Citations

Clear

279 citation(s) found for "Stephens, DH".

Industry payments to American Society of Hematology Clinical Practice Guideline authors
Jacobs, Jeremy W. , Booth, Garrett S. , Adkins, Brian D. , Martin, Amarilis , Lundberg, George D., Glover, Raeshun T, Khan, Shazia S , Jacobs, Jeremy W , Booth, Garrett , Adkins, Brian David , Stephens, Laura D. , Silver, Julie K. , Woo, Jennifer S.

Mayo Clinic

Blood Advances | April 3, 2024 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 3549-3552

10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012527 | PMID 38569136 Get It

Rh immune globulin immunoprophylaxis after RhD‐positive red cell exposure in RhD‐negative patients via transfusion: A survey of practices
Stephens, Laura D. , Shmookler, Aaron , O’Brien, Kerry L., Hermelin, Daniela , Bakhtary, Sara , AlMozain, Nour , Lu, Wen , Stephens, Laura , Shmookler, Aaron , O'Brien, Kerry , Karp, Julie Katz , Hermelin, Daniela , Bakhtary, Sara , Fung, Mark K , Almozain, Nour , George, Melissa

Mayo Clinic

Transfusion | March 27, 2024 | Volume: 64 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 839-845

10.1111/trf.17812 | PMID 38534065 Get It

AbstractBackgroundCurrent Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB) standards require transfusion services to have a policy on Rh immune globulin (RhIG) immunoprophylaxis for when RhD‐negative patients are exposed to RhD‐positive red cells. This is a survey of AABB‐accredited transfusion services in the United States (US) regarding institutional policies and practices on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD‐negative patients receive RhD‐positive (i.e., RhD‐incompatible) packed red blood cell (pRBC) and platelet transfusions.ResultsApproximately half of the respondents (50.4%, 116/230) have policies on RhIG administration after RhD‐incompatible pRBC and platelet transfusions, while others had policies for only pRBC (13.5%, 31/230) or only platelet (17.8%, 41/230) transfusions, but not both. In contrast, 18.3% (42/230) report that their institution has no written policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD‐incompatible transfusions. Most institutions (70.2%, 99/141) do not have policies addressing safety parameters to mitigate the risk of hemolysis associated with the high dose of RhIG required to prevent RhD alloimmunization after RhD‐incompatible pRBC transfusions.DiscussionWith approximately half of US AABB‐accredited institutions report having policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after both RhD‐incompatible pRBC and platelet transfusions, some institutions may not be in compliance with AABB standards. Further, most with policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD‐incompatible pRBC transfusion do not have written safeguards to mitigate the risk of hemolysis associated with the high dose of RhIG required.ConclusionThis survey underscores the diverse and inadequate institutional policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD exposure in Rh‐negative patients via transfusion. This observation identifies an opportunity to improve transfusion safety.
Transfusion Support in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Contemporary Narrative Review
Jacobs, Jeremy W. , Booth, Garrett S. , Savani, Bipin N. , Adkins, Brian David , Jacobs, Jeremy W , Savani, Bipin N , Booth, Garrett , Adkins, Brian D. , Stephens, Laura D.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Hematology International | March 25, 2024 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.46989/001c.94135 | PMID 38817704 Get It

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a cornerstone of modern medical practice, and can only be performed safely and effectively with appropriate transfusion medicine support. Patients undergoing HSCT often develop therapy-related cytopenia, necessitating differing blood product requirements in the pre-, peri-, and post-transplant periods. Moreover, ensuring optimal management for patients alloimmunized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and/or red blood cell (RBC) antigens, as well as for patients receiving ABO-incompatible transplants, requires close collaboration with transfusion medicine and blood bank professionals. Finally, as updated transfusion guidelines and novel blood product modifications emerge, the options available to the transplant practitioner continue to expand. Herein, we detail contemporary blood transfusion and transfusion medicine practices for patients undergoing HSCT.
Abstract 2029: Investigation of anti-tumor activity of porcine myeloperoxidase for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
Liu, Junnan, Allen, Robert C. , Stephens, Jackson T., Shah, Paras , Huang, Haojie

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 22, 2024 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 6_Supplement | Pages: 2029-2029

