Citations

Abstract Background: Thrombocytopenia commonly occurs in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and is associated with poor outcomes. While previous studies have examined static platelet counts and relative declines, the prognostic significance of platelet trajectory patterns before and after CRRT initiation remains unclear. This study investigates the association between platelet count trajectories and in-hospital mortality in critically ill adult patients with AKI receiving CRRT. Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective cohort study utilizing electronic health record (EHR) data from critically ill adults (≥18 years) with AKI who received CRRT at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between January 2012 and December 2023. Platelet trajectories were assessed using mixed-effects models incorporating all platelet measurements within seven days before and after CRRT initiation. The slopes of platelet count change were categorized as descending (≤ -10 × 10³/μL/day), stable (-10 to 10), or ascending (≥ 10), creating a total of nine trajectory patterns by combining the three pre-CRRT and three during-CRRT categories. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, which was analyzed in relation to these trajectory patterns using logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, medications, and use of other organ support devices as covariates. Results: The study included 2,226 critically ill adults with AKI on CRRT, encompassing 8,569 patient-days before and 11,699 patient-days after CRRT initiation for platelet slope calculation. The median age was 59 years (IQR 48–69) and the median SOFA score at CRRT initiation was 12 (9–14). The in-hospital mortality rate was 57.8%. Before CRRT initiation, the most common trajectory was descending (46.2%), while after CRRT initiation, the stable pattern was most prevalent (58.3%). All patterns with a descending platelet trajectory during-CRRT were significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.92 [95% CI: 1.16–3.21] for ascending-descending; 1.49 [1.07–2.08] for stable-descending; 1.52 [1.04–2.23] for descending-descending). In contrast, all patterns with stable or increasing platelet counts during-CRRT tended to have lower mortality. Conclusions: A descending platelet trajectory after CRRT initiation was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality.

PURPOSE Tumor treating fields (TTFields) use alternating electric fields to disrupt cancer cell proliferation. Feasibility of TTFields therapy with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel was previously demonstrated in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PANOVA-3 was designed to confirm safety and efficacy of TTFields in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC). METHODS In this global phase III trial, 571 patients with newly diagnosed LA-PAC were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m 2 by intravenous infusion once a day on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle with or without TTFields. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, pain-free survival, and overall response rate (ORR). Distant PFS was analyzed post hoc. RESULTS OS was significantly prolonged using TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (median, 16.2 months [95% CI, 15.0 to 18.0] v 14.2 months [95% CI, 12.8 to 15.4]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99]; P = .039). PFS, local PFS, and ORR were not improved. Pain-free survival was significantly prolonged with TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (median, 15.2 months [95% CI, 10.3 to 22.8] v 9.1 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 12.7]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56 to 0.97]; P = .027), as was distant PFS (median, 13.9 months [95% CI, 12.2 to 16.8] v 11.5 months [95% CI, 10.4 to 12.9]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.96]; P = .022). Device-related skin adverse events (AEs) were experienced by 76.3% of patients. Most device-related skin AEs were mild to moderate, with 7.7% of patients reporting a grade 3 AE. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated significant OS, pain-free survival, and distant PFS benefits for TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable LA-PAC, with no additive systemic toxicity.

