Citations

Abstract Background: Immunotherapy targeting tumor-associated antigens aberrantly expressed on colorectal cancers and adenomatous polyps offers the potential for a relatively non-invasive and non-toxic prevention strategy, and because of the specificity of the immune response and its long-term memory, the potential for prolonged protection. In a double-blind randomized trial in patients with a diagnosis of advanced colorectal adenomas within the previous year, we are evaluating MUC1 vaccine with the TLR-3 agonist polyICLC (Hiltonol®) as an adjuvant, for its immunogenicity and effect on colorectal adenoma recurrence at follow up colonoscopy. Aim: We report on a primary endpoint, MUC1 immunogenicity at week 12 (following vaccine or placebo administration at 0, 2, and 10 weeks), and on determinants of the immune response and vaccine toxicity. Methods: Subjects with an advanced adenoma (defined as ≥1cm, tubulovillous or villous histology, or with HGD) were randomized. Response to the vaccine was assessed by monitoring IgG anti-MUC1 antibody titer ratio; defined as t12/t0, where t0 is the initial titer measured prior to vaccination, and t12 is the titer drawn at 12 weeks. A ratio of 2.0 was used as the primary definition of a significant immune response. T Regulatory and myleoid derived suppressor cell (MDSC) levels at baseline were assessed in relation to vaccine response. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Results: 102 subjects were randomized at 6 centers, 52 received MUC1 vaccine and 50 placebo. Subjects had a mean age of 59.4±7.0 (range 40-70) years, 60.8% were male, 88.2% were white, and 18.6% Hispanic or Latino. At 12 weeks the IgG ratio was ≥2.0 in 13/52 (25%) of patients receiving vaccine (ratio range 2.9-17.3), vs. 0/50 in placebo group (P=.0001), and was ≥1.5 in 19/52 (36.5%) of patients receiving vaccine compared to 1/50 (2%) in placebo group (P<.0001). In the vaccinated group, the IgG ratio was ≥2.0 in 45% of women (9/20) vs. 12.5% of men (4/32) (P=0.009) and ≥1.5 in 55% of women (11/20) vs. 25% of men (8/32) (P=0.03). In the vaccinated group, reduced levels of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC) pre-vaccination were associated with response, 0.2±0.1 among responders (n=13) vs. 0.8±1.1 among non-responders (N=39) (p=0.0006) whereas monocytic MDSC and T regulatory cells (CD4+CD25, Foxp3) were not. There were no grade 3 adverse events (AE) possibly or probably related to the vaccine. The most common AE was an injection site reaction (grade 1 or 2) which occurred in 80.8% (n=42/52) in vaccine group vs. 6.0% in the placebo group (3/50). Conclusions: Subjects with an advanced adenoma receiving MUC1 vaccine compared with a placebo are significantly more likely to develop an anti-IgG MUC1 immune response at 12 weeks. Women and subjects with lower circulating PMN-MDSC levels at baseline were more likely to respond. The vaccine was well tolerated. Follow up for the effect of the vaccine on adenomatous polyp recurrence is ongoing. Citation Format: Robert E. Schoen, Lisa A. Boardman, Marcia Cruz-Correa, Ajay Bansal, Pamela L. Beatty, David Kastenberg, Chin Hur, Lynda Dzubinski, Luz Rodriguez, Andres Salazar, John McKolanis, Drew Seisler, Nathan R. Foster, May-Yin Polley, Paul J. Limburg, Olivera J. Finn. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled immunoprevention trial with MUC1 vaccine in patients with newly diagnosed advanced adenomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-305.

Purpose The relevance of inherited pathogenic mutations in cancer predisposition genes in pancreatic cancer is not well understood. We aimed to assess the characteristics of patients with pancreatic cancer referred for hereditary cancer genetic testing and to estimate the risk of pancreatic cancer associated with mutations in panel-based cancer predisposition genes in this high-risk population. Methods Patients with pancreatic cancer (N = 1,652) were identified from a 140,000-patient cohort undergoing multigene panel testing of predisposition genes between March 2012 and June 2016. Gene-level mutation frequencies relative to Exome Aggregation Consortium and Genome Aggregation Database reference controls were assessed. Results The frequency of germline cancer predisposition gene mutations among patients with pancreatic cancer was 20.73%. Mutations in ATM, BRCA2, CDKN2A, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, and TP53 were associated with high pancreatic cancer risk (odds ratio, > 5), and mutations in BRCA1 were associated with moderate risk (odds ratio, > 2). In a logistic regression model adjusted for age at diagnosis and family history of cancer, ATM and BRCA2 mutations were associated with personal history of breast or pancreatic cancer, whereas PALB2 mutations were associated with family history of breast or pancreatic cancer. Conclusion These findings provide insight into the spectrum of mutations expected in patients with pancreatic cancer referred for cancer predisposition testing. Mutations in eight genes confer high or moderate risk of pancreatic cancer and may prove useful for risk assessment for pancreatic and other cancers. Family and personal histories of breast cancer are strong predictors of germline mutations.

