Citations

Abstract Background: In phase I/II clinical trials, the tamoxifen metabolite Z-endoxifen (ENDX) demonstrated substantial oral bioavailability and promising antitumor activity in endocrine-refractory estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer (ER+ BC) and other solid tumors, with ENDX plasma concentrations reaching as high as 5 µM, a concentration that far exceeds the ERα-targeting nanomolar concentrations. We previously identified protein kinase C beta 1 (PKCβ1), an oncogenic signaling kinase which regulates cell proliferation and tumorigenic transformation, as a novel ENDX receptor. ENDX-bound PKCβ1 (KD: 100 nM) and inhibited PKCβ1 kinase activity (IC50: 357 nM) in vitro, at concentrations achieved in phase I/II ENDX studies. Given the observations that ENDX induces antitumor activity in breast cancers resistant to endocrine therapies, including AIs, tamoxifen and fulvestrant, we postulated that ENDX may impact additional signaling pathways. Therefore, in this study we performed unbiased mass spectrometry to analyze the effects of ENDX on the phosphoproteome and total proteome. Methods: In estrogen unstimulated aromatase-expressing ER+/human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor negative (HER2-) MCF7AC1 breast cancer cells, the effects of ENDX on the phosphoproteome and total proteome were analyzed using ENDX concentrations achieved in tamoxifen treated patients (0.01 and 0.1 µM) and concentrations observed in the ENDX phase I/II trials (5 µM). NetWorKIN and RoKAI prediction tools were utilized to identify the upstream kinases of ENDX downregulated phosphoproteins. In estrogen unstimulated MCF7AC1 as well as in the ER+/HER2- T47D breast cancer cells, the ability of ENDX, tamoxifen, fulvestrant and PKC kinase inhibitor enzastaurin to block insulin or PKC agonist phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-stimulated AKTSer473 phosphorylation was analyzed by immunoblot (IB) assay. Additionally, ENDX effects on AKTSer473 phosphorylation in the MCF7AC1 xenograft model in vivo was analyzed by IB assay. Further, the effects of PKCβ1 silencing in MCF7AC1 cells and the effects of AKT inhibitor MK-2206 treatment on growth and AKTSer473 phosphorylation in the MCF7AC1 as well as long-term estrogen deprived T47D (T47D-LTED) cell lines were analyzed by cell proliferation and IB assays. Results: In MCF7AC1 cells unstimulated with estrogen, ENDX at 5 µM but not at 0.01 and 0.1 µM concentrations inhibited growth, and induced apoptosis, suggesting an ERα-independent effect. Further, ENDX at 5 µM displayed three-fold greater effects in downregulating the phosphoproteome compared to the other concentrations, with minimal impact on the total proteome. Protein kinase C beta (PKCβ) and AKT1 were identified as the prevalent upstream kinases for ENDX downregulated protein phosphorylations. Notably, in estrogen unstimulated MCF7AC1 and T47D cells, ENDX at 5 µM attenuated phosphorylation of AKTSer473 and AKT substrates in vitro in the presence of insulin and in vivo. In MCF7AC1 cells, PMA-induced phosphorylation of PKCβ1 as well as AKTSer473 and AKT substrate phosphorylations were blocked by ENDX at 5 µM, with ENDX inducing PKCβ1 protein degradation both in the presence of insulin and PMA. Further, ENDX effects on growth and AKTSer473 phosphorylation were phenocopied by siRNA-mediated PKCβ1 knockdown as well as treatment with the pan-AKT inhibitor, MK-2206. Notably, the potent PKCβ1 kinase inhibitor, enzastaurin, had no effects either on PKCβ1 protein degradation nor on downstream AKT signaling. Conclusion: Taken together, these findings suggest that ENDX may exert anticancer activity via dual effects on blocking ERα as well as by targeting PKCβ1 for degradation, thus suppressing AKT signaling and induction of apoptosis. These preclinical findings will be studied in a planned neoadjuvant trial comparing ENDX with exemestane and ovarian function suppression (EVANGELINE) that will activate in the Fall of 2022. Citation Format: Swaathi Jayaraman, Xinyan Wu, Krishna R. Kalari, Xiaojia Tang, Mary Kuffel, Elizabeth S. Bruinsma, Santosh Renuse, James N. Ingle, Joel Reid, Matthew Schellenberg, John Hawse, Akhilesh Pandey, Matthew P. Goetz. Endoxifen Downregulates AKT Phosphorylation Through Protein Kinase C Beta 1 in ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-04.

