Citations

Clear

192 citation(s) found for "Razonable, Raymund R".

Clinical Diagnostic Testing for Human Cytomegalovirus Infections
Inoue, Naoki , Pinninti, Swetha , Boppana, Suresh B. , Simonazzi, Giuliana , Pellett, Philip E. , Schmid, D. Scott , Razonable, Raymund R. , Lazzarotto, Tiziana , Gabrielli, Liliana

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Infectious Diseases | November 22, 2019 | Volume: 221 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: S74-S85

10.1093/infdis/jiz601 | PMID 32134488 Get It

Abstract Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infections are among the most common complications arising in transplant patients, elevating the risk of various complications including loss of graft and death. HCMV infections are also responsible for more congenital infections worldwide than any other agent. Congenital HCMV (cCMV) infections are the leading nongenetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss and a source of significant neurological disabilities in children. While there is overlap in the clinical and laboratory approaches to diagnosis of HCMV infections in these settings, the management, follow-up, treatment, and diagnostic strategies differ considerably. As yet, no country has implemented a universal screening program for cCMV. Here, we summarize the issues, limitations, and application of diagnostic strategies for transplant recipients and congenital infection, including examples of screening programs for congenital HCMV that have been implemented at several centers in Japan, Italy, and the United States.
290. Hepatitis E Virus Serostatus: A Retrospective Assessment of Demographics and Comorbidities to Assess High-risk Populations
Stone, Eric C, Garrigos, Zerelda Esquer , Stone, Eric C., Sohail, M. Rizwan , Razonable, Raymund R. , O’Horo, John C.

Mayo Clinic

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | October 23, 2019 | Volume: 6 | Issue: Supplement_2 | Pages: S158-S158

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.365 Get It

Abstract Background Demographic and epidemiologic characteristics of Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infected patients in the United States are not well-described. HEV infection may result in severe complications and lead to chronic infection and cirrhosis, especially in immunocompromised patients. There are no widely accepted guidelines for HEV screening and testing in the United States. Identifying traits of known seropositive patients and comorbidities may inform better screening and prevention strategies. In this study, we describe rates of liver disease, transplant status, chronic kidney diseases, and diabetes mellitus among patients serologically tested for HEV at our institution. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients for whom HEV IgM or IgG serologic testing was performed across the Mayo Clinic enterprise using the Advanced Cohort Explorer tool. For patients with any documented HEV serologic test, we abstracted baseline patient characteristics and underlying comorbidities at the time of testing. We then grouped subjects according to serologic testing results by antibody type. Survival at one year from date of testing was also assessed. Results A total of 979 unique subjects were identified. The preponderance of subjects was Caucasian (781, 79.8%). Of subjects tested for HEV with serology, 123 (12.6%) had any positive serology. Breakdown of baseline characteristics and selected comorbidities are summarized in Table 1. The largest proportion of subjects, 458 (46.8%), were both IgG and IgM negative and 432 subjects received only IgM or IgG testing. Liver disease was more prevalent in patients with positive vs. negative testing (5.8% vs. 2.1%) as was higher age (average 55.1 years vs. 52.2). One-year survival was similar in all groups. Conclusion HEV serology is not commonly tested. Among those tested, seropositivity is uncommon. Our data show higher HEV seropositivity in older adults, which may represent increase risk of exposure over time. Higher percentage of positive testing was also observed in subjects with liver disease, which may indicate a possible etiologic association. Further population-based studies are needed to estimate prevalence of HEV infection and associated liver disease, outcomes in infected patients, and indications for testing in at-risk populations. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
1752. Differential Degree and Duration of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Viremia Between WHO International Standard-Calibrated Quantitative CMV Nucleic Acid Tests: Implications for Clinical Care
Meesing, Atibordee , Yao, Joseph D. , Germer, Jeffrey J., Gartner, Michelle L, Digmann, Benjamin, Razonable, Raymund R.

Mayo Clinic

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | October 23, 2019 | Volume: 6 | Issue: Supplement_2 | Pages: S642-S643