Objective: It is well known that patients with oral clefts have challenges with feeding. Enteral feeding access, in the form of gastrostomy, is often utilized to supplement or replace oral intake. Although commonly performed, these procedures have reported complication rates as high as 83%. We intend to discover rates of enteral access in patients with oral clefts and report-related outcomes. Design: The Healthcare Cost Utilization Project Kids’ Inpatient Database from 2000 to 2012 was analyzed using patients with oral clefts and enteral access procedures. The χ 2 test was used for univariate analyses of proportions, and linear regression was used to analyze trends. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze odds ratios. Results: Of the 46 617 patient admissions included, 14.6% had isolated cleft lip (CL), 51.7% cleft lip and palate (CLP), and 43.7% isolated cleft palate. The rates of enteral access in the oral cleft population increased from 3.7% in 2000 to 5.8% in 2012 ( P < .001). Increased rates were identified in patients with ( P = .019) and without ( P < .001) complex conditions. A significant increase in the rate of enteral access was seen in patients with CLP ( P < .001) and isolated cleft palate ( P < .001). No difference was seen in the isolated CL group ( P = .096). Patients with complex conditions were at a 4.4-fold increased risk and those admitted to urban, teaching hospitals were at a 4.7-fold risk of enteral access placement. Conclusions: The rates for enteral feeding access increased significantly from 2000 to 2012. The reasons for the increased incidence are unclear. Invasive enteral access procedures have been shown to have a multitude of complications. Careful patient selection should be done before placement of invasive enteral access.

ABSTRACT HIV protease is known to cause cell death, which is dependent upon cleavage of procaspase 8. HIV protease cleavage of procaspase 8 generates Casp8p41, which directly binds Bak with nanomolar affinity, causing Bak activation and consequent cell death. Casp8p41 can also bind Bcl2 with nanomolar affinity, in which case cell death is averted. Central memory CD4 T cells express high levels of Bcl2, possibly explaining why those cells do not die when they reactivate HIV. Here, we determine that the Casp8p41-Bcl2 complex is polyubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. Ixazomib, a proteasome inhibitor in clinical use, blocks this pathway, increasing the abundance of Casp8p41 and causing more cells to die in a Casp8p41-dependent manner. IMPORTANCE The Casp8p41 pathway of cell death is unique to HIV-infected cells yet is blocked by Bcl2. Once bound by Bcl2, Casp8p41 is polyubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. Proteasome inhibition blocks degradation of Casp8p41, increasing Casp8p41 levels and causing more HIV-infected cells to die.

262 Background: Inherited and somatic aberrations in DNA repair genes in castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) are associated with poor prognosis, but respond well to poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. We evaluated the prevalence and prognostic impact of harboring germline DNA repair variants in hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Methods: Germline DNA from buffy coat was sequenced on HiSeq4000 with a median coverage of 200X for DNA repair variants in 20 genes in HSPC and CRPC patients (pts) enrolled in a hospital registry. Pts were divided into two groups; Group A: pts enrolled at the time of CRPC stage; Group B: treatment naïve HSPC stage pts. The primary endpoints were to determine any impact of harboring DNA repair variants on time to progression from HSPC to CRPC and, from CRPC to death. Group A pts were retrospectively analyzed for time to progression from HSPC to CRPC while Group B patients were followed prospectively for outcomes. Statistical analysis included Cox proportional hazard models and Wilcoxon Rank sum test with significance at p≤0.05. Results: In Group A, 51/562 CRPC pts (9.07%) had variants in the 20 genes (most frequently in BRCA2; n = 15). 44/51 pts with variants and 399/511 without variants had died. Median time of progression from HSPC to CRPC with/without variants was 22.1 vs. 25.1 months (mths); p-value = 0.679. Median time from CRPC to death with/without variants was 32.2 Vs. 27.7 mths (p = 0.6). In HSPC Group B, 14/100 pts were identified with germline variants in ATM (n = 5), CHEK2 (n = 3), BRCA1 (n = 2), BRCA2 (n = 2), RAD50 (n = 1), and MSH2 (n = 1). 31/100 have died and median time to progression from HSPC to CRPC with/without variants was 15.6 vs.11.8 mths, p-value = 0.76. Conclusions: Pts with germline DNA repair variants detected in HSPC stage were not associated with poor prognosis. Presence of additional somatic DNA repair gene aberrations in cell-free DNA, not investigated in this cohort may add to the prevalence of DNA repair gene variations in HSPC and together impact prognosis adversely so as to provide a rationale for PARP inhibitor therapy in select HSPC stage pts.

TPS17 Background: Emerging studies suggest that breast cancer, particularly triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), may be sensitive to immunotherapy. However, the response rate of single agent immune checkpoint blockade agent in TNBC is rather low. Previous genomic study in residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed inverse correlations between MEK activation signature and the amount of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in residual disease samples as well as poor outcome. Preclinical study also showed that the combination of MEK inhibitor and anti-PD-L1 antibody in mouse model can eradicate TNBC tumors. Methods: This is a single arm, Phase I/II trial of Pembrolizumab (P) in combination with Binimetinib (B) in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC. This trial is currently opened for accrual at Mayo Clinic in Florida and Minnesota. Patients with TNBC defined as ER ≤ 10% and PR ≤ 10% who received ≤ 3 prior lines with measurable disease will be enrolled. The primary objective of the Phase I part is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of B in combination with P and for the Phase II part is objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST criteria. The secondary endpoints include ORR by irRECIST, progression free survival, and overall survival. The total sample size is 15-38 patients with 6-12 patients in Phase I with 2 dose levels and 9-26 patients in Phase II. Simon’s Two-Stage Optimal Design is used to test the null hypothesis that this two-drug combination has an ORR of at most 15% vs. the alternative hypothesis that it has an ORR of at least 35%. Patients will receive single agent B for 2 weeks prior to starting P. A mandatory biopsy will be performed before starting B and an optional biopsy will be performed after 2 weeks of B. Tumor tissue will be evaluated for the amount and phenotypes of TILs, PD-L1 expression, and gene expression analysis using PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel, and PDJ amplification. Peripheral blood will be evaluated for circulating immunoregulatory cells, cytokine profiling, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), as well as p-ERK and PD-L1 expression on CTCs. Clinical trial information: NCT03106415.