Citations

629 Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare neoplasms with outcome varying by stage, grade, and clinical presentation. We present an analysis of the epidemiology and prognosis of patients (pts) with PNETs over the last two decades using a large population-based database. Methods: Using 2000-2016 data from the SEER 18 registry, we identified pts with PNETs using a combination of ICD-O-3 and histology codes. Age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated using SEER*Stat 8.3.5. Using SAS 9.4, overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and prognostic factors were investigated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Results: We identified 8,944 pts with PNETs. Annual incidence rates increased over the study period from 0.27 to 1.00 per 100,000. This was largely explained by a significant increase in number of pts diagnosed with localized disease in recent years (2012-2016). Median OS (mOS) for the entire cohort was 68 months (95% CI 64-73) and 5-year OS rates in localized, regional, and metastatic disease were 83%, 67%, and 28%, respectively. There was a significant improvement in OS for pts diagnosed between 2009-2016 (mOS 85 months) compared to those diagnosed between 2000-2008 (mOS 46 months) (HR 0.66; p < .001). In addition, pts with grade I/II metastatic disease who underwent surgery experienced significantly longer OS (mOS 84 months) compared to those who did not undergo surgery (mOS 18 months) (HR 0.31; p < .001). In the multivariate analysis, more recent diagnosis, younger age, female sex, surgery, early stage, and lower grade favorably predicted OS. On the other hand, functional status and race did not predict OS. Conclusions: There has been a steady increase in the incidence of PNETs with notable stage migration as most patients are diagnosed in early stages of disease in recent years. Additionally, this increase in incidence is accompanied by a significant improvement in survival across different disease stages.

617 Background: Currently, there is no published data on the efficacy of SSAs for well-differentiated G3 NETs. Randomized trials have demonstrated a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit and limited tumor response for lower grade 1-2 NETs, but the optimal systemic therapy for metastatic/unresectable G3 NETs is unknown. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of SSAs in G3 NETs. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of Mayo Clinic patients treated with SSAs for metastatic/unresectable G3 NETs, querying data from 1992 - present. Inclusion criteria were: centrally reviewed pathology confirming well-differentiated morphology, G3 based on WHO classification, SSA monotherapy, and radiological data available to assess response. Patients who had prior lines of treatment were included as long they subsequently were treated with single-agent SSA. Poorly-differentiated tumors were excluded. The primary endpoint was PFS. Best overall response was determined by radiographic regression, stabilization, or progression of tumor size. Results: Ninety patient records were reviewed, with 14 meeting inclusion criteria (diagnosed 2014 – 2018). Median Ki-67 proliferative index was 25%. Two patients (14%) had a partial response to SSA therapy, five (36%) had stable disease, and seven (50%) had progressive disease. The estimated median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.9 – 24). Of the 7 patients with stable disease or partial response, the median time to progression was 8.7 months. Three patients had stable disease for greater than 9 months (24, 29 and 42 months, respectively). Overall survival was not estimable. There was no association of Ki-67 index with PFS based on a proportional hazards model. Conclusions: This is the first report on the efficacy of SSAs for G3 NETs. Although half of the patients in our series had at least stable disease, the PFS was modest at only 4.4 months. Given their favorable side-effect profile compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy, SSAs may present an attractive option to be further explored in a prospective fashion. We are presently updating this data by reassessing response using RECIST criteria.