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1615 Get It

Abstract Background Quantitative nucleic acid amplification (QNAT) tests are cornerstone for the management of CMV disease after organ transplantation. We assessed the potential impact of viral load results obtained by two commercial WHO international standard-calibrated NAT in solid-organ (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Methods Sixty-four patients (36 SOT and 28 HSCT) had plasma CMV viral load assessed using the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan CMV Test (CAP/CTM; lower limit of quantification [LLoQ] at 137 IU/mL) and cobas 6800 System (cobas CMV; LLoQ at 35 IU/mL). Viral load values were correlated with clinical course and outcomes. Results Forty-three of 64 patients (67.2%) had CMV infection or disease (asymptomatic, 67.4%; gastrointestinal disease, 16.3%; pneumonitis 4.7%) at median of 4.4 months (IQR 1.4 to 7.7) from transplantation. At CMV infection diagnosis, viral load results (mean ± SD) were almost two-fold higher when measured by cobas CMV (19,456 ± 51,618 IU/mL) compared with CAP/CTM (10,504 ± 27,744 IU/mL; P = 0.04). Time to onset of CMV viremia was significantly shorter (11.5 days; P < 0.001) while viral clearance was significantly longer (12.75 days; P < 0.001) by cobas CMV when compared with CAP/CTM. Persistent viremia was observed with cobas CMV in 44% of patients at the time of first negative results by CAP/CTM. Patients with negative results by cobas CMV at the end of antiviral treatment had a significantly lower need for re-treatment (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.99, P = 0.05). Conclusion Our study highlights significant differences between CMV QNAT assays despite calibration to the WHO-international standard. The significant differences in the degree (almost two-fold), time to onset (12 days difference) and clearance (13 days difference) of CMV viremia between two automated commercial QNAT assays have direct implications in the care of transplant recipients. Persistence of low-level viremia was observed in samples that reached negative threshold by CAP/CTM, when tested using the more sensitive cobas CMV. Clearance of CMV viremia, when assessed by the more sensitive cobas CMV, was significantly associated with a lower need for re-treatment. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
1691. Cryptococcus Species Other than C. neoformans and C. gattii: Are They Clinically Significant?
Cevallos, Edison Cano , Cano Cevallos, Edison Jose , Yetmar, Zachary A. , Razonable, Raymund R.

Mayo Clinic

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | October 23, 2019 | Volume: 6 | Issue: Supplement_2 | Pages: S619-S619

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1555 Get It

Abstract Background Cryptococcus sp. is a major cause of opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients, with nearly all cases due to C. neoformans or C. gattii. There are occasional reports of other Cryptococcus species causing invasive human disease. However, their epidemiology and clinical significance are not fully defined. We sought to describe the patients with cultures positive for Cryptococcus species other than neoformans and gattii. Methods A retrospective descriptive review of patients with cultures growing Cryptococcus species other than neoformans and gattii from November 2011 to February 2019. Clinical and laboratory data were analyzed. Results Out of 177 cases with a culture positive for Cryptococcus sp., 54 patients (mean age, 53.3 years; 61% men) had a culture for Cryptococcus other than neoformans and gattii. The most common species were unspecified non-neoformans/gattii (10), magnus (9), laurentii (8), and ater (7). Three patients had active malignancies and 15 were on immunosuppressive drugs, 6 due to transplant. The most common sites or specimens were skin (16), respiratory (16), urine (7), joint (3), intravascular catheter (2), cerebrospinal fluid (2), oral (2), peritoneal fluid, donor liver transplant, bone marrow, sinus, nail, and cornea. Whereas 21 (38.9%) cultures were obtained due to local symptoms, there was only one case of invasive disease, affecting the peritoneum, while the majority was either unaddressed (25) or considered contaminants (17). Only 12 patients received antifungal treatment, where sources were skin (4), oral (2), peritoneum, donor liver, respiratory, vascular catheter, urine, and nail. Antifungal drugs were fluconazole, itraconazole, clotrimazole, caspofungin, and griseofulvin, for a mean duration of 37.6 days. Among patients who were not treated, four died within 6 months but mostly of unrelated causes (3) or not known (1). Conclusion This large series of patients with Cryptococcus sp. other than neoformans and gattii suggests that these species rarely cause clinically significant infection in humans. Only one case of invasive disease was found. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Early CMV Infection Detected By Quantitative Nucleic Acid Testing (QNAT) Is Associated with Lower Risk of Relapse after Reduced Intensity, but Not Myeloablative, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Torghabeh, Mehrdad Hefazi, Al‐Kali, Aref , Hashmi, Shahrukh K. , Litzow, Mark R. , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Hefazi, Mehrdad , Damlaj, Moussab , Alkhateeb, Hassan B. , Razonable, Raymund R. , Hogan, William J.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | October 11, 2019 | Volume: 126 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 1913-1913

