Citations

Clear

1020 citation(s) found for "Perez, EA".

Navigating the complement cascade: A multicenter journey from pegcetacoplan to iptacopan in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
Thiagarajan, Praveena, Orland, Mark, Unlu, Serhan, Ahmed, Arooj, Bravo-Perez, Carlos, Addona, Matteo D, Basch, Megan, Lee, Soyon, Bilano, Ver, Paulose, Jincy, Geevarghese, Lincy, Bollu, Vamsi, Sanikommu, Srinivasa Reddy, Dingli, David, Maciejewski, Jaroslaw, Gurnari, Carmelo, Thiagarajan, Praveena, Orland, Mark, Unlu, Serhan, Ahmed, Arooj, Bravo-Perez, Carlos, Addona, Matteo D, Basch, Megan, Lee, Soyon, Bilano, Ver, Paulose, Jincy, Geevarghese, Lincy, Bollu, Vamsi, Sanikommu, Srinivasa Reddy, Dingli, David, Maciejewski, Jaroslaw, Gurnari, Carmelo

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 1433-1433

10.1182/blood-2025-1433 Get It

Abstract Introduction: The therapeutic landscape for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) has rapidly evolved with multiple proximal complement inhibitors now available, including pegcetacoplan (C3 inhibitor) and iptacopan (oral factor B inhibitor). While clinical trials have established individual drug efficacy compared with terminal complement inhibitors, real-world evidence regarding therapeutic transitions between proximal complement inhibitors remains extremely limited. As patients and clinicians increasingly seek to optimize treatment through sequential therapy approaches, understanding the outcomes of transitioning from pegcetacoplan to iptacopan becomes critical for evidence-based treatment sequencing in this rare hematologic disorder. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis across 3 academic medical centers (Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Levine Cancer Institute) that evaluated 15 consecutive patients with PNH who were considered for transition from pegcetacoplan to iptacopan. Patients had confirmed PNH by flow cytometry and ≥3 months pegcetacoplan exposure. After switching to iptacopan, we assessed treatment acceptance rates, demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes including hemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and safety parameters. Responses to iptacopan were classified as optimal (hemoglobin >10.5 g/dL with clinical improvement) or suboptimal. Statistical analysis used paired t tests for continuous variables. Results: Of the 15 patients evaluated (median age [range]: 53 [22-81] years; 73% female), 14 patients (93.3%) elected to transition to iptacopan, demonstrating high treatment acceptance. Disease subtypes included classic PNH (36%) and PNH (64%) in the setting of another bone marrow disorder (n=7), multiple myeloma (n=1), and myelofibrosis (n=1). Median (range) duration of pegcetacoplan treatment pre-switch was 3 months (2-7 months), and median (range) duration of iptacopan treatment was 24 months (6-36 months). Among patients who transitioned, 79% (11/14) achieved hemoglobin improvement, with a mean increase from 9.2±1.8 to 10.8±2.1 g/dL (P=.028). Overall, optimal response was achieved in 64% (9/14) of patients. Response rates varied significantly by disease subtype: 80% in patients with classic PNH vs 56% in patients with PNH and aplastic anemia, with particularly poor outcomes in patients with concurrent hematologic malignancies (0%). LDH levels improved in 86% of patients, decreasing from 400±152 to 310±95 U/L (P=.015). PNH clone sizes remained stable throughout transition (erythrocyte: 75.1%±9.2% vs 75.4%±9.4%, P=.62; granulocyte: 95.0%±3.9% versus 95.2%±4.0%, P=.45). Treatment was well tolerated with no serious adverse events, breakthrough hemolysis, thrombosis, or discontinuations required. Two patients experienced mild self-limited gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusions: This first multicenter real-world analysis demonstrates that the pegcetacoplan-to-iptacopan transition provides clinical benefit in the majority of this initial set of patients with PNH, with significant improvements in hemoglobin and an excellent safety profile while maintaining clone stability. The high acceptance rate suggests that patients prefer oral therapy over subcutaneous administration. These findings address a critical knowledge gap in proximal complement inhibitor sequencing, suggesting that iptacopan is an effective therapeutic option for patients with inadequate pegcetacoplan response and supporting the development of evidence-based treatment algorithms for optimal PNH care in the era of multiple complement inhibitor options.
Optimal therapy for pediatric B-ALL in first relapse: Comparative effectiveness of blinatumomab to hematopoietic cell transplantation versus CD19 CAR T cell therapy
Liu, Hongyan , Shinehouse, Laura K., Hinson, Ashley , Kohorst, Mira A. , Elias, Anna , Keenan, Ella, Acres, Hannah, Ahmed, Ibrahim , Al-Mulla, Abdulla , Arthur, Laura, Beck, Jill C., Berry, Abigale, Bhatla, Deepika, Briscoe, Eliza, Chu, Roland, Davis, Laurie , Elo, Lyannette, Eom, Elizabeth, Vasco, Alejandra Escobar, Faulk, Kelly , Galán‐Gómez, Víctor , Goode, Erin , Hamill, Darcy, Vasanna, Smitha Hosahalli, Kinoshita, Hannah , Krieger, Elizabeth , Lee‐Miller, Cathy , Lind, Katherine , Milner, Jordan , Moore‐Higgs, Giselle J., Murphy, Lindsey , Murphy, Megan , Nguyen, Gabriella, Patel, Hiren P. , Prosser-Dombrowski, Alexandra, Rahrig, April , Ramachandran, Shanti , Hammoud, Miza Salim, Saraf, Amanda J. , Shoag, Jamie , Symons, Heather J. , Tastet, Nicholas, Thomas, Stephanie , Thornock, Molly, Weisnicht, Allison , Zarnegar‐Lumley, Sara , Shah, Nirali, Maude, Shannon L. , Quigg, Troy C. , Elgarten, Caitlin W. , Myers, Regina M. , Li, Yimei , Hoover, Alex , Keenan, Ella, Arthur, Laura, Briscoe, Eliza, Chang, Grace, Dolan, J. Gregory , Fabrizio, Vanessa A , Grupp, Stephan A. , Hall, Anurekha G. , Moskop, Amy , Murphy, Megan, Ortega, Maria, Ferrer, Antonio Pérez , Pfeiffer, Thomas , Rahim, Mahvish Qureshi , Toner, Keri , Shah, Nirali N , Rubinstein, Jeremy , Bhojwani, Deepa