362 Background: Most pts with mGEA do not respond to ICI or ramucirumab/paclitaxel (RAM/TAX). Emerging data suggest that ICI may potentiate subsequent therapy (Tx). In KN059 we unexpectedly observed durable responses in 2 pts on RAM/TAX after ICI (PMID 29674442). We examined if ICI impacts efficacy of subsequent RAM/TAX in a larger cohort and explored alterations in the tumor microenvironment. Methods: All pts with mGEA at Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL) who received RAM/TAX (2014-19) were included. We compared best objective response rate (ORR: complete [CR] or partial response [PR]) per RECIST1.1 and overall survival (OS) in pts who received RAM/TAX with (Group A) vs without (Group B) immediately preceding PD-1 blockade. Chi square and multivariate logistic and Cox regression were used. We adjusted for total lines of Tx received and the line of Tx in which RAM/TAX was given, to control for potential differences in the biology of heavily treated pts or those receiving RAM/TAX as 2nd vs 3rd line Tx. We also adjusted for age and ECOG PS. Results: In total 87 pts met inclusion criteria. In the 19 pts (Group A) who received RAM/TAX (usually as 3rd line Tx) after progression on ICI, there was a 77% relative risk reduction of death after initiation of RAM/TAX compared to the 68 pts (Group B) who received RAM/TAX (usually as 2nd line) without preceding ICI (median OS 15.0 vs 7.6 mo; HR 0.23; P < .001). The ORR was also significantly higher (58% vs 18%; P < .001) including the CR rate (16% vs 1%; P = .006). Two CRs in Group A are ongoing (10 - 34 mo). Of note, 95% of Group A pts did not respond to ICI, and all had irRECIST progression on ICI. Immunofluorescent analysis from a responder showed 65-fold reduction (post vs pre-Tx) in intratumoral density of immunosuppressive FOXP3+ Tregs, with preserved density of antitumor CD8+ T cells. Conclusions: Higher than expected efficacy was observed on RAM/TAX when immediately preceded by ICI, suggesting ICI may enhance efficacy of subsequent anti-VEGFR/taxane therapy. This serial immunotherapy combination may be a novel option for pts with primary resistance to ICI and will be tested prospectively in a new randomized phase 2 trial (NCT04069273).

e15698 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and carcinomas (NECs) are a diverse group of tumors with an equally diverse biology and clinical behavior. Data on tissue-based genomic profiling of NETs exists, however, there is limited data using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) technology. We sought out to characterize NETs via ctDNA to identify genomic alterations. Methods: 27 patients with metastatic NET/NEC with 32 total plasma samples were analyzed using Guardant360 ctDNA assay. Breakdown of NET/NEC by location: 14 pancreatic NET (pNET), 11 NEC, 1 small bowel NET, 1 lung NET. The ctDNA test detects single nucleotide variants in 54-73 genes, copy number amplifications, fusions, and indels in selected genes. Results: Of the 27 patients, 19 (70%) had a detectable genomic alteration. The detectable (non-synonymous) alterations are as follows: TP53 (n = 14, 70%), NF1 (n = 8, 40%), EGFR (n = 5, 25%), BRCA2 (n = 4, 20%), KRAS (n = 4, 20%), ARID1A (n = 3, 15%), CDK6 (n = 3, 15%), ALK (n = 3, 15%), MET (n = 2, 10%), PTEN (n = 2, 10%), BRAF (n = 2, 10%), MTOR (n = 2, 10%) AKT1 (n = 1), BRCA1 (n = 1), CCND2 (n = 1), CCNE1 (n = 1), CTNNB1 (n = 1), ESR1 (n = 1), FGFR2 (n = 1), HRAS (n = 1), IDH1 (n = 1), KIT (n = 1), MYC (n = 1), NOTCH1 (n = 1), NRAS (n = 1), PDGFRA (n = 1), RAF1 (n = 1), RB1 (n = 1), SMAD4 (n = 1), STK11 (n = 1), TSC1 (n = 1), ERBB2 (n = 1), PIK3CA (n = 1). Conclusions: This experience highlights the feasibility of ctDNA to help identify genomic alterations in this patient population. Further studies incorporating ctDNA testing in this patient population are warranted.

