Citations

Clear

98 citation(s) found for "Sebastian, Arjun".

Perioperative Vision Loss in Cervical Spinal Surgery
Gabel, Brandon, Lam, Arthur M., Chapman, Jens R. , Oskouian, Rod J. , Currier, Bradford L. , Sebastian, Arjun S. , Hamilton, Steven R., Fehlings, Michael G. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Nassr, Ahmad , Arnold, Paul M. , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G

Mayo Clinic

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 91S-95S

10.1177/2192568216688196 | PMID 28451500 Get It

Study Design: Retrospective multicenter case series. Objective: To assess the rate of perioperative vision loss following cervical spinal surgery. Methods: Medical records for 17 625 patients from 21 high-volume surgical centers from the AOSpine North America Clinical Research Network who received cervical spine surgery (levels from C2 to C7) between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011, inclusive, were reviewed to identify occurrences of vision loss following surgery. Results: Of the 17 625 patients in the registry, there were 13 946 patients assessed for the complication of blindness. There were 9591 cases that involved only anterior surgical approaches; the remaining 4355 cases were posterior and/or circumferential fusions. There were no cases of blindness or vision loss in the postoperative period reported during the sampling period. Conclusions: Perioperative vision loss following cervical spinal surgery is exceedingly rare.
Evaluation of Adverse Events in Total Disc Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
Anderson, Paul A. , Currier, Bradford L. , Sebastian, Arjun S. , Fehlings, Michael G. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Nassr, Ahmad , Arnold, Paul M. , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G

Mayo Clinic

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 76S-83S

10.1177/2192568216688195 | PMID 28451497 Get It

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: The safety of new technology such as cervical total disc replacement (TDR) is of paramount importance and is best evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCT). We compared complication risks of TDR to fusion using data from Investigational Device Exemptions. Methods: A systematic review of FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness reports of the 8 approved cervical TDRs was performed. These were all randomized controlled trials comparing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to TDR. Important outcome variables were dysphagia, wound infection, neurologic injuries, heterotopic ossification, death, and secondary surgeries. A random effects model was selected a priori. Data on adverse events was abstracted and analyzed by calculating relative risk of ACDF to TDR by meta-analysis techniques. Results: The study included 3027 patients with 1377 randomized to ACDF and 1652 to TDR. No statistical differences were present between the 2 groups in dysphagia/dysphonia, hardware related, heterotopic ossification, death, and overall neurologic adverse events and incidence of neurologic deterioration. The relative risk of wound-related problems ACDF to TDR was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59, 0.98) favoring ACDF, which was statistically significant, but these were minor and never required a second surgical procedure for deep wound infection. The relative risk of ACDF to TDR in surgical-related neurologic events and secondary surgeries was 1.62 (95% CI = 1.04, 2.53) and 1.79 (95% CI = 1.17, 2.74), both favoring TDR. Conclusions: Cervical TDR appears to be as safe as or safer than ACDF at 2-year follow-up.
Iatrogenic Spinal Cord Injury Resulting From Cervical Spine Surgery
Hart, Robert A. , Hilibrand, Alan S. , Fish, David E., Wang, Jeffrey C. , Lord, Elizabeth L. , Buser, Zorica , Tortolani, P. Justin, Stroh, D. Alex, Currier, Bradford L. , Sebastian, Arjun S. , Fehlings, Michael G. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Daniels, Alan H. , Nassr, Ahmad , Arnold, Paul M. , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G

Mayo Clinic

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 84S-90S

10.1177/2192568216688188 | PMID 28451499 Get It

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. Objective: To examine the incidence of iatrogenic spinal cord injury following elective cervical spine surgery. Methods: A retrospective multicenter case series study involving 21 high-volume surgical centers from the AOSpine North America Clinical Research Network was conducted. Medical records for 17 625 patients who received cervical spine surgery (levels from C2 to C7) between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011, were reviewed to identify occurrence of iatrogenic spinal cord injury. Results: In total, 3 cases of iatrogenic spinal cord injury following cervical spine surgery were identified. Institutional incidence rates ranged from 0.0% to 0.24%. Of the 3 patients with quadriplegia, one underwent anterior-only surgery with 2-level cervical corpectomy, one underwent anterior surgery with corpectomy in addition to posterior surgery, and one underwent posterior decompression and fusion surgery alone. One patient had complete neurologic recovery, one partially recovered, and one did not recover motor function. Conclusion: Iatrogenic spinal cord injury following cervical spine surgery is a rare and devastating adverse event. No standard protocol exists that can guarantee prevention of this complication, and there is a lack of consensus regarding evaluation and treatment when it does occur. Emergent imaging with magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography myelography to evaluate for compressive etiology or malpositioned instrumentation and avoidance of hypotension should be performed in cases of intraoperative and postoperative spinal cord injury.
Rare Complications of Cervical Spine Surgery: Pseudomeningocoele
Smith, Zachary A. , Hsu, Wellington K. , Fehlings, Michael G. , Fish, David E., Wang, Jeffrey C. , Hilibrand, Alan S. , Mummaneni, Praveen V. , Chou, Dean , Sasso, Rick C., Traynelis, Vincent C. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Buser, Zorica , Lord, Elizabeth L. , Massicotte, Eric M. , Sebastian, Arjun S. , Than, Khoi D. , Steinmetz, Michael P. , Smith, Gabriel A. , Pace, Jonathan , Corriveau, Mark, Lee, Sung‐Ho , Shaffrey, Christopher I. , Ailon, Tamir T. , Smith, Justin S. , Nassr, Ahmad , Arnold, Paul M. , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G

