Citations

Summary Exploratory analysis of a phase III trial in esophageal cancer found that the patients who most contributed to an overall survival benefit from PD-1 blockade were not responders, but non-responders. The analysis has limitations but may have implications for investigating the optimal timing of immunotherapy relative to other treatments. See related article by Okada et al., p. 3277

Abstract Contemporary approaches for vaccination and immunotherapy are often capable of eliciting strong T-cell responses against tumor antigens. However, such responses are not parallel to clinical tumor regression. The development of evasion mechanisms within tumor microenvironment may be responsible for poor therapeutic responses. We report here that constitutive or inducible expression of B7-H1, a B7 family molecule widely expressed by cancers, confers resistance to therapeutic anti-CD137 antibody in mice with established tumors. The resistance is accompanied with failure of antigen-specific CD8+ CTLs to destroy tumor cells without impairment of CTL function. Blockade of B7-H1 or PD-1 by specific monoclonal antibodies could reverse this resistance and profoundly enhance therapeutic efficacy. Our findings support that B7-H1/PD-1 forms a molecular shield to prevent destruction by CTLs and implicate new approaches for immunotherapy of human cancers.

Abstract Background and Aims: Tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) is predominantly expressed on immune cells. Although TRAIL biology has garnered considerable attention as a potential anti-cancer strategy, TRAIL agonists have had very limited anti-cancer activity in humans. TRAIL signaling can attenuate the T lymphocyte response. However, this potential immunosuppressive function of TRAIL has not been examined in cancer biology. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a highly lethal biliary tract cancer, has a dense immunosuppressive microenvironment. Accordingly, CCA provides a model to examine the potential immune regulatory function of TRAIL in cancer biology. Methods: Using a syngeneic, orthotopic murine model of CCA (PMID: 29464042), murine CCA cells (SB cells) that express both Trail and Trail receptor (Tr) were implanted into livers of WT and Tr-/- mice. Hence, in this model the host immune cells express Trail but not the receptor; therefore, they would be capable of inducing TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in CCA cells but would be resistant to TRAIL-mediated immunosuppression. After 4 weeks of tumor growth, mice were sacrificed, and tumors were characterized using flow cytometry. Results: We observed that Tr-/- mice had a significant reduction in tumor burden compared to WT mice. Moreover, tumor bearing Tr-/- mice had a significant increase in cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and enhanced CTL effector function. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) were significantly decreased in Tr-/- tumors compared to WT tumors. Furthermore, implantation of SB cells devoid of Trail (SB-Trail-/-) into WT mice resulted in a significant reduction in tumor burden and MDSC infiltration. In vitro functional studies employing SB cells deficient in Tr (SB-Tr-/-) and MDSCs were carried out. There was a significant reduction in proliferation and immunosuppressive function of MDSCs when cocultured with SB-Tr-/- compared to SB cells. These results indicate that TRAIL-TR fosters MDSC growth and immunosuppressive function. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that Tr-/- mice have a significant reduction in CCA tumor burden and MDSC infiltration. Consequently, Tr-/- tumors have enhanced CTL infiltration and function. These data suggest that the TRAIL-TR system mediates tumors immune evasion via MDSCs, and direct targeting of TRAIL on CCA cells is a potential anti-tumor strategy. Citation Format: Emilien Loeuillard, Jingchun Yang, Haidong Dong, Gregory J. Gores, Sumera I. Ilyas. Tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis inducing ligand fosters myeloid derived suppressor cell mediated tumor immune evasion in cholangiocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1315.

Abstract Seven different anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies are now widely used in the US to treat a variety of cancer types, but there have been no clinical trials comparing them directly. Furthermore, because many of these antibodies do not cross react between mouse and human proteins, no preclinical models exist in which to consider these types of questions. Thus, we produced humanized PD-1 and PD-L1 mice in which the extracellular domains of both mouse PD-1 and PD-L1 were replaced with the corresponding human sequences. Using this new model, we sought to compare the strength of the immune response generated by FDA-approved antibodies. To do this, we performed an in vivo T cell priming assay in which anti-PD-1/L1 therapies were given at the time of T cell priming against surrogate tumor antigen (OVA), followed by subsequent B16-OVA tumor challenge. We found that anti-PD-1/L1-treated mice exhibited significantly better tumor rejection than controls, although both the control and antibody-treated mice generated comparable numbers of OVA-specific T cells at the time of priming. To determine what could mediate this strong antitumor immune response, we identified the increased production of CX3CR1+PD-1+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in the anti-PD-1/L1-treated mice, the same subset of effector T cells known to increase in clinical responders to PD-1/L1 therapy. Thus, our model permits the direct comparison of FDA-approved anti-PD-1/L1 monoclonal antibodies and further correlates successful tumor rejection with the level of CX3CR1+PD-1+CD8 + T cells, making this model a critical tool for future studies to optimize and better utilize anti-PD-1/L1 therapeutics.