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 3339-3339

10.1182/blood-2025-3339 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Outcomes for 1st relapse of pediatric B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), especially high/intermediate-risk (HR/IR) relapse, remain unacceptably poor. Limited enrollment of this population on cooperative group clinical trials has impeded our ability to study potentially effective regimens. In the current era, patients can access innovative immunotherapies commercially. However, there is no mechanism to capture outcomes for these off-study patients and no comparative effectiveness data to guide treatment selection. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of patients <30 years who initiated 1st relapse therapy at a participating center from 2018-2022 (ReCALL-1 Study). Objectives were to define real-world survival outcomes, compare response rates of reinduction strategies, describe the post-reinduction treatment landscape, and, for patients with HR/IR relapse, assess the comparative effectiveness (CE) of blinatumomab to hematopoietic cell transplant (blina/HCT) v CD19 CAR T cells (CART). For the CE analysis, we emulated an open-label, randomized study of blina/HCT v CART who achieved an M1/M2 marrow at the end of an intensive reinduction (EoRI). Patients were classified by their intended treatment at EoRI. Cox regression models were used to adjust for unbalanced patient and disease features by arms. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from EoRI. RESULTS The full cohort included 479 patients from 33 centers (31 US, 2 international). Median time to relapse was 31 months (m); 77% had bone marrow (BM) involvement and 31% central nervous sytem involvement. With a median follow-up of 49m from relapse, 4 year (y) OS, event-free survival (EFS), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 64%, 43%, and 13%, respectively. Among patients with very early BM (<18m, n=79), early BM (18-35m, n=76), late BM (≥36m, n=162), and isolated CNS (n=85) relapses, 4y OS/EFS were 29%/20%, 57%/35%, 78%/49%, and 84%/61%, respectively. Only 19% received reinduction therapy on a clinical trial. Among patients with BM disease, R3 reinduction (n=179) and VXLD (n=61) had identical MRD-negative (<0.01%) CR rates of 38% (p=1.00) and equivalent treatment failure (TF; M3 or extramedullary disease) rates: R3, 8% v VXLD 7%, p=0.79. Blina (n=33) and inotuzumab-based (n=21) reinductions achieved MRD-negative CR rates of 39% and 52%, respectively, but higher TF rates of 39% and 24%. Reinduction mortality was 2%: R3, n=5; VXLD, n=3; 3-drug reinduction, n=1. Overall, as part of 1st relapse therapy, 36% received CART (78% commercial product), 44% HCT, 40% blina, and 11% inotuzumab. The emulated trial included 159 patients, 95 on blina/HCT and 64 on CART. Study arms were well matched by demographics, cytogenetics, and relapse sites, but CART patients were more likely to have relapsed <18m from diagnosis (34% v 24%) and have EoRI M2 marrows (31% v 11%), and less likely to have private insurance (36% v 51%). Unadjusted OS was comparable between arms (log rank p=0.18): CART, 60% at 4y; blina/HCT, 71%, as was NRM (10% v 13% at 4y). EFS was lower for CART (p=0.049): 4y EFS 35% v 49% for blina/HCT. After adjustment for unbalanced covariates, the hazard of death was equivalent for CART as compared to blina/HCT (aHR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-2.1, p=0.67) and EFS became more comparable (aHR 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.1, p=0.22). 91% of blina/HCT and 97% of CART received their intended cell therapy; time from EoRI to cell therapy was shorter for CART (67 v 86 days, p<.001). In the CART arm, 34% underwent consolidative HCT; 1/3 were preplanned and 2/3 due to loss of B cell aplasia or NGS-MRD positivity. Of those with a 2nd relapse, CART patients were more likely to be CD19 negative (47% v 10%, p=0.003). CONCLUSION In this multicenter, real-world cohort of children treated for 1st relapse in the immunotherapy era, suboptimal outcomes for early BM relapse persisted, with particularly dismal 4y OS of 29% for relapses <18m after diagnosis. In contrast, survival for late BM and isolated CNS relapses compared favorably to historic data. Only 1 in 5 patients initiated relapse therapy on a clinical trial and although 1st relapse is not an approved indication for commercial CART in pediatrics, 36% received CART. In an emulated trial of post-reinduction blina/HCT v CART, adjusted EFS and OS were comparable, suggesting that CART may be a viable alternative to HCT for select patients. Post hoc analyses will identify whether specific subgroups may benefit more from one strategy.
Introducing a foundational sequence transformer for range adaptive nucleotide decoding (STRAND)
Ayanian, Shant , Osborne, Collin , Xu, Clark , Molnar, Carl, Das, Pravat, Perez, Xoab, Vassilieva, Natalia , Pondenkandath, Vinay, Kanakiya, Bhargav, Venkatesh, Ganesh, Redlon, Matt , Shah, Vijay H. , Callstrom, Matthew R. , Korfiatis, Panos, Ryu, Alexander J. , Blasi, Marc, Callstrom, Matthew, Ryu, Alexander J. , Myasoedova, Elena , Molnar, Carl, Das, Pravat, Levin, May, Blasi, Marc, Lazaridis, Konstantinos N. , Myasoedova, Elena