Abstract Introduction: Acquired ESR1 mutations (mutESR1) after long-term endocrine therapy drive treatment resistance, metastasis, and poor prognosis for patients (pts) with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Lasofoxifene (LAS), a selective estrogen receptor modulator, alone or with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) reduced tumor growth better than fulvestrant (Fulv) in mutESR1 BC xenograft models. ELAINE 1 is a randomized trial of LAS vs Fulv in pts with mutESR1 and prior progression on aromatase inhibitor and CDK4/6i. Preliminary results (ESMO 2022) showed that LAS prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared with Fulv with a favorable safety profile. Here, we report changes in ESR1 ctDNA mutant allele frequency (MAF) from baseline to 8 wks and their associations with clinical benefit (CB) and mPFS. Methods: ELAINE 1 pts were randomized to oral LAS 5 mg daily or IM Fulv 500 mg on days 1, 15, and 29, then every 4 wks, until disease progression or severe toxicity. ctDNA mutESR1 mutations (baseline and 8 wks) were assessed using the Sysmex Inostics OncoBeam or SafeSeq assays—which detect mutESR1 at low allele fractions. MAF changes from baseline to wk 8 were characterized as decreased (decrease in ESR1 MAF or fully cleared), increased (increase in MAF), or equivocal (polyclonal patients [>1 mutESR1] with some increasing and decreasing MAF trends); correlations with PFS and CB were explored. Efficacy measures included objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and CB at 24 wks (CB defined as response or stable disease ≥24 wks). Results: 103 pts received LAS (n=52) or Fulv (n=51). Most common baseline ESR1 variants detected were D538G (56%), Y537S (39%), Y537N (29%), E380Q (22%); 56 (54%) pts were polyclonal. Of the 61 pts with evaluable baseline and wk 8 ctDNA, LAS decreased mutESR1 MAF in 29/35 pts (83% [11 complete clearance]) while Fulv decreased mutESR1 MAF in 16/26 pts (61.5% [6 complete clearance]) (Table). mPFS with LAS was 8 and 4 mos for pts with decreased/cleared MAF and increased MAF, respectively, and with Fulv was 4.5 and 2.8 mos, respectively (Table). LAS decreased the common mutESR1 variants more frequently than Fulv (median relative change -87.1% vs -14.7%). In pts with decreased MAF, CB was observed in 16/29 LAS pts (55%) and 4/16 Fulv pts (25%). The predictiveness of ESR1 MAF clearance for CB was also explored. Of 11 pts with ESR1 MAF clearance taking LAS, 10 achieved CB, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90.9%. In contrast, 2/6 pts with ESR1 MAF clearance taking Fulv had CB for a PPV of 33.3%. Sensitivity for predicting CB based on direction of ESR1 MAF change was 94% with LAS and 80% with Fulv. In pts with Y537S MAF (n=33), LAS decreased Y537S in 13/15 (87%), with a median relative MAF decrease of 89%. In marked contrast, Fulv increased Y537S MAF in 11/18 pts (61%), corresponding to an MAF relative increase of 82%. LAS and Fulv resulted in complete clearance of Y537S MAF in 33% and 6% of pts, respectively. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that LAS more effectively decreased or cleared mutESR1 than Fulv. Further, mutESR1 clearance was associated with prolonged PFS and more CB in LAS but not Fulv pts, suggesting that LAS results in robust mutESR1 target engagement. Taken together, our data suggest mutESR1 as a potential liquid biomarker for predicting response to LAS in mutESR1, endocrine-resistant mBC pts. Table. Change from baseline to week 8 in ESR1 MAF and clinical benefit at 24 weeks. CI, confidence interval; MAF, mutant allele fraction; ND, none detected; PFS, progression-free survival. Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Einav Gal-Yam, Daniel Stover, Sarah L. Sammons, Stephanie L. Graff, Grace Wang, Massimo Cristofanilli, Gary Riordan, Hillary S. Sloane, Dominic Carroll, Paul V. Plourde, David J Portman. Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with lasofoxifene or fulvestrant in the ELAINE 1 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-05-04.

