Citations

5040 Background: PARPi have shown promise in mCRPC pts with mutations in DNA repair, but ATM- and BRCA2-altered pts may respond differently to PARPi. We hypothesized that differences may also exist for taxane therapy, aiding in treatment sequencing decisions. Methods: mCRPC pts (N = 137) with deleterious ATM or BRCA2 mutations who received taxanes, PARPi, or both were identified from 8 US academic centers. Demographic, treatment, and survival data were collected. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed for time-to-treatment-discontinuation (TTD), as well as overall survival (OS), from time of first taxane or PARPi therapy. Cox hazard ratio (HR) regression analyses were performed, adjusting for Gleason sum (≤7 vs. 8-10). For OS, receipt of subsequent therapies following first taxane or PARPi was also included as a covariate. Results: 50 ATM- and 87 BRCA2-mutated pts were identified. 40/50 (80%) of ATM-mutated pts received taxane only or taxane prior to PARPi, while 10/50 (20%) received PARPi only or PARPi prior to taxane. ATM-mutated pts showed a trend towards longer TTD when taxane was given first vs PARPi given first (P = 0.08, adjusted HR for taxane treatment 0.50 [95% CI: 0.24–1.08]). Considering all pts who received taxane first, ATM-mutated pts had longer TTD than BRCA2-mutated pts who received taxane first ( P= 0.04, adjusted HR for ATM 0.61 [CI: 0.37–0.99]). Among ATM-mutated pts, OS was longer in those receiving taxane first ( P= 0.06, adjusted HR for taxane treatment 0.33 [CI: 0.10–1.05]). Among BRCA2-mutated pts, 43/87 (49%) received taxane first and 44/87 (51%) received PARPi first. BRCA2-mutated pts had longer TTD when PARPi was given first vs taxane given first ( P< 0.0001, adjusted HR for PARPi treatment 0.32 [CI: 0.19–0.56]). Considering all pts who received PARPi first, BRCA2-mutated pts also had longer TTD than ATM-mutated pts who received PARPi first ( P= 0.0031, adjusted HR for BRCA2 0.29 [CI: 0.12–0.66]). There was no significant OS difference in BRCA2-mutated pts regarding which treatment was given first ( P= 0.63, adjusted HR for PARPi treatment 1.18 [CI: 0.59–2.35]). Conclusions: Our data in ATM- and BRCA2-mutated mCRPC pts suggests a trend towards improved clinical outcomes when taxanes are used prior to PARPi in ATM-mutated pts, while the reverse sequence appears to be better for BRCA2-mutated pts.[Table: see text]

4147 Background: Retrospective studies of phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3, a regulator of gene expression) in cancer-lineage cells have suggested it is a biomarker of poor prognosis. We analyzed data from 3 phase 3 RCTs (BRIGHTER [T1; NCT02178956], CO.23 [T2; NCT01830621], CanStem111P [T3; NCT02993731]) to evaluate the prognostic impact of pSTAT3 on OS in GI cancer patients (pts). Methods: pSTAT3 was evaluated in archival tumor tissue from pts with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (T1), colorectal cancer (T2), or pancreatic cancer (T3) who received standard of care in the control arms (CTL) of their respective trials. pSTAT3 positive (+) or negative (−) status was determined by detecting pSTAT3 in both tumor and tumor microenvironment (TME) cells in a laboratory-developed immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay (T1; T2), later developed into the investigational pSTAT3 IHC D3A7 assay (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) (T3). The positivity cutoff requires a sample have both a TME score of 2 and ≥5% of tumor cells staining positively for pSTAT3. Pre-analytical variables (eg, specimen collection, handling, and processing), tumor indication, and slight differences in the assays used for each study may contribute to relative differences in evaluable rates between studies. In an exploratory analysis, OS was compared in pSTAT3+ vs pSTAT3− pts via an unstratified log-rank test. Results: In each study, intent-to-treat pts with evaluable pSTAT3 results were considered pSTAT3-evaluable. This abstract includes pSTAT3-evaluable pts randomized to the CTL arms (T1: n/N=248/357, 69.5%; T2: n/N=110/144, 76.4%; T3: n/N=243/569, 42.7%). Baseline characteristics are presented in the table. Median (m) OS was shorter in pts with pSTAT3+ tumors across all studies (T1 hazard ratio [HR]=1.32 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.74]; T2 HR=2.40 [1.50, 3.83]; T3 HR=1.08 [0.77, 1.50]). Conclusions: In pSTAT3-evaluable populations from 3 RCTs across GI cancers, CTL pts with pSTAT3+ (vs pSTAT3−) tumors had shorter mOS. These results suggest that pSTAT3 positivity may be a biomarker of poor clinical outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT02178956; NCT01830621; NCT02993731. [Table: see text]