4110 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) comprise around 2% of all malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal system. The genomic landscape of NET has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to confirm the feasibility of next generation sequencing (NGS) using ctDNA in NET and characterize common alterations in the genomic profile. Methods: Molecular alterations in 114 plasma samples from 114 patients with NET using clinical-grade NGS of ctDNA (Guardant360Ò) across multiple institutions were evaluated. The test detects single nucleotide variants in 54-73 genes, copy number amplifications, fusions, and indels in selected genes. Results: A total of 114 NET patients were evaluated, of which 64 (56.1%) were female. Mean age was 59.7 years with a range between 23-89 years. ctDNA NGS testing was performed on 114 plasma samples; 1 patient had testing performed twice. Genomic alterations were defined in 94 (n = 94/114, 82.5%) samples with a total of 289 alterations identified after excluding variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) and synonymous mutations. Alterations were identified in at least one sample from 83 patients; TP53 associated genes were most commonly altered (n = 83/289, 28.7%), followed by KRAS (n = 22, 7.6%), PI3CA (n = 15, 5.2%), CCNE1 (n = 15, 5.2%), BRAF (n = 13, 4.5%), MYC (n = 12, 4.1%), ERBB2 (n = 11, 3.8%), APC (n = 10, 3.5%), EGFR (n = 10, 3.5%), MET (n = 10, 3.5%), PTEN (n = 9, 3.1%), RB1 (n = 9, 3.1%), CDK6 (n = 7, 2.4%), AR (n = 5, 1.7%), ARID1A (n = 5, 1.7%), FGFR1 (n = 5, 1.7%), and PDGFRA (n = 5, 1.7%). Other genomic alterations of low frequency, but clinical relevance included: CDK4 (n = 4, 1.3%), NF1 (n = 4, 1.3%), RAF1 (n = 4, 1.3%), GNAS (n = 3, 1.0%), KIT (n = 3, 1.3%), BRCA2 (n = 2, 0.7%), CCND2 (n = 2, 0.7%), CTNNB1 (n = 2, 0.7%), JAK2 (n = 2, 0.7%), NRAS (n = 2, 0.7%), SMAD4 (n = 2, 0.7%), and TERT (n = 2, 0.7%). Alterations in AKT1, ALK, ATM, BRCA1, CCND1, CDKN2A, FGFR2, MTOR, RHOA, SMO and STK11 were all reported once (n = 1, 0.3%). Conclusions: Evaluation of ctDNA is feasible among individuals with NET. Liquid biopsies are not invasive and can provide personalized options for targeted therapies in NET patients.

e15066 Background: Circulating cell-free tumor-DNA (ctDNA) testing (‘liquid biopsy’) is increasingly being employed both in clinical trials as well as clinical practice. We aimed to contrast and compare the differences in the number of somatic mutations observed on ctDNA testing between mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-High) versus mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) colorectal cancers (CRC). Methods: We had 20 patients at Mayo Clinic Florida that were dMMR/MSI-High with testing through the commercially available platform (Guardant360) that uses a 73-gene panel. Median numbers of somatic mutations were compared between the 2 subset of CRC. Results: Patients with dMMR/MSI-High CRC had a median of 8 mutations (range: 2-15) versus a median of 4 mutations (range: 1-22) in pMMR/MSS patients, p-value of 0.001. Similarly, the mean number of somatic mutations were 7.47 (S.D. ± 4.15) versus 5.02 mutations (S.D. ± 3.83) in patients with dMMR/MSI-H and pMMR/MSS, tumors respectively. Though it is simplistic, we could still potentially identify patients who may be candidates for immunotherapy by gauging the mutational burden reported (Table). Furthermore, on serial testing, decline in mutational burden as early as few weeks into therapy was predictive of response later on imaging. Conclusions: Analysis of number of somatic mutations on ctDNA testing can be complementary to MMR/MSI-testing, especially in situations when tissue is not available or safe to obtain. This can also be of value in predicting and/or following response to immunotherapy. The utility of this may go beyond CRC in identifying patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. [Table: see text]

3566 Background: According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) joint review on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) issued in March 2018, widespread use of ctDNA assays in most patients with advanced cancer is still an area of ongoing research. However, multiple studies thereafter published and/or presented support its use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This has led to several institutions adopting it as ‘clinical practice’. The aim of this study is to report on our institution’s adoption of ctDNA testing for every patient at the time of diagnosis and/or time of progression. Methods: We report on results of 322 CRC patients with 607 ctDNA tests at our center from January 2017 to February 2019 using a commercially available platform (Guardant360). Results: Among 322 patients of our cohort, a total of 607 ctDNA tests were done (Table). 127 (39.4%) of these tests were serial analyses. In the CRC patients who had serial testing, at progression, mechanisms of resistance included acquisition of KRAS, NRAS, EGFR mutations; and HER2- and MET-amplifications. The subclonal mutations were noted to disappear when the selective inhibition was stopped. This was seen in patients on targeted therapies/biologics rather than chemotherapy. This was of value in treatment modification, clinical trial selection and/or monitoring of disease progression in these patients. Conclusions: While ctDNA testing may not be ready for primetime in all advanced cancers, it is increasingly being adopted in practice for especially metastatic CRC. Of particular value is the serial ctDNA testing in the RAS/RAF wildtype subset and now BRAF V600E mutant CRC on anti-EGFR based therapies. [Table: see text]