Abstract Background: SG was approved in 2020 for the treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event in the ASCENT trial was neutropenia (51.2%) with a 6% incidence of febrile neutropenia. 1 Package insert recommendations do not endorse primary prophylactic growth factor support, rather only initiating if severe neutropenia occurs on treatment.2 Objective: This study retrospectively reviewed the utilization of growth factor support in patients (pts) with metastatic TNBC initiated on SG at each Mayo Clinic Enterprise site. Methods: We performed a multi-center, retrospective review of all pts with TNBC who received SG from January 2021 to December 2021 at Mayo Clinic sites in Minnesota, Florida, Arizona, and its community-based health system network. Data collected included history of neutropenia with previous cycles of SG resulting in a treatment delay, number of cycles, grade of neutropenia and cycle/day of treatment plan when growth factor added. Pts who received only one dose of SG were excluded. The Fisher’s exact test was utilized to compare the difference in the use of primary prophylaxis between sites. Results: 67 pts received at least two doses of SG. Within this cohort, 42 pts (63%) received growth factor support during treatment with SG. Growth factor support was most often added during the first two cycles (59.5%). A total of 12 patients initiated growth factor with no history of delays related to neutropenia and without neutropenia at the time of administration. Eleven of these pts had growth factor support added on Cycle 1 as primary prophylaxis. Primary prophylaxis was most common at Mayo Clinic – Rochester compared to the other sites (Table 1), however there was not a statistically significant difference (p=0.27). There were 26 pts (39%) with a treatment delay due to neutropenia while receiving SG, of which 21 (81%) were managed with the addition of growth factor (13 pegfilgrastim, 8 filgrastim). The median number of cycles for all pts was 5 (range: 1-25). Pts who received growth factor were treated with a median of 5 cycles (range: 1-25) and pts who did not receive growth factor were treated with a median of 4 cycles (range: 1-19) (p=0.10). Conclusions: We observed wide variability in the use of prophylactic growth factor between Mayo Clinic sites with SG. The optimal practice of growth factor use with SG warrants further exploration. References: 1. Bardia A, Hurvitz SA, Tolaney SM, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(16):1529-1541 2. Immunomedics, Inc. Trodelvy (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy) [package insert]. Foster City, CA: Gilead Sciences; 2020. Table 1: Grade of neutropenia for patients receiving SG when growth factor initiated Citation Format: Kaylee Clark, Jamie L. Carroll, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Brenda Ernst, Farah Raheem, Ashley Heil, Beth Boyer, Kristin Mara, Matthew P. Goetz, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Karthik V. Giridhar, Jodi Taraba. Mayo Clinic Enterprise patterns of growth-factor utilization for sacituzumab govitecan (SG)-induced neutropenia among patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-56.

Abstract Background: The role of chemotherapy in node positive (N+) luminal breast cancer (BC) is often debated, given low total pathologic complete response (pCR) rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and discrepancy in adjuvant chemotherapy benefit. A prior single institution study of cN+ luminal BC showed that pts age < 50 and tumor Ki-67 ≥ 20% had high nodal pCR (> 35%). This study’s goals were 1) to validate Ki-67 and age in relation to nodal pCR and 2) evaluate the prognostic impact of nodal pCR on overall survival (OS). Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database 2010-2019 for pts with cN+ ER+/HER2- BC treated with NAC and surgery. Breast pCR was defined as ypT0/ypTis and nodal pCR as ypN0/ypN0i+. Ki-67 was available in 2018 & 2019 only and was used to evaluate Ki-67 and nodal pCR. 2010-2018 data were used to evaluate nodal pCR and OS. OS was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: In 2018-2019, 4,801 pts were identified and 2,473 (51.5%) had Ki-67 available. Nodal pCR was 23.7% and was higher in pts < 50 years old (28.1% vs 21.1%) and in those with Ki67 ≥ 20% (28.4% vs 12.7%), both p < 0.001. Pts < 50 with Ki67 ≥ 20% had the highest nodal pCR at 31.7%, followed by age ≥ 50 with Ki67 ≥ 20% at 26.3%. With Ki67 < 20%, nodal pCR was 15.4% (in age < 50) and 11.3% (in age ≥ 50). From 2010-2018, we identified 20,084 cN+ ER+/HER2- BC pts treated with NAC. Total pCR was 7.4%, 14.3% had nodal pCR only, 3.8% had breast pCR only, and 74.5% had residual disease in breast and nodes. OS at 5 years was 79.1% and varied by NAC response: 90.8% with total pCR, 83.8% with nodal pCR only, 80.7% with breast pCR only, and 76.9% with residual disease in breast and nodes. Specifically nodal pCR (with or without breast pCR) was seen in 22.0% and was associated with 5-year OS rate of 86.4% compared to 77.1% without nodal pCR, p < 0.001. On multivariable analysis adjusted for other clinical and treatment factors, nodal pCR was associated with better OS (adjusted HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.50-0.61, p < 0.001) in all ages combined and within both the age < 50 and age ≥ 50 subgroups (see Table). In a subgroup of pts approximating RxPonder entry criteria (defined as cT1-3, N1, Grade I or II, ER+/PR+), results were consistent with the overall cohort: nodal pCR varied by both age (17.5% in age < 50 and 13.6% in age ≥ 50, p < 0.001) and by Ki67 ≥ 20% vs < 20% (16.8% vs 7.9%, p < 0.001) and nodal pCR remained prognostic for