TPS2661 Background: Letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel; GSK3377794) is an autologous T-cell therapy using a genetically modified T-cell receptor (TCR) to improve recognition of cancer cells expressing NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a. Next generation NY-ESO-1 TCR T-cell therapies, such as GSK3901961 and GSK3845097, integrate added genetic modifications to enhance anticancer activity. GSK3901961 co-expresses the CD8α chain to stabilize TCR-human leukocyte A (HLA) class I interactions on CD4+ T cells, improving T-cell persistence and helper functions such as Type 1 T-helper antitumor responses. GSK3845097 co-expresses a dominant negative transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) type II receptor to reduce TGF-β pathway activation and maintain T-cell proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxicity in the tumor microenvironment. A first-time-in-human master protocol (NCT04526509) will evaluate safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of these and possible subsequent therapies. Substudy 1 will assess GSK3901961 in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or synovial sarcoma (SS). Substudy 2 will assess GSK3845097 in pts with advanced SS. Methods: Each substudy includes a dose confirmation stage to assess RP2D and a dose expansion stage. Key inclusion criteria are age ≥18 y; measurable disease per RECIST v1.1; HLA-A*02:01, A*02:05, or A*02:06 positivity; NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a tumor expression; advanced (metastatic/unresectable) SS with t(X;18) translocation and anthracycline-based therapy receipt/completion/intolerance (SS only); and Stage IV NSCLC, receipt of ≥1 prior line(s) of standard of care (SOC) therapy including programmed death receptor- or ligand-1 inhibitors, and SOC chemotherapy receipt/intolerance (Substudy 1 only). Key exclusion criteria are prior malignancy that is not in complete remission or clinically significant systemic illness; prior receipt of gene/NY-ESO-1–specific therapy or allogenic stem cell/solid organ transplant; central nervous system metastases (SS only); and actionable genetic aberration and receipt/failure of ≥3 systemic therapy lines (Substudy 1 only). Primary endpoints are safety (adverse events) and tolerability (dose-limiting toxicities). Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed overall response rate, duration of response, and maximum expansion/persistence and phenotype of infiltrating transduced T cells. Exploratory endpoints include laboratory parameters, overall survival, and anti-GSK3901961 or -GSK3845097 titers as applicable. Analyses will be descriptive. The substudies are enrolling. Funding: GSK (209012; NCT04526509). Editorial support was provided by Eithne Maguire, PhD, of Fishawack Indicia, part of Fishawack Health; funded by GSK. Previously presented at AACR 2021 (CT219). Clinical trial information: NCT04526509.

SUMMARY This article describes a unique approach for reconstruction of large helical rim defects. By raising bilateral chondrocutaneous flaps of the helical rim while including a semicircular chondrocutaneous excision of the adjacent scapha and antihelix, large defects can be repaired with minimal loss to the overall external ear circumference. This is a technically simple and reliable method that has resulted in excellent cosmetic outcomes and minimal morbidity in our practice.

AbstractPatients with early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) are commonly excluded from large‐scale observational and therapeutic studies due to their young age, atypical presentation, or absence of pathogenic mutations. The goals of the Longitudinal EOAD Study (LEADS) are to (1) define the clinical, imaging, and fluid biomarker characteristics of EOAD; (2) develop sensitive cognitive and biomarker measures for future clinical and research use; and (3) establish a trial‐ready network. LEADS will follow 400 amyloid beta (Aβ)‐positive EOAD, 200 Aβ‐negative EOnonAD that meet National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association (NIA‐AA) criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD dementia, and 100 age‐matched controls. Participants will undergo clinical and cognitive assessments, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [18F]Florbetaben and [18F]Flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET), lumbar puncture, and blood draw for DNA, RNA, plasma, serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and post‐mortem assessment. To develop more effective AD treatments, scientists need to understand the genetic, biological, and clinical processes involved in EOAD. LEADS will develop a public resource that will enable future planning and implementation of EOAD clinical trials.

