Citations

Clear

128 citation(s) found for "Kakar, Sanjeev".

Predicting Fracture Risk for Enchondroma of the Hand
Riester, Scott M. , Ramaesch, Rishi, Wenger, Doris E. , Wijnen, André J. van , Riester, Scott, Wenger, Doris, van Wijnen, Andre, Kakar, Sanjeev , van Wijnen, Andre J

Mayo Clinic

HAND | May 6, 2016 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 206-210

10.1177/1558944715626931 | PMID 27390564 Get It

Background: Enchondromas are benign cartilage tumors that can cause pathologic fractures involving the digits of the hand. The purpose of this study is to identify objective reproducible clinical criteria that are associated with fracture that can be used to guide clinical decision making. Methods: A total of 54 enchondroma cases involving the hand were retrospectively reviewed. Criteria examined included age, gender, the hand involved (left vs right), bone involved, the digit involved, and longitudinal percentage of the bone occupied by the lesion on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the fracture and nonfracture group in regard to age, the digit involved, bone involved, and the percentage of bone occupied by the lesion on AP radiographs. Conclusion: This investigation provides evidence that patient age, the affected finger, the affected bone, and the percentage of the bone occupied by the pathologic lesion on AP radiographs can be used to predict pathologic fracture risk for enchondromas.
Fiber/collagen composites for ligament tissue engineering: influence of elastic moduli of sparse aligned fibers on mesenchymal stem cells
Thayer, Patrick, Verbridge, Scott S. , Dahlgren, Linda A., Goldstein, Aaron S. , Kakar, Sanjeev , Guelcher, Scott A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A | April 2, 2016 | Volume: 104 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1894-1901

10.1002/jbm.a.35716 | PMID 27037972 Get It

What’s New in Hand Surgery
Kakar, Sanjeev

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery | March 16, 2016 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 511-516

10.2106/jbjs.15.01214 | PMID 26984920 Get It

Quality Measures in Upper Limb Surgery
Kamal, Robin N. , Akelman, Edward , Yao, Jeffrey , Ruch, David S. , Richard, Marc J. , Got, Christopher , Blazar, Philip , Ring, David , Ladd, Amy L. , Kakar, Sanjeev , Kamal, Robin N

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery | March 16, 2016 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 505-510

10.2106/jbjs.15.00651 | PMID 26984919 Get It

Background: Quality measures are now commonplace and are increasingly tied to financial incentives. We reviewed the existing quality measures that address the upper limb and tested the null hypothesis that structure (capacity to deliver care), process (appropriate care), and outcome (the result of care) measures are equally represented. Methods: We systematically reviewed MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines, the National Quality Forum, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the Physician Quality Reporting System for quality measures addressing upper limb surgery. Measures were characterized as structure, process, or outcome measures and were categorized according to their developer and their National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care (National Quality Strategy) priority as articulated by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Results: We identified 134 quality measures addressing the upper limb: 131 (98%) process and three (2%) outcome measures. The majority of the process measures address the National Quality Strategy priority of effective clinical care (90%), with the remainder addressing communication and care coordination (5%), person and caregiver-centered experience and outcomes (4%), and community/population health (1%). Conclusions: Our review identified opportunities to develop more measures in the structure and outcome domains as well as measures addressing patient and family engagement, public health, safety, care coordination, and efficient use of resources. The most common existing measures—process measures addressing care—might not be the best measures of upper limb surgery quality given the relative lack of evidence for their use in care improvement.
Multiple Volar Carpometacarpal Dislocations: Case Report/Review of the Literature
Cates, Robert A. , Rhee, Peter C. , Kakar, Sanjeev

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Wrist Surgery | March 10, 2016 | Volume: 05 | Issue: 03 | Pages: 236-240