OS with adjusted HR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.50-0.81, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In cN+ ER+/HER2- BC treated with NAC, nodal pCR is more common in pts< 50 and those with high Ki-67 and is highly prognostic for OS. These data strongly suggest that NAC chemotherapy benefit should not be evaluated using total pCR rates in isolation, but for N+ pts to also consider nodal response. Given that nodal pCR is highly prognostic for OS, future neoadjuvant strategies should consider nodal pCR as a potential intermediate biomarker for long term survival. Multivariable analysis of factors associated with overall survival, including the adjusted effect of nodal pCR Citation Format: Dan Moldoveanu, Matthew P. Goetz, Tanya L. Hoskin, Courtney N. Day, Judy C. Boughey. Age, Ki-67, Nodal pCR and overall survival following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node Positive ER+/Her2- Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-01-22.

Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) exhibit high rates of recurrence and mortality. However, recent studies suggest that a subset of patients (pts) with early-stage TNBC enriched in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have excellent clinical outcomes even in the absence of systemic therapy. Additional histological biomarkers that could identify pts for future systemic therapy escalation/de-escalation strategies are of great interest. TNBC are frequently highly proliferative with abundant mitoses. However, classic markers of proliferation (manual mitosis counting and Ki-67) appear to offer no prognostic value. Here, we evaluated the prognostic effects of automated mitotic spindle hotspot (AMSH) counting on RFS in independent cohorts of systemically untreated early-stage TNBC. Methods: AMSH counting was conducted with a state-of-the-art deep learning algorithm trained on the detection of mitoses within 2 mm2 areas with the highest mitotic density (i.e. hotspots) in digital H&E images. Details of the development, training and validation of the algorithm were published previously [1] in a cohort of unselected TNBC. We obtained AMSH counts in a centrally confirmed TNBC cohort from Mayo Clinic [2] and focused our analysis on pts who received locoregional therapy but no systemic therapy. Using a fractional polynomial analysis with a multivariable proportional hazards regression model, we confirmed the assumption of linearity in the log hazard for the continuous variable AMSH and evaluated whether AMSH counts were prognostic of RFS. We corroborated our findings in an independent cohort of systemically untreated TNBC pts from the Radboud University Medical Center in the Netherlands (Radboud Cohort). Results are reported at a median follow-up of 8.1 and 6.7 years for the Mayo and Netherlands cohorts, respectively. Results: Among 182 pts with who did not receive systemic therapy in the Mayo Cohort, 140 (77%) with available AMSH counts were included. The mean age was 61 (range: 31-94), 71% were postmenopausal, 67% had tumors ≤ 2cm, and 83% were node-negative. As expected, most tumors were Nottingham grade 3 (84%) and had a high Ki-67 proliferation index (54% with Ki-67 >30%). Most tumors (73%) had stromal TILs ≤ 30%. The median AMSH count was 18 (IQR: 8, 42). AMSH counts were linearly associated with grade and tumor size, with the proportion of pts with grade 3 tumors and size > 2 cm increasing as the AMSH counts increased (p=0.007 and p=0.059, respectively). In a multivariate model controlling for nodal status, tumor size, and stromal TILs, AMSH counts were independently associated with RFS (p< 0.0001). For every 10-point increase in the AMSH count, we observed a 17% increase in the risk of experiencing an RFS event (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.26). We corroborated our findings in the Radboud Cohort (n=126). The mean age was 68 (range: 40-96), and 81% were node-negative. While the median AMSH count was 36 (IQR: 16-63), higher than in the Mayo Cohort (p=0.004), the prognostic impact was similar, with a significant association between AMSH count and RFS (p=0.028) in a multivariate model corrected for nodal status, tumor size, and stromal TILs. For every 10-point increase in the AMSH count in the Netherlands cohort, we observed a 9% increase in the risk of experiencing an RFS event (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17). RFS rates according to AMSH counts for both cohorts are shown in the Table. Conclusions: AMSH counting is a new proliferation biomarker that provides prognostic value independent of nodal status, tumor size, and stromal TILs in systemically untreated early-stage TNBC. Plans are underway to evaluate AMSH counts in additional cohorts of systemically untreated TNBC, and in other disease settings such as prior to neoadjuvant systemic therapy. If validated, this biomarker should be prospectively evaluated as a potential selection biomarker in clinical trials of systemic therapy de-escalation. References: 1. PMID: 29994086 2. PMID: 28913760 Table RFS according to AMSH counts in the Mayo and Radboud Cohorts Citation Format: Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Jodi M. Carter, David Zahrieh, Jason P. Sinnwell, Roberto Salgado, Vera Suman, David Hillman, Judy C. Boughey, Krishna R. Kalari, Fergus J. Couch, James N. Ingle, Maschenka Balkenkohl, Francesco Ciompi, Jeroen van der Laak, Matthew P. Goetz. Mitotic spindle hotspot counting using deep learning networks is highly associated with clinical outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer who did not receive systemic therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-34.