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1913.1913 Get It

Abstract Background The impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection on the risk of relapse after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) remains controversial, with some studies demonstrating lower risk (Green et al, Blood 2013), while others demonstrating no impact (Schmidt-Hieber et al, Blood 2013), or lower relapse risk only in myeloablative (MA) (Manjappa et al, BBMT, 2014) or in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) (Cichocki et al, ASH 2014) HCT. Furthermore, the majority of studies have used antigenemia for CMV monitoring, while there is limited data with the use of Quantitative Nucleic Acid Testing (QNAT). Aim To determine the impact of CMV infection, as detected by QNAT, on transplant-related outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), stratified by MA or RIC HCT. Methods After IRB approval, consecutive adults with AML who underwent allogenic HCT from HLA-matched peripheral blood (PB) grafts at our institution between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. All grafts were T-cell replete. Early CMV infection was defined as any positive CMV result by PCR assay during the first 100 days post HCT. Relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with and without CMV infection, and stratified according to MA or RIC. DFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared with log-rank test. Cumulative incidence of relapse and NRM were analyzed as competing events, using Gray's test. Multivariable analyses adjusting for patient's age, disease status at transplant, cytogenetic risk, and ABO incompatibility were performed using Cox's proportional hazards regression, and the Fine and Gray approach. Results A total of 190 consecutive patients, including 94 (49%) MA and 96 (51%) RIC HCT were analyzed. Patients, disease, and transplant characteristics are shown in table 1. Of the 94 MA HCT (median age 45 y, 50% male), 66 (70%) received total body irradiation. After a median follow up of 18 m, 36 (38%) CMV infection, 16 (17%) relapses, 22 (23%) NRM and 35 (37%) deaths occurred in the MA group. Median time to CMV infection and to relapse in this group was 38 (range 8-241) and 140 (29-1690) days, respectively. Among the recipients of MA HCT, patients with early CMV infection showed no difference in the RI (figure 1), but had a significant trend towards higher NRM and significantly lower DFS and OS in both univariate and multivariable analysis (figure 2) (P values shown in table 2). Among 96 RIC HCT (median age 59 y, 56% male), fludarabine plus melphalan was used in 62 (65%) and fludarabine plus busulfan in 34 (35%) patients. In this group, early CMV infection occurred in 33 (34%), relapse in 25 (26%), NRM in 25 (26%), and deaths in 46 (48%) patients after a median follow up of 21 m (1-91 m). Among the recipients of RIC HCT, median time to CMV infection and to relapse was 40 (17-175) and 291 (19-1971) days, respectively. In the RIC group, early CMV infection was associated with a significant trend towards lower RI (figure 1) and higher NRM in both univariable and multivariable analysis, but no difference in DFS and OS (figure 2). Conclusion Our study of a large homogenous group of AML patients who underwent a uniform HLA-matched PB HCT demonstrates a significantly lower risk of relapse associated with early CMV infection detected by QNAT following RIC, but not MA HCT. Early CMV infection in MA HCT is associated with higher NRM and therefore inferior survival, whereas in the RIC HCT, there is no impact on survival as the benefit of lower relapse is offset by the higher NRM. Table 1. Patients, disease and transplant characteristics according to CMV infection All Patients Patients with CMV Viremia Patients without CMV Viremia P value Patients, no (%) 190 (100) 69 (36) 121 (64) - Median age, y (range) 54 (18-72) 54 (26-70) 54 (18-72) 0.75 Male Patients, no (%) 104 (55) 30 (43) 74 (61) 0.02 D/R CMV Serostatus, no (%) <0.0001 -/- 29 (15) 1 (1) 28 (23) +/+ 64 (34) 35 (51) 29 (24) +/- 13 (7) 1 (1) 12 (10) -/+ 84 (44) 32 (47) 52 (43) Conditioning 0.65 MA 96 (51) 33 (48) 63 (52) RIC 94 (49) 36 (52) 58 (48) Disease status at Transplant 0.96 CR1 129 (68) 46 (67) 83 (69) CR2 34 (18) 13 (19) 21 (17) Other 27 (14) 10 (14) 17 (14) Cytogenetic 0.65 Favorable 8 (4) 2 (3) 6 (5) Intermediate 130 (68) 46 (67) 84 (69) Unfavorable 52 (28) 21 (30) 31 (26) Disclosures Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding.
Treatment of latent TB Infection and the risk of tuberculosis after solid organ transplantation: Comprehensive review
Abad, Cybéle Lara R. , Deziel, Paul J. , Razonable, Raymund R. , Razonable, Raymund R

Mayo Clinic

Transplant Infectious Disease | September 21, 2019 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/tid.13178 | PMID 31541575 Get It

Abstract Background Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease may occur after treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI). Prompted by a case of reactivation TB disease in a solid organ transplant (SOT) recipient who received LTBI treatment, we reviewed the literature to examine outcomes, adverse effects, resistance, and treatment choices of tuberculosis after LTBI therapy. Methods MEDLINE and Web of Science from inception to 5/2019 were reviewed using key words “latent tuberculosis infection” and “SOT” or “transplantation.” The search yielded nine cases, 41 cohort studies and six randomized controlled trials (RCT). Results Cohort and RCT demonstrated significant reduction in TB disease among transplanted patients who received LTBI therapy; only 56/2651 (2.1%) SOT patients developed TB after LTBI therapy. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 149/1148 (12.9%) and 73/641 (11.4%) of cohort and RCT patients, respectively. Among liver recipients, 56/266 (21%) developed side effects, of which half (29/56, 51.8%) was INH‐related. There was no reported INH resistance. Conclusions Latent TB infection treatment is efficacious in SOT recipients at risk of TB disease. However, tuberculosis may still occur despite LTBI treatment. Hepatotoxicity associated with LTBI therapy is infrequent, although more commonly observed among liver recipients.
Safety considerations with current and emerging antiviral therapies for cytomegalovirus infection in transplantation
Helou, Guy El , El Helou, Guy , Razonable, Raymund R.