10.1055/s-0036-1580602 | PMID 27468376 Get It

Stabilization of Volar Ulnar Rim Fractures of the Distal Radius: Current Techniques and Review of the Literature
O’Shaughnessy, Maureen , O'Shaughnessy, Maureen A, Shin, Alexander Y. , Kakar, Sanjeev

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Wrist Surgery | March 1, 2016 | Volume: 05 | Issue: 02 | Pages: 113-119

10.1055/s-0036-1579549 | PMID 27104076 Get It

Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism following Thoracolumbar Surgery: Analysis of 43,777 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005 to 2012
Sebastian, Arjun S. , Currier, Bradford L. , Nguyen, Emily C., Wagie, Amy E., Habermann, Elizabeth B. , Habermann, Elizabeth S, Kakar, Sanjeev , Nassr, Ahmad , Habermann, Elizabeth

Mayo Clinic

Global Spine Journal | February 17, 2016 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 738-743

10.1055/s-0036-1579553 | PMID 27853656 Get It

Study Design Retrospective clinical study of a prospectively collected, national database. Objective Determine the 30-day incidence, timing, and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) following thoracolumbar spine surgery. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File identified 43,777 patients who underwent thoracolumbar surgery from 2005 to 2012. Multiple patient characteristics were identified. The incidence and timing (in days) of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE) were determined. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify significant risk factors. Results Of the 43,777 patients identified as having had thoracolumbar surgery, 202 cases of PE (0.5%) and 311 cases of DVT (0.7%) were identified. VTE rates were highest in patients undergoing corpectomy, with a 1.7% PE rate and a 3.8% DVT rate. Independent risk factors for VTE included length of stay (LOS) ≥ 6 days (odds ratio [OR] 4.07), disseminated cancer (OR 1.77), white blood cell count > 12 (OR 1.76), paraplegia (OR 1.75), albumin < 3 (OR 1.73), American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 or greater (OR 1.54), body mass index > 40 (OR 1.49), and operative time > 193 minutes (OR 1.43). LOS < 3 days was protective (OR 0.427). Conclusions We report an overall 30-day PE rate of 0.5% and DVT rate of 0.7% following thoracolumbar spine surgery. Patients undergoing corpectomy were at highest risk for VTE. Multiple VTE risk factors were identified. Further studies are needed to develop algorithms to stratify VTE risk and direct prophylaxis accordingly.
The Role of Dynamic (4D) CT in the Detection of Scapholunate Ligament Injury
Breighner, Ryan , Moran, Steven L. , Berger, Richard A. , Zhao, Kristin D. , Breighner, Ryan E., Kakar, Sanjeev , Leng, Shuai , McCollough, Cynthia H. , Trentadue, Taylor P

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Wrist Surgery | January 18, 2016 | Volume: 05 | Issue: 04 | Pages: 306-310

10.1055/s-0035-1570463 | PMID 27777822 Get It

Challenging the Dogma of Tourniquet Pressure Requirements for Upper Extremity Surgery
Sarfani, Shumaila , Cantwell, Sean , Shin, Alexander Y. , Kakar, Sanjeev

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Wrist Surgery | January 15, 2016 | Volume: 05 | Issue: 02 | Pages: 120-123

10.1055/s-0036-1571281 | PMID 27104077 Get It

Putting the baby back in the bathwater
Gandhi, Rajiv , Perruccio, Anthony V. , Haddad, F. S., Kakar, Sanjeev

Mayo Clinic

The Bone & Joint Journal | November 3, 2015 | Volume: 97-B | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1456-1457

10.1302/0301-620x.97b11.36981 | PMID 26530644 Get It

Recently, several high impact randomised controlled trials have been published suggesting no greater benefit from orthopaedic surgery over conservative treatment, or limited surgical intervention. These studies can have profound effects on clinical practice, leading to the abandonment of previously widely-used operations. How do surgeons who believe these operations are beneficial over conservative treatment rationalise these findings, and justify their use with hospital administrators and health care funders who require evidence for the value and efficacy of surgical treatment? Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1456–7.