Abstract Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in ER+ breast cancer (BC) reduces local, distant, and contralateral BC events and improves overall survival (OS). Furthermore, decreased adherence or omission of ET increases the risk of death. However, in ER+ pts with early-stage BC treated with NAC who have a pathologic complete response (pCR), the importance of adjuvant ET may be called into question. We sought to examine the impact of ET omission on the survival of pts with ER+ BC treated with NAC, according to pCR vs residual disease. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2010-2018 for female pts with stage I-III ER+ BC treated with NAC followed by surgery. pCR was defined as ypT0/ypTis, ypN0. The percent receiving adjuvant ET and the impact of adjuvant ET omission on overall survival (OS) in patients with and without pCR were assessed separately based on HER2 expression. OS was analyzed with adjuvant ET as a time-dependent covariate using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: We identified 34,394 pts treated with NAC for ER+ BC (28,434 ER+/HER2-, 5960 ER+/HER2+). Pts with ER+/HER2+ BC were less likely than pts with ER+/HER2- BC to have received adjuvant ET (61.6% vs 88.8%, p< 0.001). Overall, 4505 (13.1%) had pCR (9.1% of ER+/HER2- and 32.0% of ER+/HER2+). Within each subtype, pts with pCR were significantly less likely to start adjuvant ET after surgery than pts with residual disease (78.4% vs 89.8% for ER+/HER2- and 46.5% vs 68.7% for ER+/HER2+, each p< 0.001), Table 1. Regarding those with residual disease, pts with ER+/HER2+ BC were less likely than ER+/HER2- BC to receive adjuvant ET (68.7% vs 89.8%, p< 0.001). Median follow-up was 4.4 years. Among pts with pCR, 5-year OS was 93.2% (95% CI: 92.1-94.4%) for ER+/HER2- BC and 94.3% (95% CI: 93.1-95.5%) for ER+/HER2+ BC (p=0.08), while among patients with residual disease 5-year OS was 81.7% (95% CI: 81.1-82.2%) and 85.7% (95% CI: 84.5-86.9%) for the two subtypes respectively (p< 0.001). On multivariable analysis, omission of adjuvant ET was significantly associated with poorer OS in patients with residual disease for both ER+/HER2- BC (adjusted HR 1.72, p< 0.001) and ER+/HER2+ BC (adjusted HR 1.63, p< 0.001). In contrast, omission of adjuvant ET was not significantly associated with OS in patients with pCR, regardless of HER2 status (ER+/HER2- adjusted HR 1.28, p=0.20; ER+/HER2+ adjusted HR 1.13, p=0.54), Table 1. Conclusions: In pts receiving NAC for ER+ BC, those with ER+/HER2+ disease were less likely to have received adjuvant ET compared to ER+/HER2- patients, regardless of pCR. In pts with residual disease after NAC, omission of adjuvant ET was associated with significantly higher risk of death. These data provide strong support for interventions to increase utilization of ET, especially for patients with residual disease following NAC. The observation that ET omission did not impact OS in pts with ER+ BC who achieve pCR following NAC is hypothesis generating and may have implications for future de-escalation trials for this subset of patients. Table 1. Differential use of adjuvant endocrine therapy by subtype and pCR and the impact on overall survival Citation Format: Grace M. Choong, Judy C. Boughey, Tanya L. Hoskin, Courtney N. Day, Matthew P. Goetz. Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) omission in ER+ breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-12.