10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-2029 Get It

Abstract Introduction: Porcine myeloperoxidase (pMPO) is a cationic enzyme secreted by granulocytic leukocytes capable of selectively binding cancer cells due to their negative surface charge. In the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and sodium chloride (NaCl), MPO catalyzes the production of electronically excited singlet molecular oxygen, which exerts focused cytotoxic activity against cancer cells. Methods: Human bladder non-cancer (SV-HUC1) and cancer cells (T24 and 5637) were used to assess differential cytotoxic activity of pMPO. pMPO was combined with associated reagents, including H2O2, NaCl, and L-proline and glycine for 45 minutes to support the generation of singlet oxygen. MTS assay was used to assessed cell viability at day 3 post-treatment. Non-cancer and cancer cells were labeled with GFP and mCherry, respectively, via infection with lentivirus and cultured in tandem to allow for simultaneous treatment of both cell types. After the treatment, flow cytometry and microscopy were used to monitor the growth of the cells. Results: No cytotoxicity was noted when SV-HUC1 cells were cultured with individual reagents pMPO, NaCl, L-Proline, or Glycine, and limited cytotoxicity was observed with H2O2. Notably, cell viability was nearly maximally preserved for SV-HUC1 cells. The combination of pMPO with associated reagents resulted in killing of 5637 and T24 cells, with tumoricidal activity maintained across increasing tumor cell density, with cell viability preserved for SV-HUC1 cells. Within the cell co-culture system, simultaneous treatment of both cell types with the pMPO treatment resulted in selective killing of tumor cells and preservation of SV-HUC1 cells. Mechanistic studies confirm specificity of pMPO binding to tumor cells, and further, high levels of expression of gammaH2AX and phospho-ATM in 5637 and T24 cells following treatment. Conclusion: pMPO demonstrates selective and efficient killing of bladder cancer cells with minimal cytotoxicity against non-cancer urothelial cells. Given its reliance on direct surface contact with tumor cells for activity, pMPO may be developed as an intravesical therapy for treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancers. Acknowledgements: This work was partially supported by Mayo funds provided to Dr. Haojie Huang. Citation Format: Junnan Liu, Robert C. Allen, Jackson T. Stephens, Paras Shah, Haojie Huang. Investigation of anti-tumor activity of porcine myeloperoxidase for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2029.
Social Determinants of Health and Redirection of Care for Infants Born Extremely Preterm
Bann, Carla , Vohr, Betty R. , McGowan, Elisabeth C. , Harmon, Heidi M. , Hintz, Susan R. , Duncan, Andrea F. , Polin, Richard A. , Laptook, Abbot R. , Mayne, Julie, Lamberson, Vita, Keszler, Mary Lenore, Hensman, Angelita M. , Vieira, Elisa , Pierre, Lucille St., Burke, Robert T., Alksninis, Barbara, Leach, Teresa M., Knoll, Andrea M., Moffat, Stephanie, Newman, Nancy S., Wilson-Costello, Deanne E. , Siner, Bonnie S., Friedman, Harriet, Truog, William E., Pallotto, Eugenia K. , Kilbride, Howard W. , Gauldin, Cheri, Holmes, Anne, Johnson, Kathy, Scott, Allison, Parimi, Prabhu S., Gaetano, Lisa, Merhar, Stephanie L. , Schibler, Kurt, Poindexter, Brenda B. , Cahill, Tanya E., Dudley, Juanita , Gratton, Teresa L., Grisby, Cathy, Henkes, Lisa, Kirker, Kristin, Stacey, Sara, Wuertz, Sandra, Cotten, C. Michael , Goldberg, Ronald N., Goldstein, Ricki F., Malcolm, William , Ashley, Patricia L., Mago-Shah, Deesha, Finkle, Joanne, Fisher, Kimberley A. , Gustafson, Kathryn E. , Bose, Carl , Bernhardt, Janice, Bose, Gennie, Clark, Cindy, Wereszczak, Janice, Warner, Diane, Talbert, Jennifer, Kicklighter, Stephen D. , Bentley, Alexandra, Edwards, Laura , Rhodes-Ryan, Ginger, Carlton, David P., Loggins, Yvonne, Adams‐Chapman, Ira , Bottcher, Diane I., Carter, Sheena L., Hale, Ellen C., Kendrick-Allwood, Salathiel, Laursen, Judith, LaRossa, Maureen Mulligan, Mackie, Colleen, Sanders, Amy , Smikle, Gloria V., Wineski, Lynn, Walsh, Michele C. , Bremer, Andrew A. , Higgins, Rosemary D. , Archer, Stephanie Wilson , Sokol, Gregory M. , Papile, L.A., Herron, Dianne E., Hines, Abbey C. , Lytle, Carolyn, Smiley, Lucy, Wilson, Leslie Dawn, Watkins, Donna, Gunn, Susan, Joyce, Jeff, Tyson, Jon E., Kennedy, Kathleen A. , Mosquera, Ricardo A. , Eason, Elizabeth, Stephens, Emily K. , Alaniz, Nora I., Allain, Elizabeth, Arldt-McAlister, Julie, Boricha, Fatima, Burson, Katrina, Garcia, Carmen, Hall, Donna J., John, Janice , Jones, Patrick M., Lillie, M. Layne, Mason, Carrie M., Martin, Karen , Martin, Sara C., McDavid, Georgia E., McKee, Shannon L. , Poe, Michelle, Rennie, Kimberly , Reddy, Tina, Rodgers, Shawna, Siddiki, Saba Khan, Sperry, Daniel K., Tate, Patti L. Pierce, Wright, Sharon L., Zanger, Dinorah, Jadcherla, Sudarshan R. , Timan, Christopher J., Luzader, Patricia, Batterson, Nancy, Baugher, Hallie, Beckford, Demi R., Burkhardt, Stephanie, Carey, Helen , Chao, Michelle, Cira, Courtney, Clark, Erna, DeSantis, Brittany, Fowler, Aubrey, Gutentag, Julie, Grothause, Jennifer L., Hague, Cole , Levengood, Katelyn, Marzec, Laura, McCool, Jacqueline, Miller, Bethany, Nelin, Mary Ann , Park, Courtney, Purnell, Jessica, Seabrook, Ruth , Shadd, Julie C., Small, Kristi , Stein, Melanie, Sullivan, Margaret, Sullivan, Rox Ann, Warnimont, Kyrstin, Yossef‐Salameh, Lina, Fearns, Erin, Wallace, Dennis, Auman, Jeanette O’Donnell , Gabrio, Jenna, Huitema, Carolyn M. Petrie , Zaterka-Baxter, Kristin M. , Meurs, Krisa P. Van , Chock, Valerie Y. , Stevenson, David K. , Ball, M. Bethany , Bahmani, Dona, Adams, Marian M. , Bentley, Barbara, DeAnda, Maria Elena, DeBattista, Anne M., Earhart, Beth, Huffman, Lynne C. , Krueger, Casey E., Lucash, Ryan E., Proud, Melinda S., Reichert, Elizabeth N., Weiss, Hali E., Williams, R. Jordan , Peralta-Carcelén, Myriam , Collins, Monica V., Cosby, Shirley S., Bailey, Kirstin J., Biasini, Fred J., Chopko, Stephanie A., Domnanovich, Kristy A., Jno-Finn, Chantel J., Ladinsky, Morissa, Moses, Mary Beth, Buie, Cindie, McNair, Tara E., Phillips, Vivien A., Preskitt, Julie , Rector, Richard V., Stringer, Kimberlly, Whitley, Sally, Chapman, Sheree York, Devaskar, Uday, Garg, Meena, Purdy, Isabell B., Chanlaw, Teresa , Geller, Rachel , Johnson, Karen, Eastman, Diane L., Walker, Jacky R., Goeke, Claire A., Schmelzel, Mendi L., Faruqui, Sarah E., Coulter, Brenda J., Schrimper, Bailey M., Jellison, Sydney S., Knosp, L.K., Arnold, Sandra J., Andrews, Haley A., Ellsbury, Dan L., Bass, Donia B., Tud, Tracy L., Baack, Michelle , Richards, Laurie A., Henning, Megan M., Elenkiwich, Chelsey, Broadbent, Megan, Muyden, Sarah Van, Brodkorb, Aimee, Watterberg, Kristi