TPS4170 Background: IMbrave150 is the first study demonstrating the benefit of anti-PDL1 in the frontline treatment of aHCC, and established Atezo/Bev as a new 1st line standard for aHCC. There is currently limited evidence to guide subsequent therapy for aHCC patients progressing on Atezo/Bev. ACCRU-GI-2008 is designed to determine the benefit of continuing Atezo into 2nd line and the safety of Atezo plus a MKI in patients with aHCC who previously received Atezo/Bev. The study is being conducted across 12 centers in the United States (ClincalTrials.gov#: NCT05168163). Methods: This study utilizes a 2:1 randomized phase II design where eligible patients will receive either Atezo/MKI (experimental arm) or MKI alone (control). Patients will be stratified according to the MKI choice (cabozantinib or lenvatinib, per physician’s decision), etiology of HCC (viral vs. non-viral) and alpha-fetoprotein level ( < 400 vs. > = 400 ng/mL). The major eligibility criteria are histological/cytological diagnosis or clinical diagnosis of HCC per the AASLD or WASL 2018 guidelines, has advanced disease not amendable to curative treatment, previously received and progressed on Atezo/Bev, has received only 1 previous line of systemic therapy (2nd line only), ECOG PS 0-1, Child Pugh Class A, adequate organ reserves and RECIST v1.1 measurable disease; previous MKI for advanced disease is excluded. The primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). A total sample size of 122, with 89 PFS events, we will have 80% power to detect an improvement in median PFS from 4 to 7 months, assuming a one-sided significance level of 0.05. With approximately 84 deaths, we will have 80% power to detect an improvement in median OS from 10 to 18 months, assuming a one-sided significance level of 0.05. The overall one-sided significance level, for the study, is 0.1. An OS interim analysis will be conducted at 89 PFS events. Secondary endpoints include objective response, duration of response, and adverse events. Archival tumor and serial blood samples will be collected to evaluate for potential prediction biomarkers and mechanisms of sensitivity/resistance. Baseline and on-treatment tumor biopsy specimens will also be collected from the initial 10 patients of each arm. The study is approved by the ethics committee and enrollment to the study will be underway by Q2/3 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05168163.

Background Patients with metastatic melanoma rely on PD-(L)1 immunotherapy, but only one-third of patients experience treatment response and all initial responders eventually develop resistance. Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles expressing Programmed death ligand 1 (evPD-L1) and soluble Programmed death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) in peripheral blood of patients with melanoma limit PD-(L)1 immunotherapy and correlate with poor survival. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) removes immunosuppressive evPD-L1 and sPD-L1. We hypothesise that TPE may rescue and restore antimelanoma immunity. Methods In this two-arm study, 60 patients with metastatic melanoma progressing on checkpoint inhibition will be accrued. All patients will undergo radiotherapy on days 1–5 (at least one measurable lesion will not be irradiated) and ongoing checkpoint inhibition on day 8 and every 2–3 weeks per standard of care. Patients with baseline sPD-L1 level of ≥1.7 ng/mL and adequate clinical capacity will be enrolled in the TPE intervention arm and will undergo TPE on days 5–7, in addition to standard of care radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Other patients will remain in the standard of care arm. The primary endpoint of the study is to evaluate safety. Secondary endpoints include kinetics of sPD-L1 and evPD-L1 and clinical response by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. Study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04581382 ). Ethics and dissemination This trial has been approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. It will assess the safety and feasibility of TPE in improving outcomes for PD-(L)1 inhibitor immunotherapy in melanoma. Data will be maintained on a secure database with deidentified patient information. Data will be shared on publication in a peer-reviewed journal without the aid of professional writers. If successful, this trial will lay the ground for phase II studies that will include cancer treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors which may benefit from TPE such as renal, bladder and lung cancers. Trial registration number NCT04581382 .

Abstract Purpose: This phase Ib/2 trial investigated pembrolizumab-containing trimodality therapy in patients with gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: Patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma (cT1–3NanyM0) received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab-containing chemoradiation (CROSS regimen) followed by surgical resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab. The primary endpoints were tolerability in the first 16 patients and pathologic complete response [pCR (ypT0N0)]. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). An independent propensity-score-matched cohort (treated with CROSS without immunotherapy) was used for comparison. Exploratory analyses included immune biomarkers in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and plasma. Results: We enrolled 31 eligible patients, of whom 29 received all expected doses of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and 28 underwent R0 resection. Safety endpoints were met. The primary efficacy endpoint was not met [7/31 (22.6%) achieved pCR]. Patients with high [i.e., combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10] baseline expression of programmed death (PD)-L1 in the TME had a significantly higher pCR rate than those with low expression [50.0% (4/8) vs. 13.6% (3/22); P = 0.046]. Patients with high PD-L1 expression also experienced longer PFS and OS than propensity-score-matched patients. Among trial patients with PD-L1 CPS &lt; 10, unprespecified analysis explored whether extracellular vesicles (EV) could identify further responders: an elevated plasma level of PD-L1–expressing EVs was significantly associated with higher pCR. Conclusions: Adding pembrolizumab to trimodality therapy showed acceptable tolerability but did not meet the pre-specified pCR endpoint. Exploratory analyses suggested that high PD-L1 expression in the TME and/or on EVs may identify patients most likely to achieve tumor response.