3569 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a standard treatment for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability (MSI). However, around 50% of patients develop resistance to ICIs, during treatment or after discontinuation. In these patients, the efficacy of reuse an ICI in patients progressing during a previous ICI (rechallenge), or in patients who progressed after discontinuation (reintroduction), remains unknown. The INFLATE study evaluates the efficacy of ICI reuse in patients who progressed on or after discontinuing ICI. Methods: This is a multicenter international retrospective study from the IMMUNODIG cohort, including patients from 34 centers in France, the United States, Italy, Belgium and Spain. All patients received ICI for dMMR/MSI GI cancer. We analyzed patients who had progressed following initial ICI (ICI-1) and subsequently received a rechallenge or a reintroduction with ICI (ICI-2), either monotherapy (mono-ICI) or biotherapy (bi-ICI). Results: A total of 77 patients were included, receiving bi-ICI (N = 34) or mono-ICI (N = 43) during ICI-2. The majority (76%) had a metastatic colorectal cancer. The reason for discontinuing ICI-1 was disease progression in 53% of cases, end of treatment in 15%, toxicity in 5% and other reasons in 26%. Patients who discontinued ICI-1 due to progression received MONO-ICI-2 in 29% of cases and BI-ICI-2 in 71%, whereas those who stopped for other reasons received MONO-ICI-2 in 86% and BI-ICI-2 in 14% of cases. Efficacy results are shown in Table 1. The ORR and DCR were 26% and 79% with MONO-ICI-2, and 16% and 71% with BI-ICI-2. Among patients who discontinued ICI-1 due to progression, BI-ICI-2 (N = 29) achieved an ORR and DCR of 8% and 65%, with a median PFS of 5.5 months (95%CI 4.07-10.4). These outcomes were 17%, 67%, and 3.7 months (95%CI 2.37-NA), respectively, with MONO-ICI-2 (N = 12). For patients who discontinued ICI-1 for reasons other than progression, BI-ICI-2 (N = 5) achieved an ORR and DCR of 60% and 100%, with a median PFS not reached (95%CI 11.5-NR), while MONO-ICI-2 (N = 31) achieved 29%, 82%, and 14.2 months (95%CI 11.2–NR), respectively. Conclusions: This is the first multicenter real-world study evaluating ICI reuse in dMMR/MSI GI cancers. In patients who discontinued ICI for reasons other than progression, reintroduction of ICI therapy upon progression achieves tumor control in 85% of cases. In cases of progression on mono-ICI, Bi-ICI re-challenge achieve tumor control in two-thirds of cases and might be to consider in some patients. ORR % DCR % PFS median (95%CI) OS median (95%CI) Overall N=77 21 76 7.65 months(5.5–11.5) 27.6 months(22.2–55.7) Discontinued ICI-1 due to Progression N=41 11 68 5.03 months(3.7–8.05) 26.7 months(21.1–NR) Discontinued ICI-1 for Other Reasons N=36 33 85 14.22 months(11.24–NR) 27.6 months(22.2–NR)

11106 Background: Patients with cancer take different types of medication (e.g., enteral, parenteral), with varying treatment schedules, in various settings. They are also sometimes instructed to stop medication in response to toxicity. To measure medication nonadherence in this heterogenous population, we modified and pilot-tested a self-report measure originally developed to assess nonadherence to daily oral medication, the Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence), in adults with cancer. Methods: Participants were ≥21 years, on active cancer treatment at Memorial Sloan Kettering, and spoke English and/or Spanish. A branching logic was added to allow participants to select the setting where they take cancer medication: 1) only at home, 2) only in clinic, or 3) partly at home/partly in clinic. Based on administration setting, participants reported nonadherence to medications their clinician expected them to take over a given reference period (1 week for home and 1 month for clinic medications). Participants then reported on setting-relevant reasons for nonadherence. Survey instructions/items were refined in an iterative process using feedback from a patient investigator committee and participant cognitive interviews. During interviews, we asked participants about the interpretation of instructions/items, recall period, and comprehensiveness of reasons for nonadherence, regardless of their own adherence. After initial testing in English, a Spanish version was developed through transcreation. Adherence was dichotomized for analysis (complete adherence vs. any nonadherence). For all participants who received clinic medications, concordance between chart abstracted and self-reported adherence was evaluated. Results: Of 55 participants who completed the surveys and interviews (67% in English; 33% in Spanish), 87% were female and 44% identified as Latino. The majority (73%) had breast cancer; 60% had metastatic disease. 12 of 45 who received medication in clinic reported nonadherence as did 8 of 35 who took medication at home. Participants felt able to respond accurately to both recall periods. All reasons for nonadherence were perceived as relevant to themselves or other patients. There was 89% concordance between self-reported and chart abstracted adherence for clinic-administered medication. To improve concordance, changes were made to the formatting and instructions. Of 12 participants who completed the final version of the survey for clinic-administered medication, there was 100% concordance between self-reported and chart abstracted nonadherence. Conclusions: Our results support the reliability and validity of modified DOSE-Nonadherence for cancer patients. This instrument can be used to better identify nonadherence to cancer medications in a population of adult patients with cancer receiving various treatment regimens.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONThis study investigated the role of the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease (DIAD) by examining cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of UPS proteins.METHODThe SOMAscan assay was used to detect changes in UPS proteins in mutation carriers (MCs) relative to disease progression; imaging and CSF biomarkers of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration measures; and Clinical Dementia Rating scale.RESULTSSubtle increases in specific ubiquitin enzymes were detected in MCs up to two decades before symptom onset, with more pronounced elevations in UPS‐activating enzymes near symptom onset. Significant correlations were found between UPS proteins and Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers, especially between autophagy markers and late‐stage tau biomarkers, microglia, and axonal degeneration.DISCUSSIONThe rise in UPS proteins alongside tau‐related markers suggests UPS involvement in tau neurofibrillary tangles. Elevated CSF UPS proteins in DIAD MCs may serve as indicators of disease progression, and may support the UPS as a therapeutic target in AD.Highlights This study investigates the ubiquitin‐proteasome system (UPS) in Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Disease (DIAD), highlighting early molecular changes linked to disease progression. Using SOMAscan proteomics, we identified significant UPS protein alterations in cerebrospinal fluid of mutation carriers, notably up to 20 years before clinical symptom onset. Correlations between UPS protein levels and Alzheimer's biomarkers, particularly tau and neurodegeneration markers, suggest a strong association between UPS dysregulation and tau pathology in DIAD. Dynamic UPS changes align with A/T biological staging: UPS proteins were shown to increase across Aβ/tau (A/T) groups, with largest increases in the A+/T+ group, reinforcing their role in late‐stage tau pathology and disease progression. These findings underscore the potential of UPS proteins as early biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease progression and as novel therapeutic targets, especially in tau‐pathology‐driven neurodegeneration. This work contributes to understanding AD pathogenesis, by emphasizing the importance of protein quality control systems and by offering avenues for future biomarker discovery and therapeutic development in Alzheimer's disease.