Mayo Clinic

Briefings in Bioinformatics | November 24, 2025 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/bib/bbaf618 | PMID 41283814 Get It

Abstract The advent of high-throughput sequencing has led to an exponential increase in genomic data, highlighting the need for efficient and accurate models to analyze and interpret this information. In this study, we introduce a novel, exomic foundational model that leverages a combination of the human reference genome and multispecies data to improve variant detection and interpretation. Our model utilizes a short-range transformer architecture and is trained on a large dataset of human exomic sequences derived from the Tapestry study. Through a series of ablation studies and scaling experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our model in predicting next token accuracy and identifying clinically pathogenic variants. We also show that our model outperforms existing models in a range of downstream tasks, including variant effect prediction and disease state identification. In fact, our largest sequence transformer for range adaptive nucleotide decoding variant (1B parameters) surpassed previous benchmarks, demonstrating a mean accuracy of 0.880 [an 8.2% improvement over the original nucleotide transformer (NT) and a 7% improvement over NT-v2]. Furthermore, we construct a unique exomic ClinVar dataset to evaluate the model’s performance on pathogenicity and disease states. Our results highlight the potential of this model to improve our understanding of the human exome and its role in disease. The model and its applications have significant implications for genomics-based diagnosis and personalized medicine, including tailored therapeutic development.
Functional and Structural Connectivity Correlates of Axial Symptom Outcomes After Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease
Garcia, Gilberto Perez Rodriguez , Middlebrooks, Erik H. , Tsuboi, Takashi , Burns, Matthew R. , Ramirez‐Zamora, Adolfo , Perez Rodriguez Garcia, Gilberto , Middlebrooks, Erik H , Tsuboi, Takashi , Ramirez-Zamora, Adolfo , Mei, Shanshan , Wong, Joshua K. , Hemptinne, Coralie de

Mayo Clinic

Brain Sciences | November 20, 2025 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1245

10.3390/brainsci15111245 | PMID 41300251 Get It

Background/Objectives: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) is a safe and established therapy for management of refractory motor fluctuations and dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the relationship between stimulation site connectivity and improvement of axial gait symptoms remains poorly understood, particularly when stimulating in the GPi. This study investigated functional and structural connectivity patterns specifically associated with axial symptom outcomes following bilateral GPi-DBS, and, as a secondary exploratory analysis, examined whether Volumes of tissue activated (VTAs)-based connectivity related to overall UPDRS-III change. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 19 PD patients who underwent bilateral GPi-DBS at the University of Florida (2002–2017). Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) axial gait subscores were assessed at baseline and 36-month follow-up. VTAs were reconstructed using Lead-DBS and coregistered to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space. Structural connectivity was evaluated with diffusion tractography, and functional connectivity was estimated using normative resting-state fMRI datasets. Correlations between VTA connectivity and clinical improvement were examined using Spearman correlation and voxelwise analyses. Results: Patients with axial improvement in motor scales demonstrated specific VTA connectivity to sensorimotor and supplementary motor networks, particularly lobule V and lobules I–IV of the cerebellum. These associations were specific to axial gait subscores. In contrast, worsening axial gait symptoms correlated with connectivity to cerebellar Crus II, cerebellum VIII, calcarine cortex, and thalamus (p < 0.05). Total UPDRS-III scores did not show a significant positive correlation with supplementary motor area or primary motor cortex connectivity; a non-significant trend was observed for VTA–M1 connectivity (R = 0.41, p = 0.078). Worsening total motor scores were associated with cerebellar Crus II and frontal–parietal networks. These findings suggest that distinct connectivity patterns underlie differential trajectories in axial and global motor outcomes following GPi-DBS. Conclusions: Distinct connectivity profiles might underlie axial gait symptom outcomes following GPi-DBS. Connectivity to motor and sensorimotor pathways supports improvement, whereas involvement of Crus II and occipital networks predicts worsening. Additional studies to confirm and expand on these findings are needed, but our results highlight the value of connectomic mapping for refining patient-specific targeting and developing future programming strategies.
A framework for using DNA methylation-based modelling for the clinical management of cranial meningioma
Landry, Alexander , Wang, Justin Z. , Patil, Vikas, Ajisebutu, Andrew, Gui, Chloe , Yefet, Leeor, Mamatjan, Yasin , Wei, Qingxia , Singh, Olivia, Mansouri, Sheila , Ehret, Felix , Capper, David , Cohen-Gadol, Aaron A, Behling, Felix , Sloan, Andrew E. , Chambless, Lola B. , Makarenko, Serge , Yip, Stephen , Tsang, Derek S. , Gao, Andrew , Aldape, Kenneth , Nassiri, Farshad , Zadeh, Gelareh , Santarius, Thomas , Selman, Warren R., Couce, Marta , Wen, Patrick Y. , Walbert, Tobias , Felicella, Michelle M. , Brodie, Chaya , Snyder, James P., Saladino, Andrea , Schichor, Christian , Tonn, Jörg‐Christian, Goldbrunner, Roland , Timmer, Marco , Schimdt, Nils Ole, Jenkinson, Michael D. , Millward, Christopher P. , Islim, Abdurrahman I. , Fl, Behling, Santacroce, Antonio , Schittenhelm, Jens , Raleigh, David R. , Butowski, Nicholas , Westphal, Manfred , Lamszus, Katrin , Mawrin, Christian , Kurz, Sylvia C. , Zada, Gabriel , Yip, Stephen, Zherebitskiy, Viktor, Hnenny, Luke, Dunn, Ian F. , Moliterno, Jennifer , McDermott, Michael , Vogelbaum, Michael A. , Aldape, Kenneth, Alkividias, Tzannis, Short, Susan , Bos, Eelke M. , Dincer, Alper , Paßlack, Peter, Ehret, Felix, Lopez, Clara, Arvaniti, Christina , Benjamin, Carolina , Jackson, Christina , Jeyaretna, Sanjeeva, Scartoni, Daniele , Amelio, Dante , Ivanidze, Jana , Kien, Duong Trung, Millareschavez, Miguel, AlThgafi, Malak, LeRhun, Emilie, Smee, Robert, Muirhead, William , Molina, Eric Suero, Julius, Vitowanu, Chen, J., Mrugała, Maciej M. , Castro, Ana Valeria , Mamatjan, Yasin , Capper, David , Tatagiba, Marcos , Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S , Yip, Stephen , Aldape, Kenneth , Zadeh, Gelareh , Short, Susan C , Yefet, Leeor S. , Ellenbogen, Yosef , Liu, Jeff , Singh, Olivia , Tabatabai, Ghazaleh , Tatagiba, Marcos , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Mansouri, Alireza , Brastianos, Priscilla K. , Shih, Helen A. , Bi, Wenya Linda , Huang, Raymond Y. , Wen, Patrick Yung , Lee, Ian , Malta, Tathiane Maistro , Castro, Ana Valéria , Noushmehr, Houtan , DiMeco, Francesco , Pollo, Bianca , Kaufmann, Timothy J. , Lachance, Daniel Honore , Giannini, Caterina , Galanis, Evanthia , Raghunathan, Aditya , Hanemann, C. Oliver , Au, Karolyn , Galldiks, Norbert , Herold‐Mende, Christel C. , Sahm, Felix , Jungk, Christine , Jungwirth, Gerhard , Deimling, Andreas von , Drummond, Katharine Jann , Morokoff, Andrew P. , Renovanz, Mirjam , Fougère, Christian la , Perry, Arie , Ricklefs, Franz , Horbinski, Craig , Ng, Ho‐Keung , Snuderl, Matija , Sulman, Erik P. , Cohen‐Gadol, Aaron , Javadpour, Mohsen , Fountain, Daniel Mark , Mathiesen, Tiit Illimar , Pathmanaban, Omar Nathan , Boutros, Paul C. , Fountas, Konstantinos N. , Walsh, Kyle M. , Carvalho, Bruno , Maas, Sybren L. N. , Deng, Maximilian Y. , Mehta, Minesh P. , Odia, Yazmín , Everson, Richard G. , Balogun, James , Calabrese, Evan , Karschnia, Philipp , Teske, Nico , Fariselli, Laura , Greve, Tobias , Ivan, Michael E , Palmer, Joshua D. , Ostrom, Quinn T. , Youngblood, Mark W. , Emerson, Sam, Weller, Michael , Martínez-Pérez, Rafael , Mukherjee, Raj, Cervio, Andrés , Turner, Clinton P. , Chen, Jiawei, Karmur, Brij S. , Neth, Bryan J.

