Citations

BACKGROUND: Packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions in patients undergoing surgery for cancer are given to treat anemia or acute hemorrhage. Evidence indicates that pRBC transfusions are associated with poor perioperative and oncological outcomes. The ARCA-1 (Perioperative Care in the Cancer Patient-1) study was designed to test the association between perioperative pRBC transfusions and postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cancer surgery. The primary hypothesis of our study was that perioperative pRBC transfusions have a negative impact on postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality. METHODS: ARCA-1 was an international multicenter prospective observational cohort study. Participating centers enrolled a minimum of 30 consecutive adult patients with cancer who underwent surgery with curative intent. The primary end point was all-cause mortality 1 year after major cancer surgery. Secondary end points were rates of perioperative blood product use, 1-year cancer-specific mortality, overall survival, and 30-day morbidity and mortality. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to adjust for selection bias. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the effects of significant covariates on 1-year mortality, cancer-related mortality, and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 1079 patients were included in the study. The rate of perioperative pRBC transfusions was 21.1%. Preoperative comorbidities, including anemia, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III to IV, a history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), myocardial infarction, stroke, need for dialysis, history of blood transfusions, and metastatic disease were statistically significantly more frequent in transfused patients compared to nontransfused patients. The 1-year mortality rate was higher in transfused patients before (19.7% vs 6.5%; P < .0001) and after (17.4% vs 13.2%; P = .29) propensity score matching. 1-year mortality was 1.97 times higher in transfused than in no-transfused patients (odd ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–3.41). The odds of 1-year cancer mortality for patients who had perioperative pRBCs was 1.82 times higher (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.97–3.43) compared to those who did not receive perioperative pRBC transfusion. The effect of perioperative pRBC transfusion on overall survival was also significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.15–2.99). Transfused patients also had a higher rate of 30-day postoperative mortality before (3.5% vs 0.7%; P = .0009) and after propensity score matching (4.2% vs 1.8%; P = .34). CONCLUSIONS: This international, multicenter observational study showed that perioperative pRBC transfusion was associated with an increased mortality risk.

While studies have evaluated the utility of telehealth in replacing in-person clinical encounters, there is a dearth of literature examining the quality of patient-physician communication with telehealth encounters. Accordingly, this study assessed the feasibility of using virtual cardiology clinical encounters to examine patient-physician interaction, communication, and perceptions of the clinical encounter. Telemedicine cardiology clinical encounters were audio- and video-recorded following the encounter, patients, and cardiologists completed an electronic survey to assess perceptions of the encounter. Qualitative analysis of the communication and statistical analysis of the survey data was conducted, providing descriptive data. The study included 11 patient-physician dyads; all patients were non-Hispanic White. Cardiologists were more racially and ethnically diverse (63% Asian). Most patients agreed telemedicine was comparable to in-person encounters (85.7%), with all cardiologists reporting that patients appeared satisfied with the encounter. We utilized an assessment tool to examine patient-physician communication in the recorded virtual encounters. This study suggests examining patient-physician communication using virtual clinical encounters is feasible, although there are barriers that need addressing for larger studies.

AbstractBackgroundSome patients express concerns regarding receipt of allogeneic blood transfusions from donors potentially vaccinated against SARS‐CoV‐2 (COVID‐19). However, limited information exists about patients' expression of these concerns or how to address them during the blood transfusion consent process. In this study, we describe our experience of working collaboratively with patients with vaccine‐related transfusion concerns prior to elective surgery, summarizing treatment decisions and clinical outcomes.Study Design and MethodsThis observational descriptive study includes patients seen in our Bloodless Medicine and Surgery clinic between June 2022 and June 2024 for vaccine‐related transfusion concerns prior to elective surgery. A shared decision‐making framework was employed to foster conversation, share information, provide reassurance, reconcile conflict, and match preferences with available care options. Patient characteristics, treatment decisions, and surgical outcomes were reviewed and summarized.ResultsThirty‐five patients were included, with median (1st, 3rd quartile) age of 61 (53, 69) years. Cardiac surgery was the most common type of surgery (29%). Twelve patients (34%) were anemic preoperatively, and all received preoperative treatment. After discussion with a Bloodless Medicine specialist, 24 (68.6%) decided to consent to the use of all blood products, 5 (14.3%) accepted only red blood cells, and 6 (17.1%) declined all blood products. Among 28 patients undergoing surgery, only 4 (14%) received allogeneic transfusion perioperatively.ConclusionMany patients concerned about the vaccination status of blood donors may ultimately consent to allogeneic blood products after shared decision‐making with a Bloodless Medicine specialist, highlighting the importance of patient empowerment and collaborative care.

ABSTRACTBackgroundFollowing breast cancer (BC), many young women are interested in future childbearing and some may wish to breastfeed. However, limited information is available regarding their lactation experiences.MethodsParticipants in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a multicenter, prospective cohort study of women ≤40 years diagnosed with stage 0–III BC between 2006–2016 and who reported one or more live births following diagnosis, were surveyed about pregnancy and breastfeeding after BC treatment, including reasons for attempting and stopping breastfeeding, satisfaction, and supports.ResultsOf 143 eligible women sent a survey, 115 responded and 94 were included in the analytic cohort. Breastfeeding was attempted by 55% of women (52 of 94). Among those who had not attempted, 93% noted prior bilateral mastectomies (39 of 42). Among those who attempted breastfeeding, 69% had undergone lumpectomy and radiotherapy (36 of 52), 83% of whom reported no milk production from their treated breast (30 of 36). Most (65%, 34 of 52) were at least somewhat satisfied with their ability to breastfeed. Reasons for stopping breastfeeding included: having completed the planned duration (36%, 19 of 52); to start/resume endocrine therapy (21%, 11 of 52); and to resume breast imaging (8%, 4 of 52). Approximately half (27 of 55) of women who had not undergone bilateral mastectomies recalled receiving specific information about breastfeeding after BC, mostly from the oncology team (59%, 16 of 27), online resources (48%, 13 of 27), or a lactation consultant (44%, 12 of 27).ConclusionMost young BC survivors who attempted to breastfeed were able to and were satisfied with the experience, despite challenges. Specific resources to support BC survivors who wish to breastfeed are needed.