Mayo Clinic

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 109S-114S

10.1177/2192568216687769 | PMID 28451481 Get It

Study Design: This study was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. Objectives: Rare complications of cervical spine surgery are inherently difficult to investigate. Pseudomeningocoele (PMC), an abnormal collection of cerebrospinal fluid that communicates with the subarachnoid space, is one such complication. In order to evaluate and better understand the incidence, presentation, treatment, and outcome of PMC following cervical spine surgery, we conducted a multicenter study to pool our collective experience. Methods: This study was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients who underwent cervical spine surgery at any level(s) from C2 to C7, inclusive; were over 18 years of age; and experienced a postoperative PMC. Results: Thirteen patients (0.08%) developed a postoperative PMC, 6 (46.2%) of whom were female. They had an average age of 48.2 years and stayed in hospital a mean of 11.2 days. Three patients were current smokers, 3 previous smokers, 5 had never smoked, and 2 had unknown smoking status. The majority, 10 (76.9%), were associated with posterior surgery, whereas 3 (23.1%) occurred after an anterior procedure. Myelopathy was the most common indication for operations that were complicated by PMC (46%). Seven patients (53%) required a surgical procedure to address the PMC, whereas the remaining 6 were treated conservatively. All PMCs ultimately resolved or were successfully treated with no residual effects. Conclusions: PMC is a rare complication of cervical surgery with an incidence of less than 0.1%. They prolong hospital stay. PMCs occurred more frequently in association with posterior approaches. Approximately half of PMCs required surgery and all ultimately resolved without residual neurologic or other long-term effects.
Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism following Thoracolumbar Surgery: Analysis of 43,777 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005 to 2012
Sebastian, Arjun S. , Currier, Bradford L. , Nguyen, Emily C., Wagie, Amy E., Habermann, Elizabeth B. , Habermann, Elizabeth S, Kakar, Sanjeev , Nassr, Ahmad , Habermann, Elizabeth

Mayo Clinic

Global Spine Journal | February 17, 2016 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 738-743

10.1055/s-0036-1579553 | PMID 27853656 Get It

Study Design Retrospective clinical study of a prospectively collected, national database. Objective Determine the 30-day incidence, timing, and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) following thoracolumbar spine surgery. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File identified 43,777 patients who underwent thoracolumbar surgery from 2005 to 2012. Multiple patient characteristics were identified. The incidence and timing (in days) of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE) were determined. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify significant risk factors. Results Of the 43,777 patients identified as having had thoracolumbar surgery, 202 cases of PE (0.5%) and 311 cases of DVT (0.7%) were identified. VTE rates were highest in patients undergoing corpectomy, with a 1.7% PE rate and a 3.8% DVT rate. Independent risk factors for VTE included length of stay (LOS) ≥ 6 days (odds ratio [OR] 4.07), disseminated cancer (OR 1.77), white blood cell count > 12 (OR 1.76), paraplegia (OR 1.75), albumin < 3 (OR 1.73), American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 or greater (OR 1.54), body mass index > 40 (OR 1.49), and operative time > 193 minutes (OR 1.43). LOS < 3 days was protective (OR 0.427). Conclusions We report an overall 30-day PE rate of 0.5% and DVT rate of 0.7% following thoracolumbar spine surgery. Patients undergoing corpectomy were at highest risk for VTE. Multiple VTE risk factors were identified. Further studies are needed to develop algorithms to stratify VTE risk and direct prophylaxis accordingly.
Thromboembolic Disease after Cervical Spine Surgery: A Review of 5,405 Surgical Procedures and Matched Cohort Analysis
Sebastian, Arjun S. , Currier, Bradford L. , Larson, Dirk, Huddleston, P.M. , Huddleston, Paul M, Clarke, Michelle J. , Nassr, Ahmad , Huddleston, Paul M

Mayo Clinic

Global Spine Journal | November 26, 2015 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 465-471