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | November 15, 2025 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 430-439

10.1093/neuonc/noaf237 | PMID 41259653 Get It

Abstract Background DNA methylation profiling can be used to robustly predict postsurgical outcomes and response to radiotherapy (RT) for meningioma patients. To allow for seamless integration of these complementary models into clinical practice, a practical framework is needed. Methods We leveraged a cohort of nearly 2000 surgically-treated meningiomas with DNA methylation profiling and clinical outcomes data. Existing methylation-based prediction models were dichotomized to yield four risk groups: low and high recurrent risk, each with RT sensitive and resistant subgroups. Risk groups were correlated with progression-free survival in the context of existing biomarkers including extent of resection and WHO grade. Results We first demonstrated that all risk groups benefit from gross total resection. All “high-risk, RT sensitive” tumors (n = 306, 15.7%) also benefited from adjuvant RT: after GTR, median PFS increased from 4.68 (4.13-9.48) years to not reached (P = .003); after subtotal resection (STR), from 2.12 (1.59-3.02) to 4.09 (3.41-not reached) years (P = .004). “Low-risk, RT sensitive cases” (n = 1207, 61.8%) also benefited from RT after STR (median PFS 7.39 (6.66-12.8) vs. 16.53 (10.35-not reached) years, P = .03), suggesting that RT be considered in these patients. Neither “low-risk RT resistant” (n = 84, 4.3%) nor “high-risk RT resistant” (n = 356, 18.2%) cases benefited from RT, and the latter group was associated with universally poor outcomes. Conclusions We identify methylation-defined risk groups of meningioma for which additional benefit is gained from adjuvant RT, leading to a clinical decision-making framework for straightforward integration of molecular models into clinical practice.
A new classification for heterotopic ossification following periacetabular osteotomy with and without concomitant hip arthroscopy
Tai, Ta-Wei, Restrepo, Diego J., Perez, Sergio F. Guarin , Gonzalez-Bravo, Adrian E. , Hapa, Onur , Sierra, Rafael J. , Restrepo, Diego J. , Guarin Perez, Sergio F , Restrepo, Diego J. , Tai, Ta-Wei, Restrepo, Diego J.