L. , Fuller, Janell, Ohls, Robin K. , Lacy, Conra Backstrom, Hartenberger, Carol, Beauman, Sandra Sundquist , Hanson, Mary, Lowe, Jean, Kuan, Elizabeth, Eichenwald, Eric C. , Abbasi, Soraya, Chaudhary, Aasma S. , Cucinotta, Dara M., Bernbaum, Judy, Gerdes, Marsha , Ghavam, Savin, Hurt, Hallam, Snyder, Jonathan, Ziolkowski, Kristina, Dhawan, Megan , Booth, Lauren, Catts, Christine, D’Angio, Carl T., Guillet, Ronnie , Myers, Gary J. , Reynolds, Anne Marie , Wadkins, Holly I.M., Sacilowski, Michael G., Jensen, Rosemary L., Merzbach, Joan, Zorn, William, Farooq, Osman , Maffett, Dee, Williams, Ashley, Hunn, Julianne, Guilford, Stephanie , Yost, Kelley, Rowan, Mary, Prinzing, Diane, Bowman, Melissa, Reubens, Linda J., Scorsone, Ann Marie, Harley-McAndrew, Michelle, Fallone, Caitlin, Binion, Kyle, Orme, Constance, Sabaratnam, Premini , Jones, Rachel , Boylin, Elizabeth, Rochez, Daisy, Li, Emily, Kachelmeyer, Jennifer , McKee, Kimberly G., Coleman, Kelly R., Moreland, Melissa, Cavanaugh, Brenna, Wyckoff, Myra H. , Heyne, Roy J. , Vasil, Diana M., Adams, Sally S., Chen, Lijun , Leon, Maria Magdalena, Duran, Joanne, Eubanks, Frances, McDougald, Rebecca, Pavageau, Lara, Sepulveda, Pollieanna , Guzman, Alicia, Harrod, M. J. E., Heyne, Elizabeth T., Madden, Linda A., Lee, Lizette E. , Puentez, Anna E., Tolentino-Plata, Kristine , Boatman, Cathy Twell, Vera, Azucena, Waterbury, Jillian, Yoder, Bradley A. , Baserga, Mariana , Faix, Roger G., Minton, Stephen D., Sheffield, Mark J., Rau, Carrie A., Baker, Shawna, Burnett, Jill, Christensen, Susan, Bledsoe, Laura Cole, Cunningham, Sean D. , Davis, Brandy, Elmont, Jennifer O., Hall, Becky, Jensen, Erika R., Loertscher, Manndi C., Marchant, Trisha, Maxson, Earl, McGrath, Kandace M., Mickelsen, Hena G., Morshedzadeh, Galina, Parry, Dilys M. , Reich, Brixen A., Schaefer, Susan T., Stout, Kelly, Stuart, Ashley L., Weaver-Lewis, Kimberlee, Winter, Sarah , Woodbury, Kathryn D., Osborne, Karen A., Bird, Karie, Coleman, Kathleen, Francom, Barbara L., Jordan, Jamie, Steffen, Mike, Tice, Katherine, Shankaran, Seetha , Natarajan, Girija , Pappas, Athina, Sood, Beena G. , Bajaj, Monika , February, Melissa, Agarwal, Prashant , Chawla, Sanjay , Bara, Rebecca, Childs, Kirsten, Woldt, Eunice, Goldston, Laura A., Wiggins, Stephanie A., Christensen, Mary, Carlson, Martha, White, Diane F., Baack, Michelle L , Brumbaugh, Jane E. , Bell, Edward F. , Travers, Colm P. , Carlo, Waldemar A. , Keszler, Martin , Watson, Victoria E. , Hibbs, Anna Maria , Kim, Jae Hong , Yolton, Kimberly , Russell, David G. , Laughon, Matthew Maxwell , White, Donna, Patel, Ravi M. , Stoll, Barbara J. , Sewell, Elizabeth , Maitre, Nathalie L. , (deceased), Jeff Joyce, Khan, Amir M , Rysavy, Matthew A. , Dempsey, Allison G. , White, Michelle, Sánchez, Pablo J. , Slaughter, Jonathan L. , Nelin, Leif Daniel , Yeates, Keith Owen , Fortney, Christine A. , Keim, Sarah A. , Newton, Julia L. , Pietruszewski, Lindsay , Das, Abhik , Gantz, Marie G. , Wiener, Laura Elizabeth , Crawford, Margaret M. , Newman, Jamie E. , Parlberg, Lindsay M. , Taylor, Heather Lee , Ambalavanan, Namasivayam , Colaizy, Tarah T. , Widness, John A. , DeMauro, Sara B. , Schmidt, Barbara Kristina , Kirpalani, Haresh Murli , Mancini, Toni, Lakshminrusimha, Satyan , Kent, Alison , Brion, Luc P. , Leon, Maria M. De, Harrod, Michelle, Parry, D. Melody, Coleman, Kathleen, Barks, John