Abstract Inhibitory receptors have a critical role in the regulation of immunity. Siglecs are a family of primarily inhibitory receptors expressed by immune cells that recognize specific sialic acid modifications on cell surface glycans. Many tumors have increased sialic acid incorporation. Overexpression of the sialyltransferase ST8Sia6 on tumors led to altered immune responses and increased tumor growth. In this study, we examined the role of ST8Sia6 on immune cells in regulating antitumor immunity. ST8Sia6 knockout mice had an enhanced immune response to tumors. The loss of ST8Sia6 promoted an enhanced intratumoral activation of macrophages and dendritic cells, including upregulation of CD40. Intratumoral regulatory T cells exhibited a more inflammatory phenotype in ST8Sia6 knockout mice. Using adoptive transfer studies, the change in regulatory T cell phenotype was not cell intrinsic and depended on the loss of ST8Sia6 expression in APCs. Thus, ST8Sia6 generates ligands for Siglecs that dampen antitumor immunity.

AbstractImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as a novel class of anticancer therapy, can be more efficacious and less toxic than chemotherapy, but their clinical success is confined to certain tumor types. Elucidating their targets, mechanisms and scope of action, and potential synergism with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies are critical to widen their clinical indications. Treatment response to an ICI targeting programmed death‐1 (anti‐PD‐1) is sought to be understood here by conducting a preplanned correlative analysis of a phase II clinical trial in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA). The cytolytic capacity of circulating immune cells in cancer patients using a novel ex vivo cytotoxicity assay is evaluated, and the utility of circulating biomarkers is investigated to predict and monitor the treatment effect of anti‐PD‐1. Baseline expression of Bim and NKG7 and upregulation of CX3CR1 in circulating T cells are associated with the clinical benefit of anti‐PD‐1 in patients with SBA. Overall, these findings suggest that the frequency and cytolytic capacity of circulating, effector immune cells may differentiate clinical response to ICIs, providing a strong rationale to support immune monitoring using patient peripheral blood.

Abstract Background and Aims: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is predominantly expressed on immune cells. Although TRAIL biology has garnered considerable interest as a potential anti-cancer strategy, TRAIL agonists have had very limited anti-cancer activity in humans. TRAIL signaling in T cells may also potentially provide an immune checkpoint function as it can inhibit T cell activation and proliferation by interfering with T cell receptor signaling. However, this potential immune checkpoint function of TRAIL has not been examined in cancer biology. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a highly lethal biliary tract cancer, provides a model to examine the potential immune checkpoint function of TRAIL. Methods: Using a syngeneic, orthotopic murine model of CCA (PMID: 29464042), murine CCA cells (SB cells) that express both TRAIL and TRAIL receptor (TR) were implanted into livers of WT and Tr−/− mice. Hence, in this model the host immune cells express TRAIL but not the receptor; therefore, they would be capable of inducing TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in CCA cells but would be resistant to TRAIL-mediated immunosuppression. After 4 weeks of tumor growth, mice were sacrificed, and tumors were characterized using flow cytometry. Results: We observed that Tr−/− mice had a significant reduction in tumor burden compared to WT mice. Moreover, tumor bearing Tr−/− mice had a significant increase in cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and enhanced CTL effector function. However, coculture of T cells with SB cells or SB cells deficient in Tr (SB-Tr−/−) did not result in a significant difference in T cell apoptosis or function, implying that TRAIL-TR is not a direct T cell checkpoint. Myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) were significantly decreased in Tr−/− tumors compared to WT tumors. Furthermore, implantation of SB cells devoid of Trail (SB-Trail−/−) into WT mice resulted in a significant reduction in tumor burden and MDSC infiltration. Coculture of SB cells with MDSCs from Tr−/− mice attenuated MDSC proliferation and immunosuppression compared to WT MDSCs. Moreover, treatment of MDSCs from Tr−/− mice with TRAIL recombinant protein resulted in a reduction in their proliferation and immunosuppressive function compare to MDSCs from WT mice implying that TRAIL-TR fosters MDSC growth and immunosuppressive function. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that Tr−/− mice have a significant reduction in CCA tumor burden and MDSC infiltration. Consequently, Tr−/− mice bearing tumors have enhanced CTL infiltration and function. These data suggest that the TRAIL-TR system mediates tumor immune evasion via MDSCs. Herein, we suggest that TRAIL-TR appears to function as an indirect T cell checkpoint by augmenting the immunosuppressive effects of MDSCs. Citation Format: Emilien Loeuillard, Juan Wang, Jingchun Yang, Haidong Dong, Gregory Gores, Sumera Ilyas. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) foster myeloid-derived suppressor cell-mediated tumor immune evasion in cholangiocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Abstracts: AACR Virtual Special Conference: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2021 Oct 5-6. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2022;10(1 Suppl):Abstract nr P072.