Abstract Z-Endoxifen Allosterically Inhibits PKCβI and its Paradoxical Membrane Translocation Sayantani Sarkar Bhattacharya1, Taylor L. Witter1, Anh Q. T. Cong1, Elizabeth Bruinsma2, Swaathi Jayaraman2, Matthew P. Goetz2, John R. Hawse1, and Matthew J. Schellenberg1 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA 55905 2Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA 55905 Background: Z-Endoxifen (ENDX), the active metabolite of tamoxifen (TAM) and a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), exhibited high antitumor activity in endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive breast and other gynecologic cancer. ENDX has also been shown to be a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor. PKCs participate in diverse cellular functions and their activity is often elevated in breast tumors. Guided by mechanistic insights from our recently determined crystal structure of PKCβI, we sought to determine the effects of ENDX on PKCβI in a breast cancer cell line model. Methods: To determine how ENDX regulates PKC activity, we used a Z’LYTE kinase activity assay. This Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) based biochemical method can detect differential sensitivity of phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated peptides to proteolytic cleavage. We probed changes in activity for conventional and novel PKCs, as well as the purified catalytic domain of conventional PKCs in vitro. Alongside, as kinase activity of PKC relies on its spatial assembly, therefore we studied its intracellular localization using live cell confocal imaging. MCF7 cells expressing YFP-tagged PKCβI were grown in a glass bottom chamber and treated with ENDX and other modulators for relevant time and doses for this study. Images were taken using Zeiss LSM 780 confocal laser scanning microscope and analyzed in Zeiss-ZEN microscope software and GraphPad Prism 9. Results: Our data from an in vitro kinase assay indicates that ENDX inhibits the kinase activity of conventional (PKCβI) and novel (PKC𝛿) PKC isoforms with a similar IC50, however PKCβI catalytic domain is less sensitive to ENDX. We also identified a multi-domain mechanism of PKC inhibition through an allosteric inhibitory mechanism. Our live cell imaging study demonstrated that ENDX promotes the recruitment of PKCβI to the cell membrane in both a dose and time-dependent manner. Moreover, this translocation can also be mitigated by co-treatment with inhibitors of the PKC-regulator PHLPP phosphatases. Conclusion: Taken together, these results suggest the allosteric effects of ENDX trigger PKCβI recruitment to the cell membrane, yet since ENDX also inhibits kinase activity it suggests that ENDX triggers a non-productive interaction with the enzyme and "breaks" the well-known mechanism of PKC activation upon binding the cell membrane. Furthermore, ENDX is likely to trigger dephosphorylation and ultimately degradation, suggesting that ENDX represents a new mechanistic basis for targeting and downregulating PKC in cancer cells. Hence, the current study provides an integrated pattern of highly specific treatments regimen that can exploit PKCβI as a repurposing clinical target in breast cancer. Citation Format: Sayantani Sarkar Bhattacharya, Taylor L. Witter, Anh T. Cong, Elizabeth S. Bruinsma, Swaathi Jayaraman, Matthew P. Goetz, John Hawse, Matthew Schellenberg. Z-Endoxifen Allosterically Inhibits PKCβI and its Paradoxical Membrane Translocation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-24-03.

