Citations

ABSTRACT Background Flap complications following maxillectomy, reconstruction, and adjuvant proton beam therapy (PBT) for primary maxillary and sinonasal malignancies are not well described. Methods This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients treated between 2016 and 2023 from a single‐institutional database. Results Thirteen patients were identified with a median follow‐up of 26 months. No immediate post‐operative complications occurred, with a median time between surgery and PBT of 61 days. Nine patients (69.2%) had high‐risk postoperative pathology and required 66+ Gy(RBE), including five (38.5%) with gross disease receiving 70 Gy(RBE). Flap necrosis and fistulization occurred in three patients (23.1%) following PBT (median time from PBT to complication, 112 days). Higher flap mean and minimum dose, flap volume receiving at least 66 Gy[RBE], and minimum dose to 50% flap volume were associated with complications. Conclusions Careful patient selection and planning strategies should be considered to mitigate flap complication risk following adjuvant PBT for high‐risk post‐operative pathology.

Purpose of review To synthesize the current literature regarding the evaluation and management of genitourinary fistula in women. Recent findings Genitourinary fistula are aberrant communications between the urinary tract and genital tract that present with urinary leakage per the vagina. Initial management often involves conservative measures, such as urethral catheter or ureteral stent placement, progressing to surgical repair when needed. Key surgical principles include a tension-free, watertight closure with well-vascularized tissue including tissue interposition as appropriate, and postoperative urinary drainage. When surgical management of vesicovaginal fistula is necessary, a transvaginal repair is the most common. Other minimally invasive approaches are increasing and result in similarly high success rates with lower patient morbidity compared to open abdominal surgeries. The initial management of ureterovaginal fistula commonly includes ureteral stent placement. When not feasible or in persistent fistula, laparoscopic and robotic surgical repair with ureteral reconstruction offers high success rates with lower morbidity than an open approach. Summary Successful management of genitourinary fistula ranges from conservative urinary tract drainage to surgical interventions based on etiology, location, and complexity. Approaches to repair are shifting toward less invasive procedures. With optimal technique and surgical planning, high success rates can be achieved, particularly in primary repairs.

ObjectiveIn the phase 3 head‐to‐head MANDARA study (NCT04157348), benralizumab demonstrated noninferiority to mepolizumab in inducing remission (defined as Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score [BVAS] of 0 and oral glucocorticoid [OGC] dosage ≤4 mg/day at weeks 36 and 48) in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). This analysis investigated a more stringent definition of remission that included discontinuation of OGCs and being relapse‐free.MethodsPatients aged ≥18 years with documented relapsing or refractory EGPA receiving OGCs at ≥7.5 mg/day with or without immunosuppressive therapy for ≥4 weeks before enrollment were randomized (1:1) to benralizumab at 30 mg or mepolizumab at 300 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The proportion of patients achieving remission off OGCs, defined as BVAS of 0, OGC dose of 0 mg/day (at weeks 36 and 48) and no relapses during the double‐masked period, was assessed.ResultsPatients (n = 140) were randomized to benralizumab (n = 70) or mepolizumab (n = 70). The adjusted percentage of patients with remission off OGCs was 23.5% (n = 16) with benralizumab versus 11.1% (n = 8) with mepolizumab (difference 12.47 [95% confidence interval 0.46–24.48], P = 0.042). Of those who achieved remission off OGCs, 100% of benralizumab‐treated patients and 98.6% of mepolizumab‐treated patients achieved remission within the first 36 weeks of treatment.ConclusionThe administration of anti–interleukin‐5/receptor (IL‐5/R) therapies, benralizumab and mepolizumab, enable discontinuation of OGCs in some patients with EGPA, while avoiding relapses. These findings suggest that adding anti‐IL‐5/R therapy to standard primary treatment for patients with EGPA may improve response.

Abstract Background and Aims In the VICTOR trial (NCT05093933), vericiguat was neutral for the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HF). VICTOR was powered to independently assess cardiovascular death. This study reports detailed analysis on the effects of vericiguat on mortality. Methods VICTOR, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, enrolled 6105 ambulatory patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) without recent worsening and randomized them to vericiguat or placebo. The main outcome for this analysis was the pre-specified secondary endpoint of cardiovascular death. All-cause death, sudden cardiac death, and death related to HF were also assessed. Results Over a median of 19.7 months (inter-quartile range 14.6–25.4), cardiovascular deaths occurred in 292 patients (5.7 deaths per 100 patient-years) and 346 patients (6.8 deaths per 100 patient-years) in the vericiguat and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.97; P = .020). Risk of death from any cause was lower with vericiguat vs placebo (377 [7.3 deaths per 100 patient-years] vs 440 [8.6 deaths per 100 patient-years]; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.97; P = .015). Sudden cardiac death and HF-related deaths were lower with vericiguat vs placebo (1.6 vs 2.2 events per 100 patient-years; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56–0.99; P = .042 and 1.7 vs 2.4 events per 100 patient-years; HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54–0.94; P = .016, respectively). Lower mortality rates were consistent across subgroups including baseline therapy. Consistent cardiovascular and all-cause mortality benefit was seen across baseline N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Conclusions In ambulatory well-treated participants with HFrEF, vericiguat was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in the key secondary outcome of cardiovascular death, as well as all-cause mortality.