Background and Aims Recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis (rPSC) following liver transplant (LT) has a negative impact on graft and patient survival; little is known about risk factors for rPSC or disease course in children. Approach and Results We retrospectively evaluated risk factors for rPSC in 140 children from the Pediatric PSC Consortium, a multicenter international registry. Recipients underwent LT for PSC and had >90 days of follow‐up. The primary outcome, rPSC, was defined using Graziadei criteria. Median follow‐up after LT was 3 years (interquartile range 1.1‐6.1). rPSC occurred in 36 children, representing 10% and 27% of the subjects at 2 years and 5 years following LT, respectively. Subjects with rPSC were younger at LT (12.9 vs. 16.2 years), had faster progression from PSC diagnosis to LT (2.5 vs. 4.1 years), and had higher alanine aminotransferase (112 vs. 66 IU/L) at LT (all P < 0.01). Inflammatory bowel disease was more prevalent in the rPSC group (86% vs. 66%; P = 0.025). After LT, rPSC subjects had more episodes of biopsy‐proved acute rejection (mean 3 vs. 1; P < 0.001), and higher prevalence of steroid‐refractory rejection (41% vs. 20%; P = 0.04). In those with rPSC, 43% developed complications of portal hypertension, were relisted for LT, or died within 2 years of the diagnosis. Mortality was higher in the rPSC group (11.1% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.05). Conclusions The incidence of rPSC in this cohort was higher than previously reported, and was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Patients with rPSC appeared to have a more aggressive, immune‐reactive phenotype. These findings underscore the need to understand the immune mechanisms of rPSC, to lay the foundation for developing new therapies and improve outcomes in this challenging population.

Abstract Background: A positive association between circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) and colorectal cancer survival was reported in observational studies, which are susceptible to unmeasured confounding and reverse causality. We used a Mendelian randomization approach to evaluate the association between genetically predicted CRP concentrations and colorectal cancer–specific survival. Methods: We used individual-level data for 16,918 eligible colorectal cancer cases of European ancestry from 15 studies within the International Survival Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Consortium. We calculated a genetic-risk score based on 52 CRP-associated genetic variants identified from genome-wide association studies. Because of the non-collapsibility of hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards models, we used the additive hazards model to calculate hazard differences (HD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted CRP concentrations and colorectal cancer–specific survival, overall and by stage at diagnosis and tumor location. Analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, body mass index, genotyping platform, study, and principal components. Results: Of the 5,395 (32%) deaths accrued over up to 10 years of follow-up, 3,808 (23%) were due to colorectal cancer. Genetically predicted CRP concentration was not associated with colorectal cancer–specific survival (HD, −1.15; 95% CI, −2.76 to 0.47 per 100,000 person-years; P = 0.16). Similarly, no associations were observed in subgroup analyses by stage at diagnosis or tumor location. Conclusions: Despite adequate power to detect moderate associations, our results did not support a causal effect of circulating CRP concentrations on colorectal cancer–specific survival. Impact: Future research evaluating genetically determined levels of other circulating inflammatory biomarkers (i.e., IL6) with colorectal cancer survival outcomes is needed.

Background: Academic centers' and professional societies' top leadership representation and professional societies' award recipients remain disparate by gender in many fields. Little is known regarding leadership representation and recognition within pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine (PCCM), which has ∼22% women physicians. We sought to understand the landscape of female PCCM leaders. Methods: We abstracted gender of fellowship program directors (PDs), Department of Medicine (DOM) Chairs and Division Chiefs from academic medical centers with PCCM fellowship programs from 2018 and for comparison 2008. We abstracted leadership and recognition award recipients within four PCCM professional societies from 2013 to 2018 (American Thoracic Society [ATS], American Academy of Sleep Medicine [AASM], American College of Chest Physicians [CHEST], and Society of Critical Care Medicine [SCCM]). Results: In 2018, 29% of PCCM PD, 15% of PCCM Division Chiefs, and 15% of DOM Chairs were women. There were significantly more female PDs in 2018 (29%) compared with 2008 (16%, p = 0.04). On average, 25% of society presidents were women, with 28% of PCCM societal awards going to women, with significant difference between societies ( p = 0.04). Each society differed in average distribution of female board members over the 6-year period: ATS 38%, AASM 35%, CHEST 18%, and SCCM 44% ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: PCCM leadership and societal recognition are disparate by gender with few women holding top leadership roles and receiving societal recognition. Fortunately, the distribution notably is starting to reflect the specialty's demographics. Understanding why these inequalities exist will be essential to achieving gender parity in PCCM.