Abstract Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive lung tumor marked by significant molecular heterogeneity. In a study of 590 patients across two independent cohorts, we observed comparable overall survival across treatment regimens (chemotherapy, chemoimmunotherapy, immunotherapy) without unexpected adverse events. Genomic analysis identified distinct NSCLC-like (KEAP1, KRAS, STK11 mutations) and SCLC-like (RB1, TP53 mutations) LCNEC subtypes, with 80% aligning with SCLC transcriptional profiles. Serial sampling revealed stable mutational but shifting transcriptomic landscapes over time. NSCLC-like LCNECs showed elevated FGL-1 (a LAG-3 ligand) and SPINK1 expression, while SCLC-like subtypes expressed higher levels of DLL3. Immunofluorescence confirmed FGL-1 in NSCLC-like LCNECs, and H&E slide analyses indicated fewer tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in LCNECs versus other lung cancers. These findings highlight LCNEC’s distinct immunogenomic profile, supporting future investigations into LAG-3, SPINK1, and DLL3-targeted therapies.

ABSTRACTBackground and PurposeLarge‐bore aspiration catheters (LBACs) are used for thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion (LVO), either as a standalone direct aspiration first‐pass technique or combined with a stent retriever (ASR). LBAC design may influence ASR thrombectomy efficacy. We compared the safety and performance of the novel MIVI Q segmental catheter with the well‐established SOFIA aspiration device in ASR thrombectomy.MethodsWe analyzed data from the Registry cOmbined vS SinglE Thrombectomy TechnIques registry of consecutive patients with anterior circulation LVO and compared the outcomes of those treated with first‐line ASR thrombectomy using Q (Q5 or Q6) or SOFIA (5F or 6F Plus) catheters. Demographic, clinical, angiographic, and clinical outcome data (24‐h National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] and modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months) were compared.ResultsOf the 853 patients, 155 (18.2%) were treated with MIVI Q and 698 (81.8%) with SOFIA catheters. After adjusting for age, sex, NIHSS score at baseline, tPA use, site occlusion, anesthesia type, and diameter and length of SR, the MIVI Q group was comparable to the SOFIA group in terms of first‐pass effect or successful final recanalization and safety. However, the MIVI Q group had a shorter mechanical thrombectomy time (20 [10–45] min vs. 33 [20–51] min; odds ratio [OR] = 7.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–14; p = 0.021) and a lower rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (3.3% vs. 8.8%; OR = 3.59, 95% CI: 1.45–10.9; p = 0.011).ConclusionsIn ASR neurothrombectomy, SOFIA aspiration catheters were not superior to MIVI Q in achieving successful and complete first‐passage recanalization; however, MIVI Q had shorter procedural times and a lower rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