Abstract Introduction: We performed matched case-control studies utilizing cohorts of postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AI) on MA.27 [anastrozole, exemestane] or PreFace [letrozole] to assess the association between estrogen suppression after 6 months of treatment and an early breast cancer (EBC) event within 5 years of AI initiation (Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:2986-98). We found a significant 3.0-fold increase in risk of an EBC event for those taking anastrozole with levels of estrone (E1) ≥1.3 pg/mL and estradiol (E2) ≥0.5 pg/mL, but not for exemestane or letrozole. Given these findings we designed a prospective pharmacodynamic (PD) study to evaluate the impact of anastrozole (1 mg/day: ANA1) on E1 and E2 levels, and among those with inadequate estrogen suppression (IES: E1 ≥1.3 pg/mL and E2 ≥0.5 pg/mL), to evaluate the safety and PD efficacy of high-dose anastrozole (10 mg/day: ANA10), which has been found to be safe in prior clinical trials (Cancer 1998;83:1142-52). Methods: Post-menopausal women with stage I-III, ER ≥1% positive/HER2-negative breast cancer who were candidates for anastrozole were eligible after completion of locoregional therapy and chemotherapy, as clinically indicated. Women who were pre-menopausal at diagnosis were not eligible. All patients received 8-10 weeks of ANA1, after which those with adequate estrogen suppression (AES: E1< 1.3 pg/mL or E2< 0.5 pg/mL) came off study. Those with IES went on to receive ANA10 for 8-10 weeks, followed by letrozole (2.5 mg/day: LET) for 8-10 weeks. All patients were managed at their treating oncologist’s discretion following study discontinuation. E1 and E2 blood levels were measured pre-treatment and after completion of each treatment cycle by a CLIA-approved liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in the Immunochemical Core Laboratory at Mayo Clinic. With a sample size of 29 patients with IES after ANA1, a one-sided binomial test of proportions with a significance level of 0.05 will have an 87% chance of rejecting the proportion with AES after ANA10 is at most 25% (Ho) when the true proportion is at least 50%. Specifically, the null hypothesis is rejected if the number of women with AES after ANA10 is 12 or more. Data lock was July 6, 2022. Results: Of the 161 women enrolled from April 2020 through May 2022, 3 withdrew consent prior to start of ANA1 and 2 were ineligible; thus, 156 women comprised the study cohort. Median patient age was 64 years (range 44-86), 10% of patients were of Hispanic ethnicity and/or non-white race, and 15% received chemotherapy. Six patients remain on ANA1, and 10 discontinued ANA1 due to refusal (7), adverse event (AE) (2), or COVID-19 (1). Forty-one of the remaining 140 patients (29.3%; 95%CI: 21.9-37.6%) had IES with ANA1. Nine of these 41 patients did not go on to ANA10 due to refusal (6) or AE (3). Of the 32 patients who started ANA10, 8 remain on treatment, 5 discontinued due to refusal (3) or AE (1-grade 2 urinary tract infection; 1-grade 1 palpitations), and 19 had a blood draw 45 days or more after starting ANA10. No grade 3-5 AEs or grade 2 hot flashes or arthralgias were reported. Of these 19 patients, 14 achieved AES with ANA10 (73.7%; 95%CI: 48.8-90.9%). All 19 patients switched to LET of which 3 remain on treatment, 1 is missing E1/E2 data, and 15 had a blood draw 45 days or more after starting LET. Of these 15 patients, 10 maintained AES, 2 acquired AES with LET, and 3 no longer had AES. Anastrozole and letrozole drug levels will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: Approximately 29% of postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- BC receiving adjuvant anastrozole 1 mg/daily had IES. A majority of these patients achieved AES with dose escalation to ANA10 without tolerability issues. E1 and E2 levels are logical biomarkers given the mechanism of action of anastrozole, and further study utilizing them to determine the optimal dose of anastrozole for a given patient should be performed. Citation Format: Tufia C. Haddad, Vera Suman, Karthik V. Giridhar, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald Northfelt, Brenda Ernst, Kostandinos Sideras, Ciara C. O’Sullivan, Ravinder Singh, Zeruesenay Desta, Jodi Taraba, Barbara Goodnature, Matthew P. Goetz, Liewei Wang, James N. Ingle. Anastrozole dose escalation for optimal estrogen suppression in postmenopausal early stage breast cancer: A prospective trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-04-02.

Abstract Background: Adjuvant ET has been the standard of care for patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) EBC. A significant proportion of patients with increased risk still experience disease relapse despite available ET and more optimum ET is needed to prevent patients developing incurable metastatic cancer. Distant recurrence risk ranges from 20% to 40% after 5 years of adjuvant ET, depending on clinicopathological (clin-path) features at diagnosis. Consequently, there is a need to further optimize adjuvant treatment, particularly in those patients who are at increased risk of recurrence. Imlunestrant is an orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) with pure antagonistic properties and the potential to overcome ET resistance. In early phase trials, imlunestrant monotherapy showed favorable safety with pharmacokinetic (PK) exposures exceeding fulvestrant and preliminary efficacy in ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer patients (EMBER, Jhaveri 2022) along with robust biological/pharmacodynamic activity and tolerability in EBC (EMBER-2, Neven). Trial Design: EMBER-4 is a randomized, open-label, global phase 3 study comparing imlunestrant versus physicians’ choice of ET, in patients who are at an increased risk of recurrence based on clin-path features and who have received 2 to 5 years of standard adjuvant ET. Approximately 6,000 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive imlunestrant (400 mg daily) for 5 years or physicians’ choice of adjuvant ET (tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor, AI, dosed per label). Study treatment duration is 5 years. Males and pre-/peri-menopausal women will receive concomitant treatment with a GnRH agonist if receiving imlunestrant or an AI. Stratification factors include time from initial adjuvant ET, use of prior adjuvant cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, nodal status, menopausal status, and geographic region. Eligibility criteria: Eligible patients are adult males and females (pre-, peri- or postmenopausal) with ER+, HER2- EBC who have completed definitive locoregional therapy and have received 2 to 5 years of prior adjuvant ET without disease recurrence, but who are at increased risk of recurrence based on clin-path features at diagnosis. Prior (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy with a CDK4/6- or PARP- inhibitor is permitted. Study endpoints: The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), excluding second non-breast primary invasive cancers. Key secondary endpoints include distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, IDFS including second non-breast primary invasive cancers, safety, PK and patient reported outcomes. Recruitment for EMBER-4 begins globally in Q4 2022. Citation Format: Komal Jhaveri, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Fabrice Andre, Matthew P. Goetz, Nadia Harbeck, Miguel Martín, Francois-Clement Bidard, Zachary M. Thomas, Suzanne Young, Roohi Ismail-Khan, Lillian M. Smyth, Michael Gnant. EMBER-4: A phase 3 adjuvant trial of imlunestrant vs standard endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with ER+, HER2- early breast cancer (EBC) with an increased risk of recurrence who have previously received 2 to 5 years of adjuvant ET [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-02.

