Citations

Purpose The time to complete oncology pharmacist tasks is needed to determine workload and productivity. The Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) and the Hematology/Oncology Practice and Research Network (PRN) of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) partnered with the aim of establishing consensus on the time required to complete oncology pharmacy tasks. Methods Fifteen patient care tasks and 9 non-patient care tasks, commonly completed by oncology pharmacists were each assigned an average amount of time to be completed. This list was then converted into 24 statements and the Delphi survey method was utilized with an expert panel to arrive at consensus between December 2023 and February 2024. Consensus was defined as at least 75% agreement. The complete manuscript was endorsed by HOPA and ACCP Hematology/Oncology PRN. Results Thirty-three pharmacist-experts agreed to participate in this survey with all participating in round 1, and 29 (87.9%) participating in round 2. In round 1, 9 tasks achieved consensus, with 7 of these being classified as patient care associated. Seven statements reaching 65% but less than 75% agreement were deemed to reach borderline consensus. Eight statements failed to achieve at least 65% agreement and were modified based on respondent feedback. In round 2, 15 statements were included with all achieving consensus. At the completion of round 2, all 24 statements reached consensus, and the survey was deemed complete. Conclusion This project produced the first comprehensive consensus statements for the average time for a US-based oncology pharmacist to complete common patient and non-patient care-related tasks.

Background: Cognitive change is an important factor in understanding dementia. Estimating effects of exposures on cognitive change requires choosing an analytical timescale, typically time on study or current age. There is limited consensus regarding timescale choice in epidemiologic cognitive aging research. Methods: Using a coordinated analytic approach in 10 cohorts of older adults, we evaluated whether estimated effects of two exposures on memory change differed depending on timescale (time on study or current age). We modeled effects of apolipoprotein-E (APOE) ε4 genotype (a time-invariant exposure) and diabetes (a potentially time-varying/acquired exposure evaluated at baseline) using mixed-effects models with linear and nonlinear time specifications for both timescales. Results: Among APOE ε4 carriers, model-estimated memory scores at baseline (time on study timescale) or at each cohort’s median baseline age (current age timescale) were lower, and the average rate of decline was faster than among APOE ε4 noncarriers. Model-estimated memory scores at baseline or at median baseline age were generally similar across baseline diabetes status, with variability across cohorts in the diabetes-memory change association. In some cohorts, trends in diabetes-memory change associations differed in direction across timescales. Conclusions: Timescale was largely inconsequential for estimated effects of APOE genotype, but yielded differences in estimated diabetes effects, raising questions about the appropriate scale. The current age scale may be problematic because diabetes was measured heterogeneously in age across individuals, a common issue in aging cohorts. Our work demonstrates approaches to evaluate alternative timescales, including in multicohort analyses, and highlights potential implications for estimated exposure effects on cognitive change.

Objective: To address whether kidney transplant (KTx) candidates, ages 60+, should accept a high Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) kidney and differences when considering a high (>85%) versus low (<85%) KDPI KTx. Background: To date, there is limited survival data to guide decision-making for patients aged ≥60 years who are faced with the choice of accepting a high KDPI kidney or remaining on the waitlist. Methods: Propensity-matched cohort study using data from United Network on Organ Sharing (2014–2021). Cox proportional hazard models and competing risk models allowed comparison of (1) patient survival on the waitlist or after KTx and (2) patient and graft survival after KTx for the second comparison between matched groups, stratified by age groups: 60 to 65, 66 to 70, and 71+. Results: Receiving a >85% KDPI kidney versus remaining on the waitlist was associated with reduced mortality [Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59–0.80, P < 0.001] overall and across the 2 oldest age groups: 66 to 70 (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44–0.73, P < 0.001) and 71+ (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.44–0.83, P < 0.001). Those aged 60 to 65 did not experience a survival benefit (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.67–1.11, P = 0.259). Patients ages 60+ receiving a >85% or ≤85% KDPI kidney experience comparable survival rates. Conclusions: Our study revealed a survival advantage linked to receiving a lower-quality KTx than remaining on the waitlist in the overall sample and for those 66+. Graft failure and survival were independent of the organ quality.

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsOne strategy to minimize the risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is to avoid an Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) mismatch through kidney paired donation. We aimed to estimate the incidence of PTLD in EBV‐negative kidney transplant recipients with EBV‐positive donors (D+/R−) and evaluate the excess risk of death following the occurrence of PTLD.MethodsWe included adult patients in OPTN database who underwent kidney transplants between 2012 and 2022. Cox regression analysis was employed to evaluate the impact of EBV serostatus on the development of PTLD, and to assess mortality following PTLD diagnosis in D+/R− individuals.ResultsA total of 179 068 patients were included, with 92.8% in the R+, 6.4% in the D+/R−, and 0.8% in the D−/R− group. D+/R− exhibited a significantly higher risk of PTLD compared to R+ and D−/R− groups. D+/R− had a greater risk of PTLD when compared to D−/R− recipients (aHR: 3.82; p < 0.001). Among D+/R− recipients, those who developed PTLD had a significantly higher risk of mortality (aHR: 2.28; p < 0.001 in deceased donor kidney transplant [DDKT] and aHR: 5.22; p < 0.001 in living donor kidney transplant [LDKT]).ConclusionsD+/R− recipients have nearly a fourfold higher risk of PTLD compared to D−/R− recipients, suggesting that choosing an EBV D−/R− transplant could reduce the PTLD risk by about 73%. This data is crucial for counseling EBV‐negative patients considering kidney paired donation to avoid an EBV serostatus mismatch.