Abstract Outcomes in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have steadily improved; however, additional therapies are needed for patients who relapse or do not respond to novel agents. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of camidanlumab tesirine (Cami), an anti-CD25 antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with relapsed/refractory cHL after brentuximab vedotin/programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor therapies from the phase 2 ADCT-301-201 study. Eligible patients were adults with cHL who had received ≥3 previous lines of systemic therapy (or ≥2 if ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant). Patients received 45 μg/kg Cami (IV, once every 3 weeks) in cycles 1 to 2, followed by 30 μg/kg IV once every 3 weeks for ≤1 year. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) per 2014 Lugano classification. Secondary end points included complete response rate (CRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In total, 117 patients were enrolled with a median age of 37.0 years (range, 19-87). The ORR was 70.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.9-78.2), with a CRR of 33.3% (95% CI, 24.9-42.6). The median PFS was 9.13 months (95% CI, 5.3-15.0); median OS was not reached. Thirty-three (28.2%) patients discontinued treatment because of treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common reasons were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (n = 10 [8.5%] patients), infections and infestations (n = 5 [4.3%]), and nervous systems disorders (n = 5 [4.3%]). Guillain-Barré–type or polyradiculopathy-type events occurred in 8 (6.8%) patients. Cami was efficacious in this heavily pretreated population; however, the efficacy was overshadowed by substantial issues with the safety profile. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04052997.

Background: Home telemetry has been shown to reduce 30-day readmissions in patients at high risk for readmission. It remains unclear whether this finding is due to the telemetry itself or the nurse contact that follows detection of an abnormal parameter. Purpose: This study was a subgroup analysis from a prior trial comparing patients on home telemetry for 30 days to usual care after discharge to determine if nurse contact affected readmission rates. Methods: Patients randomized to telemetry who had at least 1 nurse contact were compared to those who had none to see if the contact reduced the rate of readmissions. Results: Of 449 home telemetry patients, 292 (65.0%) received 1 or more nurse contacts. Single and multivariable logistic regression models exploring the association of contact with 30-day readmission did not find any statistically significant associations of nurse contact with readmission (all unadjusted P ≥ .13, all adjusted P ≥ .18). Conclusion: Our subset analysis did not show that the nurse contact was the factor that reduced readmission in patients on home telemetry.

ABSTRACT Rationale Longer duration of epilepsy before surgery is a predictor of poor outcome. While referral delays of surgical candidates are well documented, factors causing delay during the presurgical evaluation remain unclear and may vary depending on institutional characteristics. By benchmarking the duration of presurgical evaluation across multiple centers and identifying patient and evaluation characteristics contributing to duration, we can ascertain best practices and address modifiable contributors to reduce delays. Methods We queried the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Surgery Database, a prospective, observational multicenter study enrolling children 0–18 years at 27 US pediatric epilepsy centers, for all patients undergoing initial presurgical evaluation for drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE). We included patients with completed evaluations and data on duration from initiation of presurgical evaluation to final surgical decision. We compared patient characteristics and evaluation components between those with long duration evaluations (> 75% quartile) and those with short evaluations (< 25% quartile). Akaike information criteria selection identified variables associated with longer duration. From these, we developed a logistic prediction model for evaluation duration, using a random 80/20 training/testing split of the entire cohort. The model was tested among institutions with ≥ 10 patients in the cohort to assess its accuracy in predicting long durations. Linear models for each site assessed each variable's impact on duration. Variables with < 10% of the patient population at each site were excluded. Beta values were compared to identify intra‐ and inter‐institution variability and to delineate institutions with the shortest added duration for each variable. Results Of 2318 patients undergoing surgical evaluation, 1655 (71%) from 23 sites had complete data. Median evaluation duration was 8 weeks (interquartile range 3–22); 453 (27%) were short‐duration evaluations and 414 (25%) were long‐duration evaluations. Multiple patient and evaluation characteristics were associated with duration (Table 1). Table 6 provides the average duration each variable contributes to evaluation by site, highlighting the shortest durations compared with other groups. Conclusions Duration of presurgical evaluation for DRE can be accurately modeled using multiple patient characteristics and testing strategies commonly employed in epilepsy surgery evaluations. This predictive model can not only estimate evaluation duration but also identify opportunities to improve systemic efficiency. Institution‐level modeling identifies specific program strengths, providing an opportunity to learn from successful processes. Subsequent research will focus on institutional process mapping to better understand systemic practices that lead to improved efficiencies, then sharing these processes across the consortium to shorten evaluation durations.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) have become a pediatric standard of care. However, rounds experiences of families using languages other than English (LOE)—particularly languages other than English or Spanish (LOES; eg, Arabic)—receive less focus. We aimed to identify differences in PFCR communication and engagement by language. METHODS We analyzed postintervention data from a 21-center structured PFCR study, assessing communication practices, quality, and family and nurse engagement during PFCR. Logistic regression adjusted by site compared PFCR between families using (1) LOE vs English, (2) Spanish vs English, and (3) LOES vs English. RESULTS Among 3051 PFCR encounters, 348 (11.4%) involved LOE (Spanish = 260; LOES = 85). Interpretation was not used in 7.2%, 5.8%, and 9.4% of encounters using LOE, Spanish, and LOES, respectively. PFCR in the following groups had lower adjusted odds (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]) for the following domains: (1) LOE vs English: including providing verbal patient summaries (0.66 [0.46–0.95]), explaining diagnoses and differentials (0.62 [0.44–0.88]), family engagement (0.34 [0.20–0.57]), nursing inclusion (0.75 [0.60–0.93]), and nursing engagement (0.69 [0.52–0.90]). (2) Spanish vs English: diagnoses/differentials being explained (0.56 [0.37–0.85]), family engagement (0.35 [0.18–0.67]), nursing inclusion (0.77 [0.59–1.00]), and nursing engagement (0.68 [0.52–0.89]). (3) LOES vs English: families sharing concerns (0.66 [0.47–0.93]), family engagement (0.30 [0.16–0.54]), and nursing inclusion (0.74 [0.55–0.99]). CONCLUSION Even after implementing a PFCR intervention, families using LOE—especially LOES—experienced significant disparities in communication and engagement. Future approaches to improving PFCR should emphasize language access and promote nurse and family engagement for families using LOE, particularly LOES.