Mayo Clinic

Bone & Joint Open | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1436-1445

10.1302/2633-1462.611.bjo-2025-0222.r1 | PMID 41213296 Get It

Aims Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a recognized complication following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), but its patterns, incidence, and clinical relevance remain poorly defined. The commonly used Brooker classification, developed for total hip arthroplasty, is not fully applicable to HO after PAO. This study aimed to propose a new classification system specific to HO after PAO, evaluate its clinical relevance, and report the cumulative probabilities of radiological and symptomatic HO. Methods This retrospective study included 643 patients who underwent PAO between January 2006 and July 2024. A total of 308 patients (47.9%) had concomitant arthroscopic procedures. Radiographs were analyzed to identify HO using both the Brooker classification and a newly developed system. The cumulative probabilities of radiological and symptomatic HO were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Difference of variables between patients with and without HO was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the predictive performance of the two classification systems. Results The cumulative probabilities of radiological and symptomatic HO at five years post-PAO were 30.4% and 3.8%, respectively. The probabilities were 41.9% in males and 29.2% in females. Four patients (2.8%) required surgical excision of HO, all classified as type 3 or 4 under the new system. The ROC analysis demonstrated superior predictive performance for the new classification system (AUC = 0.928) compared to the Brooker classification (AUC = 0.697; p = 0.007). No significant differences were found between the patients with and without HO in terms of age, sex, concomitant arthroscopic procedures, or receiving prophylaxis in addition to low-dose aspirin. Conclusion This study highlighted the cumulative probabilities of HO following PAO and introduced a new classification system that improved clinical relevance and predictive accuracy. These findings have provided insights into the incidence and management of HO after PAO, and laid the groundwork for standardized reporting and future research. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(11):1436–1445.
Evaluation of Interventions for Cognitive Symptoms in Long COVID
Koltai, Deborah, Laskowitz, Daniel T. , Wisnivesky, Juan P., Federman, Alex D. , Silverstein, Adam M. , Lokhnygina, Yuliya, Haddad, Michelle M., Mahncke, Henry W. , Vleet, Tom Van, Huang, Rong , Cox, Wendy C., Terry, Diana, Karwowski, Jeannie, McCray, Netia, Lin, Jenny , Singh, Upinder , Geng, Linda N. , Reece, Rebecca , Moy, James N., Arvanitakis, Zoe , Parthasarathy, Sairam , Patterson, Thomas F., Gupta, Aditi , Parsonnet, Jeffrey, Kiriakopoulos, Elaine T. , Mullington, Janet , Jolley, Sarah E. , Shah, Nirav S. , Morimoto, Sarah Shizuko , Lee‐Iannotti, Joyce , Isache, Carmen, Frontera, Jennifer , O’Steen, Ashley, James, Melissa, Harper, Barrie, Zimmerman, Kanecia O. , Lawler, Andrew , Johnson, Brandon M. , Pitsch, Chloe E. , Feuerriegel, Elen , McKeehan, Jeffrey, Molden, Joie, Reid, Kayleigh M., Dowling, Sarah , Wodushek, Thomas, Canton, Diara, Turut, Dilara, Sheppard, Ethan , Scott‐Sutherland, Jennifer, Shaughnessy, Lynn, Beck, Michelle L. , Heisey, Sabrina, Katragadda, Vaishanvi, Yusuff, Amidat, Perlack, Amy, Merisme, Christie, Krause, David, Schulte, Duncan, Dupre, Fabiola, Sanchez, Gina A. Montealegre , Asupoto, Olanike, Simmons, Quinneil, Schroeder, Ryan W. , Timlin, Shannon, Devis, Ycar, Carter, Della, Caceres, Leomaris Caba, Rodríguez, Miguel Grande, Alvarez, Zariya , Yakubov, Amin , Engelson, Celia, Reyes, Michael, Youkhana, Alvin, Jennings, Cheryl , Naquiallah, Dina, Behun, Dylan , Stephen, Ellen, Timm, Emily , Bilimoria, Farrah, Li, Grace , Stricker, Thomas, Michelle, Kang, Minnie, Suarez, Rebeca Tojo, Carmona, Tania, Ramírez, Ana, Kadubek, Grace, Baker, Aileen, Romo-Serna, Andrea, Predki, Barbara, Leman, Cindy, Panhans, Cristina, Roth, Genevieve E., Rudraraju, Gowrisree , Miller, Hannah , DeLisa, Julie A., Williams, Kat, Woodson, Kimberly S., Jennette, Kyle J. , Villanueva, Laura, Norwick, Maria, Martínez, M. T., Rowley, Matt, Carrithers, Michael D. , Pliskin, Neil H. , Pérez, Nicolás , Durkin, Nicole M., Maniar, Nikita, Beety, Rachel, Daspgupta, Raktima, Ramchandran, Ramaswamy, Jaramillo, R., Hasek, Sharon, Macías, S Aguirre, Schuh, Tina , Ialacci, Sarah, Bailey, Christopher , Labbato, Danielle, Hautmann, Amanda , Smith, Beth, Nath, Dia, Meyer, Jessica , DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Pettinato, Kimberly, Curtis, Lynette, Daher, Joviane , Koberssy, Ziad , Mavar, Caleb, Andrefsky, John, Merheb, Alexander, Hernandez, Carla, Baissary, Jhony , Atieh, Ornina , Pereira, Carol, Carpenter, Deborah, Raynor, Jennifer , Brunton, Kristine, Podgoreanu, Andreea, Bunch, P. C., O’Brien, Sean M. , Dickey, Sheila, McNulty, Steven E., Gajjar, Varsha, Neale, Alec C. , Cohen, Cari, Geary, Elizabeth, Campanella, Franco, Anderson, Kirsten, Prestige, Laura, Guidotti-Breting, Leslie, Biewer, Megan, Morton, Melissa , Mathenia, Nicholas, Adeyemi, Oluwadamilola A. , Hengst, Samanike, Ning, Wei , Vanderloo, Adam, Caplan, Amanda, Chen, July, Acree, Mary Ellen , Nakhate, Mukund, Dan, Zaw Nu, Pk, Switzer, Aryal, Shambhu , Sanchez, Jessica, Sims, Luke, Ferdinand, Rebecca , Mammadova, Mehriban, Grimes, Carolyn Z. , Vidales, Elizabeth, Pham, Hau , Nielsen, Laura, Keller, Maryjane, Uruba, Syeda, Hernandez, Maria, Patel, Bela , Umana-Sanchez, Virginia, Pak, Chong, Gainer, Jeffery, BURR, R, Trapuzzano, Ashleigh, Celso, Brian G. , Bienkowski, Grace, Bowman, Jennifer, Verdecia, Jorge , Zerwekh, Kathryn, Serrano, Liliana , Marotz, Meghan, Propp, Piper, Sarig, Yonatan , Murphy, Annie, Comfort, Brandon, Torres, Iri, Klein, Jeffrey A. , Walker, John, Moore, John J., Tempest-Browning, Lisa, Arain, Mudassar, Kemp, Pamela, Sullivan, Samantha, Way, Sonja, Chevalier, Jessica, Sykes, Carly, Kruck, Carrie L., Sackett, L. W., Bang, Claire, Hynes, Mary, Gallagher, Torrey L., Childers-Kakos, Margaret, Zia, Ahmad, South, AP, Oravets, Anne, Ferreyra, Carolyn, Glaze, Chad, Villanueva, Daphne-Dominique , Blystone, Erica, Pritchard, Jane, Alyward, Laura, Cooper, Melissa, Chidester, Michelle, Alderson, R. Matt , Clark, Renee D., Hodder, Sally , Sarwari, Arif R, Juskowich, Joy, Welch, Shelly, Civil, Alyssa, Bendl, Ashley, Dicker, Elisa, Hanson, Hannah, Viola, Heather, Morinigo, Janice, Pantaleon, Karisma, Marcon, Kathryn, Stone, Kimberly, Stewart, Kiwan, Evo-Ortega, Lorraine, McVeety, Megan, Guliyeva, Sabina , Watson, Eric , Pehel, Shayna, Ko, Tim, Caropolo, Leah, Kocas, H. Deniz , O’Donnell, Andrew, Saperia, Corey , Thai, Daniel, Pathak, Divya , Keller, Jennifer M. , Olszewski, Kelly, Clinton, Kimberly, Cherian, Kirsten , Dutton, L M, Elepano, Ma, Mohapatra, Sukanya , Chen, Ting , Wroolie, Tonita, Leang, Zenita, Shashidhar, Sumana, Nguyen, T L, Ravisankar, Ashwath, Weiden, Brycie, Bolliger, Dawn, Glesne, Heather, Dixon, Jennifer , Chebrolu, Praneeth, Gazali, Zarine, Hurst, Whitney, Fry, Avery, Murthy, Ganesh, Grischo, Garrett, Erickson, Heidi L. , Gomez, Isaias, Copeland, Jacquelynn, Galaz, Judy, Autry, Lynn, DiLise-Russo, Marjorie, Marshell, Nikki, Borwege, Sabine, Vadovicky, Sheila, Marsh, Stephanie, Hartley, William, Murtagh, Linda, Kennedy, Anna, Meltzer-Christensen, Annie, Stringham, Caitlyn, Gaskin, Ella, Judd, Melissa, Côté, Sarah , Mahasenan, Shreya, Bjorklund, Todd, Farner, Cheryl E., Taylor, Barbara S. , Soileau, Bridgette, Cote, Cyrena , Hromas, Gabrielle A., Scholler, Irma, Longoria, Lisa, Heard, Patricia, Jones, Johnnie, Tragus, Robin , Harris, Maya, Pinones, Alexis, Anderson, Alyssa , Hastings, Gabrielyd, Courtright, jessica, Jayakumar, Madhumita, Fischer, M, Solis, Pamela, Harteloo, Alex, Elias-Warren, Anna, Nguyen, Daniel , McDonald, Dylan , Rau, Holly , Mernaugh, Jean, Pagulayan, Kathleen F. , Watanabe, Kino, Huden, Kristen, Peabody, Laurel, Mei, Tiffany, Ogunwuyi, Catherine, Cobbina, Esther, Sankar, Ian, Nguyen, Lisa , Fromm, N., Arnold, R. Douglas, Ogu, Stephanie, Yuan, Ying , Ibrahim, Homam , Szum, Izabella, Patel, Jignesh, Sultan, Sonia, Jazayeri, Yasmin, Anderson, Betty Lise, Muñoz, Isabel , Rhys, Logan, Vane, Ryan, Kim, Jessica , Diaz, Leticia M., Yee, Nathan, Gruhn, Robert, Browngoetz, Sarah, Johnson, Elisha, Chand, Arista , Bottrill, Kenneth , Henderson, Kymberly, Johnson, DeArmond, Richard C., Hughes, Trina, Silverstein, A , Silverstein, Adam P , Frontera, Jennifer , Geng, Linda N. , Knopman, David S. , Becker, Jacqueline , Charvet, Leigh , Pilloni, Giuseppina , Huang, Rong, Cox, Wendy, Karwowski, Jeannie, McComsey, Grace A. , Chu, Helen Y. , Ostrosky‐Zeichner, Luis , Fong, Tamara G. , Killgore, William D. S. , Dwyer, Brigid C. , Stringer, William W. , Krishnan, Jerry A , James, Melissa, Johnson, Brandon, Erlandson, Kristine M. , Dowling, Sarah, Hauser, Kristine , Doyle, Michael, Beck, Michelle, Tran, Anh, Altaras, Caroline , Sanchez, Gina, Krengel, Maxine , Ly, Monica T. , Asupoto, Olanike, Schroeder, Ryan, Rodriguez, Miguel, González, David Andrés , Torres, Jimena, García, Maria Luisa , Carrera, Laura, Rutherford, Melissa, Perez, Nicolas, Jaramillo, Ruthie, Smith, Beth, Walkup, Kevin, Scott, Sarah , Mavar, Caleb B., Carpenter, Deborah, Bunch, Pyper, Brown, Richard, Escobar, Carolina, Campanella, Franco, Mathenia, Nicholas, Glickman, Michael S. , Sims, Luke A., Pham, Hoai Phuang, Lopez, John, Hernandez, Maria, Lin, Matthew Junda , Gainer, Jeffery, Brown, Gina , Klein, Jeffrey, Reed, Jessica, Walker, John, Sackett, Lisa, Kaden, Sarah J. , Childers-Kakos, Margaret G, South, Amy, Blystone, Erica, Cooper, Melissa, Alderson, Rachael, Clark, Renee, Bardes, James M. , Hanson, Hannah, Loizos, Maria , Caropolo, Leah J., Fernandez, Luis, Keller, Jennifer, Lin, Rebecca, Brown, Daniel, Dixon, Jennifer, James, Michelle, Kala, Mrinalini , Smith, Ryan S. , Mahasenan, Shreya, Johnson, Hillary, Anderson, Alyssa, Hernandez, Jessica, Sullivan, Michael, Nguyen, Helen , Logue, Jennifer, Mei, Tiffany, Arnold, Rowan, Szum, Izabella , Hatlen, Timothy J. , Anderson, Betty, Munoz, Isabel, Wright, Matthew, Diaz, Leticia, DeCato, Thomas W. , Ortiz, Ernesto, Hildebrand, Lindsey L. , DeArmond, Richard