PURPOSE The combination of the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib with bendamustine-rituximab for first-line treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), but without improvement in overall survival (OS), likely because of toxicity. Acalabrutinib was shown to be efficacious and less toxic than ibrutinib in a head-to-head trial in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and therefore might lead to better outcomes in MCL. METHODS Patients 65 years and older with previously untreated MCL received acalabrutinib (100 mg twice daily) or placebo (until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity), plus six cycles of bendamustine (90 mg/m 2 once daily; days 1 and 2) and rituximab (375 mg/m 2 as a single dose; day 1) followed by rituximab maintenance in responding patients for 2 years. Crossover to acalabrutinib at disease progression was permitted. The primary end point was PFS per the independent review committee; overall response rate and OS were secondary end points. RESULTS In total, 598 patients were randomly assigned, with 299 in each arm. At a median follow-up of 49.8 months using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method, the median PFS was 66.4 months in the acalabrutinib arm and 49.6 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.94]; P = .0160). Benefit was seen across all subgroups, including those with high-risk features. Overall response/complete response rates were 91.0%/66.6% and 88.0%/53.5% in the acalabrutinib and placebo arms, respectively. OS was not significantly different (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.13]; P = .27). Grade 3 or greater adverse events were reported in 88.9% and 88.2% in the acalabrutinib and placebo arms, respectively. CONCLUSION The combination of acalabrutinib with bendamustine-rituximab significantly improved PFS. Clinical benefit of acalabrutinib with bendamustine-rituximab was achieved with manageable toxicity.

Gastric point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may offer clinical value in assessing aspiration risk among medically complex patients undergoing regional anesthesia and pain procedures. While the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) preoperative fasting guidelines primarily apply to healthy individuals, medically complex populations often present with differing gastric emptying and aspiration risk. This narrative review, conducted by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA-PM), adhered to PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. It focused on seven medically complex patient groups: those who are pregnant, obese, diabetic, have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), are receiving emergency care, are enterally fed, or are taking GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA). Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Practice recommendations were developed using an iterative expert consensus process, with final recommendations based on evidence strength, clinical relevance, and expert agreement. Findings support the use of gastric POCUS in patients in active labor, those undergoing urgent cesarean sections, and those with diabetes. Conditional support is given for obesity, emergency care, enteral feeding, and GLP-1RA use. Routine use is not recommended in non-laboring pregnancies, elective cesarean delivery, or GERD. While gastric POCUS may aid with aspiration risk evaluation, its use should complement clinical judgment. Implementation may be limited by practical and training constraints, requiring individualized decision-making. These recommendations serve as a foundation for future research and potential clinical guideline development. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023445927.

Abstract ZUMA-8 evaluated the safety of brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), a CD19-directed autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy, for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL). Patients with ≥2 prior lines of therapy (including a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor) underwent leukapheresis, optional bridging therapy, and conditioning chemotherapy (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide) before infusion of 1 × 106 (cohort 1) or 2 × 106 (cohort 2) anti-CD19 CAR T cells per kg. Patients in cohort 3 (low tumor burden), and cohort 4A (postibrutinib) received 1 × 106 cells per kg. Fifteen patients, median age of 63 years (range, 52-79), were treated in cohorts 1 (n = 6), 2 (n = 3), 3 (n = 3), and 4A (n = 3). Median follow-up was 24.3 months. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed in cohort 3 (grade 4 cytokine release syndrome). Grade ≥3 neurologic events occurred in 3 patients (20%). Seven of 15 patients responded (overall response rate, 47%; complete response [CR], 7%), including all 3 patients in cohort 3 (1 with CR). CAR T-cell expansion occurred in 4 patients (27%), with an apparent weak inverse correlation with absolute lymphocyte count before apheresis. Brexu-cel had no new safety signals in R/R CLL. CAR T-cell expansion and responses occurred in patients with low tumor burden. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03624036.