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is an uncommon vascular neoplasm characterized by variable clinical behavior. Our aim was to describe the therapeutic approach for HEHE at diagnosis and define clinicopathological characteristics associated with tumor progression and long‐term survival. Methods This is a retrospective study that includes patients with HEHE who received treatment at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1984 and 2023. Results Eighty patients were included in the study (median age: 44 years; 62.5% female), 24 underwent liver transplantation, 26 underwent liver resection, and 30 were managed medically. The 3‐year overall survival rates were 86.7%, 80.9%, and 51.1%, respectively. Notably, 26 patients had extrahepatic metastases at the time of diagnosis, four (16.7%) in the transplantation group, four (15.4%) in the resection group, and 18 (69.2%) in the nonsurgical group. On multivariable modeling, bone metastasis was independently associated with long‐term mortality (HR 6.3, p < 0.001) while lung metastasis and surgical intervention were not associated with long‐term mortality (HR 0.8, p = 0.8; HR 1.1, p = 0.9, respectively). Conclusion Bone metastasis emerged as a strong predictor of poor survival. Hence, aggressive surgical intervention may not be advantageous in patients with skeletal metastases but can still be offered for those with other extrahepatic metastases.

AbstractBackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) negatively impact fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer. This study assessed PPI impact on major pathologic response (mPR) rates of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients receiving fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy.MethodsAn institutional retrospective review of resected PDAC patients receiving neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy (98% FOLFIRINOX) from 2011 to 2021 was conducted. Outcomes were stratified by use or nonuse of PPIs within 6 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy initiation. Primary outcome was mPR defined as complete or near complete response.ResultsAmong 540 patients included, the median age was 64 (IQR: 60–70) years, 297 (55%) were male, and 202 (37%) were PPI users. 170 (31%) patients had mPR with similar rates among PPI users and nonusers (29% vs. 33%, p = 0.38). No difference in mPR was seen between PPI users and nonusers receiving chemoradiation (35% vs. 36%, p = 0.89) or ≥8 cycles of NAC (33% vs. 36%, p = 0.55). Median OS for PPI users was 30.9 versus 31.7 months for nonusers (p = 0.62). On multivariable analysis, PPI therapy was not associated with decreased survival.ConclusionPPI usage did not significantly influence mPR or OS following neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy in resected PDAC patients. Further analysis of all patients, not just those who underwent resection, is required.

ABSTRACT Background Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer has a profound impact on patients' lives. However, the long‐term financial implications are poorly understood. Objective Assess the financial burden of long‐term survivors who underwent PD. Methods Patients who underwent PD between January 2011 and June 2019 were identified. To evaluate the long‐term financial burden, patients surviving ≥ 3 years post‐resection were prospectively surveyed using the Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST‐FACIT) and a customized institutionally developed questionnaire. A logistic regression model predicting high financial toxicity was used to identify predictive factors. Results Among 238 eligible patients, 137 (57.6%) responded. Responders had a median age of 66 (59–73) years, with 86.7% identifying as financial prosperous or comfortable. However, 33.3% experienced financial distress due to treatment costs, 27.3% demonstrated high financial toxicity on the COST‐FACIT survey, and 37.2% made sacrifices to afford treatment. Only 8.9% stated that the treatment costs influenced their decisions, and the majority (85.9%) did not discuss financial implications with healthcare providers. Multivariable analysis identified younger age as a risk factor for high financial toxicity. Conclusion One in three long‐term survivors experienced high financial toxicity, with younger age being a predictor. This emphasizes the need for efforts to provide comprehensive support and guidance to patients to navigate their oncological journey.

AbstractBackgroundEvaluations of critical bleeding and massive transfusion have focused on traumatic hemorrhage. However, most critical bleeding in hospitalized patients occurs outside trauma. The purpose of this study was to provide an in‐depth description examining the critical administration threshold (CAT; ≥3 units red blood cells (RBCs) in a 1‐h period) occurrences in nontraumatic hemorrhage. This will assist in establishing the framework for future investigations in nontraumatic hemorrhage.MethodsThis is an observational cohort study of adults experiencing critical bleeding defined as being CAT+ during hospitalization from 2016 to 2021 at a single academic institution. A CAT episode started with administration of the first qualifying RBC unit and ended at the time of completion of the last allogeneic unit prior to a ≥4‐h gap without subsequent transfusion. The primary goal was to describe demographic, clinical and transfusion characteristics of participants with nontraumatic critical bleeding.Results2433 patients suffered critical bleeding, most often occurring in the operating room (71.1%) followed by the intensive care unit (20.8%). 57% occurred on the initial day of hospitalization, with a median duration of 138 (36, 303) minutes. The median number of RBCs transfused during the episode was 5 (4, 8), with median total allogeneic units of 9 (4, 9). Hospital mortality was 19.2%. The most common cause of death was multi‐organ failure (50.3%), however death within 24 h was due to exsanguination (72.7%).DiscussionThe critical administration threshold may be employed to identify critical bleeding in non‐trauma settings of life‐threatening hemorrhage, with a mortality rate of approximately 20%.