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Neurology | November 10, 2025 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 49

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.4415 | PMID 41212544 Get It

Importance Treatment for cognitive dysfunction due to postacute sequelae of long COVID (ie, symptoms of fatigue, malaise, weakness, confusion that persist beyond 12 weeks after an initial COVID infection) remains a significant unmet need. Objective To test evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for improving cognitive symptoms in persons with long COVID. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a 5-arm, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 3 remotely delivered interventions conducted between August 17, 2023, and June 10, 2024. The study took place at 22 trial sites and included the screening of individuals with cognitive long COVID. Interventions Participants were randomized to 1 of 5 arms: adaptive computerized cognitive training (BrainHQ [Posit Science]), cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation involving both group and individual counseling sessions (PASC-Cognitive Recovery [PASC-CoRE]) paired with BrainHQ, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with BrainHQ. Two comparator arms were included as follows: unstructured computer puzzles and games (active comparator) and sham tDCS paired with BrainHQ. The interventions occurred 5 times per week over 10 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Cognitive and behavioral in-person assessments were performed at baseline, midintervention, at the end of intervention, and 3 months after the end of the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the modified Everyday Cognition Scale 2 (ECog2) completed at the end of the intervention compared to the baseline visit based on participant self-report looking back over the prior 7 days. Results A total of 378 individuals were screened, from which there were 328 participants (median [IQR] age, 48.0 [37.0-58.0] years; 241 female [73.5%]; race: 15 Asian [4.6%], 47 Black [14.3%], and 235 White [71.6%]; ethnicity: 52 Hispanic [15.9%]). None of the 3 active interventions demonstrated benefits on the modified ECog2 in the intention-to-treat population by the end of the intervention period. The adjusted differences in mean change were 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for tDCS-active + BrainHQ vs tDCS-sham + BrainHQ, and 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs BrainHQ alone. Secondary participant-reported outcomes and neuropsychological tests showed no differential benefits for any treatment arm. All 5 arms demonstrated some improvements over time on the modified ECog2 and on secondary outcomes. There were no serious adverse events attributable to the interventions. Conclusions and Relevance This phase 2 randomized clinical trial failed to demonstrate differential benefits for online cognitive training, a structured cognitive rehabilitation program, and tDCS for cognitive long COVID. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05965739 .
541 ctDNA as a potential surrogate biomarker for response to combination vilastobart and atezolizumab in heavily pretreated microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (NCT04896697)
Hecht, J. Randolph, Xie, Hao , Algaze, Sandra, Perez, Cesar A. , Bessudo, Alberto, Knecht, John, Vandross, Andrae Lavon, Patel, Ekta , Popejoy, Myra W., Fantini, Damiano , Annese, Rachel, Dezube, Bruce J., DeVito, Nicholas C. , Fakih, Marwan , Parikh, Aparna R. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Algaze, Sandra , Spira, Alexander I. , Jones, Jeremy C , McConnell, Scott, Davar, Diwakar

Mayo Clinic

Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts | November 10, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A617-A617

10.1136/jitc-2025-sitc2025.0541 Get It

Cold vs Warm Tumescent Solution in Arm Liposculpture: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Study
Uribe, Laura C. Cala, Ferrero, Andreina Zannin, Perez, Mauricio E.

Mayo Clinic

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery | November 10, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/prs.0000000000012595 | PMID 41211968 Get It