10.1055/s-0035-1569056 | PMID 27433431 Get It

Study Design Retrospective matched cohort analysis. Objective The majority of the literature on venous thromboembolism (VTE) after spine surgery is limited to studies of thoracolumbar surgery. Less is known regarding the incidence of VTE and associated risk factors following cervical spine surgery. Methods A total of 5,405 patients at our institution underwent cervical diskectomy, laminectomy, corpectomy, laminoplasty, or fusion between 1995 and 2012; 85 of the 5,405 patients (1.57%) suffered either a DVT (55) or pulmonary embolus (51) within 30 days postoperatively. The cases were matched 1:2 to controls based on age, sex, and date of surgery. Data regarding multiple perioperative factors, demographics, and comorbidities was collected. Results Several risk factors were identified for VTE. Significant medical comorbidities included chronic venous insufficiency (odds ratio [OR] = 3.40), atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.69), obesity (OR = 2.67), and ischemic heart disease (OR = 2.18). Staged surgery (OR = 28.0), paralysis (OR = 19.0), combined approach (OR = 7.46), surgery for infection (OR = 18.5), surgery for trauma (OR = 11.1), comorbid traumatic injuries (OR > 10), oncologic procedures (OR = 5.2), use of iliac crest autograft (OR = 4.16), two or more surgical levels (OR = 3.48), blood loss > 300 mL (OR = 1.66), and length of stay 5 days or greater (OR = 3.47) were all found to be risk factors for VTE ( p < 0.05) in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis found staged surgery (OR = 35.7), paralysis (OR = 7.86), and nonelective surgery (OR = 6.29) to be independent risk factors for VTE. Conclusions Although the incidence of VTE following cervical spine surgery is low, we identified several risk factors that may be predictive. More aggressive approaches to prophylaxis and surveillance in certain patient populations may be warranted.
Minimally Invasive Treatment of a Painful Osteolytic Lumbar Lesion Secondary to Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma
Sebastian, Arjun S. , Adair, Marcus J. , Khan, Mustafa H. , Arndt, Carola A.S., Morris, Jonathan M. , Khan, Mustafa H. , Nassr, Ahmad

Mayo Clinic

Global Spine Journal | August 5, 2014 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 135-139

10.1055/s-0034-1387198 | PMID 25844287 Get It

Study Design Case report. Objective Multifocal epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) of the spine is a rare disorder. We describe a novel, multimodal treatment of a painful osteolytic lumbar lesion secondary to EHE. The minimally invasive treatment results in an excellent patient outcome with decreased morbidity compared to traditional techniques. Methods A previously healthy young adult presented with a painful osteolytic lesion at the L2 vertebrae. Imaging revealed multifocal spinal lesions consistent with a history of EHE. Core needle biopsy confirmed the diagnosis. Preoperative cryoablation of L2 was followed by a staged surgery, which included a partial L2 corpectomy, tumor resection, bone grafting, and vertebral reconstruction using a minimally invasive technique. This treatment was followed by prolonged therapy with interferon and bisphosphonate. Results At 3.5 years’ follow-up, the patient has maintained his vertebral body height, has not required a fusion, and has had no recurrence of disease. Conclusion Multimodal treatment consisting of tumor cryoablation, partial corpectomy, allograft reconstruction of the vertebrae, and adjuvant interferon and bisphosphonate can result in good outcomes for well-contained EHE tumors of the spine.
Youth Ice Hockey Injuries Over 16 Years at a Pediatric Trauma Center
Polites, Stephanie F. , Sebastian, Arjun S. , Habermann, Elizabeth B. , Iqbal, Corey W., Ishitani, Michael B., Stuart, Michael J. , Habermann, Elizabeth

Mayo Clinic

Pediatrics | May 27, 2014 | Volume: 133 | Issue: 6 | Pages: e1601-e1607

10.1542/peds.2013-3628 | PMID 24864187 Get It

BACKGROUND:Youth ice hockey is an exciting sport with growing participation in the United States. Updated assessment of injury patterns is needed to determine risk factors for severe injury and develop preventive efforts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience as a level 1 pediatric trauma center in Minnesota treating injured youth ice hockey players.METHODS:Children ≤18 years old who presented to our institution from July 1997 to July 2013 with an injury sustained while participating in ice hockey were identified. Patient demographic information, injury characteristics, and outcomes including use of computed tomography, hospital admission, and procedures were obtained. Age- and gender-specific patterns were determined for injuries and outcomes.RESULTS:Over 16 years, 168 injuries in 155 children occurred, including 26 (15.5%) injuries in girls. Extremity injuries were most common, followed by traumatic brain injury. Injuries to the spine, face, and trunk were less common. Traumatic brain injury and injuries to the spine were most common in younger children (≤14 years old) and girls, whereas injuries to the face were most common in older players (≥15 years old). Most injuries resulted from intentional contact. Admission to the hospital was needed in 65 patients, including 14 (8.3%) who needed intensive care. A major procedure was needed by 23.2% of patients because of their injuries.CONCLUSIONS:Youth ice hockey trauma can be severe, necessitating a thorough evaluation of injured children. Injury patterns are influenced by age and gender, providing an opportunity for targeted preventive efforts.