Abstract Background and Aims There is a paucity of data on arrhythmia burden in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGAs). The present study sought to quantify the incidence of atrial arrhythmia (AA), ventricular arrhythmia (VA), and complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) in patients with ccTGA and identify associated factors. Methods An international, multi-centre, retrospective cohort study was conducted in 29 tertiary hospitals (six countries) between 1990 and 2018. Primary analyses consisted of determining the incidence of a combined outcome consisting of AA, VA, or CAVB, along with its individual components. Factors associated with the different types of arrhythmias were assessed by uni-variable and multi-variable Cox regression analyses. Results A total of 1131 patients with ccTGA were followed for 9.0 (interquartile range 4.0–17.2) years. Cumulative rates of the primary endpoint at 10, 15, and 20 years were 44.5%, 51.0%, and 58.8%, respectively. AA, VA, and CAVB occurred in 2.1, 1.4, and 2.0 cases per 100 person-years, respectively. In multi-variable analyses, surgery/intervention conferred a greater than three-fold higher risk of AA [hazard ratio (HR) 3.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.90–4.78, P &lt; .001]. Furthermore, surgery/intervention was significantly associated with a greater risk of VA (HR 1.73, 95% CI 0.98–3.05, P = .003) and CAVB (HR 3.65, 95% CI 2.20–6.05, P &lt; .001). The left bundle branch block was associated with a higher risk of VA (HR 4.03, 95% CI 1.59–10.23, P = .003) and the right bundle branch block with a higher risk of CAVB (HR 3.71, 95% CI 1.81–7.63, P &lt; .001). Conclusions The arrhythmia burden in patients with ccTGA is substantial, with a high incidence of AA, VA, and CAVB.

Abstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) infections are significant causes of morbidity and mortality, especially when diagnosis is delayed. Traditional cerebrospinal fluid diagnostic methods for CNS infections have limited sensitivity. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid (MSCSF) is a newer diagnostic tool capable of detecting a broad range of pathogens in a single assay. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated the first-year experience with MSCSF at Mayo Clinic. A total of 422 tests performed during calendar year 2024 on adult patients at Mayo Clinic facilities and those tested through Mayo Clinic Laboratories were analyzed, with a subcohort analysis of the 210 Mayo Clinic patients performed to define patient characteristics associated with positive results and clinical outcomes. Results The sensitivity of MSCSF for detecting neuroinfection in the subcohort was 64%, with 43% of confirmed neuroinfections diagnosed by MSCSF only. Subjects who were immunosuppressed (odds ratio [OR]: 3.5, P = .008) and those with a high pretest probability of CNS infection (OR: 20.1, P &lt; .001) were more likely to have positive results. Also, those who tested positive were more likely to die within the ensuing 30 days than those who tested negative (OR: 5.2, P = .001). Conclusions MSCSF can be a valuable tool for diagnosing CNS infection but should not be used indiscriminately. It appears to be most beneficial when there is a high clinical suspicion of CNS infection and conventional diagnostics, and available molecular tests, yield negative results. Its integration into clinical practice should be guided by diagnostic stewardship to maximize cost-effectiveness and clinical utility.