BACKGROUND: Use of cold tumescent solutions in liposuction is hypothesized to enhance vasoconstriction, potentially reducing bleeding and improving clinical outcomes. However, evidence for its efficacy in arm liposculpture remains inconclusive. PURPOSE: To compare the effects of cold (4°C) and warm (37°C) tumescent solutions on postoperative outcomes in arm liposculpture, focusing on pain, bruising, and fat emulsification quality. METHODS: This double-blinded, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients undergoing bilateral arm liposculpture. One arm was infiltrated with a cold tumescent solution and the other with a warm solution, randomly assigned. Liposuction was performed using VASER-assisted fat emulsification followed by Power-Assisted Liposuction (PAL) or conventional suction-assisted liposuction (SAL). Outcomes included pain (Visual Analog Scale) assessed at Days 1, 8, 15, and 30; bruising, and lipocrit values. RESULTS: A total of 104 arms were analyzed from 52 female participants (mean age: 39.7 years; mean BMI: 24.7 kg/m²). Pain scores were similar between groups at all time points (Day 1: Cold = 5 [2–9], Warm = 6 [2–9]; p = 0.9). Bruising areas were comparable (Cold: 40,444 mm²; Warm: 41,212 mm²; p > 0.05). Lipocrit values for Microaire and SAL techniques showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Patients reported high satisfaction, with 78.7% "very satisfied" and 96.1% recommending the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Cold tumescent solutions do not significantly enhance outcomes in arm liposculpture compared to warm solutions. Surgeons should exercise caution with cold solutions due to potential hypothermia risks. Further research is warranted to assess the potential long-term effects of cold tumescent infiltration.
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia mediated by ryanodine receptor 2: a validated risk stratification
Lieve, Krystien V.V. , Werf, Christian van der , Kallas, Dania , Denjoy, Isabelle , Bos, J Martijn , Aiba, Takeshi , Behr, Elijah R. , Berg, Maarten P van den, Bergeman, Auke T. , Blom, Nico A. , Borggrefe, Martin , Mora, Lidia María Carrillo , Chorin, Ehud , Franciosi, Sonia , Giudicessi, John R. , Llopis, Francisco Ángel González , Heuvel, Freek van den , Ingles, Jodie , Kammeraad, Janneke A.E. , Khan, Habib R, MacIntyre, Ciorsti , Maltret, Alice , Marjamaa, Annukka, Ohno, Seiko , Peltenburg, Puck J. , Perez, Guillermo J, Roberts, Jason D, Robyns, Tomas , Noguer, Ferran Roses I., Roston, Thomas M. , Rydberg, Annika , Sacher, Frédéric , Semsarian, Christopher , Starling, Luke, Skinner, Jonathan R, Tavačová, Terézia , Tfelt‐Hansen, Jacob , Till, Janice A, Yap, Sing‐Chien , Wada, Yuko, Wangüemert, Fernando , Zorio, Esther , Ackerman, Michael J, Wilde, Arthur A, Khan, Habib , Lieve, Krystien V , van der Werf, Christian , Brugada, Ramón , Carrillo Mora, Lidia María , Chorin, Ehud , Crotti, Lia , Davis, Andrew , Drago, Fabrizio , Dusi, Veronica , Extramiana, Fabrice , Franciosi, Sonia , Giudicessi, J R , González Llopis, Francisco Ángel , Haugaa, Kristina , van den Heuvel, Freek , Horie, Minoru , Ingles, Jodie , Kammeraad, Janneke A E , Kannankeril, Prince J , Krahn, Andrew D , MacIntyre, Ciorsti , Maltret, Alice , Ohno, Seiko , Peltenburg, Puck J , Probst, Vincent , Robyns, Tomas , Rootwelt-Norberg, Christine , Roston, Thomas M , Rydberg, Annika , Sacher, Frederic , Sarquella-Brugada, Georgia , Schwartz, Peter J. , Semsarian, Christopher , Shimizu, Wataru , Sumitomo, Naokata , Tavacova, Terezia , Tfelt-Hansen, Jacob , Yap, Sing-Chien , Wangüemert, Fernando , Zorio, Esther , Leenhardt, Antoine , Sanatani, Shubhayan , Tanck, Michael , Behr, Elijah Raphael , Denjoy, Isabelle , Blom, Nico A , Kallas, Dania , Bos, J Martijn , Aiba, Takeshi , Berg, Maarten P van den, Bergeman, Auke T , Borggrefe, Martin , Khan, Habib R, Marjamaa, Annukka, Perez, Guillermo J, Roberts, Jason D, Noguer, Ferran Roses I., Starling, Luke, Skinner, Jonathan R, Till, Janice A, Wada, Yuko, Ackerman, Michael J, Leenhardt, Antoine , Wilde, Arthur A.M.

Mayo Clinic

European Heart Journal | November 9, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf965 | PMID 41416846 Get It

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for potentially life-threatening arrhythmic events (AEs) even while treated with β-blockers. The aim was to develop a model for individualized prediction of AEs in patients with RYR2-mediated CPVT on β-blocker monotherapy. Methods The derivation and independent validation cohorts included 743 and 129 patients, respectively. AEs were defined as arrhythmic syncope, appropriate implantable cardioverter–defibrillator shock, sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), and sudden cardiac death. Near-fatal or fatal AEs (nf/fAEs) included all AEs except for arrhythmic syncope. Prediction models using Cox regression were developed and internally and externally validated. Results A total of 102 (13.7%) patients in the derivation cohort and 24 (18.6%) patients in the validation cohort experienced ≥1 AE over a median follow-up of 5.1 [interquartile range (IQR), 7.7] and 2.4 (IQR, 4.4) years, respectively. Predictors of AE were arrhythmic syncope or SCA prior to diagnosis and age at β-blocker initiation. In the derivation and validation cohorts, the optimism-corrected C-indices of the models for AE were 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–0.72] and 0.59 (95% CI 0.48–0.71), respectively. For nf/fAEs, ventricular arrhythmia severity before β-blocker initiation was a fourth independent predictor, and C-indices of the models in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.74 (95% CI 0.68–0.80) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.47–0.72), respectively. In the derivation cohort, calibration slopes were 1.00 (95% CI 0.59–1.41) for AE and 1.00 (95% CI 0.69–1.32) for nf/fAE. Conclusions These externally validated risk prediction models using clinical parameters accurately distinguished CPVT patients on β-blocker monotherapy at low and high risk for future AEs while treated with β-blockers. These models provide guidance for implementation of clinical management therapies to prevent AEs in patients with CPVT.