. Materials and Methods: Patients with a baseline stone burden of ≥10 mm who underwent SURE were identified. Subject demographics, secondary procedures, complications, and stone clearance (defined as percent baseline volume reduction) were evaluated. Subanalyses were performed to explore patients identified as high risk for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) because (1) they were on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy at the time of procedure or (2) they had limited mobility due to neurologic conditions. Results: Identified patients ( N = 43) had a mean preoperative stone burden of 29 ± 12 mm and mean stone volume of 3092 ± 5002 mm 3 . Approximately one-half of patients ( n = 24, 55.8%) had CT imaging at follow-up, and of those, 8 (33.3%) had no residual stones, 22 (91.7%) had >90% stone clearance, 23 (95.8%) had >80% stone clearance, and 24 (100%) had >60% stone clearance. Stone clearance based on baseline stone burden varied between 93.8% and 98.9%. At baseline, 21 patients were anticipated to require staged ureteroscopy; however, only two of those (9.5%) needed secondary procedures. High-risk patients ( n = 22) were on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy ( n = 12) or had neurologic conditions ( n = 10). Stone clearance was 97% among patients in the anticoagulated cohort with postoperative CT imaging and 83% in the neurologic condition cohort. There were no device-related complications and no postoperative admissions. Conclusions: The CVAC Aspiration System is safe and effective for treating large stone burdens, including in high-risk patients, and may decrease the need for PCNL or secondary procedures. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04519294.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab, an anti-α4β7 integrin approved for intravenous (IV) treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), was evaluated as a subcutaneous (SC) formulation in maintenance therapy for UC and CD in phase 3 VISIBLE 1, 2, and open-label extension studies, and recently approved in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy and safety of IV and SC vedolizumab in clinically relevant UC and CD scenarios. Methods Post hoc data analyses from VISIBLE trials examined: (1) whether baseline characteristics predict clinical response to 2 vs 3 IV vedolizumab induction doses; (2) efficacy and safety of switching during maintenance vedolizumab IV to SC in patients with UC; (3) vedolizumab SC after treatment interruption of 1–46 weeks; (4) increasing dose frequency of vedolizumab SC from every 2 weeks (Q2W) to every week (QW) after disease worsening. Results No baseline characteristics were identified as strong predictors of response to 2 vs 3 vedolizumab infusions. Most patients achieved clinical response after 2 or 3 doses of IV vedolizumab maintained with SC treatment. Clinical remission and response rates were maintained in patients transitioned from maintenance vedolizumab IV to SC treatment. Of patients with UC, ≥75% achieved response following resumption after dose interruption. Escalation to QW dosing resulted in ≥45% of patients regaining response after loss while receiving vedolizumab Q2W. Conclusions Clinical real-world scenarios with vedolizumab SC were reviewed using VISIBLE studies data. Vedolizumab SC provides an additional dosing option for patients with UC and CD.

Abstract Bone marrow is a primary immune organ responsible for stem cell maintenance and hematopoiesis. While the bone marrow niche is mainly studied in the context of hematopoiesis, aging, and mechanisms underlying stem cell and plasma cell survival, changes of the niche during brain viral infections and primary T cell responses is unknown. Intracranial infection with the neurotropic Theiler’s Murine Encephalomyelitis Virus (TMEV) results in an acute infection in the C57BL/6 mouse which is cleared 30 days post infection due to generation of an antigen specific CD8 T cell response raised against the immunodominant epitope VP2121–130. We determined that 7–10% of CD8 T cells present in the sternal and femoral bone marrows and 15–20% in the cranial bone marrow were antigen specific 7 days post intracranial TMEV infection. Over 70% of these CD8 T cells were located outside of the vasculature as determined by IV labeling. Importantly, continuous treatment with FTY720, which sequesters T cells outside of the blood, did not eliminate antigen specific CD8 T cells in any bone marrow compartment. CD8 T cells in the bone marrow established durable memory following viral clearance and were reactivated upon cognate antigen reencounter. Both acute TMEV infection and antigen specific reactivation caused an increase in lineage−, Sca-1+, ckit+ (LSK) cells in the bone marrow. This LSK dysregulation was abrogated upon CD8 T cell depletion. We conclude that brain viral infections induce in situ effector and memory T cell responses within the bone marrow compartment. Both acute and memory recall CD8 T cell responses cause stem cell dysregulation. Our data hence paves the way for crucial studies of bone marrow resident antigen specific CD8 T cells in health and disease. Supported by grants from NIH (K99NS117799-01A1 (KA), R01NS103212 (AJJ), and RF1NS122174(AJJ)