PURPOSE Recent advances in molecular diagnostic technologies have allowed for the evaluation of solid tumor malignancies via noninvasive blood sampling, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling. We sought to characterize the ctDNA genomic alteration landscape in patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 2015 to February 2018, 124 patients with BTC at the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center underwent ctDNA testing using a clinically available assay. The majority of samples (n = 122) were tested using the 73-gene panel that includes somatic genomic targets, including complete or critical exon coverage in 30 and 40 genes, respectively, and in some, amplifications, fusions, and indels. RESULTS A total of 138 samples were included, with approximately 70% of patients having intrahepatic BTC. All patients had locally advanced or metastatic BTC. Samples with one or more alterations, when variants of unknown significance were excluded, numbered 105 (76%). Each sample contained, on average, three alterations with a median allelic fraction of 0.52%. The overall landscape of alterations is summarized in Figures 1 and 2. After excluding variants of unknown significance, therapeutically relevant alterations were observed in 76 patients (55%), including BRAF mutations, ERBB2 amplifications, FGFR2 fusions, FGFR2 mutations, and IDH1 mutations seen in 21% of patients. A different spectrum of alterations was observed in patients with early-onset BTC (younger than age 50 years) compared with older patients (older than age 50 years). CONCLUSION Data on ctDNA in BTC is currently limited. Our study, the largest cohort reported to date to our knowledge, demonstrates the feasibility of ctDNA testing in this disease. We provide a foundation upon which the field can continue to grow.

291 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has limited treatment options. Genomic analyses have led to development of targeted therapies now in clinical trials, and may enable discovery of new treatment options. However, biopsy often yields limited tissue, thus hampering tissue-based profiling opportunities. Comparative data regarding circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis and tissue based profiling in CCA are limited. Methods: We performed ctDNA NGS analysis along with tissue based profiling in pts with advanced CCA (January 2015- February 2018). ctDNA analysis was performed using Guardant 360 (Guardant Health, CA) which detects single nucleotide variants, amplifications, fusions, and specific insertion/deletion mutations in up to 73 different genes and the majority of tissue based profiling using Foundation One. The mutant allele fraction (MAF) for detected alterations was calculated relative to wild type in ctDNA. Therapeutic relevance was defined as alterations within OncoKB levels 1-3B and R1. The study was conducted in accordance with Mayo Clinic IRB requirements. Results: Among 124 pts and 139 total samples, ctDNA NGS revealed at least one genomic alteration (excluding variants of uncertain significance and synonymous mutations) in 89% of pts. Median number of alterations per pt was 3 [range, 1-15], with a median MAF of 0.42% (range, 0.1% - 94.2%). The total number of unique alterations was 321. The most commonly altered genes: TP53 (31%), KRAS (11%), FGFR2 (7%), APC and PIK3CA (each 5%) and ARID1A (3%). Amplifications were noted in 14 genes: BRAF, CCND1, CCND2, CCNE1, CDK4, CDK6, EGFR, ERBB2, FGFR1, FGFR2, MET, MYC, PDGFRA, and PIK3CA. Tissue-based profiling was available in 57 (46%) pts, with a median of 63 days between liquid and tissue biopsy. IDH1, FGFR2, TP53 and KRAS were most common gene mutations found in pts who had both liquid and tissue biopsy done. (Comparative results to be shown). Conclusions: ctDNA plasma profiling of pts with advanced CCA is a feasible alternative method to gather comprehensive genomic data. Further larger cohort studies comparing landscape of alterations seen on ctDNA versus tissue-based assays are needed.