Mayo Clinic

Expert Opinion on Drug Safety | September 3, 2019 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1017-1030

10.1080/14740338.2019.1662787 | PMID 31478398 Get It

Differences in Duration and Degree of Cytomegalovirus DNAemia Observed With Two Standardized Quantitative Nucleic Acid Tests and Implications for Clinical Care
Meesing, Atibordee , Germer, Jeffrey J., Yao, Joseph D. , Gartner, Michelle L, Digmann, Benjamin, Digmann, Benjamin J, Razonable, Raymund R.

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Infectious Diseases | August 30, 2019 | Volume: 221 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 251-255

10.1093/infdis/jiz452 | PMID 31504626 Get It

AbstractCytomegalovirus (CMV) viral loads overall were 0.29 log IU/mL higher with cobas CMV for use on the cobas 6800/8800 System (cobas CMV) compared with Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan CMV Test (CAP/CTM CMV). Cytomegalovirus DNAemia was detected 11.5 days earlier by cobas CMV, whereas clearance was delayed by 12.8 days. Cytomegalovirus remained detectable by cobas CMV in 44.2% of patients at the time of viral clearance as determined by CAP/CTM CMV. Undetectable viral load by cobas CMV at end of treatment was associated with reduced risk for retreatment (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.99; P = .05).The use of different quantitative cytomegalovirus nucleic acid tests may affect direct patient care as a result of significant differences in reporting the degree of CMV DNAemia and the time to first detection and clearance of CMV DNAemia.
A Fatal Case of Disseminated Microsporidiosis Due to Anncaliia algerae in a Renal and Pancreas Allograft Recipient
Anderson, Neil W. , Muehlenbachs, Atis , Arif, Sana , Deziel, Paul J. , Wilhelm, Mark , Metcalfe, Maureen G., Pritt, Bobbi S. , Wilhelm, Mark P, Pritt, Bobbi S , Bruminhent, Jackrapong , Razonable, Raymund R. , Qvarnström, Yvonne

Mayo Clinic

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | July 8, 2019 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofz285 | PMID 31304191 Get It

Microsporidiosis is an emerging opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients. We report a case of fatal disseminated Anncaliia algerae infection in a profoundly immunosuppressed pancreas and kidney transplant recipient.
Antifungal prophylaxis in lung transplant: A survey of United States' transplant centers
Pennington, Kelly M. , Yost, Kathleen J. , Escalante, Patricio , Kennedy, Cassie C. , Kennedy, Cassie C , Razonable, Raymund R.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Transplantation | June 7, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/ctr.13630 | PMID 31173402 Get It

AbstractBackgroundAntifungal prophylaxis strategies for lung transplant recipients vary without consensus or standard of care. Our current study aims to identify antifungal prophylaxis practices in the United States.MethodsFrom November 29, 2018, to February 15, 2019, we emailed surveys to medical directors of adult lung transplant centers. An alternate physician representative was approached if continued non‐response after three survey attempts. Descriptive statistics were used to report findings.ResultsForty‐four of 62 (71.0%) eligible centers responded. All Organ Procurement and Transplantation Networks were represented. Only four (9.1%) centers used pre‐transplant prophylaxis for prevention of tracheobronchitis (3 of 4) and invasive fungal disease (4 of 4). Thirty‐nine of forty (97.5%) centers used post‐transplant prophylaxis: 36 (90.0%) universal and 3 (7.5%) pre‐emptive/selective prophylaxis. Most centers used nebulized amphotericin with a systemic agent (26 of 36, 72.2%). Thirty‐two of thirty‐six (88.9%) centers continued universal prophylaxis beyond the hospital setting. Duration of prophylaxis ranged from the post‐transplant hospitalization to lifelong with most centers (25 of 36, 69.4%) discontinuing prophylaxis 6 months or less post‐transplant.ConclusionMost United States' lung transplant centers utilize a universal prophylaxis with nebulized amphotericin and a systemic triazole for 6 months or less post‐transplant. Very few centers use pre‐transplant antifungal prophylaxis.