Abstract Background Adjuvant abemaciclib (a CDK4 and 6 inhibitor) combined with ET resulted in significant and clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high risk EBC in the monarchE trial, and is an approved adjuvant therapy for these patients. Here we present efficacy results from a pre-specified overall survival interim analysis (OS IA2) which was planned to occur 2 years (yrs) after the primary outcome analysis. Methods Pts were randomized (1:1) to receive ET for up to 10 yrs +/- abemaciclib for 2 yrs (study treatment period). High-risk EBC was defined as either ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALN), or 1-3 ALN with either Grade 3 disease and/or tumor ≥5 cm (Cohort 1). While the proliferation biomarker Ki-67 was centrally assessed in all pts with available tissue sample, an additional smaller group of pts with 1-3+ ALN and central Ki-67 ≥20% as the only high-risk feature were included (Cohort 2). The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of both Cohort 1 (5120 pts) and Cohort 2 (517 pts). Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard model. Results At a median follow-up of 42 months, all pts were off abemaciclib. IDFS and DRFS data illustrate a sustained benefit beyond the treatment period. In the ITT population, the HR for IDFS was 0.664 (95% CI: 0.578, 0.762) and DRFS was 0.659 (95% CI: 0.567, 0.767). At 4 yrs, this reflected an improvement in IDFS rates from 79.4% to 85.8% (absolute difference 6.4%), and in DRFS rates from 82.5% to 88.4% (absolute difference 5.9%). The continued separation of the curves was associated with an increase in absolute benefit in IDFS 4-year rates compared to 2-and 3-year IDFS rates (absolute difference 2.8% and 4.8% respectively). While OS remained immature, there was a lower number of deaths observed in the abemaciclib plus ET arm compared to the ET alone arm (157 [5.6%] vs 173 [6.1%], HR 0.929 [95% CI: 0.748, 1.153], p = 0.503), suggesting that the robust benefit in IDFS and DRFS began to translate into a numerically favorable OS HR. As previously described, within Cohort 1, a Ki-67 index of ≥20% was associated with a worse prognosis, but similar abemaciclib treatment effects were observed regardless of Ki-67 index. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion The clinically meaningful benefit of adjuvant abemaciclib added to ET in HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk EBC persists beyond completion of abemaciclib therapy, yielding an increase in absolute IDFS and DRFS benefit at 4 yrs. While OS remains immature at this time, the lower number of deaths in the abemaciclib arm compared to the ET arm suggest that a survival signal favoring abemaciclib is emerging. Citation Format: Stephen Johnston, Masakazu Toi, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Priya Rastogi, Mario Campone, Patrick Neven, Chiun Sheng Huang, Jens Huober, Georgina Garnica Jaliffe, Irfan Cicin, Sara Tolaney, Matthew P. Goetz, Hope Rugo, Elżbieta Senkus, Laura Testa, Lucia Del Mastro, Chikako Shimizu, Ran Wei, Ashwin Shahir, Maria Munoz, Belen San Antonio, Valerie Andre, Nadia Harbeck, Miguel Martín. Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer: results from a pre-planned monarchE overall survival interim analysis, including 4-year efficacy outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-09.