Kidney transplantation remains the gold standard for managing end-stage kidney disease, providing superior survival and quality-of-life outcomes compared to dialysis. Despite the ongoing gap between organ availability and demand, it is inevitable that kidney transplantation will continue to grow. This is owed to broader organ sharing, increased comfort of transplant programs with marginal kidney utilization, and the expansion of paired exchange among living donor kidneys. The evolution of kidney transplantation could not have been possible without the availability of effective immunosuppressive regimens that prevent rejection and maintain graft function. Mycophenolic acid and calcineurin inhibitors continue to serve as the foundation of modern maintenance immunosuppression. While these agents have markedly reduced acute rejection rates, their long-term efficacy in graft survival remains suboptimal. Alternative immunosuppressive therapies, including belatacept and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, have demonstrated potential benefits. However, concerns regarding an increased risk of rejection have limited their widespread adoption as primary treatment options. In addition to ongoing efforts to refine steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor-sparing strategies, the identification of practical and quantifiable biomarkers for predicting long-term graft survival remains a critical objective. This review evaluates contemporary immunosuppressive protocols, highlights existing challenges, and explores future directions for optimizing long-term transplant outcomes.

Abstract Purpose: DROSHA, DGCR8, and DICER1 regulate miRNA biogenesis and are commonly mutated in cancer. Although DGCR8 and DICER1 germline pathogenic variants (GPV) cause autosomal dominant tumor predisposition, no association between DROSHA GPVs and clinical phenotypes has been reported. Experimental Design: After obtaining informed consent, sequencing was performed on germline and tumor samples from all patients. The occurrence of germline DROSHA GPVs was investigated in large pediatric and adult cancer datasets. The population prevalence of DROSHA GPVs was investigated in the UK Biobank and Geisinger DiscovEHR cohorts. Results: We describe nine children from eight families with heterozygous DROSHA GPVs and a diagnosis of pineoblastoma (n = 8) or Wilms tumor (n = 1). A somatic second hit in DROSHA was detected in all eight tumors analyzed. All pineoblastoma tumors analyzed were classified as miRNA processing–altered 1 subtype. We estimate the population prevalence of germline DROSHA loss-of-function variants to be 1:3,875 to 1:4,843 but find no evidence for increased adult cancer risk. Conclusions: This is the first report of DROSHA-related tumor predisposition. As pineoblastoma and Wilms tumor are also associated with DICER1 GPVs, our results suggest that the tissues of origin for these tumors are uniquely tolerant of general miRNA loss. The miRNA processing–altered 1 pineoblastoma subtype is associated with older age of diagnosis and better outcomes than other subtypes, suggesting DROSHA GPV status may have important clinical and prognostic significance. We suggest that genetic testing for DROSHA GPVs be considered for patients with pineoblastoma, Wilms tumor, or other DICER1-/DGCR8-related conditions and propose surveillance recommendations through research studies for individuals with DROSHA GPVs.

Key Points Patient-centered care in an interdisciplinary CKD clinic addresses complex needs and supports comprehensive CKD management. Implementation of an interdisciplinary CKD clinic reduced hospital admissions by 26%, emergency department visits by 30%, and increased nephrology consultations. Comprehensive care models with integrated registries enhance tailored interventions, leading to improved CKD management outcomes. Background CKD is a significant public health issue globally. Its progressive nature calls for innovative care models to mitigate disease progression and enhance patient outcomes. An interdisciplinary clinic model may offer comprehensive care tailored to the needs of patients with CKD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an interdisciplinary CKD clinic on disease progression, health care utilization, and social determinants of health (SDOH). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. The study included 534 patients enrolled in the CKD clinic between March 5, 2021, and May 31, 2022, excluding those who opted out of research. The intervention involved a clinical registry and an interdisciplinary team delivering evidence-based care pathways, patient education, shared decision making, and care coordination. The primary outcomes assessed were CKD progression and health care utilization, while secondary outcomes examined the effect of SDOH. Results At entry, the median age was 73 (interquartile range, 64–79) years, with 60% at stage 4 or lower. Clinic implementation correlated with a 26% decrease in hospital admissions (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 0.91; P = 0.004) and a 30% reduction in emergency visits (IRR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.87; P = 0.001). Nephrology consultations increased by 46% (IRR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.60; P < 0.001), reflecting enhanced specialized care. Lower exercise frequency and unemployment were linked to increased CKD progression and health care usage. Conclusions An interdisciplinary CKD clinic supported by a registry can potentially reduce health care utilization among patients with CKD, with SDOH playing a critical role in disease management.