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Pediatrics | March 11, 2024 | Volume: 178 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 454

10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0125 | PMID 38466268 Get It

ImportanceRedirection of care refers to withdrawal, withholding, or limiting escalation of treatment. Whether maternal social determinants of health are associated with redirection of care discussions merits understanding.ObjectiveTo examine associations between maternal social determinants of health and redirection of care discussions for infants born extremely preterm.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of infants born at less than 29 weeks’ gestation between April 2011 and December 2020 at 19 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers in the US. Follow-up occurred between January 2013 and October 2023. Included infants received active treatment at birth and had mothers who identified as Black or White. Race was limited to Black and White based on service disparities between these groups and limited sample size for other races. Maternal social determinant of health exposures were education level (high school nongraduate or graduate), insurance type (public/none or private), race (Black or White), and ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was documented discussion about redirection of infant care. Secondary outcomes included subsequent redirection of care occurrence and, for those born at less than 27 weeks’ gestation, death and neurodevelopmental impairment at 22 to 26 months’ corrected age.ResultsOf the 15 629 infants (mean [SD] gestational age, 26 [2] weeks; 7961 [51%] male) from 13 643 mothers, 2324 (15%) had documented redirection of care discussions. In unadjusted comparisons, there was no significant difference in the percentage of infants with redirection of care discussions by race (Black, 1004/6793 [15%]; White, 1320/8836 [15%]) or ethnicity (Hispanic, 291/2105 [14%]; non-Hispanic, 2020/13 408 [15%]). However, after controlling for maternal and neonatal factors, infants whose mothers identified as Black or as Hispanic were less likely to have documented redirection of care discussions than infants whose mothers identified as White (Black vs White adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96) or as non-Hispanic (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.87). Redirection of care discussion occurrence did not differ by maternal education level or insurance type.Conclusions and RelevanceFor infants born extremely preterm, redirection of care discussions occurred less often for Black and Hispanic infants than for White and non-Hispanic infants. It is important to explore the possible reasons underlying these differences.
Analysis of editor in chief gender and associated journal variables among 126 pathology journals
Wang, Dayle K. , Clark, Landon M. , Adkins, Brian D. , Khan, Shazia S , Booth, Garrett S. , Jacobs, Jeremy W. , Adkins, Brian David , Booth, Garrett , Jacobs, Jeremy W , Stephens, Laura D.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Clinical Pathology | March 4, 2024 | Volume: 162 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 12-16

10.1093/ajcp/aqae018 | PMID 38437878 Get It

Abstract Objectives Gender equity studies have shown that women are underrepresented in journal editor in chief positions, which confer major professional opportunities and influence. We sought to systematically investigate editor in chief gender and journal attributes within pathology. Methods We constructed a journal data set using the Scimago Journal & Country Rank and Clarivate Journal Citation Reports databases. We also included official journals of the major medical societies for the 12 pathology subspecialties recognized by the Association of American Medical Colleges. The final data set included 126 journals. We obtained editor in chief gender, impact factor, publication model (ie, hybrid access vs open access), year of founding, and geographic location for all included pathology journals. Results Women made up only 18% of the 141 total editor in chief positions. This inequity was present irrespective of all pathology journal variables studied. Among 10 journals with 2 editor in chief positions, 5 had only men and 5 had 1 man and 1 woman. All 3 journals with 3 editor in chief positions had 2 men and 1 woman. Conclusions Women are significantly underrepresented among editor in chiefs across pathology journals. Journals and affiliated members should advocate for diversity among these influential positions, given their impact on research, science, and medicine.
Crizanlizumab and sickle cell disease: When should medications have their approval status revoked?
Jacobs, Jeremy W. , Stephens, Laura D. , Chooljian, David M. , Sharma, Deva , Adkins, Brian D. , Booth, Garrett S. , Jacobs, Jeremy W , Booth, Garrett , Adkins, Brian David , Stephens, Laura

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Hematology | February 27, 2024 | Volume: 99 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1016-1018

10.1002/ajh.27275 | PMID 38409818 Get It

Impact of Unplanned Readmission on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Cervical Spine Surgery: A National Study of 13 355 Patients
Croft, Andrew J. , Vaughan, Wilson E. , Khan, Inamullah , Davidson, Claudia , Bydon, Mohammad, Asher, Anthony L. , Archer, Kristin R. , Berkman, Richard A., Abtahi, Amir M. , Zuckerman, Scott L , Pennings, Jacquelyn S. , Chanbour, Hani , Gardocki, Raymond J. , Stephens, Byron F. , Zuckerman, Scott L.

Mayo Clinic

Neurosurgery | February 21, 2024 | Volume: 95 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 234-249

10.1227/neu.0000000000002872 | PMID 38380924 Get It

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although risk factors for unplanned readmission after cervical spine surgery have been widely reported, less is known about how readmission itself affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Using the Quality Outcomes Database registry of patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery, we sought to (1) determine the impact of unplanned readmission on PROMs and (2) compare the effect of specific readmission reasons on PROMs. METHODS: An observational study was performed using a multi-institution, retrospective registry for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. The occurrence of 90-day unplanned readmission classified into medical, surgical, pain only, and no readmissions was the exposure variable. Outcome variables included 12-month PROMs of Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-neck/arm pain, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and patient dissatisfaction. Multivariable models predicting each PROM were built using readmission reasons controlling for demographics, clinical characteristics, and preoperative PROMs. RESULTS: Data from 13 355 patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery (82% anterior approach and 18% posterior approach) were analyzed. Unplanned readmission within 90 days of surgery occurred in 3.8% patients, including medical (1.6%), surgical (1.8%), and pain (0.3%). Besides medical reasons, wound infection/dehiscence was the most common reason for unplanned readmission for the total cohort (0.5%), dysphagia in the anterior approach (0.6%), and wound infection/dehiscence in the posterior approach (1.5%). Based on multivariable regression, surgical readmission was significantly associated with worse 12-month NDI, NRS-neck pain, NRS-arm pain, EQ-5D, and higher odds of dissatisfaction. Pain readmissions were associated with worse 12-month NDI and NRS-neck pain scores, and worse dissatisfaction. For specific readmission reasons, pain, surgical site infection/wound dehiscence, hematoma/seroma, revision surgery, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism were significantly associated with worsened 12-month PROMs. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery, 90-day unplanned surgical and pain readmissions were associated with worse 12-month PROMs compared with patients with medical readmissions and no readmissions.
Roux-en-Y retrograde intussusception: surgical reconstruction via sequential isoperistaltic side-to-side anastomoses
Chopko, Trevor C. , Sudhindran, Vineeth, Stephens, Daniel , Stephens, Daniel , Chopko, Trevor , Stephens, Daniel

Mayo Clinic

BMJ Case Reports | February 17, 2024 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e258660

10.1136/bcr-2023-258660 | PMID 38367992 Get It

Intussusception following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a rare, potentially life-threatening complication. Patients present with intermittent obstructive symptoms, and the diagnosis is made on imaging. Treatment is surgical considering the high likelihood of non-operative failure, strangulation, incarceration, perforation and concern for malignancy. We present the case of a woman in her 60s with a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass who presented with retrograde jejunojejunal intussusception at the distal Roux anastomosis. She proceeded to the operating room for complete anastomotic resection with reconstruction of three blind ends via two sequential isoperistaltic anastomoses. She progressed appropriately throughout her hospitalisation and was discharged on postoperative day 5 without recurrence. While intussusception in Roux-en-Y anatomy has been previously described, a literature review yielded sparse results in detailing its surgical correction. We highlight our unique surgical approach of jejunojejunal anastomotic resection with the creation of sequential isoperistaltic side-to-side anastomoses.
Utility of routine follow‐up defibrillation safety margin testing in young patients with epicardial implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
Leng, Tomas , Stephens, Elizabeth H. , Cannon, Bryan C. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Wackel, Philip L. , Griffeth, Elaine, Cannon, Bryan C , Wackel, Philip , Griffeth, Elaine M. , Dearani, Joseph A.

Mayo Clinic

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | February 11, 2024 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 392-397

10.1111/pace.14948 | PMID 38341633 Get It

AbstractBackgroundRoutine defibrillation threshold testing (DFT) of transvenous implantable defibrillators (ICDs) has largely been in decline. In patients with non‐transvenous ICDs that utilize subcutaneous and pleural ICD leads, serial DFT testing can detect a significant number of failures. Data about the utility of follow‐up defibrillation safety margin testing (DSM) testing in pediatric patients and young adults with an epicardial ICD are lacking.MethodsPatients aged < 25 years old who underwent epicardial ICD placement at Mayo Clinic from 2014 to 2023 with at least one follow‐up DSM test were included. The patients were divided into a “routine” (R) and “clinically indicated” (CI) group based on the index of clinical concern. Inadequate DSM was defined as unsuccessful defibrillation at an output of less than 10 J below the maximum output of the device. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of follow‐up DSM testing.ResultsAn epicardial ICD system was placed in 122 patients. A total of 26 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent a total of 47 DSM follow up tests. Inadequate DSM occurred in 1/33 (3%) in the R group and 2/14 (14%) DSM tests in the CI group. The median follow‐up period was 54 and 36 months for the R and CI group, respectively.ConclusionsOur data suggest that epicardial ICDs are reliable and routine follow‐up DSM testing may not be necessary for all patients. DSM testing should be performed in individuals with epicardial ICD systems when there is clinical concern about lead or coil performance.